- About
-
The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers
to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is
provided by the
Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
Search results
Showing 21 to 25 of 25 (0.059 seconds)Spelling suggestions: "subject:"syntax tre""
| 21 |
Interaktivní interpret jazyka C / C Language Interactive InterpreterBlažek, Martin January 2008 (has links)
This master's thesis deals with implementation of ISO C99 language interpreter. The goal of this thesis is to provide support of education in C language programming and fast algorithm prototyping. It enables students to create own C programs and to experiment with language constructions without compiling. User interface includes editor and simple debugger. The interpreter is implemented in a novel grammar development environment written in Java language - ANTLRWorks which includes ANTLR language tool.
|
| 22 |
Well-Formed and Scalable Invasive Software Composition / Wohlgeformte und Skalierbare Invasive SoftwarekompositionKarol, Sven 26 June 2015 (has links) (PDF)
Software components provide essential means to structure and organize software effectively. However, frequently, required component abstractions are not available in a programming language or system, or are not adequately combinable with each other. Invasive software composition (ISC) is a general approach to software composition that unifies component-like abstractions such as templates, aspects and macros. ISC is based on fragment composition, and composes programs and other software artifacts at the level of syntax trees. Therefore, a unifying fragment component model is related to the context-free grammar of a language to identify extension and variation points in syntax trees as well as valid component types. By doing so, fragment components can be composed by transformations at respective extension and variation points so that always valid composition results regarding the underlying context-free grammar are yielded. However, given a language’s context-free grammar, the composition result may still be incorrect.
Context-sensitive constraints such as type constraints may be violated so that the program cannot be compiled and/or interpreted correctly. While a compiler can detect such errors after composition, it is difficult to relate them back to the original transformation step in the composition system, especially in the case of complex compositions with several hundreds of such steps. To tackle this problem, this thesis proposes well-formed ISC—an extension to ISC that uses reference attribute grammars (RAGs) to specify fragment component models and fragment contracts to guard compositions with context-sensitive constraints. Additionally, well-formed ISC provides composition strategies as a means to configure composition algorithms and handle interferences between composition steps.
Developing ISC systems for complex languages such as programming languages is a complex undertaking. Composition-system developers need to supply or develop adequate language and parser specifications that can be processed by an ISC composition engine. Moreover, the specifications may need to be extended with rules for the intended composition abstractions.
Current approaches to ISC require complete grammars to be able to compose fragments in the respective languages. Hence, the specifications need to be developed exhaustively before any component model can be supplied. To tackle this problem, this thesis introduces scalable ISC—a variant of ISC that uses island component models as a means to define component models for partially specified languages while still the whole language is supported. Additionally, a scalable workflow for agile composition-system development is proposed which supports a development of ISC systems in small increments using modular extensions.
All theoretical concepts introduced in this thesis are implemented in the Skeletons and Application Templates framework SkAT. It supports “classic”, well-formed and scalable ISC by leveraging RAGs as its main specification and implementation language. Moreover, several composition systems based on SkAT are discussed, e.g., a well-formed composition system for Java and a C preprocessor-like macro language. In turn, those composition systems are used as composers in several example applications such as a library of parallel algorithmic skeletons.
|
| 23 |
Well-Formed and Scalable Invasive Software CompositionKarol, Sven 18 May 2015 (has links)
Software components provide essential means to structure and organize software effectively. However, frequently, required component abstractions are not available in a programming language or system, or are not adequately combinable with each other. Invasive software composition (ISC) is a general approach to software composition that unifies component-like abstractions such as templates, aspects and macros. ISC is based on fragment composition, and composes programs and other software artifacts at the level of syntax trees. Therefore, a unifying fragment component model is related to the context-free grammar of a language to identify extension and variation points in syntax trees as well as valid component types. By doing so, fragment components can be composed by transformations at respective extension and variation points so that always valid composition results regarding the underlying context-free grammar are yielded. However, given a language’s context-free grammar, the composition result may still be incorrect.
Context-sensitive constraints such as type constraints may be violated so that the program cannot be compiled and/or interpreted correctly. While a compiler can detect such errors after composition, it is difficult to relate them back to the original transformation step in the composition system, especially in the case of complex compositions with several hundreds of such steps. To tackle this problem, this thesis proposes well-formed ISC—an extension to ISC that uses reference attribute grammars (RAGs) to specify fragment component models and fragment contracts to guard compositions with context-sensitive constraints. Additionally, well-formed ISC provides composition strategies as a means to configure composition algorithms and handle interferences between composition steps.
Developing ISC systems for complex languages such as programming languages is a complex undertaking. Composition-system developers need to supply or develop adequate language and parser specifications that can be processed by an ISC composition engine. Moreover, the specifications may need to be extended with rules for the intended composition abstractions.
Current approaches to ISC require complete grammars to be able to compose fragments in the respective languages. Hence, the specifications need to be developed exhaustively before any component model can be supplied. To tackle this problem, this thesis introduces scalable ISC—a variant of ISC that uses island component models as a means to define component models for partially specified languages while still the whole language is supported. Additionally, a scalable workflow for agile composition-system development is proposed which supports a development of ISC systems in small increments using modular extensions.
All theoretical concepts introduced in this thesis are implemented in the Skeletons and Application Templates framework SkAT. It supports “classic”, well-formed and scalable ISC by leveraging RAGs as its main specification and implementation language. Moreover, several composition systems based on SkAT are discussed, e.g., a well-formed composition system for Java and a C preprocessor-like macro language. In turn, those composition systems are used as composers in several example applications such as a library of parallel algorithmic skeletons.
|
| 24 |
Web applications using the Google Web Toolkit / Webanwendungen unter Verwendung des Google Web Toolkitsvon Wenckstern, Michael 04 June 2013 (has links) (PDF)
This diploma thesis describes how to create or convert traditional Java programs to desktop-like rich internet applications with the Google Web Toolkit.
The Google Web Toolkit is an open source development environment, which translates Java code to browser and device independent HTML and JavaScript.
Most of the GWT framework parts, including the Java to JavaScript compiler as well as important security issues of websites will be introduced.
The famous Agricola board game will be implemented in the Model-View-Presenter pattern to show that complex user interfaces can be created with the Google Web Toolkit.
The Google Web Toolkit framework will be compared with the JavaServer Faces one to find out which toolkit is the right one for the next web project. / Diese Diplomarbeit beschreibt die Erzeugung desktopähnlicher Anwendungen mit dem Google Web Toolkit und die Umwandlung klassischer Java-Programme in diese.
Das Google Web Toolkit ist eine Open-Source-Entwicklungsumgebung, die Java-Code in browserunabhängiges als auch in geräteübergreifendes HTML und JavaScript übersetzt.
Vorgestellt wird der Großteil des GWT Frameworks inklusive des Java zu JavaScript-Compilers sowie wichtige Sicherheitsaspekte von Internetseiten.
Um zu zeigen, dass auch komplizierte graphische Oberflächen mit dem Google Web Toolkit erzeugt werden können, wird das bekannte Brettspiel Agricola mittels Model-View-Presenter Designmuster implementiert.
Zur Ermittlung der richtigen Technologie für das nächste Webprojekt findet ein Vergleich zwischen dem Google Web Toolkit und JavaServer Faces statt.
|
| 25 |
Web applications using the Google Web Toolkitvon Wenckstern, Michael 05 June 2013 (has links)
This diploma thesis describes how to create or convert traditional Java programs to desktop-like rich internet applications with the Google Web Toolkit.
The Google Web Toolkit is an open source development environment, which translates Java code to browser and device independent HTML and JavaScript.
Most of the GWT framework parts, including the Java to JavaScript compiler as well as important security issues of websites will be introduced.
The famous Agricola board game will be implemented in the Model-View-Presenter pattern to show that complex user interfaces can be created with the Google Web Toolkit.
The Google Web Toolkit framework will be compared with the JavaServer Faces one to find out which toolkit is the right one for the next web project.:I Abstract
II Contents
III Acronyms and Glossary
III.I Acronyms
III.II Glossary
IV Credits
1 Introduction
2 Basics
2.1 Development of the World Wide Web
2.2 Hypertext Markup Language
2.3 Cascading Style Sheets
2.4 JavaScript
2.5 Hypertext Markup Language Document Object Model
2.6 Asynchronous JavaScript and XML
3 GWT toolbox and compiler
3.1 GWT in action
3.2 A short overview of the toolkit
3.3 GWT compiler and JSNI
3.3.1 Overview of GWT compiler and JSNI
3.3.2 Deferred binding and bootstrapping process
3.3.3 GWT compiler steps and optimizations
3.4 Java Runtime Environment Emulation
3.5 Widgets and Panels
3.5.1 Overview of GWT Widgets
3.5.2 Event handlers in GWT Widgets
3.5.3 Manipulating browser’s DOM with GWT DOM class
3.5.4 GWT Designer and view optimization using UiBinder
3.6 Remote Procedure Calls
3.6.1 Comparison of Remote Procedure Calls with Remote Method Invocations
3.6.2 GWT’s RPC service and serializable whitelist
3.7 History Management
3.8 Client Bundle
3.8.1 Using ImageResources in the ClientBundle interface
3.8.2 Using CssResources in the ClientBundle interface
4 Model-View-Presenter Architecture
4.1 Comparison of MVP and MVC
4.2 GWT Model-View-Presenter pattern example: Agricola board game
4.3 Extending the Agricola web application with mobile views
4.4 Introducing activities in the Agricola Model-View-Presenter pattern enabling browser history
5 Comparison of the two web frameworks: GWT and JSF
5.1 Definitions of comparison fields
5.2 Comparison in category 1: Nearly completely static sites with a little bit of dynamic content, e.g. news update
5.3 Comparison in category 2: Doing a survey in both technologies
5.4 Comparison in category 3: Creating a forum to show data
5.5 Comparison in category 4: Writing a chat application
5.6 Comparison in category 5: Writing the speed game Snake
5.7 Summary
6 Security
6.1 Download Tomcat
6.2 Dynamic Web Application Project with GWT and Tomcat
6.3 Establish HTTPS connections in Tomcat
6.3.1 Create a pem certificate
6.3.2 Convert pem certificate into a key store object
6.3.3 Configure Tomcat’s XML files to enable HTPPS
6.4 Establish a database connection in Tomcat
6.4.1 Create TomcatGWT user and schema, and add the table countries
6.4.2 Configure Tomcat’s XML files to get access to the database connection
6.4.3 PreparedStatements avoid MySQL injections
6.5 Login mechanism in Tomcat
6.6 SafeHtml
7 Presenting a complex software application written in GWT
8 Conclusions
8.1 Summary
8.2 Future work
A Appendix
A 1 Configure the Google Web Toolkit framework in Eclipse
A 1.1 Install the Java Developer Kit
A 1.2 Download Eclipse
A 1.3 Install the GWT plugin in Eclipse
A 1.4 Create first GWT Java Project
A 2 Figures
A 3 Listings
A 3.1 Source code of the Agricola board game
A 3.2 Source code of GWT and JSF comparison
A 4 Tables
R Lists and References
R 1 Lists
R 1.1 List of Tables
R 1.2 List of Figures
R 1.3 List of Listings
R 2 References
R 2.1 Books
R 2.2 Online resources / Diese Diplomarbeit beschreibt die Erzeugung desktopähnlicher Anwendungen mit dem Google Web Toolkit und die Umwandlung klassischer Java-Programme in diese.
Das Google Web Toolkit ist eine Open-Source-Entwicklungsumgebung, die Java-Code in browserunabhängiges als auch in geräteübergreifendes HTML und JavaScript übersetzt.
Vorgestellt wird der Großteil des GWT Frameworks inklusive des Java zu JavaScript-Compilers sowie wichtige Sicherheitsaspekte von Internetseiten.
Um zu zeigen, dass auch komplizierte graphische Oberflächen mit dem Google Web Toolkit erzeugt werden können, wird das bekannte Brettspiel Agricola mittels Model-View-Presenter Designmuster implementiert.
Zur Ermittlung der richtigen Technologie für das nächste Webprojekt findet ein Vergleich zwischen dem Google Web Toolkit und JavaServer Faces statt.:I Abstract
II Contents
III Acronyms and Glossary
III.I Acronyms
III.II Glossary
IV Credits
1 Introduction
2 Basics
2.1 Development of the World Wide Web
2.2 Hypertext Markup Language
2.3 Cascading Style Sheets
2.4 JavaScript
2.5 Hypertext Markup Language Document Object Model
2.6 Asynchronous JavaScript and XML
3 GWT toolbox and compiler
3.1 GWT in action
3.2 A short overview of the toolkit
3.3 GWT compiler and JSNI
3.3.1 Overview of GWT compiler and JSNI
3.3.2 Deferred binding and bootstrapping process
3.3.3 GWT compiler steps and optimizations
3.4 Java Runtime Environment Emulation
3.5 Widgets and Panels
3.5.1 Overview of GWT Widgets
3.5.2 Event handlers in GWT Widgets
3.5.3 Manipulating browser’s DOM with GWT DOM class
3.5.4 GWT Designer and view optimization using UiBinder
3.6 Remote Procedure Calls
3.6.1 Comparison of Remote Procedure Calls with Remote Method Invocations
3.6.2 GWT’s RPC service and serializable whitelist
3.7 History Management
3.8 Client Bundle
3.8.1 Using ImageResources in the ClientBundle interface
3.8.2 Using CssResources in the ClientBundle interface
4 Model-View-Presenter Architecture
4.1 Comparison of MVP and MVC
4.2 GWT Model-View-Presenter pattern example: Agricola board game
4.3 Extending the Agricola web application with mobile views
4.4 Introducing activities in the Agricola Model-View-Presenter pattern enabling browser history
5 Comparison of the two web frameworks: GWT and JSF
5.1 Definitions of comparison fields
5.2 Comparison in category 1: Nearly completely static sites with a little bit of dynamic content, e.g. news update
5.3 Comparison in category 2: Doing a survey in both technologies
5.4 Comparison in category 3: Creating a forum to show data
5.5 Comparison in category 4: Writing a chat application
5.6 Comparison in category 5: Writing the speed game Snake
5.7 Summary
6 Security
6.1 Download Tomcat
6.2 Dynamic Web Application Project with GWT and Tomcat
6.3 Establish HTTPS connections in Tomcat
6.3.1 Create a pem certificate
6.3.2 Convert pem certificate into a key store object
6.3.3 Configure Tomcat’s XML files to enable HTPPS
6.4 Establish a database connection in Tomcat
6.4.1 Create TomcatGWT user and schema, and add the table countries
6.4.2 Configure Tomcat’s XML files to get access to the database connection
6.4.3 PreparedStatements avoid MySQL injections
6.5 Login mechanism in Tomcat
6.6 SafeHtml
7 Presenting a complex software application written in GWT
8 Conclusions
8.1 Summary
8.2 Future work
A Appendix
A 1 Configure the Google Web Toolkit framework in Eclipse
A 1.1 Install the Java Developer Kit
A 1.2 Download Eclipse
A 1.3 Install the GWT plugin in Eclipse
A 1.4 Create first GWT Java Project
A 2 Figures
A 3 Listings
A 3.1 Source code of the Agricola board game
A 3.2 Source code of GWT and JSF comparison
A 4 Tables
R Lists and References
R 1 Lists
R 1.1 List of Tables
R 1.2 List of Figures
R 1.3 List of Listings
R 2 References
R 2.1 Books
R 2.2 Online resources
|
Page generated in 0.0691 seconds