O estudo pesquisa a noção de cinema do crítico e realizador brasileiro Rogério Sganzerla (1946-2004). Para tanto, parte de seus textos publicados na imprensa, que começaram a ser escritos em meados dos anos 1960, até chegar aos filmes que realizou. Já no começo de sua carreira jornalística, Sganzerla escrevia textos que transcendiam a análise fílmica, buscava perceber tendências criativas e procurava compreender o que diferencia a arte cinematográfica das demais. Os anos 60, para ele, viviam num impasse: uma vertente buscava aproximar o cinema da \"arte\", e era de veia mais literária, introspectiva, intelectual; outra não se pretendia tão profunda, e encarava o cinema como uma arte provisória, que investiga as superfícies. Após a resolução desse impasse, ou seja, através da análise do diálogo entre o cineasta/crítico e a história do cinema (até chegar ao que lhe era contemporâneo), tentamos investigar as seguintes lacunas: 1) como um diretor e crítico que defende um cinema com linguagem própria consegue aglutinar outras linguagens em seus filmes? E 2) como funciona a presença do Brasil nos filmes de um diretor que se opõe à ideia de um cinema sociológico. / This dissertation presents a research on the film notion of the brazilian filmmaker and critic Rogério Sganzerla (1946 - 2004). To that end, we begin the study from his critical texts, which were published in the press around the 60\'s, until we get the movies he filmed. Since the beginning of his journalistic career, Sganzerla wrote texts which transcended the filmic analysis, attempted to recognize creative tendencies, and tried to understand the difference between film art and the other forms of art. The 60\'s were a sticking period for Sganzerla. One perspective tried to approximate cinema of \"art\" and it was characterized as literary, introspective, and intellectual. The other one, however, was not so insightful and analyzed cinema as a provisory art, which investigates surfaces. After this stalemate\'s resolution, that is, through the analysis of the dialogue between the filmmaker and the history of cinema, we intend to contribute investigating the following gaps: 1) how can a director and critic who defends a cinema with its own language can bring together other languages on his films? And 2) how it occurs the presence of Brazil in the films of a director who is opposed to the idea of a sociological cinema.

[pt] O presente trabalho se ocupa de fazer uma releitura da obra do escritor goiano José J. Veiga com base nas diversas revisões que têm ocorrido no conceito de fantástico dentro da literatura e na noção de realidade nas obras de alguns filósofos. É uma revisão geral da obra de Veiga, inclusive retornando à leitura original que muitos críticos fizeram do autor no contexto da ditadura e destacando os principais elementos que aparecem na maior parte da obra do autor. / [en] The present study engages itself in read anew the work of José J. Veiga, a brazilian writer from Goiás. This reading is based on several reviews that have been made to the concept of fantastic literature and to the notion of reality in the work of some philosophers. It is a general reexamination of Veiga’s works, which includes a return to the original readings made by most critics during the period of dictatorship in Brazil. The main elements of most of his work will be recollected.

La thèse montre comment les lettres et les arts communiquent, de quelle façon ce rapport est introduit sous la forme de la Grèce. L’objectif de cette recherche se situe dans le cadre d’une étude comparatiste sur la relation qui existe entre la littérature et les arts, plus précisément : l’architecture, la sculpture et la peinture. Nous pensons dans un premier temps qu’il est nécessaire d’énumérer et de présenter quelques principes déjà développés par des écrivains, des artistes, des comparatistes, des sociologues et des esthéticiens. Dans cette étude, nous examinons le problème inverse, à savoir comment un thème littéraire devient-il le sujet d’une œuvre picturale ou sculpturale. Nous élaborons un sujet, le 19e siècle, tel que Gautier et la Grèce, sur la relation entre la littérature et les arts plastiques : peinture, sculpture et architecture, car notre cursus est basé sur ce siècle. Partie à la recherche des sources, nous avons d’abord examiné les œuvres de Gautier : Mademoiselle de Maupin, Poésies complètes (T. I, II, III), Le Voyage en Turquie (chapitre consacré à la Grèce), Le Voyage en Grèce, Arria Marcella, Spirite, Avatar, Jettatura, La Toison d’Or, La Morte Amoureuse, ainsi que les écrits sur l’art des journaux : Moniteur universel, La Presse, L’Artiste, Le Journal Officiel, La Revue de Paris, Le Guide de l’Amateur au Musée du Louvre. Donc, la méthode que nous avons employée est à la fois historico-sociale, puisqu’elle s’intéresse à l’étude des sources et examine le contexte culturel et social ; théorique, puisqu’elle repose sur la situation des théories ; analytique, puisqu’elle se situe dans une conception fondée sur l’interprétation, l’analyse et la thématique. / The thesis shows how literature and art communicate, and how this relation is introduced by the theme of Greece. The purpose of this research is within the frame of a comparative study about the relation between literature and the arts, more precisely, architecture, sculpture and painting. We think that at first it is necessary to define a few principles which have already been described by writers, scholars of comparative studies and anesthetics and sociologists. In this study, we are going to examine the opposite face of the problem that is how a literature subject becomes the subject of a painting or of a sculpture. We are examining a subject, the 19th century, Gautier and Greece, considering in particular the relation between literature and the plastic arts: painting, sculpture and architecture, as our work is based upon this century. In our research about the sources, we have started examining Gautier’s works: Mlle de Maupin, Poésies complètes (T. I, II, III), Le Voyage en Turquie (chapter dedicated to Greece), Le Voyage en Grèce, Arria Marcella, Spirite, Avatar, Jettatura, La Toison d’Or, La Morte Amoureuse as well as the articles about art published on the press: Moniteur universel, La Presse, L’Artiste, Le Journal Officiel, La Revue de Paris, Le Guide de l’Amateur au Musée du Louvre. Therefore, the method we have used is, at the same time, historical and social as it is based on a research about the sources and about the social and cultural background; and theorist, as it is based on the situation of theoretical studies; analytical, as it also based on an approach based on interpretation, analysis and thematic structure.

Louis Figuier (1819-1894) est un scientifique français qui s’est orienté vers la publication d’ouvrages de vulgarisation destinés au grand public du XIXe siècle. Parmi les inventions scientifiques qu’il a traitées dans ses publications depuis la fin des années 1840, figure à plusieurs reprises la photographie. Le corpus principal de notre réflexion porte sur des ouvrages de Figuier publiés entre les années 1840 et 1880, et à des publications d’autres auteurs de cette époque, abordant chacune la photographie. Notre recherche vise d’abord à analyser comment Figuier a envisagé la relation entre l’art et la photographie. Elle examine ensuite l’influence des idées de Figuier sur le regard porté sur la photographie par la société de son époque. Puis elle étudie l’impact de son analyse concernant la valeur artistique de la photographie, sur une nouvelle façon d’aborder la vulgarisation de la science. La première partie porte sur l’étude approfondie des ouvrages de Figuier et d’articles de revues, à partir de l’invention de la photographie jusqu’au début des années 1850. Elle a pour but de décrire les impacts sociaux de cette invention et d’étudier les remarques de Figuier sur ce procédé, dans ses premières publications. La deuxième partie examine la controverse sur la valeur artistique de la photographie dans les années 1850 et la contribution des ouvrages de Figuier à cette discussion. La troisième partie aborde des ouvrages de Figuier publiés à partir des années 1870 et analyse la manière dont Figuier a cherché à dépasser le cadre traditionnel de la science et à lui donner une nouvelle définition / Louis Figuier (1819-1894) is a French scientist and scientific popularizer who published many works for the general public in nineteenth-century France. Since the late 1840s, one invention in particular with which Figuier involved himself was photography. The main corpus of our research covers Figuier’s works printed between the 1840s and 1880s, along with publications on photography by contemporary writers. First, our research aims to analyze how Figuier envisioned the relationship between art and photography. Second, it examines Figuier’s opinions and their influence on society’s views of photography, and how his analyses concerning the artistic value of photography influenced him in his own efforts to revitalize the notion of science.The first section examines Figuier’s works and journal articles written by his contemporaries, starting from the invention of photography and leading up to the 1850s. It also considers the social impact of photography at the time, and Figuier’s early works in which he remarks about the process.The second section explains the controversy surrounding the artistic value of photography during the 1850s, and the works Figuier contributes to this discussion. The third section explores Figuier’s works published since the 1870s, and explains how Figuier aimed to exceed the traditional definition of science and offer a new interpretation

Il y aurait un Baudelaire réaliste, un décadent, un classique, un catholique, un révolutionnaire, un réactionnaire et même un postmoderne. Les images attribuées à l’auteur se superposent selon l’époque, le lieu et les courants esthétiques et politiques dans lesquels il a été lu. Mais quelle image Baudelaire construit-il de lui-même dans ses textes critiques ?Comment s’y présente-t-il à son public ? Pour mieux cerner le visage littéraire de cette figure changeante et paradoxale, l’étude proposée ici cherche à démontrer qu’il existe bel et bien dans la critique littéraire de Baudelaire un travail de mise en scène de soi qui ne peut se comprendre qu’à partir des diverses scènes d’énonciation que le poète-critique a capitalisées tout au long de sa carrière. Cela soulève la question de la relation entre, d’un côté, la présentation de soi et la scène de parole dans laquelle elle s’inscrit et qu’elle aide à construire, et de l’autre, entre cette mise en scène discursive de soi et les stratégies de positionnement de l’auteur à l’intérieur du champ littéraire. Dans quelle mesure ce travail de présentation de soi est-il redevable de la « situation de discours » dans laquelle il s’énonce ? Et, corollairement, dans quelle mesure relève-t-il d’une stratégie de positionnement littéraire ? Dès que l’on constate que le choix d’une posture, ou de diverses postures au fil du temps, est à la fois lié à une scène d’énonciation, à une étape socioprofessionnelle et à un répertoire de rôles et de modèles prêts à être investis, on entre dans la logique de construction d’une oeuvre, mais aussi d’une identité littéraire / There would be realistic Baudelaire, Decadent, classic, Catholic, revolutionary, reactionary one and the same a postmodern. The images attributed to the author overlap according to time, the place and the esthetic and political currents in which he was read. But what embellishes with images Baudelaire does it build of himself in its critical texts? How if does he present to it to his public? To encircle better the literary face of this changeable and paradoxical face, the study proposed here tries to demonstrate that there is well and truly in the literary critic of Baudelaire a work of direction of one who can understand only from the diverse scenes of statement which the poet-critic capitalized throughout its career. It raises the question of the relation enters, on one side, the presentation of one and the scene of word which it joins and which it helps to build, and of the other one, enters this discursive direction of one and the strategies of positioning of the author inside the literary field. To what extent this work of presentation of one is indebted of the " situation of speech " in which one it expresses itself? And, corollairement, to what extent is he is a matter of a strategy of literary positioning? As soon as we notice that the choice of a posture, or diverse postures over time, is bound at the same time to a scene of statement, to a social and occupational stage and to a directory of roles and models ready to be invested, we enter the logic of construction of a work, but also a literary identity. / Habría un Baudelaire realista, uno decadente, uno clásico, uno católico, uno revolucionario, uno reaccionario e incluso uno posmoderno. Las imágenes que se le atribuyen al autor se superponen según la época, el lugar y las corrientes estéticas y políticas en las que ha sido leído. Estas se transforman (y transforman la obra y su autor) en función del interés que sele preste a una u otra parte de su vida y de su obra. Pero, qué imagen de sí mismo construye Baudelaire en sus textos críticos? Para aprehender mejor el rostro literario de esta figura cambiante y paradoxal, el estudio aquí propuesto busca demostrar que en la crítica literaria de Baudelaire existe un trabajo de puesta en escena de sí mismo que solo puedecomprenderse a partir de las diversas escenas de enunciación que el poeta-crítico capitalizó a lo largo de su carrera. Esto nos lleva a preguntarnos por la relación que existe entre, por un lado, la autorepresentación y la escena de palabra en la que esta inscribe y que ayuda a construir, y, por el otro, entre dicha puesta en escena discursiva y las estrategias deposicionamiento del autor en el interior del campo literario. ¿En qué medida este trabajo de autorepresentación del autor está ligado a la “situación de discurso” en la que se enuncia? Y, ¿en qué medida depende este de una estrategia de posicionamiento literaria? A partir del momento que constatamos que la elección de una postura, o de diversas posturasa lo largo del tiempo, está ligada a una escena de enunciación, a una etapa profesional y a un repertorio de roles y de modelos listos para usar, entramos en la lógica de la construcción de una obra, pero también de una identidad literaria.

[pt] Face à quebra do projeto de autonomia modernista e do esgotamento do debate desconstrutivista da década de 1980, tem-se agora a produção de uma arquitetura contemporânea desinteressada no diálogo crítico da disciplina e mais preocupada com as possibilidades do projeto e da construção de edificações espetaculares e autoindulgentes. Neste contexto, a concepção de autonomia crítica da arquitetura’ de Peter Eisenman aparece como uma voz de resistência aos impositivos históricos culturais de espaço e poder. Partindo da ideia de ‘interioridade da arquitetura’ o autor propõe uma autonomia crítica de caráter paradoxal, que tanto aponta para o interior e tradição da disciplina quanto se desdobra para além de seus limites. A abordagem deste tema depende de uma leitura atualizada da obra do arquiteto o que nos leva ao reconhecimento - desde seus primeiros projetos e escritos - de suas estratégias críticas a respeito da autonomia arquitetônica e sua rasion d’être. / [en] Given the rupture of modernist autonomy project and the exhaustion of the deconstructivist debate in the 1980s, there is now the production of a contemporary architecture indifferent to the critical dialogue of the discipline and more concerned about the possibilities of design and construction in spectacular and self-indulgent buildings. In this context, the conception of critical autonomy of the architecture’ by Peter Eisenman appears as a voice of resistance to the historical cultural impositions of space and power. Starting from the idea of insideness of architecture’ the author proposes a critical autonomy of paradoxical character, which points to both the interior and tradition of the discipline and it unfolds beyond its limits. The approach to this subject depends on an updated reading of the architect’s work which leads us to the recognition - since his first projects and writings - of his critical strategies regarding the autonomy of architecture and its rasion d etre.

On n’aborde jamais un texte sans une série d’acquis et de présupposés. Ceux-ci déterminent l’idée que l’on se fait du langage, du sens, du texte, de la littérature, de l’écrivain, de la lecture. Tout un ensemble d’idées non-formulées viennent conditionner l’expérience que l’on fait du texte. Dès lors, une image de la littérature opère inconsciemment dans l’esprit du lecteur et tend à limiter le panel d’expériences que celui-ci peut faire de l’œuvre. Nous croyons que cette image procède d’une certaine science critique, héritière d’une tradition philosophique qui valorise la connaissance en premier lieu. La littérature est alors asservie au projet cognitif que la communauté se donne. Nous avons souhaité proposer un nouvel abord du texte qui puisse débrider les connexions possible à celui-ci. Une approche pragmatique et empirique qui s’attache davantage à maximiser le gain éthique et existentiel en germe dans la relation à l’œuvre littéraire qu’à dégager une saisie conceptuelle de ce que serait l’œuvre. Non plus cerner ce que le texte voudrait dire, mais multiplier les branchements. Pour appuyer cette nouvelle présentation, nous avons étudié la relation entretenue par trois poètes avec la peinture (Artaud, Michaux, du Bouchet). Nous avons tenté de démontrer que leur relation au langage impliquait une autre manière de lire - davantage tournée vers les conséquences affectives et perceptives de l’expérience. En même temps que la critique d’une certaine perspective dominante sur la littérature (conventionnalisme, herméneutique, phénoménologie...) notre thèse propose, éclairée par une pluralité de regards (philosophes, peintres, poètes, tradition judaïque), un nouveau champ d’expérience. / One can’t approach a text without a series of presupposed knowledge determining the idea one makes about language, meaning, text, literature, the writer and reading. A whole ensemble of unformulated ideas influences the experience of the text one can have. Then, an image of what literature is or supposed to be operates secretly in the reader’s mind - limiting the spectrum of experiences. We believe that image proceeds from a certain critical science, successor of a philosophical tradition enhancing knowledge above all. Literature is then enslaved by the cognitive project of the community. We wished to propose a new way of approaching the text - so we could unbridle the possible connections to it. A pragmatic and empiric approach more concerned by the ethical and existential benefit of the literature encounter than by a conceptual understanding of what the work may be. Not wondering what the text means but what one can do with it. We studied the relationship between three poets (Artaud, Michaux, du Bouchet) and painting, trying to demonstrate that their relation to language is asking for a new way of reading (concerned with perceptive and affective consequences). Our thesis is both criticizing a certain dominant perspective on literature (conventionalism, hermeneutic, phenomenology...) and proposing by the means of different angles (philosophers, painters, poets, judaic tradition...) a new field of experience.

The Master thesis discusses the origin, development and termination of Alfred Radok's foundation. Furthermore the thesis deals with Alfred Radok's award endowment fund, which was focusing on the presentation of Alfred Radok's award. The aim of this thesis is to assess the activities of the foundation and of the endowment fund with a special focus on issues Alfred Radok's awards ceremony during its 23-year's operation. A great benefit of the thesis is information which is not going to be accessible anymore due to the end of Alfred Radok's awards. Alfred Radok's awards were composed of two parts. First part was an anonymous dramatic competition which awards the best script of an original Czech theatre play. And the second part was awarding of a production categories. Results of the production categories were based on a theatre critic's survey. The aim was to find out how are the critics and publicists satisfied with this survey. The method of the research was qualitative investigation based on semi-structured interviews. In conclusion, the data was evaluated and interpreted.

Orientador: Antonio Alcir Bernardez Pecora / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-14T10:18:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Beso(Escritor)_M.pdf: 1130377 bytes, checksum: cbb888760c7b15db98277e5f141acb12 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 / Resumo: Este projeto pretende desenvolver um estudo da poesia de Roberto Piva (1937-), particularmente de sua fase inicial (primeira metade da década de 60), propondo uma análise intertextual pelas referências literárias presentes em sua obra, e na maneira como funcionam de matriz poética para a constituição de sua própria poesia. O corpus de poemas a serem analisados nesse estudo é: o poema intitulado "Ode a Fernando Pessoa", de 1961, os manifestos em prosa poética "O Minotauro dos minutos", "A máquina de matar o tempo", "Bules, bílis e bolas" e "Catedral da Desordem", datados de 1962, e os dois primeiros livros de Piva -Paranóia (1963) e Piazzas (1964). Destacam-se, para o presente estudo, os seguintes autores referidos neste corpus e considerados na análise da poesia de Piva: Mário de Andrade, Allen Ginsberg, Oswald de Andrade, Jorge de Lima, Murilo Mendes, Walt Whitman, Fernando Pessoa, Wladimir Maiakovski, Federico Garcia Lorca, Dante Alighieri, William Blake e Pablo Neruda. / Abstract: This project aims to study Roberto Piva's poetry, in particular its first period (beginning of the 60's), with the purpose to make an intertextual analysis by the literary references present in his writings, and in the way how they work like a poetic matrix to construct his original poetry. The corpus of the poems to be analyzed in this research is: the poem entitled "Ode a Fernando Pessoa" (1961); the prose-poetic manifests "O Minotauro dos minutos", "A máquina de matar o tempo", "Bules, bílis e bolas" and "Catedral da Desordem" (1962); and, finally, the first two books "Paranóia" (1963) and "Piazzas" (1964). Considering the dialog of the Piva's poetry with the literature, the present study detach the citations and allusions, in his poems, from the authors: Mario de Andrade, Allen Ginsberg, Oswald de Andrade, Jorge de Lima, Murilo Mendes, Walt Whitman, Fernando Pessoa, Wladimir Maiakovski, Federico Garcia Lorca, Dante Alighieri, William Blake e Pablo Neruda. / Mestrado / Literatura Brasileira / Mestre em Teoria e História Literária

The aim of this thesis is to analyse nine contemporary Czech debuts that were published during the 2010s and that were written by authors who were born in the 1980s or in the late 1970s. Based on the thematic analysis and analysis of narrative modes the debuts are compared mutually and placed widely in the context of the contemporary Czech prose. Published reviews of the analysed debuts are considered in this thesis too. Not only because these reviews are almost only available secondary literature related to the theme, the aim of this thesis is also to analyse literary critical context, and how it was shaped by the reviews. Debuts that are analysed in the thesis are (in the order of publish date): Pálenka by Matěj Hořava, Spoušť by Sára Vybíralová, Do tmy by Anna Bolavá, Anežka by Viktorie Hanišová, Augustin Zimmermann by Zuzana Kultánová, Stvoření by Eugen Liška, jr., Malinka by Dita Táborská, Do vnitrozemí by Vladimíra Valová, Lapači prachu by Lucie Faulerová.