Résumé : S'intéressant à l'action administrative de premier niveau, ce mémoire tente de mettre en lumière les limites juridiques et les facteurs organisationnels qui influent sur l'exercice par les agents d'indemnisation et les conseillers en réadaptation de la CSST de leurs fonctions. Tout comme des études empiriques réalisées dans d'autres juridictions à l'égard de différents régimes de sécurité sociale et desquelles elle est inspirée, cette étude révèle que l'exercice d'une discrétion administrative est inévitable. Y sont décrites et commentées les méthodes de gestion privilégiées par l'organisme et les fonctions exercées par les décideurs de manière à identifier la part d'appréciation ou de jugement que peuvent exercer les agents et les conseillers dans le cadre du régime québécois de réparation des lésions professionnelles, ainsi que les processus décisionnels, variables selon les fonctions particulières exercées, qui y mis en œuvres. Cette étude démontre également comment la structure administrative privilégiée par l'organisme est susceptible de contribuer au respect des droits des administrés, tout en comportant certains risques d'atteinte à l'équité des processus. / Abstract : This aim of this study is to expose the legal limits and organisational factors which may affect decision-makers' discretion in the context of the employment injuries compensation system in the province of Québec. The findings of this study align with some empirical studies concerning different social security regimes in other jurisdictions from which it is inspired. Indeed, it reveals that administrative discretion is inevitable. It describes and comments the management techniques implemented in the organization. It also describes the particular functions of two categories of street-level workers, the agents d'indemnisation and the conseillers en réadaptation, in order to identify the matters about which they may use their judgment or exercise a discretion, as well as the particular decision-making processes that occur at the front lines of service delivery. It shows how the administrative structure concurs to the respect of the clients rights but may neverheless undermine the processes fairness.

The aim of this thesis is to compare the concept of sin in the theologies of Ellen G. White and Leonardo Boff. Chapter 1 examines Ellen G. White's concept of sin. White's historical and theological backgrounds coupled with her use of the "great controversy" motif provide a better grasp of her understanding of sin. White defines sin as the transgression of God's Law. She views sin to comprise at least two dimensions, namely, the individual and the social. White regards these two aspects of sin to have equal significance. White's detailed treatment of the sanctuary teaching also highlights the two dimensions of sin. In Chapter 2 Boff' s idea of sin is investigated. Boff' s historical background, which exposed him to the poor, influenced his perception of sin. Boff's theological background together with his familiarity with Karl Marx's social analysis prompted Boff to define sin as the negation of God's love in a human history bedevilled by class conflict. Boff views sin to have the individual and social dimensions. Yet, in terms of importance, Boff believes that the social dimension of sin is more consequential than the individual one. In Chapter 3 White's and Boff s views on sin are compared. From this comparison it is evident that both White and Boff recognize the bipolarity of sin. Both seem to agree that christians should take an active role in correcting social evils because love for God is manifested by how we relate to our neighbor. Boff devotes less space to the individual aspect of sin than White. Chapter 4 shows that White's theological tradition has a lot to learn from Boff and his tradition and also vice versa. An awareness of the current priestly ministry of Christ evident in White's theology could help Boff to bring some balance to his stance on the social and the individual dimension of sin. Boff' s use of Marx's social analysis should also help Seventh-day Adventists, the inheritors of White's theology, not to interpret White's theology of sin only along individualistic lines while overlooking its social dimension. / Philosophy, Practical & Systematic Theology / D.Th. (Systematic Theology)

The overall purpose of this study is to establish whether auditors in South Africa also fail to issue the appropriate audit opinion on the going concern assumption underlying financial statements the reasons for auditors' failure to issue the appropriate audit opinion on the going concern assumption The hypotheses of this study are tested by examining professional auditing standards and secondary data on the going concern assumption conducting an empirical study of listed industrial compames whose listings were terminated because of financial failure This study provides evidence that auditors in South Africa fail to Issue the appropriate audit opinion on the going concern assumption advances specific reasons for this failure / Auditing / M. Comm. (Auditing)

The moderation function of in-group status position on the relationship between group-based guilt and reparation intention was tested in a 2 (group-based guilt: low versus high) x 2 (status loss: weak versus strong) factorial between-subjects design, using an online survey software program named Qualtrics. The target population was white South African undergraduate students born after 1988 and registered at the University of South Africa. The results of the first Experiment confirmed the hypothesis, that the relationship between group-based guilt and reparation intention becomes less significant the more participants perceive a loss of status for their in-group. However, the hypothesis could not be confirmed in Experiment 2. The results are presented and discussed in detail / Psychology / M.A. (Psychology)

My dissertation draws upon ancient political philosophy (Plato and Aristotle) and 20th century hermeneutic thought (Heidegger and Gadamer) to argue that our judgment and understanding is always “situated” within a world, or horizon, shaped by the projects, practices, and traditions in which we are engaged. This means that judgment never starts from scratch. The exercise of judgment, in evaluating competing arguments in politics or law, in trying to understand a philosophical text, in deliberating about how to act in this or that circumstance, is always informed by preconceptions and commitments that we have not justified in advance. In this sense, our judgment is always “prejudiced.” But contrary to a familiar way of thinking, the prejudicial aspect of judgment is not some regrettable limitation. Certain prejudices, I argue, can actually enable good judgment rather than hinder it. The primary goal of the dissertation is to clarify the concept of prejudice and to draw out its implications for politics, ethics, and philosophy. What does it mean to reason from within the world? What room does such reasoning allow for human agency and political reform? By drawing upon Heidegger’s notion of “Being-in-the-World” and Gadamer’s notion of “horizon,” I develop the idea that our life circumstance is an intelligible perspective that informs our deliberation and judgment. Moreover, our life perspective provides the basis for a kind of situated agency. After elaborating the situated conception of understanding, I show that it is implicit in Aristotle’s notion of practical wisdom (phronesis) and in Plato’s notion of dialectic. My goal is to bring out a link that is often overlooked between their philosophy and 20th century hermeneutic thought. By reading each in light of the other, we gain a deeper understanding of what it means to reason from within the perspective of our lives.

Thesis (DPhil (Philosophy))--University of Stellenbosch, 2005. / The purpose of this thesis twofold: first, to develop an account of modernity as a “loss of the world” which also entails the “death” of the human as a meaningful philosophical, political or moral category, and second, to explore the possibility of recovering a sense of the world in us and with it, a sense of what it means to be human. This argument is developed by way of a sustained engagement with the work of Friedrich Nietzsche and Hannah Arendt, whose analogous critiques of modernity centre on the problem of the connection between humanity and worldliness. My argument consists of three parts, each of which spans two chapters. Part one of the thesis sets out the most important aspects of Nietzsche’s and Arendt’s respective critiques of modernity. Chapter one focuses on modernity as a rupture of a philosophical, political and religious tradition within which existence in the world could be experienced as unquestionably meaningful. Following arguments developed by Nietzsche and Arendt, chapter two establishes that the loss of this tradition results in a general crisis of meaning, evaluation and authority that can be designated as “modern nihilism”. The second part of the thesis deals with what may be called the “anthropological grounds” of the critique of modernity developed in part one. To this end, chapter three focuses on Nietzsche’s portrayal of the human as “the as-yet undetermined animal” who is neither the manifestation of a subjective essence nor the product of his own hands, but who only exists in the unresolved tension between indeterminacy and determination. This is followed in chapter four by an inquiry into Arendt’s conception of “the human condition”, which in turn points to the conditionality of being human. What is clearly demonstrated in both cases is that, in so far as the predicament of modernity is incarnate in modern human beings themselves, any attempt at overcoming this predicament would somehow have to involve re-thinking or transcending our present-day humanity. The third part of the thesis examines the way in which the reconceptualisation of the human as advocated by Nietzsche and Arendt transforms our understanding of “world”. The more specific aim here is to demonstrate that both thinkers conceive of a reconciliation between self and world as a form of redemption. In chapter five I explore their respective attempts to resurrect the capacity for judgement in the aftermath of the death of God as the first step in this redemptive project, before turning to a more in-depth inquiry into the “soteriology” at work in Nietzsche’s and Arendt’s thinking in chapter six. This inquiry ultimately makes clear that there is a conflict between the Nietzschean conception of redemption as amor fati (love of fate) and Arendt’s notion of redemption as amor mundi (love of the world). I conclude the thesis by arguing that what is at stake here are two conflicting notions of reconciliation: a worldly – or political – notion of reconciliation (Arendt), and a much more radical, philosophical notion of reconciliation (Nietzsche), which ultimately does away with any boundary between self and world. However, my final conclusion is not that we face an inevitable choice between these two alternatives, but rather that the struggle between these two dispositions is necessary for an understanding of what it means to be human as well as for the world in which our humanity is formed.

Davantage d’évaluations de projets internationaux dans les pays en développement se réalisent pour informer les décisions sur la base de données probantes. L’utilisation des résultats d’évaluation est remise en cause et pour y remédier des évaluations participatives qui incluent à certaines étapes du processus évaluatif des acteurs non évaluateurs sont proposées. Parmi celles-ci, les évaluations participatives pratiques visent principalement à améliorer l’utilisation du processus et des résultats des évaluations. Ces évaluations participatives pratiques seraient obstruées par des attitudes individuelles négatives, ou résistance individuelle au changement, et favorisées par des attitudes individuelles positives, ou propension. Cette thèse propose d’étudier la propension individuelle des gestionnaires envers les évaluations participatives pratiques d’intervention (EPP), les éléments influençant cette propension, et de caractériser des niveaux de propension des individus envers les EPP. Tout d’abord une revue de littérature a proposé une définition multidimensionnelle de la propension envers les EPP comme étant une attitude favorable envers la pratique des EPP qui se décline à chaque étape d’une évaluation sous les volets affectif et cognitif. Les dimensions identifiées théoriquement étaient : apprentissage, travail en groupe, emploi de méthodes systématiques, usage de l’esprit critique. Ces dimensions ont servi de cadre pour la partie empirique de la thèse. Une étude de cas multiples avec les gestionnaires d’une institution de santé en Haïti a été menée pour contextualiser la propension et identifier les éléments d’influence. Les données ont été recueillies à l’aide d’entrevues semi-structurées et de sources documentaires. L’analyse des données concernant l’apprentissage a révélé une prédominance des formes d’apprentissage par l’action et par l’observation. Le travail en groupe se retrouve ancré dans la pratique des gestionnaires administratifs et des gestionnaires cliniques. Les méthodes systématiques se reflètent principalement dans la consultation de plusieurs acteurs ayant de l’intérêt pour la problématique immédiate à solutionner plutôt que par l’outillage méthodologique. L’emploi de méthodes systématiques prend généralement la forme de consultation élargie d’avis pour régler une situation ou prend la forme de tentative de validation des informations reçues. L’esprit critique se déclenche sous stimulation lorsque l’image individuelle, professionnelle, corporative ou organisationnelle est touchée ou lors de suggestions jugées constructives. En plus de contextualiser quatre composantes de la propension individuelle envers les EPP, les gestionnaires se sont positionnés par rapport à la propension de leurs collègues sur la base de la réactivité, plus ou moins réactif vis-à-vis des composantes de la propension individuelle. Ainsi, la propension étudiée empiriquement a laissé émerger deux axes : un axe formalisation et un axe réactivité. L’axe formalisation reprend la contextualisation des quatre composantes de la propension individuelle envers les EPP, soit la forme d’expression des composantes. L’axe réactivité reprend le niveau d’activité déployé dans chaque composante de la propension individuelle, de réactif à plus proactif. De plus, des profils d’individus ayant différents niveaux de propension envers les EPP ont été développés. Des influences favorables et défavorables au niveau de propension envers les EPP ont été identifiées. L’originalité de cette thèse tient dans le fait de se positionner dans un courant récent de réflexion autour de la résistance aux changements et aux évaluations avec un regard positif et d’avoir défini théoriquement et appliqué empiriquement le concept pluridimensionnel de propension individuelle aux EPP. Des profils de niveau de propension individuelle aux EPP et les éléments d’influence favorables et défavorables associés peuvent servir d’outil de diagnostic aux types d’évaluation possibles, servir d’ajustement à la mise en place d’évaluations selon les interlocuteurs, permettre le suivi des changements de niveaux de propension pendant une EPP et servir de sources d’informations pour ajuster les plans d’évaluations participatives. / Increasing importance is being given to the evaluation of international projects implemented in developing countries. Some approaches to evaluation seek to include non-evaluators in some steps of the evaluation process. It is believed to result in decision-making that is better supported by the evidence. One such approach is practical participatory evaluation, or PPE. PPE faces a number of challenges, including negative individual attitudes or resistance to change on the part of non-evaluator participants. This thesis studies the positive individual attitudes or propensity of managers toward PPE. It examines the factors that affect individual propensity toward PPE and individual variation in propensity toward PPE. I first defined propensity toward PPE based on a literature review. In general, propensity toward PPE is a favourable attitude, both affectively and cognitively, toward the practice of PPE at all steps of the evaluation process. More specifically, it comprises four dimensions: learning, working in groups, use of systematic methods and use of judgment. I used these dimensions to analyse data I collected in a multiple case study of managers working at a health institution in Haïti. The data came from semi-structured interviews and documentary sources. I found that learning mainly occurred though doing and observing. Working in groups was entrenched in the daily practice of both administrative and clinical health managers. The use of systematic methods took the form of managers consulting multiple actors who had a stake in the immediate problem being addressed, rather than using methodological tools. The use of systematic methods involved either seeking a broader array of opinions in order to solve a situation or attempting to validate information received. Health managers used judgment in situations where their individual, professional, corporative or organizational image was affected, or when others had constructive suggestions to make. In addition to explaining the contexts in which they have exhibited, or would exhibit, each of the four behaviours of propensity toward PPE, the health managers also ranked themselves vis-à-vis their colleagues in terms of frequency of occurrence and degree of integration into daily practice. Hence, this empirical study of propensity yielded data on two aspects of propensity: “formalization” and “reactivity”. The formalization aspect contextualized the four dimensions, showing the forms that learning, working in groups, using systematic methods and using judgment actually take for these particular managers. The reactivity aspect revealed the degree of energy exhibited for each of the four dimensions, from reactive to more proactive. I also developed a schema for classifying individuals based on their level of propensity toward PPE. I identified the factors that favour versus impede levels of propensity toward PPE. The originality of this thesis lies in the insights it brings to current reflection and debate on individual resistance to change and the evaluation process. And in the approach that I have chosen: adopting a positive stance that focuses on propensity rather than resistance toward PPE, and deriving a theory-based, multi-dimensional definition of PPE and applying it empirically. Individual profiles of propensity toward PPE and knowledge of the factors that favour/impede PPE may be helpful in determining the best type of evaluation to use in a given situation. They could be used to develop quantitative tools, and to fine-tune plans and adjust the implementation of evaluations.

Déterminer si quelqu’un est digne de confiance constitue, tout au long de notre vie, une décision à la base de nos interactions sociales quotidiennes. Des études récentes chez les jeunes adultes ont proposé que le jugement de confiance basé sur un visage constituerait une extension des processus de reconnaissance des expressions faciales, particulièrement de la colère et de la joie (Todorov, 2008). Bien que le jugement de confiance soit d’une grande importance tout au long de notre vie, à notre connaissance, aucune étude n’a tenté d’explorer l’évolution de ce processus au cours du vieillissement. Pourtant, sachant que les personnes âgées saines sont moins efficaces que les jeunes adultes pour reconnaître les expressions faciales émotionnelles (Ruffman et al., 2008; Calder et al., 2003), des différences pourraient exister dans les capacités de ces deux groupes d’âge à poser un jugement de confiance. Le présent travail a permis d’explorer, pour une première fois, les processus perceptifs sous-jacents au jugement de confiance chez une population âgée saine ainsi que chez une population présentant une démence fronto-temporale. Les résultats démontrent que les représentations de colère, de joie et de confiance sont similaires chez les jeunes et les âgés sains et suggèrent qu’il existe bel et bien un lien entre le jugement de confiance et les jugements de joie et de colère. De plus, ils révèlent que ce lien persiste au cours vieillissement, mais que les adultes âgés sains se fient davantage à leur représentation de la colère que les jeunes adultes pour déterminer si un visage est digne de confiance ou non. Enfin, les patients présentant une démence fronto-temporale possèdent des représentations différentes des âgés sains en ce qui concerne la colère, la joie et la confiance, et ils semblent se fier davantage à leur représentation de la joie que les âgés sains pour déterminer le niveau de confiance d’un visage. / To determine whether someone looks trustworthy or not is, throughout our lives, a basic decision in our social interactions. Recent studies have suggested that this type of judgment may be an extension of facial expression judgments, more specifically of anger and happiness judgments (Todorov, 2008). Even though trustworthiness judgments play a great role in our social interactions throughout our lives, little is known about the evolution of this process through aging. However, knowing that older adults are less efficient than younger adults in identifying facial expressions (Ruffman et al., 2008; Calder et al., 2003), one could expect to find differences between young and older adults in the way they judge trustworthiness. This work aimed to explore, for the first time, perceptual processes underlying trustworthiness judgments in a healthy older adult population as well as in a population of fronto-temporal dementia (FTD) patients. Results show that anger, happiness and trustworthiness representations are similar between young and older adults, and they suggest that a relationship does exist between emotional judgments and trustworthiness judgments. Moreover, results show that this relationship persists throughout aging, but that older adults rely more on their representation of anger than younger in adults while judging trustworthiness. Finally, patients with fronto-temporal dementia show different representations of anger, happiness and trustworthiness than that of the controls. Also, for trustworthiness judgments, they rely more on their representation of happiness than controls.

Nous nous proposons, dans le cadre de cette étude, de démontrer que les Essais de Montaigne contiennent bel et bien, en dépit d’une forme éclatée et d’un propos non systématique, ce qu’il convient d’appeler une morale. Non seulement cette morale ne s’oppose-t-elle pas au scepticisme des Essais, mais elle lui est même d’une certaine façon coextensive : la morale de Montaigne est une morale de l’essai, lequel constitue l’expression la plus achevée de son scepticisme. Ce dernier, pour être bien compris, doit préalablement être mis en parallèle avec la « voie » (ἀγωγή) que propose Sextus Empiricus dans ses Hypotyposes pyrrhoniennes, dont l’influence sur Montaigne pourrait être bien plus importante que ne le laissent croire plusieurs travaux récents. / We will argue, in the following study, that Montaigne’s Essays, despite their fragmented writing and unsystematic form, indeed contain what deserves to be called an ethics. This ethics, far from contradicting his scepticism, identifies with it in a certain way: Montaigne’s ethics is an ethics of the essay, which is the definitive expression of his scepticisim. The latter, to be correctly understood, needs to be compared with Sextus Empiricus’ « way » (ἀγωγή), whose influence on Montaigne may be more important than it has been argued in recent years.

Dans la question 10 du livre II de son commentaire au traité De l’âme d’Aristote, Nicole Oresme soulève la question suivante : est-ce que le sens se trompe relativement à son objet propre? S’attaquant à la problématique de l’illusion sensible, il soutient qu’il y a effectivement place pour l’erreur dans la connaissance sensible puisque les facultés sensitives de l’âme ont la capacité de former des jugements. Influencé par le modèle perspectiviste de la vision, Oresme met l’accent sur le rôle des sens internes, plutôt que les sens externes, dans la perception. Ce mémoire de maîtrise a pour but d’élucider les notions de « concept » (conceptus), « jugement » (iudicium) et « discours » (discursus) telles qu’Oresme les emploie dans le deuxième livre de ses Quaestiones De anima et est accompagné d’une traduction des questions I.4, II.8-15 et II.21 des Quaestiones De anima. / In question 10 of book II of his commentary on Aristotle’s De anima, Nicole Oresme asks whether the senses can be deceived about their proper objects. Tackling the issue of sense illusion, he maintains that there is indeed error in sense cognition since the sensitive faculties of the soul can form judgments. Influenced by the perspectivist account of vision, Oresme highlights the role of the internal senses, rather than the external senses, in perception. This master’s thesis aims to elucidate the notions of « concept » (conceptus), « judgment » (iudicium) and « discourse » (discursus) as Oresme uses them in book II of his Quaestiones De anima and includes a French translation of questions I.4, II.8-15 and II.21 of the Quaestiones De anima.