No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

La présente étude a comme objectif de comprendre la place que prend la dimension temporelle dans l’incarcération d’un détenu, ainsi que comment est décrit son influence sur son expérience carcérale. À l’aide de l’autobiographie You’ve Got Nothing Coming : Notes From a Prison Fish de Jimmy Lerner (2002), nous avons alors analysé différents thèmes concernant l’expérience temporelle d’une détention carcérale. Il ressort de notre analyse que le temps en prison se vit de façon extrêmement pénible. Il semble ne pas vouloir se passer ou s’écouler. Cependant, le détenu détient, tout de même, une certaine autonomie sur la façon dont il décide de passer son temps. Ainsi, dépendamment des comportements qu’il adopte et des relations qu’il entretient avec les autres détenus et les gardes, son temps peut passer encore plus lentement qu’il ne l’est déjà ou il peut trouver des façons pour aider à ce que son attention ne soit pas portée sur le passage du temps et ainsi, le faire paraitre passer un peu plus rapidement.

Although parole boards have discretion and responsibility for deciding if and when prison inmates will be released on parole, previous studies of parole decisionmaking have found that the recommendations made by prison staff weigh heavily in parole decisions. In light of these findings it is surprising that the prison recommendation process has not come under greater scrutiny. What contributes to release recommendations made by prison superintendents, whether those recommendations are influenced by those made by lower level prison staff, and the factors shaping the latter, have not yet been explored by criminal justice scholars. It is the purpose of this research to examine parole release recommendations made at the prison decisionmaking stage. Practices followed by prison staff within one large state prison system as they formulated release recommendations for a random sample of 1610 parole applicants were examined. Of these applicants, 58% were recommended for release by unit management teams that operated on the cell block level. Using multi-level modeling it was possible to take into account characteristics related to applicants and prison staff teams, as well as institutions. Observations of decisionmaking teams and conversations with prison staff supplemented and contributed to the interpretation of quantitative findings. Results showed significant variation across teams and institutions in both the probability of an applicant receiving a positive recommendation for release--even after controlling for applicant and decisionmaking attributes--and in the strength of the influence of one applicant attribute: number of misconducts. A strong concordance also was found between recommendations made by lower level prison staff teams and prison superintendents. The findings have implications for prison and parole policies, the relationship between prison personnel and paroling authorities, prison operational procedures, and the perceptions of people who are incarcerated. / Criminal Justice

In view of the vast numbers of individuals with co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders within the offender population, the scarcity of research on the potential exacerbating effects of co-occurring disorders on prisoner misconduct is surprising. With a sample of 1,470 incarcerated women offenders in Pennsylvania, this study examined prisoner misconduct among four distinct groups: 1) inmates with co-occurring disorders, 2) those with mental illness only, 3) inmates with substance use disorders only, and 4) prisoners with no mental health or substance use disorders net the effects of other factors demonstrated in prior studies to influence institutional misconduct. Results suggested that female prisoners with mental health and co-occurring disorders were significantly more likely than those with no disorders to be charged with prison misconduct . Co-occurring disorder inmates were also more likely to be charged with both minor and serious misconduct compared to inmates with no disorders. The results of this study suggest that menttal health and co-occurring disorders may hinder the ability of some female offenders to successfully assimilate to the prison environment as evidenced by higher rates of institutional misbehavior. Practice and policy implications are discussed / Criminal Justice

ABSTRACT: Background: The United Nations states that "prisoners should enjoy the same standards of health care that are available in the community." However, persons in custody continue to face barriers to care worldwide. The health of persons in federal custody in Canada is governed by the Corrections and Conditional Release Act (CCRA), which states that Correctional Services Canada is responsible for the provision of "essential health care" to all inmates. In the absence of concrete definition, these "essential" services provided in Canadian federal prisons often fall below standard. More research is needed into how "health care" is represented as a problem in Canada's federal prisons, and the impact on the incarcerated population. Methodology: Carol Bacchi's "What's the Problem Represented to Be?" (WPR) (Bacchi, 2009) framework was applied to the CCRA with a specific focus on health care. Questions one, three, and five of the WPR approach were applied, respectively, in order to analyze how the "problem" of "health care" is represented, how this particular representation came about, and the effects of this representation on the health of persons in custody. Findings: In applying the WPR approach to the CCRA, three main themes emerged. First, the notion of what services are constituted as "essential" in the context of federal prisons is more limited compared to the broader community. Second, the creation of the CCRA involved a great deal of discussion around the rights of persons in custody versus the protection of society, a dichotomy that has significant bearings on the treatment of those in prison. Third, this representation has negative effects on the health of those in custody. Conclusion: The representation of health care in the CCRA has negative effects on the health of persons in custody. Greater attention must be paid to these inequities in health care provision in order to meet UN standards. Keywords: Prison Health, Essential Health Care, Carol Bacchi, Inequity / Thesis / Master of Science (MSc) / LAY ABSTRACT The United Nations states that "prisoners should enjoy the same standards of health care that are available in the community." Despite this, persons in custody around the world continue to experience barriers to care and face unique health challenges. In Canada, the health of persons in federal custody is governed by the Corrections and Conditional Release Act. This legislation states that Correctional Services must provide "essential health care" and "reasonable access to non-essential mental health care" to inmates. Without clear definition, the interpretation of which services are "essential" is left to the discretion of correctional authorities, and as a result access and quality of care are significantly reduced in Canada's prisons when compared to the broader community. This thesis applied Carol Bacchi's "What's the Problem Represented to Be" analytical framework to examine how "health care" is uniquely represented as a "problem" for Canada's federal prison population, and the concerning inequities that are produced by this representation.