ABB is a global company with a leading position in power and automation technologies. Being active on a global market creates a high pressure to always develop the business and reduce costs in order to stay competitive. The purchasing function at ABB ́s unit Control Products is divided into a strategic- and an operative purchase department. The negotiated setups the strategic purchasers establish with the suppliers have been shown to affect the transport- and inventory costs that are charged to the operative purchase department. In order to determine whether more beneficial setups could be negotiated by including transport- and inventory costs when they are evaluated, this case study has been requested. Two master students from Linköping University have conducted the study and by investigating different setups, conclusions to answer the study ́s purpose could be drawn. The purpose is presented below. The study’s purpose is to recommend future guidelines for the strategic purchasers at ABB’s unit Control Products that can be applied when negotiating with suppliers, by evaluating purchase-, transport- and inventory costs. In order to investigate how the purchase-, transport- and inventory costs were affected by different setups, four different cases were defined. Each case included a specific article, which was chosen based on its properties and its current and alternative setups. The conducted literature reviews and interviews with employees at Control Products resulted in the two sub- criteria lead time and net price were defined as the most important ones when negotiating and evaluating suppliers. A combination of these sub-criteria was therefore used to choose suitable articles. Once the cases had been defined, the purchase-, transport- and inventory costs could be calculated for both their current situation and alternative setup scenarios. Theories from relevant researches were used to strengthen and criticised the cases’ results. Each case's result provided information regarding how the purchase-, transport- and inventory costs were affected by specific setups. By comparing the alternative scenarios with the setup currently used, the alternatives ́ profitability could be determined. The cases showed that by only studying one of the three cost posts, only a limited insight was gained. Even if the purchase cost was to increase for an alternative setup, it could still be profitable to implement due to decreased transport- and inventory costs. Furthermore, an alternative setup that showed significant potential to reduce inventory costs was proven to not be profitable because of its effect on the net price. Neglecting to take transport- and inventory costs into account when a potential supplier is evaluated can make a deal look more profitable than it is. The final recommendation is that purchase-, transport- and inventory costs all have to be taken into consideration in order to determine which setups that are economically preferable. If the strategic purchasers at Control Products includes these when they negotiate with suppliers, more profitable deals can be obtained. / <p>Examensarbetet är en förvrängd version då känslig information om ABB inte ska läcka ut.</p>

A seleção de fornecedores é um problema complexo e que vem ganhando importância estratégica nas organizações, principalmente devido à inclusão de diversos atributos que podem ser especificados de acordo com as necessidades da situação, pois o fator custo não é mais o único responsável pela decisão. A relevância da sustentabilidade, em termos econômicos, ambientais e sociais, traz ao tema ainda mais atributos que devem ser mapeados como parte da decisão. Neste trabalho é proposta uma abordagem baseada em otimização combinatória (programação linear inteira) aliada à análise de valor multicriterial que estabelece prioridades e compensações entre os atributos definidos, para seleção de fornecedores de um conjunto de embalagens de cosméticos para uma nova linha de produtos. A solução encontrada é comparada aos métodos de otimização tradicionais (monocriteriais) e à otimização multicriterial sem leilão combinatório. Também são realizadas análises de sensibilidade com o modelo, permitindo que sejam feitas validações de forma a justificar a decisão. / Supplier selection is a complex issue that has gained strategic importance in organizations, mainly due to the consideration of several criteria that can be specified according to the situation, since cost is no longer solely responsible for the decision. The sustainability relevance, in economical, environmental and social terms, brings to the theme even more criteria that should be included as part of the decision. This work proposes an approach based on combinatorial optimization (integer linear programming) combined with multi-criteria value analysis that establishes priorities and trade-offs among the defined criteria, to the supplier selection of a cosmetics packaging set for a new product line. The obtained solution is compared to traditional optimization methods (mono-criteria) and to the multi-criteria optimization without combinatorial auction. Sensitivity analyses are also performed with the model, allowing assessments to be made in order to justify the decision.

O cenário de negócios atual se caracteriza pela competição feroz em mercados globais, pela introdução de produtos com ciclos de vida cada vez mais curtos e por uma expectativa elevada por parte dos clientes e consumidores. Estas demandas vêm forçando as empresas a investirem seu foco e atenção em suas cadeias de suprimentos. Para reduzir custos e melhorar os níveis de serviço, as estratégias de fornecimento, de manufatura e de distribuição de produtos são elaboradas levando em consideração os vários elos e interações existentes na cadeia de suprimentos. As grandes empresas multinacionais manufatureiras do setor de bens de consumo não-duráveis entenderam rapidamente esta mensagem e alavancadas por suas escalas globais, passaram a tratar a gestão estratégica dos custos de matérias-primas como importante vantagem competitiva, utilizando seu imenso poder de negociação junto à sua base de fornecedores para obter descontos significativos na compra de grandes volumes de matérias-primas, reduzindo o número de fornecedores, através de processos de seleção estratégicas. Com altos volumes de produção (milhões de unidades por mês) e baixo preço unitário de venda, estas multinacionais (como Nestle, P&G, Unilever, e L.Oreal) se consolidaram como a parte mais forte de suas cadeias de suprimentos, através de seu poder de barganha sobre uma base dispersa de fornecedores e usando o poder de suas marcas sobre um comércio fragmentado e em bases locais. A internacionalização do varejo e o crescimento do poder de compra dos clientes (como Wal Mart, Carrefour e Tesco) trouxeram à tona um novo cenário, no qual existe uma disputa estratégica pela liderança da cadeia global de valor, entre varejistas poderosos, uma nova e concentrada base de fornecedores e as empresas manufatureiras de bens de consumo não-duráveis. A governança nestas cadeias globais de valor torna-se um tema para ser entendido e gerenciado. A importância da liderança nestas cadeias está relacionada às definições dos parâmetros chave que caracterizarão os processos da cadeia produtiva: o que e onde produzir, quanto e quando produzir e a que preço. Gereffi et al. desenvolveram um framework para explicar os padrões de governança em cadeias globais de valor, considerando que existe uma variedade de relações de governança que vão desde relações de mercado até operações integradas verticalmente. Foram definidas variáveischave que estabelecem o tipo de governança em uma dada cadeia global: complexidade de transações, habilidade de codificar as transações e competências da base fornecedora. Esta pesquisa propõe um processo para quantificar estas três variáveis-chave, através de oito dimensões operacionais e uma série de KPIs mensuráveis (indicadores chave de performance) a fim de suportar o completo entendimento e a análise do tipo de governança em uma cadeia global de valor, complementando o trabalho de Gereffi et al., com base em um estudo de caso no setor de higiene e limpeza doméstica no Brasil. Esta pesquisa também avalia como as empresas de bens de consumo não.duráveis selecionam e segmentam sua base de fornecedores, e se as ferramentas utilizadas atualmente ainda são validas neste novo ambiente de disputa pela governança. / The current business environment presents a strong competition in global markets, with cost pressures, focus on new products development with shorter lifetimes than ever and a high customer and clients expectations to have their needs and requirements satisfied. The big fast moving consumer goods companies have already understood these messages, and leveraged by their global scales, started to manage their raw and packaging materials costs in a more strategic and competitive way, using their bargain power over the supplier base to get significant cost savings through big volumes discounts concentrating their supplier base, with the reduction of the number of suppliers by the implementation of strategic sourcing tools. With high production volumes (million of units per month) and low unit price, the multinationals (as Nestle, P&G, Unilever, and L.Oreal) were the strongest part of their supply chains, through their purchase bargain power over the still not concentrated supplier base and using their powerful brands over a fragmented and local trade base. The internationalisation of trade and the growing of clients bargain power (as Wal Mart, Carrefour and Tesco) brought a new scenario, starting a strategic fight to have the leadership of the global value chain, among a powerful trade, a new concentrated supplier base and the manufacturing package consumer goods companies. Governance of these new global chains became than an issue to be understood and managed. The importance of the leadership in the global value chain is related to the definition of the key parameters that will characterise the chain productive process: what to produce, where to produce, how much to produce, when to produce and with what price. Gereffi et al. have developed a theoretical framework to explain governance patterns in global value chain, considering that there is a variety of governance relationships in the global chains, from arm.s length to vertical integrated operations. Key variables were defined to establish the type of governance in a given global chain: complexity of transactions, ability to codify transactions and capabilities in the supplier base. This research proposes a process to quantify these three key variables, presenting eight operational dimensions and a series of measurable KPIs (key performance indicators) in order to support the fully understanding and the analysis of the governance type in a global value chain, building on the framework defined by Gereffi et al., based on a case study in the household care business in Brazil. The second outcome of this research evaluates how fast moving consumer goods companies select and segment their supplier base, and if the current tools used are still valid in this new governance environment.

A seleção de fornecedores é uma decisão-chave nos processos de aquisição e de compra. Tanto a escolha de critérios como a avaliação das possíveis alternativas são etapas fundamentais neste processo de decisão. Nas últimas décadas, as instituições de ensino superior privado do Brasil vêm sofrendo grandes desafios na tentativa de institucionalizar práticas administrativas aplicadas no mercado empresarial com o objetivo principal de aperfeiçoar seus processos de trabalho e reduzir riscos e custos operacionais, aumentando assim sua produtividade e qualidade dos serviços prestados. Estas iniciativas visam manter as instituições autossustentáveis e competitivas em um mercado agressivo em constante expansão. Desta forma, um olhar crítico e profissionalizado para seus processos de negócios tem sido uma das soluções encontradas a fim de atingirem suas metas organizacionais. Neste contexto, este trabalho propõe a formalização do processo decisório na seleção de fornecedores através de sua sistematização utilizando os mapas cognitivos para estruturação e identificação de critérios que efetivamente apresentam valor na seleção de parceiros para o tomador de decisão dos departamentos de Controladoria e Suprimentos e Administração do Patrimônio. O trabalho também propõe a posterior priorização destes critérios para a seleção de potenciais fornecedores através da utilização do método multicritério Analytic Hierarchy Process. / Supplier selection is a key decision in the procurement and purchasing processes. Both the choice of criteria and the evaluation of possible alternatives are critical steps in this decision-making. One of the great challenges of private higher education institutions (PHEI) in Brazil in recent decades has been the attempt to institutionalize administrative practices applied in the business market with the primary goal of optimizing their business processes and achieve reduced risks and operational costs, thereby increasing their productivity and the quality of services. These initiatives aim to maintain self-sustaining and competitive institutions in an aggressive market which is constantly expanding. Therefore, a critical and professionalized look at their business processes has been one of the solutions in order for them to achieve their organizational goals. In this context, this paper proposes to formalize the decision-making process in the selection of suppliers through their systematization using cognitive maps to structure and identify the criteria that effectively present value during the partner selection of the decision-maker\'s procurement and purchasing department. The paper also proposes the subsequent prioritization of these criteria for evaluation and selection of potential suppliers through the use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process multi-criteria method.

No contexto organizacional, o departamento de suprimentos exerce papel fundamental na melhoria dos desempenhos sociais e ambientais de uma cadeia. Dentre as atividades desempenhadas pela função de suprimentos está a seleção de fornecedores na qual são definidos os critérios utilizados para a escolha de um fornecedor. Sendo assim, pode-se afirmar que a função de suprimentos é capaz de estender a sua cadeia requerimentos econômicos, sociais e ambientais. Como objeto desse trabalho foi selecionada a indústria química, uma vez que trata-se de uma indústria base para diversas outras atividades econômicas e com grande importância na economia brasileira. Além disso, é um segmento marcado por acidentes ambientais bem como programas de apoio ambiental e social mundialmente reconhecidos como o Responsible Care. Diante desse contexto, esse trabalho buscou propor um modelo conceitual de seleção de fornecedores que incorpore critérios sociais e ambientais para a indústria química. A partir da revisão de literatura, elaborou-se a proposta de um modelo conceitual capaz de abranger organizações compradoras em diferentes níveis de maturidade para incorporação de critérios sociais e ambientais em seu processo de seleção de fornecedores. A primeira etapa proposta no modelo consiste na utilização de ferramentas simples como listagens, nessa primeira etapa o objetivo é proteger a organização compradora de um comportamento não adequado por parte do fornecedor à legislação pertinente. A segunda etapa do modelo consiste no desenvolvimento de uma base gerencial, estabelecimento de critérios sociais e ambientais e utilização de certificações para seleção de fornecedores. Através do método survey, por correio eletrônico, entre abril a setembro do ano de 2015, objetivou-se compreender as atitudes dos responsáveis por formular e implementar as estratégias de compras em direção às compras sustentáveis. A pesquisa demonstrou que há descompasso entre estratégia e execução no sentido de incorporar as perspectivas sociais e ambientais em um processo de seleção de fornecedores. O estudo indicou que as organizações ainda se encontram em estágios iniciais de seleção do fornecedor e compras em se tratando da inclusão de uma perspectiva socioambiental. As ações apresentam-se mais em termos de políticas e documentações, do que em nível operacional. / In the business environment, purchasing department plays a fundamental role in improving social and environmental performance of a chain. Among the activities carried out by the procurement function is the supplier selection in which the criteria are set used for choosing a supplier. Thus, the supply function is able to extend its chain economic, social and environmental requirements. The focus of this work was chemical industry, since it is a key industry for many other economic activities and with high importance in the Brazilian economy. In addition, a segment is marked by environmental accidents as well as environmental and social support programs globally recognized as Responsible Care. In this context, this study aimed to propose a conceptual model of selecting suppliers that incorporates social and environmental criteria for the chemical industry. From the literature review, a conceptual model was elaborated. The model was able to absorb purchasing organizations at different levels of maturity for incorporating social and environmental criteria in their supplier selection process. The first step in the proposed model is the use of simple tools such as listings. The goal is to protect the purchasing organization unsuitable by the supplier to the relevant legislation behavior. The second step of the model is the development of a management base, establishment of social and environmental criteria and use of certifications for selecting suppliers. Through the survey by email, from April to September/2015, the author aimed to understand the attitudes of those responsible for formulating and implementing purchasing strategies toward sustainable procurement. Finally, we proceeded to a comparison between the proposed conceptual model and the results obtained in the survey. The research identified organizations are still in the early stages of supplier selection containing social and environmental criterias. Actions are more related to policies and documentation than operational level.

A seleção de fornecedores é uma decisão-chave nos processos de aquisição e de compra. Tanto a escolha de critérios como a avaliação das possíveis alternativas são etapas fundamentais neste processo de decisão. Nas últimas décadas, as instituições de ensino superior privado do Brasil vêm sofrendo grandes desafios na tentativa de institucionalizar práticas administrativas aplicadas no mercado empresarial com o objetivo principal de aperfeiçoar seus processos de trabalho e reduzir riscos e custos operacionais, aumentando assim sua produtividade e qualidade dos serviços prestados. Estas iniciativas visam manter as instituições autossustentáveis e competitivas em um mercado agressivo em constante expansão. Desta forma, um olhar crítico e profissionalizado para seus processos de negócios tem sido uma das soluções encontradas a fim de atingirem suas metas organizacionais. Neste contexto, este trabalho propõe a formalização do processo decisório na seleção de fornecedores através de sua sistematização utilizando os mapas cognitivos para estruturação e identificação de critérios que efetivamente apresentam valor na seleção de parceiros para o tomador de decisão dos departamentos de Controladoria e Suprimentos e Administração do Patrimônio. O trabalho também propõe a posterior priorização destes critérios para a seleção de potenciais fornecedores através da utilização do método multicritério Analytic Hierarchy Process. / Supplier selection is a key decision in the procurement and purchasing processes. Both the choice of criteria and the evaluation of possible alternatives are critical steps in this decision-making. One of the great challenges of private higher education institutions (PHEI) in Brazil in recent decades has been the attempt to institutionalize administrative practices applied in the business market with the primary goal of optimizing their business processes and achieve reduced risks and operational costs, thereby increasing their productivity and the quality of services. These initiatives aim to maintain self-sustaining and competitive institutions in an aggressive market which is constantly expanding. Therefore, a critical and professionalized look at their business processes has been one of the solutions in order for them to achieve their organizational goals. In this context, this paper proposes to formalize the decision-making process in the selection of suppliers through their systematization using cognitive maps to structure and identify the criteria that effectively present value during the partner selection of the decision-maker\'s procurement and purchasing department. The paper also proposes the subsequent prioritization of these criteria for evaluation and selection of potential suppliers through the use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process multi-criteria method.

For many retailers, manufacturers, and wholesalers, inventory is their single largest investments of corporate assets. Problems such as stock-outs and bullwhip effect due to sales fluctuation and poor visibility are normal for manufactures. Unnecessary activities, in the purchasing process internally and externally, such as double order handling, cost both money and time. It is widely known that firms no longer can compete effectively in isolation of their suppliers and other entities. The future success of many businesses depends on co-operation and the co-ordination of efforts; making Supply Chain Management important. JIT and VMI are two of the philosophies that have been used to update supply chain relationships and management. By recognising your own supply weaknesses, the need for a supply strategy and a purchasing portfolio which classify suppliers emerges. There is an interest in examining what possible benefits and drawbacks, JIT and VMI collaboration can bring and how they differ from each other. In order to have a successful collaboration and implementation, it is important to know what basis to choose suppliers on and understand what needs to be in place, internally and externally, before starting either a JIT or VMI relationship with different suppliers. An inductive method was used in order to transform the literature review into a case study research. Explanatory and exploratory strategy was combined as well as qualitative and quantitative data collection such as oral interviews and written questionnaires. The case study was carried out at an accessory purchasing department at a large production company referred to as the “Focal company” in this thesis. Also, participating in the study were selected suppliers of the Focal company. The literature review and the case study data was analysed which led to the results that: • JIT and VMI can shorten lead time, improve quality and relationships if used properly, otherwise it can lead to increased inventory levels. • Key factors for enabeling JIT and VMI are common goals, management commitment, accurate information and suitable software systems. • Suitable suppliers for JIT and VMI are companies that have equal dependency and/or have interdependency and are willing and able to contribute to the competitive advantage of the buying firm. • Supplier selection criteria are price, quality, delivery, flexibility, reliability organizational culture, structure and strategy. • Implementation of JIT is not an option today at the Focal company. • With a few IT-system updates, a little bit of education and training the Focal company and most of the suppliers in this study are ready for VMI. • Because of the good balance of power and dependence in the relationships between the Focal company and their suppliers there is a good chance of a successful outcome. • The Focal company’s rating criteria are well correlating with the literatures findings, which further support that they are ready to select suppliers for integrated relationships.

<p>For many retailers, manufacturers, and wholesalers, inventory is their single largest investments of corporate assets. Problems such as stock-outs and bullwhip effect due to sales fluctuation and poor visibility are normal for manufactures. Unnecessary activities, in the purchasing process internally and externally, such as double order handling, cost both money and time.</p><p>It is widely known that firms no longer can compete effectively in isolation of their suppliers and other entities. The future success of many businesses depends on co-operation and the co-ordination of efforts; making Supply Chain Management important. JIT and VMI are two of the philosophies that have been used to update supply chain relationships and management. By recognising your own supply weaknesses, the need for a supply strategy and a purchasing portfolio which classify suppliers emerges.</p><p>There is an interest in examining what possible benefits and drawbacks, JIT and VMI collaboration can bring and how they differ from each other. In order to have a successful collaboration and implementation, it is important to know what basis to choose suppliers on and understand what needs to be in place, internally and externally, before starting either a JIT or VMI relationship with different suppliers.</p><p>An inductive method was used in order to transform the literature review into a case study research. Explanatory and exploratory strategy was combined as well as qualitative and quantitative data collection such as oral interviews and written questionnaires. The case study was carried out at an accessory purchasing department at a large production company referred to as the “Focal company” in this thesis. Also, participating in the study were selected suppliers of the Focal company.</p><p>The literature review and the case study data was analysed which led to the results that:</p><p>• JIT and VMI can shorten lead time, improve quality and relationships if used properly, otherwise it can lead to increased inventory levels.</p><p>• Key factors for enabeling JIT and VMI are common goals, management commitment, accurate information and suitable software systems.</p><p>• Suitable suppliers for JIT and VMI are companies that have equal dependency and/or have interdependency and are willing and able to contribute to the competitive advantage of the buying firm.</p><p>• Supplier selection criteria are price, quality, delivery, flexibility, reliability organizational culture, structure and strategy.</p><p>• Implementation of JIT is not an option today at the Focal company.</p><p>• With a few IT-system updates, a little bit of education and training the Focal company and most of the suppliers in this study are ready for VMI.</p><p>• Because of the good balance of power and dependence in the relationships between the Focal company and their suppliers there is a good chance of a successful outcome.</p><p>• The Focal company’s rating criteria are well correlating with the literatures findings, which further support that they are ready to select suppliers for integrated relationships.</p>

Title: Conscious purchasing - Securing the purchasing process in the apparel industry Authors: Jakob Bank, Emma Sjödoff and Helena Zebergs Tutor: Roger Stokkedal Examiner: Helena Forslund Background: There has been several scandals within the apparel industry and due to this brand owners of apparel companies has started to offer their customers’ alternative products, which has been manufactured in a more conscious and sustainable way. The purchasing process has thereby become more complex including multiple criteria such as social and environmental considerations which have to be fulfilled by their suppliers. Purpose: To describe how Swedish brand owners of apparel companies select their supplier for their conscious collections, which sustainability policies they include in contracts with their selected suppliers and how they evaluate these suppliers in regard to the brand owners’ policy on sustainability. Method: This thesis was conducted using qualitative semi-structured interviews and a deductive approach. Several sampling methods was used which led to the involved companies who were interviewed through both structured as well as semi-structured interviews. Conclusion: Swedish brand owners of apparel companies select their suppliers based on how well they fulfil their demands, and if there is a possibility to establish a long term relationship. They include different sustainability policies in their contracts, but all suppliers need to approve the brand owners CoC as well as use organic cotton. The evaluation visits are conducted, but the evaluation responsible, how often it takes place and the duration of the visit depends on the brand owner.

No contexto organizacional, o departamento de suprimentos exerce papel fundamental na melhoria dos desempenhos sociais e ambientais de uma cadeia. Dentre as atividades desempenhadas pela função de suprimentos está a seleção de fornecedores na qual são definidos os critérios utilizados para a escolha de um fornecedor. Sendo assim, pode-se afirmar que a função de suprimentos é capaz de estender a sua cadeia requerimentos econômicos, sociais e ambientais. Como objeto desse trabalho foi selecionada a indústria química, uma vez que trata-se de uma indústria base para diversas outras atividades econômicas e com grande importância na economia brasileira. Além disso, é um segmento marcado por acidentes ambientais bem como programas de apoio ambiental e social mundialmente reconhecidos como o Responsible Care. Diante desse contexto, esse trabalho buscou propor um modelo conceitual de seleção de fornecedores que incorpore critérios sociais e ambientais para a indústria química. A partir da revisão de literatura, elaborou-se a proposta de um modelo conceitual capaz de abranger organizações compradoras em diferentes níveis de maturidade para incorporação de critérios sociais e ambientais em seu processo de seleção de fornecedores. A primeira etapa proposta no modelo consiste na utilização de ferramentas simples como listagens, nessa primeira etapa o objetivo é proteger a organização compradora de um comportamento não adequado por parte do fornecedor à legislação pertinente. A segunda etapa do modelo consiste no desenvolvimento de uma base gerencial, estabelecimento de critérios sociais e ambientais e utilização de certificações para seleção de fornecedores. Através do método survey, por correio eletrônico, entre abril a setembro do ano de 2015, objetivou-se compreender as atitudes dos responsáveis por formular e implementar as estratégias de compras em direção às compras sustentáveis. A pesquisa demonstrou que há descompasso entre estratégia e execução no sentido de incorporar as perspectivas sociais e ambientais em um processo de seleção de fornecedores. O estudo indicou que as organizações ainda se encontram em estágios iniciais de seleção do fornecedor e compras em se tratando da inclusão de uma perspectiva socioambiental. As ações apresentam-se mais em termos de políticas e documentações, do que em nível operacional. / In the business environment, purchasing department plays a fundamental role in improving social and environmental performance of a chain. Among the activities carried out by the procurement function is the supplier selection in which the criteria are set used for choosing a supplier. Thus, the supply function is able to extend its chain economic, social and environmental requirements. The focus of this work was chemical industry, since it is a key industry for many other economic activities and with high importance in the Brazilian economy. In addition, a segment is marked by environmental accidents as well as environmental and social support programs globally recognized as Responsible Care. In this context, this study aimed to propose a conceptual model of selecting suppliers that incorporates social and environmental criteria for the chemical industry. From the literature review, a conceptual model was elaborated. The model was able to absorb purchasing organizations at different levels of maturity for incorporating social and environmental criteria in their supplier selection process. The first step in the proposed model is the use of simple tools such as listings. The goal is to protect the purchasing organization unsuitable by the supplier to the relevant legislation behavior. The second step of the model is the development of a management base, establishment of social and environmental criteria and use of certifications for selecting suppliers. Through the survey by email, from April to September/2015, the author aimed to understand the attitudes of those responsible for formulating and implementing purchasing strategies toward sustainable procurement. Finally, we proceeded to a comparison between the proposed conceptual model and the results obtained in the survey. The research identified organizations are still in the early stages of supplier selection containing social and environmental criterias. Actions are more related to policies and documentation than operational level.