Global ETD Search

1	傅柯《性史》中的倫理與自由 / The ethics and freedom in Foucault's history of Sexuality 謝宗宜, Hsieh, Tzung Yi Unknown Date (has links) 法國思想家傅柯於1984年6月出版了《性史》的第二、三卷。此二卷與第一卷的出版之間長達八年的間隔，取材的範圍也從原先16到19世紀的現代西方社會，往前推移至西元前到西元初的古希臘社會及希臘化羅馬時期。除此之外，傅柯更清楚地表明，他的研究旨趣已經從原先對權力運作的解析，轉移到關於倫理修身實踐的議題上。儘管傅柯本人對於這個轉折十分坦然，但他卻又透過主體化、真理和自由實踐等概念，說明這個轉向其實可以放進他整個研究的藍圖中。本文即以《性史》作為主要的討論素材，首先，將探討傅柯在《性史》第二、三卷中所提出的倫理是什麼？接著，由此回溯《性史》第一卷中對權力的研究，討論傅柯是怎樣分析現代西方文明中的主體化歷程？對權力的分析是否促使傅柯轉向研究自我倫理？最後，我們將綜合上述有關倫理、權力、真理及主體化的討論，說明傅柯所謂自由實踐的意涵為何？ / Michel Foucault published the second and third volumes of History of Sexuality in June 1984. The interval between the first and the rest of the volumes was as long as eight years, and the scope of the first volume was modern European society from the sixteen to the nineteen century, whereas in the second and the third volumes it extended to as early as from ancient Greek to the Hellenistic period. In addition, the central issue was shifted from “power” to “ethics” in those later volumes respectively. He frankly admitted that the central concern of this work did encounter a change described above, however, he also claimed that the change can be regarded as the link between two phases of a continued project, that is, the discussions of “power” and “ethics” are indeed integral parts of his project viewed in light of the concepts of subjectivation, truth, and practice of freedom. This dissertation attempts to explore the implication of “ethics” in the second and third volumes of History of Sexuality and, based on this implication explored, to elucidate the way Foucault analyses the process of subjectivation in modern Western civilization. Then in turn we try to answer whether this analysis of “power” caused Foucault’s shift of interest to “ethics.” Finally, as a conclusion, through integrated examination of the concepts of “ethics,” “power,” “truth” and “subjectivation,” we try to explicate the significance of “practice of freedom” Foucault propounds. 倫理權力真理主體化自由實踐 ethics power truth subjectivation practice of freedom
2	盧曼社會系統理論的去主體化問題 — 從自我同一性弔詭與環境同一性弔詭出發胡育祥 Unknown Date (has links) 這篇論文的目的是為盧曼社會系統理論中的一個難題提供可能的解決之道。此難題即為：社會系統既是去主體化的，又是主體化的。這個難題的出現，乃肇因於盧曼認為系統既是自我透明的，也是自我不透明的，既是環境透明的，也是環境不透明的。這兩種弔詭就是盧曼社會系統理論的自我同一性弔詭與環境同一性弔詭。因此，為了解決社會系統理論的去主體化問題，首先就必須解決自我同一性弔詭與環境同一性弔詭。對此，我們建議從盧曼與胡塞爾的比較開始。藉由此種比較以及隨之而來的清洗與重組，我們可以從他們那裡擷取有利於解決上述弔詭的概念與命題。這些概念與命題是：一、存在著諸系統；二、新的觀察概念：構造；三、社會作為內在於意識系統中的社會行動秩序，而溝通系統則作為內在於理解系統中的社會溝通秩序。 / This thesis is aimed at solving a dilemma in Luhmann's theory of social systems.The delimma is: social systems are both desubjectized and subjectized. This is because in Luhmann's theory, they are both transparent and intransparent to itself, and the environments are both transparent and intransparent to systems. These two paradoxes are self-identity paradox and environment-identity paradox. Therefore, if we want to solve the problem of desubjectization in Luhmann's theory, we must solve the self-identity paradox and environment-identity paradox at first. We suggest that it can begin with the comparison between Luhmann and Husserl. Through this comparison, and correspondingly, cleaning and recombination, we can take concepts and propositions which can be used for resolving the above-mentioned paradoxes. The concepts and propositions are: 1. there are systems; 2. new concept of observation; and 3. society as the order of social actions in a consciousness system, and communication system as the order of social communications in a understanding system. 盧曼社會系統弔詭茁生去主體化自我同一性環境同一性胡塞爾主體化溝通透明不透明理解觀察 Luhmann social system paradox emergence desubjectization self-identity environment-identity Husserl subjectization communication transparency intransparency understanding observation

Search results

傅柯《性史》中的倫理與自由 / The ethics and freedom in Foucault's history of Sexuality

盧曼社會系統理論的去主體化問題 — 從自我同一性弔詭與環境同一性弔詭出發