Global ETD Search

11	選擇權波動度交易策略之探討-以台指選擇權為例 / A study of volatility trading strategies: evidence from Taiwan index options 賴星旅, Lai, Hsing Lu Unknown Date (has links) 本文考量波動度不對稱效果(Volatility Asymmetric Effect)與均數回歸(Mean Reverting)兩個特性，並考量台股市場特性，嘗試建立一個適合台灣市場的波動度交易策略。利用GARCH(1,1)波動度與VIX指標建構第一個交易訊號，並建立當日沖銷部位。以賺取日內行情為出發點，利用時間序列模型捕捉波動度的高估或低估且搭配純跨式(Pure Straddle)策略或根據Delta調整後的跨式(Adjusted Straddle)策略。第二個交易訊號則是利用市場敏感指標，觀察外資與自營商在交易部位與未平倉部位的變化，找出對於波動度的影響。建立由選擇權與期貨組成的Delta-Hedged部位，藉由觀察市場上主力籌碼的變化，動態調整部位契約，尋找波段之間的獲利機會。實証部分以期交所公布的每日交易資料與VIX日資料，利用2007至2008兩年的歷史資料，估計參數與測試交易訊號。樣本外期間為2009年1月開始至3月結束共55個交易日。考量交易成本後，兩個不同型態的交易訊號，仍然能夠藉由本研究的策略，獲得正的報酬。本文認為台灣為一個淺碟市場，過度反應資訊的特性，讓波動度策略出現獲利的機會。藉由這個波動度交易系統的研究，除了讓資金豐沛的機構投資人使用外，也能夠讓一般投資大眾建立自己的波動度交易策略關鍵字:波動度交易，選擇權交易策略，GARCH(1,1)，VIX，市場情緒指標 / Trying to apply a preliminary study of volatility trading strategies in Taiwan derivative market is the topic of this dissertation. Capturing the market movement or even the dynamic of underlying asset is a Pandora’s Box for academic researchers and industry participants. Mean-reverting and asymmetrical effects are the two special characteristics of volatility for us to design our trading system according to the previous empirical studies. In our study, we use different type of volatility signal to capture the trading opportunities. Use the new released information form TAIFEX including VIX and Position Structure of Institutional Traders to design our signal. We apply the idea to use pure option position and delta-hedged position as our trading tools in this volatility trading system and look for the opportunities between realized volatility and implied volatility. An over-reaction may rises the uncertainty and also lead the market volatility change coherently. We use history data from 2007 to 2008 test our trading signal and parameters. The out sample period is from 2009 January to 2009 March which has 55 trading days to simulate our strategies. In the end, we see a positive result in both trading signals which earns positive return after considering the trading cost. Key words: Volatility Trading, Market Sentiment Indices, Option Strategies, VIX, GARCH(1,1) 波動度交易選擇權交易策率隱含波動度指數時間序列模型市場情緒指標 volatility trading option trading strategy VIX GARCH(1,1) Market Sentiment Indices
12	交易量對於隱含波動度預測誤差之對偶效果-Panel Data的分析 / The Dual Effect of Volume and Volatility Forecasting Error-Panel Data analysis 李政剛, Lee,Jonathan K. Unknown Date (has links) 本研究探討選擇權交易量之大小對於波動度預測之效率性所造成之對偶效果(dual effect)，驗證〝正常的高交易量〞與〝異常的高交易量〞對於波動度預測能力是否有不同的影響。本研究採用panel data之資料型態，以LIFFE上市的個股買權為對象，資料長度為三年左右。主要欲探討之假說為： 1.一般而言，交易量大的選擇權，其波動度估計誤差較交易量小的選擇權來得小。 2.相對於平日水準而言，某日交易量異常高的選擇權將有較大的波動度估計誤差。本研究所使用的波動度預測模型為隱含波動度(ISD)，採用的是最接近到期月份及最接近價平的合約。實證以組合迴歸、固定效果模型、隨機效果模型分別估計之，加以比較。結果發現固定效果模型為較佳之解釋模型，然而結果顯示交易量的對偶效果並不明確影響波動度預測誤差，故推測有某種影響公司間差異的因素，即公司間之異質性，比相對交易量更容易影響波動度預測之誤差。另外，透過組間與組內效果之分析，發現不論是長期還是短期，由於公司間的異質性存在，使得相對交易量對於波動度預測誤差均無明顯影響。 / The purpose of this research is to study the dual effect on the efficiency of volatility forecasting which is caused by the volume of option market, with the intent to test whether〝normal high volume〞and〝abcdrmal high volume〞cause different results on the ability of volatility forecasting. The data used is in the form of panel data. It is drawn from LIFFE, and has a length of about three years. The hypotheses to be examined in this study are：1. High-average-volume options have smaller volatility forecasting errors than low-average-volume options; 2. Options have larger volatility forecasting errors on abcdrmally-high-volume days than on normal-volume days. In this research, volatility is forecasted by implied standard deviation (ISD) which is implied in the at-the-money and the nearest expiry month options. Pooled regression、fixed effect model、and random effect model methods were applied. The results show that the fixed effect model made the best analysis amongst the three models. However, the result does not support the hypotheses made above, which means that volume does not have much influence on volatility forecasting error. It is inferred that there exists some other factors which could cause the difference between firms, namely heterogeneity, and these factors have much more powerful influence over volatility forecasting error than volume. Finally, it was found that no matter for long run or short run, because of the existence of heterogeneity, relative volume doesn’t have obvious influence on volatility forecasting errors when analyzing the difference between the between-individual effect and the within-individual effect. 對偶效果交易量隱含波動度波動度預測異質性固定效果模型隨機效果模型 dual effect volume implied volatility volatility forecasting panel data heterogeneity fixed effects model random effects model
13	市場風險值管理之應用分析以某金融控股公司為例 / The analysis of Market Risk VaR management ：the case of financial holding company 周士偉, Chou, Jacky Unknown Date (has links) 2008年次貸風暴橫掃全球金融市場，Basel II制度歷經多年的實施，卻無法有效防阻金融風暴的發生。觀察2008已採用內部模型法之主要國際金融機構之年報，亦發現採用蒙地卡羅模擬法之代表銀行『德意志銀行』於該年度竟發生了35次穿透，市場風險管理到底出了什麼問題？這是被極度關心的現象，產官學界也對此現象提出了許多議題。2012年的現在，次貸的風暴尚未遠去，新的歐債危機也正在蔓延，若金融風暴再次來臨，市場風險管理是否能克服次貸風暴後所凸顯的缺失，市場風險管理的價值除被動管理外，是否還可以進階到主動預警，以作為經營決策的重要參考資訊？這些都是國內金融機構需積極面對的急迫的市場風險管理議題。個案金控的市場風險管理機制致力於解決次貸以來所凸顯的市場風險管理議題、提升市場風險衡量的精準度、擴大市場風險管理之應用範圍，並將市場風險管理的價值由被動管理角色進階到主動預警角色，以期作為經營決策的重要參考。經過多年的淬煉，其發展理念與經驗應具相當參考價值，故本論文以個案金融控股公司(以下簡稱個案金控)之實務經驗進行個案研究，除分析個案金控市場風險管理機制的基礎架構外，也將研究重心放在個案金控如何在此基礎架構下，開發多種進階市場風險量化管理功能。本論文除研究個案金控如何完善市場風險值量化機制外，也對各量化功能的實施結果進行分析，以期研究成果可更客觀的作為其他金融控股公司未來發展進階市場風險衡量機制之參考。市場風險風險值經濟價值信託基金操作風險風險因子一般風險值壓力風險值條件風險值增額風險值邊際風險值變異數-共變異數法歷史模擬法蒙地卡羅模擬法隱含波動度厚尾順景氣循環標準法內部模型法市場流動性風險外生性市場流動性風險內生性市場流動性風險流動性調整後風險值壓力測試回溯測試 Market Risk Value at Risk Economic Value Active Management VaR Tracking Error Risk Factor Common VaR Stressed VaR Conditional VaR Incremental VaR Marginal VaR Variance-Covariance Approach Historical Simulation Approach Monte Carlo Simulation Approach Fat Tail Time-Varying Volatility pro-cyclical Standardized Approach Internal Models Approach Implied Volatility Generalized Error Distribution Bernoulli trial test Likelihood ratio test Unconditional Coverage Test Conditional Coverage Test Backward Looking Model Forward Looking Model Forecasting VaR Pearson Correlation Cholesky decomposition Kendall Correlation Copula method Future Volatility Disconnection Market Liquidity Risk Exogenous Market Liquidity Risk Endogenous Market Liquidity Risk Liquidity-adjusted VaR Stress Test Backtesting Net Interest Income Re-pricing Model Maturity Model Duration Model

Page generated in 0.0144 seconds