Background: The late onset of therapeutic response and a relatively large proportion of nonresponders to antidepressants remain major concerns in clinical practice. Therefore, there is a critical need for effective medication strategies that augment treatment with antidepressants. Methods: To review the available evidence on the use of lithium as an augmentation strategy to treat depressive episodes. Results: More than 30 open-label studies and 10 placebo-controlled double-blind trials have demonstrated substantial efficacy of lithium augmentation in the acute treatment of depressive episodes. Most of these studies were performed in unipolar depression and included all major classes of antidepressants, however mostly tricyclics. A meta-analysis including 10 randomized placebo-controlled trials has provided evidence that lithium augmentation has a statistically significant effect on the response rate compared to placebo with an odds ratio of 3.11, which corresponds to a number-needed-to-treat of 5. The meta-analysis revealed a mean response rate of 41.2% in the lithium group and 14.4% in the placebo group. One placebo-controlled trial in the continuation treatment phase showed that responders to acute-phase lithium augmentation should be maintained on the lithium-antidepressant combination for at least 12 months to prevent early relapses. Preliminary studies to assess genetic influences on response probability to lithium augmentation have suggested a predictive role of the –50T/C single nucleotide polymorphism of the GSK3β gene. Conclusion: Augmentation of antidepressants with lithium is currently the best-evidenced augmentation therapy in the treatment of depressed patients who do not respond to antidepressants. / Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) är en av de vanligaste diagnostiserade GI-tillstånden idag och är en störning av gastrointestinalkanalen (GI-kanalen). Det finns inget botemedel mot IBS på grund av att patogenesen är oklar och därför är fokusen symtomlindring vid behandling.  De vanligaste symtom som förekommer är buksmärta, obehag i buk, uppblåsthet, utspänd buk och förändring av avföringens konsistens och frekvens. Patofysiologin är inte fullt klarlagd men en rubbning i tarm-hjärn-axeln kan leda till förändring i GI-rörelser. Neurotransmittorerna noradrenalin och serotonin (5-HT) är troligen viktiga faktorer för patofysiologin kopplad till tarm-hjärn-axeln. Syftet var att undersöka effektiviteten och säkerheten för de antidepressiva läkemedlen vid behandling av IBS. De antidepressiva som undersöktes i arbetet var tianeptin, amitriptylin, escitalopram, venlafaxin, vortioxetin och mirtazapin. De fem artiklarna som användes i detta arbete upptäcktes med hjälp av databaserna Pubmed och Onesearch. Sökord som användes var ”IBS” AND ”antidepressants” och ”IBS” AND ”SSRI”.  Alla antidepressiva visade en signifikant förbättring för livskvalitén hos deltagarna i studierna. Tianeptin, amitriptylin, escitalopram, venlafaxin och mirtazapin undersökte förändring av buksmärta och alla hade en signifikant förbättring förutom escitalopram. Escitalopram jämfördes mot rektal ballongutvidgning vid behandling hos IBS med förstoppning (IBS-C). Ballongutvidgningen visade bättre resultat än escitalopram och denna jämförelse gör det svårt att dra någon slutsats om escitalopram i arbetet. Amitriptylin, tianeptin och mirtazapin undersökte förändring av avföringskonsistensesn och frekvensen och visade en signifikant förbättring hos IBS med diarré (IBS-D). Venlafaxin visade signifikant förbättring för både lös och hård avföringsfrekvens och studerade ingen specifik IBS-grupp. Vortioxetin undersökte alla IBS-grupper och endast förändring av livskvalitén, depression och ångest vilket också gör det svårt att dra slutsats om effekt hos IBS. Det var inga av de depressiva medlen som gav allvarliga biverkningar, dock kan vissa biverkningar tolkas som mer obehagliga än andra. För vissa antidepressiva var det deltagare som avslutade studien på grund av biverkningar. Amitriptylin, tianeptin, venlafaxin vortioxetin och mirtazapin visade alla god effekt och säkerhet. Om effektiviteten ock säkerheten jämförs bland dessa har tianeptin det bästa resultatet. / Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the most diagnosed conditions in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract today and is a disorder of the GI tract. There is no cure for IBS, which is probably due to the fact that the pathogenesis is unclear, and therefore the focus has been a symptom-relieving treatment. The most common symptoms that occur are abdominal pain, abdominal discomfort, bloating, distension of the abdomen, and change in the consistency and frequency of the stool. The pathophysiology is not fully understood, but a disorder of the gut-brain axis can lead to a change in GI movements. The neurotransmitters norepinephrine and serotonin (5-HT) are probably important factors for pathophysiology and linked to the gut-brain axis.  The aim was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of antidepressants used in IBS treatment. The antidepressants examined in this literature were tianeptine, amitriptyline, escitalopram, venlafaxine, vortioxetine, and mirtazapine. The five articles on which current litter tour work is based were obtained using the PubMed and OneSearch databases. Keywords used were "IBS" AND "antidepressants" and "IBS" AND "SSRI."  All the antidepressants examined showed a significant improvement in the participants' quality of life in the studies. The studies also examined changes in abdominal pain using tianeptine, amitriptyline, escitalopram, venlafaxine, and mirtazapine. All participants showed a significant improvement and reduced abdominal pain except when ingesting escitalopram. Intake of escitalopram was compared against rectal balloon enlargement as a treatment for IBS with constipation (IBS-C). The balloon expansion showed better results than escitalopram, and this comparison makes it difficult to draw any conclusion about escitalopram and its actual effect in different types of IBS. Amitriptyline, tianeptine, and mirtazapine investigated stool consistency and stool frequency changes and showed a significant improvement in these symptoms in IBS with diarrhea (IBS-D). Venlafaxine showed significant improvement for both loose and hard stool frequency; however, no specific IBS group was studied in this study. When ingesting vortioxetine, all different IBS groups and changes in quality of life, depression, and anxiety were examined, making it difficult to conclude about the effect of the drug in IBS. None of the antidepressant medicines produced severe side effects. However, some side effects can be interpreted as more unpleasant than others, and hence there was some loss during some studies.  Amitriptyline, tianeptine, venlafaxine vortioxetine, and mirtazapine showed good efficacy and safety. If the effectiveness and safety were to be compared between these drugs, tianeptine would be the first choice in treating IBS.

Bakgrund: Globalt drabbas 300 miljoner av depression och sjukdomen kan idag behandlas med både antidepressiva läkemedel och psykoterapi. Depression diagnosticeras utifrån klassificeringssystemen ICD-10 och DSM-5 och självskattats utifrån MADRS-skala. Sjukdomen kan delas in i följande svårighetsgrader: lätt/lindrig depression, medelsvår/måttlig depression och svår/djup depression. Vid val av antidepressiva läkemedel är det viktigt att ta hänsyn till svårighetsgrad, biverkningar och interaktioner.  Syfte: Syftet med denna studie är att kartlägga läkemedelslistor framtagna av Sveriges olika läkemedelskommittéer och beskriva val av läkemedelsbehandling vid depression för vuxna och äldre.  Metod: En dokumentanalys utfördes som lämpar sig till att kunna jämföra aktuell offentlig information. Datainsamlingen utfördes hösten 2022 med hjälp av Sveriges 21 olika regioners behandlingsrekommendationer för vuxna och äldre. En egen bedömningsskala med maximalt tre poäng utfördes för att lyckas bedöma regionernas läkemedelsrekommendationer.  Resultat: För vuxna rekommenderar 19 regioner vid lindrig-medelsvår depression sertralin, vid medelsvår-svår rekommenderar 13 regioner venlafaxin och vid svår rekommenderar sex regioner TCA där amitriptylin/klomipramin är mest förekomna. För äldre rekommenderar 13 regioner sertralin/mirtazapin/escitalopram vid lindrig-medelsvår depression, vid medelsvår-svår rekommenderar 13 regioner duloxetin/venlafaxin och vid svår rekommenderar två regioner duloxetin. Enligt den egna bedömningsskalan uppnås varierande antal poäng där totalt sju regioner uppnår maximal poäng.  Slutsats: SSRI var den vanligaste preparatgruppen som rekommenderades av regionerna vid medelsvår depression hos både vuxna- och äldre. Vid svår depression var den vanligaste preparatgruppen SNRI för äldre och TCA för vuxna. Enligt den egna bedömningsskalan var Läkemedelverkets och Socialstyrelsens rekommendationer mest vanligt förekomna källorna hos regionerna. / Background: Globally, 300 millions of people suffer from depression and the disease can today be treated with both antidepressants and psychotherapy. Depression is diagnosed from the classification system ICD-10 and DSM-5 and is self-assessed based on the MADRS-scale. The disease can be divided into the following difficulty level: light/mild depression, medium/moderate depression, and severe/deep depression. It is very important to consider difficulty level, side effects and interactions when choosing an antidepressant.  Aim: The aim of this study is to identify drug lists produced by Sweden’s different pharmaceutical committees and describe the choice of drug treatment for depression for adults and the elderly.  Materials and methods: A document analysis was performed which is suitable to be able to compare public information. The collection of data was performed autumn 2022 with the help of Sweden’s 21 different regions treatment recommendations for adults and the elderly. An own assessment scale was accomplished to judge the regions drug treatment recommendations. Results: For the adults, 19 regions primarily recommend sertraline for mild-moderate depression, for moderate-deep depression 13 regions recommend venlafaxine and for deep depression six regions recommend TCA where amitriptyline/clomipramine are most common. For the elderly, 13 regions primarily recommend sertraline/mirtazapine/escitalopram for mild-moderate depression, for moderate-deep depression 13 regions recommend duloxetine/venlafaxin and for deep depression two regions recommend duloxetine. According to the own assessment scale a varying number of points were achieved, were a total of seven regions achieved maximum points.  Conclusions: SSRIs were the most common drug group recommended by the regions for moderate depression for both adults and the elderly. In deep depression the most common drug group was SNRIs for the elderly and TCAs for adults. According to the own assessment scale the Swedish- Medicines Agency and Social Welfare Board are most common sources in the regions.

Eine Reihe von Studien konnte zeigen, dass sich Schlaf förderlich auf den Prozess der Gedächtniskonsolidierung auswirkt. Dabei wurde die Konsolidierung unterschiedlicher Lerninhalte mit bestimmten Schlafstadien – z. B. perzeptiv-prozedurale Inhalte mit dem REM (von engl. rapid eye movement) Schlaf – in Verbindung gebracht. Da viele Antidepressiva den REM Schlaf teilweise oder sogar vollständig unterdrücken, stand die Frage im Raum, ob bzw. unter welchen Umständen deren Einnahme die Gedächtniskonsolidierung im Schlaf beeinträchtigen kann. In diesem Zusammenhang scheint zudem die Rolle von Schlafstörungen interessant, da der REM Schlaf im Falle einer Schlafstörung auch Bedeutung für die schlafabhängige Gedächtniskonsolidierung deklarativer Inhalte erlangen kann. Die Arbeit basiert auf einer klinischen Studie (EudraCT 2007-003546-14), in deren Rahmen 32 männliche Probanden im Alter von 18 bis 39 Jahren jeweils über eine Zeitspanne von 48 Stunden im Schlaflabor untersucht wurden. Sie umfasst drei Manuskripte. Im ersten Manuskript wird gezeigt, dass die Einnahme eines REM Schlaf-reduzierenden Antidepressivums (Amitriptylin) die REM Schlaf abhängige perzeptiv-prozedurale Gedächtniskonsolidierung im Schlaf beeinträchtigt, während sie auf die Konsolidierung REM Schlaf unabhängiger Inhalte keinen Effekt hat. Eine weitere unerwünschte Arzneimittelwirkung von Amitriptylin wird im Manuskript 2 beschrieben: Amitriptylin kann den Schlaf stören, indem es das Auftreten periodischer Gliedmaßenbewegungen im Schlaf verstärkt. Im dritten Manuskript wird dargestellt, dass eine neue, fremde Schlafumgebung den Schlaf beeinträchtigen und sich eine solche Beeinträchtigung ähnlich wie eine chronische Schlafstörung auf die schlafabhängige Gedächtniskonsolidierung auswirken kann. Die Ergebnisse werden in den Manuskripten ausführlich diskutiert und im Epilog zusammengefasst sowie in Zusammenhang gesetzt. / Numerous studies suggest that sleep benefits memory consolidation and that the consolidation of different types of memory is differentially influenced by certain sleep stages. For example, consolidation of a perceptual skill is linked with rapid eye movement (REM) sleep whereas declarative memory consolidation is linked with slow wave sleep. Antidepressants strongly suppress REM sleep. Therefore, it is important to determine whether their use can affect memory consolidation. In this context, sleep disturbances are also of interest because when these are experienced REM sleep rather than slow wave sleep seems to become important for sleep-dependent declarative memory consolidation. The work in this thesis is based on a clinical trial (EudraCT 2007-003546-14) in which 32 male subjects (aged 18 through 39 years) were studied in a sleep laboratory over a 48 hour period. Three manuscripts are included. In the first manuscript, it is demonstrated that the REM sleep-suppressing antidepressant amitriptyline specifically impairs REM sleep-dependent perceptual skill learning, but not REM sleep-independent motor skill or declarative learning. In the second manuscript, another adverse effect of amitriptyline is presented: for the first time it is shown that amitriptyline can disturb sleep by inducing or increasing the number of periodic limb movements during sleep. In the third manuscript, it is demonstrated how sleeping in an unfamiliar environment can disturb sleep and how this kind of sleep disturbance can affect memory consolidation during sleep. The results from the specific studies are discussed in detail in the respective manuscripts and are summarized in the epilogue.

No description available.

No description available.

For more than half a decade, lithium has been successfully used to treat bipolar disorder. Worldwide, it is considered the first-line mood stabilizer. Apart from its proven antimanic and prophylactic effects, considerable evidence also suggests an antisuicidal effect in affective disorders. Lithium is also effectively used to augment antidepressant drugs in the treatment of refractory major depressive episodes and prevent relapses in recurrent unipolar depression. In contrast to many psychiatric drugs, lithium has outlasted various pharmacotherapeutic ‘fashions’, and remains an indispensable element in contemporary psychopharmacology. Nevertheless, data from pharmacogenetic studies of lithium are comparatively sparse, and these studies are generally characterized by small sample sizes and varying definitions of response. Here, we present an international effort to elucidate the genetic underpinnings of lithium response in bipolar disorder. Following an initiative by the International Group for the Study of Lithium-Treated Patients (www.IGSLI.org) and the Unit on the Genetic Basis of Mood and Anxiety Disorders at the National Institute of Mental Health,lithium researchers from around the world have formed the Consortium on Lithium Genetics (www.ConLiGen.org) to establish the largest sample to date for genome-wide studies of lithium response in bipolar disorder, currently comprising more than 1,200 patients characterized for response to lithium treatment. A stringent phenotype definition of response is one of the hallmarks of this collaboration. ConLiGen invites all lithium researchers to join its efforts. / Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

Background: Antidepressants are widely used in the treatment of chronic pain. Applied doses are lower than those needed to unfold an antidepressive effect. While efficacy of antidepressants for chronic pain has been reported in large randomized-controlled trials (RCT), there is inconsistent data on adverse effects and tolerability. We aimed at synthesizing data from RCT to explore adverse effect profiles and tolerability of antidepressants for treatment of chronic pain. Methods: Systematic literature research and meta-analyses were performed regarding side effects and safety of different antidepressants in the treatment of chronic pain according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The National Center for Biotechnology Information library and MEDLINE were searched. Randomized placebo-controlled trials were included in quantitative data synthesis. results: Out of 1,975 screened articles, 33 papers published between 1995 and 2015 were included in our review and 23 studies were included in the meta-analyses. A higher risk for adverse effects compared to placebo was observed in all antidepressants included in our analyses, except nortriptyline. The most prevalent adverse effects were dry mouth, dizziness, nausea, headache, and constipation. Amitriptyline, mirtazapine, desipramine, venlafaxine, fluoxetine, and nortriptyline showed the highest placebo effect-adjusted risk of adverse effects. Risk for withdrawal due to adverse effects was highest in desipramine (risk ratio: 4.09, 95%-confidence interval [1.31; 12.82]) followed by milnacipran, venlafaxine, and duloxetine. The most common adverse effects under treatment with antidepressants were dry mouth, dizziness, nausea, headache, and constipation followed by palpitations, sweating, and drowsiness. However, overall tolerability was high. Each antidepressant showed distinct risk profiles of adverse effects. conclusion: Our synthesized data analysis confirmed overall tolerability of low-dose antidepressants for the treatment of chronic pain and revealed drug specific risk profiles. This encompassing characterization of adverse effect profiles might be useful in defining multimodal treatment regimens for chronic pain which also consider patients’ comorbidities and co-medication.

No description available.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a mood disorder majorly responsible for disability and mortality worldwide. With a lifetime prevalence of 15-20%, it is the main cause of functional impairment in Western societies as well as the fourth most debilitating illness in the world. Although the pathophysiology of MDD is not yet fully understood, some evidence that suggest the presence of a neuroanatomical deficiency have given rise to the theory of a specific imbalance in the monoamine neurotransmitters noradrenaline (NA) and/or serotonin (5-HT) levels in the brain. Overall, the various classes of antidepressant agents that have been developed to increase monoamine levels on the basis of this proposal have been successful. However, facts relating to prevalent escalation in the illness and recurring episodes of depression point towards a need to enhance clinical treatment. Most conventional antidepressants such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and selective serotonin and noradrenaline inhibitors (SNRI) pose problems in symptomatic improvement. These include therapeutic lag, safety and tolerability issues, making more than 30% patients with MDD unable to reach adequate relief. In this respect, the action mechanism has moved beyond conventional SSRI and lead to the introduction of vilazodone, a novel antidepressant with an additional 5-HT1A partial agonist profile argued to be of potential benefit for a greater efficacy, faster onset of action and better tolerability. Using secondary data, this project aimed to evaluate the role of vilazodone as a SPARI-drug in the overall clinical treatment of MDD as well as its potential in addressing some of the most common obstacles in antidepressant treatment. Study results proved vilazodone’s efficacy to be superior to placebo. Patients across all studies showed significant improvement in depressive symptoms measured in MADRS and HAMD17. Vilazodone was also shown to be generally safe and tolerable but was not positively distinguished from placebo with regards to adverse effects. An overall, meaningful improvement in depressive symptoms was demonstrated in vilazodone, which reinforces its merit as an important treatment option for patients with MDD.