D'un point de vue théorique , il s'agira de mobiliser des champs diversifiés de la recherche sociologique, tels que la sociologie urbaine, la sociologie du travail, ou encore de la formation, tout en proposant une mise en perspective socio-historique sur les politiques publiques d'orientation mises en place depuis les années 40-50. l'orientation, invoquée à cette période pour résoudre des problèmes d'emploi, dans un contexte marqué par une forte croissance industrielle et une pénurie de main d'oeuvre qualifiée apparait désormais comme un moyen d'adapter la main d'oeuvre à la flexibilité du marché du travail. ce retour vers le passé permettra de comprendre comment le présent s'est construit. / The lifelong guidance has become a commonplace of political discourses. It is presented as a way to unify a patchwork of organisms, stakeholders and ideas, and to equip people to face in the labor market. Structured through a plethora of legislative proceedings, this notion carries a vision of rational persons, able to take charge of their careers independently. This thesis questions the concrete forms of guidance, at a time when its access throughout life is enshrined as a right, an,d the continuity it preaches given to obvious. This work intends to combine what disciplinary boundaries deal separately; it proposes a joint analysis of the orientation in educational and professional contexts. The three levels of interaction apprehended (national, local, individual) lead us to confront political wills, translations of these injunctions operated by local actors, and experiences of targeted audiences, both in the educational and professional spheres. We speculate that lifelong guidance is become an organizing principle of professional life. However, we believe this approach can be a powerful vector of inequalities, people being unequally able to successfully anticipate and project themselves, to the image of that request the orientation process.

(EN) The aim of this thesis is to analyse a decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union ("ESD") in the case of Allianz SpA (formerly Riunione Adriatica Di Sicurta SpA) and Others v West Tankers Inc. ("West Tankers"), in which the Court ruled that an anti- suit injunction, issued to enforce an arbitration agreement, is incompatible with the Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters ("Brussels I Regulation"). The thesis is divided into eight chapters, whereas as to the methodology, a case study approach is applied. The first chapter is an introduction to the legal context of the dispute, with determination of the relevant law and legal concepts. The most important legal concept is the power to grant an anti-suit injunction, which could be defined as an order preventing a party from beginning or continuing to commence legal proceedings in another forum. The second chapter deals with the use of anti-suit injunctions by the English courts prior West Tankers decision with a special emphasis on its compatibility with the Brussels I Regulation. Also, we will introduce the abusive delaying tactics of "torpedo actions", as well as the problems caused by the interpretation of the arbitration exception...

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:30:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Eduardo Jose da Fonseca Costa.pdf: 1076274 bytes, checksum: 311258a291d703faf4ae6c9a12956e77 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-11-05 / As far as the matter of granting injunctive relief is concerned there is a dead right provided in state-approved legal texts that is in disagreement with the living right of forensic practice. When ruling on the granting of urgent injunctions, the plain wording in the legislative text may give rise to an interpretation whereby the fumus boni iuris and the periculum in mora are requirements independent of each other. As a result, for the traditional scholastic doctrine which usually conforms to chiefly analytic and hermeneutic dogmatic models the absence of either one or the other of these requirements suffices to have the motion for preliminary injunction denied [= rigid and mechanistic model]. However, an empirical study of the status of the legal practice shows that justices usually take together the fumus boni iuris and the periculum in mora and that those requirements seem to have a mutually complementary relationship. In other words: a dogmatic-pragmatic model can through empiric, descriptive and inductive investigative procedures prove that in daily court practice the absence or the lean presence of one of the requirements may from time to time be offset by the exaggerated presence of the other [= fluid and adaptive model]. This is why in daily court practice it is possible to find orders granting preliminary injunctions grounded (α) merely on a near certainty of the allegation of a material right to which the plaintiff claims to be entitled, with the justice leaving out of consideration the presence of the periculum in mora [= plain extreme evidence injunction], or (β) only on the imminent danger of extreme irreparable harm, with the justice leaving out of consideration the presence of the fumus boni iuris [= plain extreme urgency injunction]. In this sense, the several types of preliminary injunction are but points of tension tugging at the strands of a rope stretched between the fumus boni iuris and the periculum in mora. The more the tension moves toward the fumus boni iuris the closer it gets to the granting of extreme evidence injunction; the more the tension moves toward the periculum in mora the closer it gets to the granting of extreme urgency injunction. Halfway between these extremes lies an infinitesimal set of possibilities all interlinked by means of a vital connection. Thus, within this infinitude eight key-types of preliminary injunction stand out: a) plain extreme evidence injunction; b) plain extreme urgency injunction; c) extreme evidence and non-extreme urgency injunction; d) extreme urgency and non-extreme evidence injunction; e) extreme evidence and extreme urgency injunction; f) non-extreme evidence and non-extreme urgency injunction; g) presumed extreme plain evidence injunction; h) presumed extreme plain urgency injunction. Therefore, it is naïve to maintain that the granting of preliminary injunctions is either a discretionary (Cândido Rangel Dinamarco), or an associative (Betina Rizzato Lara) act. As a matter of fact, it does have something of a discretionary and something of an associative quality, since it is an act of complex conditionality, an outcome of a justice s appraisal of the fundamental tension between the fumus boni iuris and the periculum in mora such as they appear in a given real case / Em matéria de concessão de medidas liminares, existe um direito morto nos textos de lei positivados pelo Estado que não coincide com o direito vivo da prática forense. No momento da concessão das medidas de urgência, o campo meramente textual dos diplomas legislativos dá a entender que o fumus boni iuris e o periculum in mora funcionam como pressupostos autônomos entre si. Portanto, para a doutrina escolástica tradicional que, em geral, segue modelos dogmáticos prevalentemente analíticos e hermenêuticos a falta de um desses pressupostos é suficiente para o provimento liminar deixar de ser concedido [= modelo rígido e mecanicista]. Todavia, um estudo empírico do plano situacional da prática judiciária revela que o fumus boni iuris e o periculum in mora costumam ser analisados em conjunto pelos juízes e que eles parecem assumir uma relação de complementação mútua . Em outros termos: um modelo dogmático-pragmático é capaz de comprovar, através de procedimentos investigativos empíricos, descritivos e indutivos, que, na experiência quotidiana dos Tribunais, a ausência ou a presença minguada de um dos pressupostos pode ser eventualmente compensada pela presença exagerada do outro [= modelo fluido e adaptativo]. Daí a razão pela qual, no dia-a-dia forense, é possível deparar-se com a concessão de liminares calcadas (α) tão apenas na quase-certeza da pretensão de direito material alegada pelo autor, sem que a presença do periculum in mora tenha sido levada em consideração pelo juiz [= tutela de evidência extremada pura], ou (β) somente no perigo iminente de um dano irreparável extremo, sem que a presença do fumus boni iuris tenha sido examinada [= tutela de urgência extremada pura]. Nesse sentido, os diferentes tipos de liminar nada mais são do que pontos de tensão ao longo de uma corda esticada entre o fumus boni iuris e o periculum in mora. Quanto mais essa tensão se dirige para o fumus boni iuris, mais se está perto da outorga de uma tutela de evidência extremada; quanto mais a tensão se dirige para o periculum in mora, mais se está perto da concessão de uma tutela de urgência extremada. Em meio às duas extremidades, existe um conjunto infinitesimal de possibilidades, todas interligadas por uma conexão vital. Assim, dentro dessa infinitude, podem destacar-se oito tipos-chave de providência liminar: a) tutela de evidência extremada pura; b) tutela de urgência extremada pura; c) tutela de evidência extremada e urgência não-extremada; d) tutela de urgência extremada e evidência não-extremada; e) tutela de evidência e urgência extremadas; f) tutela de evidência e urgência não-extremadas; g) tutela de evidência pura de extremidade presumida; h) tutela de urgência pura de extremidade presumida. Logo, é simplista sustentar que a concessão de liminares é ato discricionário (Cândido Rangel Dinamarco), ou vinculativo (Betina Rizzato Lara). Na verdade, existe nela um quid de discricionariedade e um outro de vinculatividade, visto que se trata de um ato de condicionalidade complexa, fruto da valoração que o juiz faz da tensão fundamental havida entre o fumus boni iuris e o periculum in mora, tal como configurados num determinado caso concreto

This study traces and analyzes the influence of Samuel Gompers, President of the American Federation of Labor, on the anti- injunction movement and the participation of the American Federation of Labor in the presidential campaign of 1908. Particular attention is given to the thought and position of Gompers concerning the labor injunction and the beginning of organized labor activity in national politics because it was his leadership that guided the AF of L response to these problems.

L'étude de l'introduction de l'injonction en droit administratif français et colombien nous renvoie aux fondements de l'absence de ce mécanisme juridique en France et en Colombie. Cela permet de faire ressortir les différences structurelles entre ces deux systèmes juridiques. Ces constatations s'avèrent paradoxales, car l'absence d'injonction en droit administratif colombien a été établie sur la base de dogmes propres au droit administratif français et en particulier sur la conception française de séparation des pouvoirs. Or, le dogme colombien selon lequel le droit administratif de ce pays est une adaptation du droit administratif français a déterminé de telles justifications. La présente recherche met en exergue la fausse similitude entre les sources du droit administratif colombien et français. Cependant, cette investigation permet de constater que l'introduction de l'injonction en ces deux pays les a rapprochés, donnant lieu à plus de ressemblances que de différences. En effet, l'introduction de l'injonction, tant en France qu'en Colombie, s'est faite sans générer d'oppositions importantes dans aucun des deux pays. Sa seule consécration en France a modifié le caractère traditionnellement objectif du recours pour excès de pouvoir, permettant que des notions de droit subjectif et de droit d'obligations deviennent admissibles en droit administratif français. Ces notions, quant à elles, n'avaient jamais été exclues du droit administratif colombien. Finalement, la consécration de l'injonction, aussi bien en France qu'en Colombie, permet d'aboutir à une véritable prévention des dommages dans les deux pays. Cette modification est loin d'être anodine, car elle transforme la responsabilité civile extracontractuelle, faisant apparaître, en plus, une revalorisation des droits des particuliers dans le champ individuel et collectif. Ce phénomène devient évident avec la perte que subit l'administration de certains de ses privilèges, dans les deux pays. / The study of the injunction's introduction in the French and Colombian administrative law allows us to realize the lack of such mechanism in France and Colombia, which, at the same time, reveals the structural differences between the two legal systems objects of this study. Such ascertainment leads us to a paradox as the injunction's absence in the Colombian's administrative law system has been based on the French administrative law's dogmas, especially the French concept of the separation of powers. However, the Colombian dogma that claims that their administrative law system is an adaptation of the French one, determined such justifications. This investigation demonstrates the false similarity between the sources of the Colombian and French administrative law systems, but at the same time, it shows how the introduction of the injunction in both of the law systems has drawn them near, creating more similarities than differences between them. As a matter of fact, such introduction took place without facing any opposition from any of the involved countries. When the concept was finally established in France, it changed the traditionally objective character of the appeal by means of the excess of power, allowing the notions of subjective and the obligations' law to be admissible within the French administrative law. These notions had never been excluded from the Colombian administrative law. Finally, the establishment of the injunction in France and Colombia makes possible to experiment real damage prevention inside both countries. This change is no trivial matter as it represents the transformation of the extra contractual civil liability law within the administrative law, showing at the same time a revaluation of the people's rights regarded in their individual and collective spheres. Such phenomenon is obvious when we observe the loss of privileges that each administration experiment in both countries.

Cette thèse se veut une modeste contribution au débat déjà ancien, sur la question des rapports entre les notions de compétence et de pouvoir, dans le cadre de la saisine du juge des référés. À ce titre, elle s’adresse d’abord aux praticiens du droit ainsi qu’à la doctrine des trois systèmes juridiques étudiés (français, koweïtien et égyptien), déjà très largement impliqués dans cette controverse qui est sans doute encore loin de son épilogue. En pratique, il s’est agi pour nous, tout au long de notre étude comparative, de tenter de lever la confusion entre les notions de compétence et de pouvoir. Car, nous considérons nécessaire de distinguer la compétence du pouvoir du juge des référés. En raison notamment des conséquences juridiques pratiques qu’implique cette distinction. Ce débat n’est pas que théorique, si l’on sait que le régime du moyen de la défense, aussi bien que les sanctions processuelles et substantielles, ne sont pas les mêmes, selon que le juge des référés a déclaré la demande en référé irrecevable, ou selon qu’il s’est déclaré incompétent ou encore lorsqu’il excède sa saisine, en clair, son pouvoir juridictionnel. / This dissertation explains the issue that had a long-standing debate regarding the relationship between jurisdiction and judicial discretion on the light of three different legal jurisdictions ; France, Kuwait, and Egypt. In doing so, this thesis will explore the connection between these two principles, specifically as it pertains to recourse and interim relief. To achieve this goal, it offers two critiques of the system goals. First, strive to resolve the discrepancy between judicial discretion and their competence in determining jurisdiction through answering this question : does the judge is not competent or do not have the jurisdiction ? Does the judge have the power or the authority to grant interim relief ? I believe it is necessary to resolve this issue practically, not in theory. Second, eliminate the confusion between the concepts jurisdiction and the authority of a judge in issuing an injunction relief. The importance of this goal is arise due to the legal consequences that entailed by this distinction. The regimes of the defense, as well as procedural and substantive sanctions are no longer the same, depending on whether the judge of injunction relief declared the application is inadmissible, or the judge is not competent or when a judge exceeds a jurisdictional authority. / هذه الأطروحة تهدف الى المشاركة في نقاش محل للجدل، طرح مسبقاً، حول العلاقة بين مفهوم الاختصاص وسلطة الفصل، في إطار التقاضي امام قاضي الأمور المستعجلة. فهي بهذا الشأن موجهه أولاً الى ممارسين مهنه المرافعات، وكذلك الى الفقه القانوني في الدول الثلاثة محل هذه الدراسة المقارنة ( الفرنسي، الكويتي، والمصري)، الذين تناولوا بسخاء هذه المسألة محل الخلاف، والتي دون ادنى شك لا تزال بعيده عن نهايتها. في الواقع، بالنسبة لنا هذه الدراسة، بقدر ما انها مقارنه تحليليه، بقدر ما انها ترمي الى أزاله الخلط بين مفهوم الاختصاص وسلطة الفصل. لما لهذه التفرقة من أهمية خصوصاً في المسائل المستعجلة. فهذا النقاش محل الجدل ليس في الواقع مجرد جدال نظري، وذلك بسبب العواقب القانونية المترتبة على هذه التفرقة. لاسيما إذا ما أخذنا بالاعتبار ان نظام وسائل الدافع وكذلك الجزاءات الاجرائية والموضوعية ليست متماثله؛ عندما يحكم قاضي الأمور المستعجلة بعدم القبول او بعدم الاختصاص او عندما يتجاوز حدود ولايته اَي حدود سلطته القاضية.

Submitted by Marlene Aparecida de Souza Cardozo (mcardozo@pucsp.br) on 2016-12-19T14:57:47Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Natália Cançado Scarpelli.pdf: 1486317 bytes, checksum: 8b671bfdce3cb774d993981268ed7fe9 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-12-19T14:57:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Natália Cançado Scarpelli.pdf: 1486317 bytes, checksum: 8b671bfdce3cb774d993981268ed7fe9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-11-30 / The scope of this dissertation is to analyze, through a vast bibliographic research, the interlocutory advance injunction (also called interlocutory relief) stabilization technique recently incorporated in our legal system with the edition of the 2015 Civil Litigation Code. In regards to its structure, this work is divided in five chapters. The first chapter discusses the historical evolution of the interlocutory injunction focusing in the characterization of said institute by Italian doctrine, as well as its development in the Brazilian environment analyzing the precautionary injunction introduced in our legal system with the 1939 Civil Litigation Code and the preliminary injunction introduced with the 1973 Civil Litigation Code. The second chapter presents the treatment dispensed to the interlocutory injunction by foreign legal systems, specifically Italian, German, French and Portuguese Law. The third chapter assesses Brazilian current rules related with the interlocutory injunction through examination of the applicable provisions in the 2015 Civil Litigation Code. The fourth chapter specifically analyzes the procedures involved in filing motions for interlocutory injunctions of urgent and advance natures. At last, the fifth chapter is dedicated to a thorough exam of all specifics and potential issues related with the interlocutory advance injunction stabilization technique. The objective of this work is, supported in solid doctrine, to bring solutions to questions and doubts derived from the interpretation of Article 304 of the 2015 Civil Litigation Code in its concise terms. The ultimate goal is to achieve the dynamic construction of the entire procedure required to stabilize the interlocutory advance injunction and allow the practical application of such technique to ensure that Brazilian Litigation systems may take advantage of this application / A presente dissertação possui como objeto o estudo, a partir de ampla pesquisa bibliográfica, da técnica de estabilização da tutela antecipada antecedente, inserida recentemente em nosso sistema por ocasião da entrada em vigor do Código de Processo Civil de 2015. No tocante à estrutura, o trabalho se divide em cinco capítulos. O primeiro capítulo aborda a evolução histórica da tutela provisória, com destaque no estudo e caracterização do instituto pela doutrina italiana, bem como o seu desenvolvimento dentro da realidade brasileira, mediante a análise da tutela cautelar, prevista em nosso sistema desde o Código de Processo Civil de 1939, e da tutela antecipada, introduzida na vigência do Código de Processo Civil de 1973. O segundo capítulo apresenta o tratamento da tutela provisória pelo direito estrangeiro, especificamente nos sistemas da Itália, Alemanha, França e Portugal. O terceiro capítulo explora a atual disciplina da tutela provisória através do exame dos respectivos dispositivos legais previstos no Código de Processo Civil de 2015. O quarto capítulo, por sua vez, trata especificamente sobre o procedimento da tutela de urgência antecipada requerida em caráter antecedente. Por fim, o quinto capítulo se dedica ao minucioso estudo de todas as questões que envolvem a técnica da estabilização da tutela antecipada antecedente. O objetivo deste trabalho é, com o apoio na doutrina, trazer soluções para as dúvidas interpretativas que decorrem da concisa redação do artigo 304 do Código Processual de 2015. Busca-se, assim, a construção da dinâmica de todo o procedimento necessário para se estabilizar a tutela antecipada requerida em caráter antecedente e permitir, sem qualquer receio das partes, que a técnica seja efetivamente aplicada na prática, de modo a possibilitar que o sistema processual brasileiro usufrua dos benefícios decorrentes desta aplicação.

Informationsplattformen Internet har blivit som en självklarhet för många. Dock har den tekniska utvecklingen medfört omfattande upphovsrättsintrång på Internet och utmaningen att komma till rätta med problemet utgör främst fall där Internetleverantörer eller så kallade mellanhänder av teknikens hjälp endast tillhandahåller uppkoppling till nätet. Med anledning av att Internetleverantörers tjänster utnyttjas av kunder för att begå intrång kan det diskuteras huruvida det är möjligt och eftersträvbart att ålägga dessa leverantörer en blockeringsskyldighet för att begränsa åtkomsten av Internet. Vitesförbudsbestämmelsen 53 b § i upphovsrättslagen och även annan reglering ger begränsat utrymme för att meddela förelägganden mot mellanhänder i den utsträckning som torde vara önskvärd utifrån den olagliga verksamhet som förekommer på Internet. Med stöd av 53 b § har Internetleverantörer förbjudits att tillhandahålla uppkoppling till tjänster som används på ett sätt som innebär upphovsrättsintrång. Domstolen är uppenbart medveten om att ”förbjuda uppkoppling” respektive ”blockera” endast innebär en hårfin skillnad. Även i den situation när tjänsten kommer ifrån ett land utanför EU och torde vara laglig i det landet verkar heller inte påverka svaret på frågan. Det kan anses att EU-rätten talar för en mer generös tolkning med hänsyn till exempelvis ett nyligen avgjort mål från Storbritannien. Dock framgår det av EU-rättspraxis att nationell domstol inte tillåts att i förebyggande syfte och utan utredning om intrång framtvinga blockering eller införande av filtreringssystem. En annan frågeställning som aktualiseras är om en möjlig censur av Internet kan anses förenlig med censurförbudet i grundlagarna och om ett åläggande kan anses förenligt med förbudet för medlemstaterna att ålägga en allmän övervakningsskyldighet för tjänsteleverantörer. / Internet as a platform for information has become as obvious to many. However, technological developments have resulted in widespread copyright infringement on the Internet and the challenge to deal with the problem are mostly cases where Internet service providers (ISPs) or known as intermediaries by using technology only provides connectivity to the Internet. As a result of those ISPs whose services are utilized by customers to infringe, it may be arguable whether it is possible and pursued to impose these suppliers a blockage obligation to limit access of the Internet. The rule of injunction § 53 b of the copyright law and other regulations provide limited scope for injunctions against intermediaries to the extent as would be desirable from the illegal activities on the Internet. According to § 53 b, the ISPs are banned from providing access to services that are used in a way that constitutes copyright infringement. The Court is obviously aware of the subtle difference between “prohibit access” and “block”. Even in the situation when the service comes from a country outside the EU and could probably be legal there does not seem to affect the response to the question. It may be considered that EU law could points out a more generous interpretation regarding, for example, a recently determined case from the UK. However, it appears from the EU law that national courts are not allowed to force blocking or introduction of filtering system only in order to prevent a future infringe and without investigation of such an infringe. Another question that arises is whether a possible censorship of the Internet can be considered as consistent with the censorship ban in the constitutions and whether an injunction may be considered compatible with the prohibition for Member States to impose a general monitoring obligation on service providers.

L’article 493 du Code de procédure civile définit l’ordonnance sur requête comme une « décision provisoire rendue non contradictoirement dans les cas où le requérant est fondé à ne pas appeler de partie adverse ». Proche, dans sa nature, de l’ordonnance de référé, elle s’en démarque par son aspect unilatéral, qui en conditionne l’efficacité. L’ordonnance sur requête est au cœur de nombreuses controverses, d’une part sur sa qualification, d’autre part sur l’autorité dont elle doit être revêtue. Ces incertitudes rendent inconstant le régime des ordonnances sur requête, dont l’application varie fortement selon les juridictions. La notion de provisoire, combinée à la considération du caractère unilatéral de la procédure, doit servir de guide pour lever ces doutes. L’analyse de l’ordonnance sur requête sous ce prisme aboutit à la conclusion que l’ordonnance sur requête est une mesure procédurale d’attente, provisoire en ce qu’elle permet de préparer l’intervention du juge du principal sans le lier dans la sa décision. / The 493rd article of the french code of civil proceedings defines the injunction on demand as a “provisional decision taken unilaterally when there is no need to call the opposing party”. While close by its nature to the refere injunction, the injunction on demand is specific by its unilaterral side that marks its efficiency as a procedure. Numerous questions remain to this day unsolved regarding both its legal definition and its significance.These controversies make the daily use of the injunction on demand vary wildly according to every court. The concept of provisional decision, as well as the unilaterral side of this specific injunction, can serve as a guide to finding a satisfying solution. The research leads to the conclusion that the injunction ondemand is provisional in the sense that its role is to preserve the rights of the parties involved in order to prepare the definitive decision taken by the court, on which the injunction has no legal influence.

O trabalho tem o objetivo de apresentar a homossexualidade na Bíblia Hebraica através das passagens de Levítico 18:22, 20:13, Deuteronômio 22:5, 23:18-19, 1º Reis 14:24, 15:12, 22:46 e 2 Reis 23:7; analisar as relações da prostituição cultual masculina dos termos encontrados em Deuteronômio 23:18-19 (qadesh e keleb); os termos da região do Oriente Próximo com o papel da adoração ritual homossexual (qaditu e assinu); as deidades rituais com o rito masculino (Asherah de 2º Reis 23:7 e a Astarte de Kítion do Chipre relacionada ao keleb em Deuteronômio 23:18-19) as quais estão relacionadas aos ritos de fertilidade; trabalhar o contexto histórico no qual a homossexualidade ritual se desenvolveu em Israel e Judá (1º Reis 14:24, 15:12, 22:46 e 2º Reis 23:7); e com a questão das abominações e interditos tanto da homossexualidade (Levítico 18:22 e 20:13) quanto do travestismo (Deuteronômio 22:5). A pesquisa será realizada através de diversos estudos de acadêmicos que discorreram sobre o tema da homossexualidade na Bíblia Hebraica e sobre as suas questões levantadas e conclusões. / The work has the objective to present the homosexuality in the Hebrew Bible through the passages of Levíticus 18:22, 20:13; Deuteronomy 22:5, 23:18-19; 1st King 14:24, 15:12, 22:46; and 2nd Kings 23:7; to analyse the relations of prostitution cultual masculine of terms found in Deuteronomy 23:18-19 (qadesh and keleb); region of the Near Easts terms made a list to ritual homosexual worships role (qaditu and assinu); ritual deities with the masculine rite (Asherah of 2 Kings 23:7 and Astarte of Kítion in Cyprus connected with keleb in Deuteronomy 23:18-19) what they are with the fertility rites; to work the historical context in which the ritual homosexuality was developed in Israel and Judá (1st Kings 14:24, 15:12, 22:46 and 2nd Kings 23:7); and the question of the abominations and injunctions so much of the homosexuality (Levíticus 18:22 and 20:13) how much of tranvestism (Deuteronomy 22:5). The research will be carried out through several academic\'s studies which wrote about the subject of homosexuality in the Hebrew Bible and on his lifted questions and conclusions.