Orientador: Paulo Sergio de Vasconcellos / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-08T03:30:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Bem_LucyAnade_M.pdf: 1381102 bytes, checksum: 5c9a54105f6fd8923369f803a7e85cbd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 / Resumo: Este trabalho de pós-graduação propõe a tradução latina-portuguesa e a análise lingüística e literária do livro I d¿Os Amores de Ovídio. Essa análise visa principalmente o(s) discurso(s) que compõem o volumen: acreditamos que o discurso elegíaco, típico da poesia amorosa da época de Augusto, seja em si mesmo um lugar de encontro e confronto de diversos discursos, entre eles o épico (o bélico), o cômico, o amoroso e o trágico. Através de nossa análise, demonstramos que Ovídio deixou manifesta essa mistura discursiva, tão própria da elegia em seus Amores ¿ a todo o momento vemos que, para o poeta, o amor e a guerra constituem milícias importantes, ora distintas, ora semelhantes. Dessa forma, podemos entender que o poeta, através de sua postura n¿Os Amores, tenta valorizar aquele que se dedicava ao amor (entenda-se a poesia amorosa) em vez dos assuntos militares e da vida pública. Podemos dizer, também, que o(s) discurso(s) que ele utiliza para compor Os Amores revelam o quanto a vida militar (e sua violência peculiar) e seu discurso se encontravam presentes nas mais distintas esferas da vida romana. Finalmente, também podemos dizer que essa obra demonstra, claramente, que nenhum discurso é isolado em si mesmo, mas que é permeado por muitos gêneros e tipos de discursos / Abstract: This post-graduating work proposes the translation from Latin to Portuguese and the linguistic and literary analysis of the book one from Ovid¿s Loves. This analysis aims, especially at discourses that integrate the volumen: we believe that the elegiac discourse, typical of the love poetry of Augustan age, is in itself a point of meeting and confrontation of many other discourses, and among them, the epic (warlike), the comic, the love and the tragic discourses. Through our analysis, we demonstrate that Ovid let evident this blend of speeches, so usual in the elegy of his Amores ¿ all the time we can see that, for the poet himself, love and war are significant armies, sometimes distinct, sometimes similar. Thus, we can see that the poet, in the posture his persona adopts in the Loves, tries to valorize that one who dedicates himself to love (and to the poetry of love) instead of military matters and public life. We also can say that the discourses in the Loves show how the military life (and the violence inherent to it) and his peculiar speech were present in the most distinct areas of private life from the Roman Empire. At last, we can also say that this work shows, clearly, that no speech is isolated in itself, but that it is permeated by a lot of genres and types of discourses / Mestrado / Mestre em Linguística

No description available.

Im Mittelpunkt der Dissertation „Politik der kleinen Form“ steht die Frage nach der Politizität ‚kleiner‘ Formen in augusteischer Zeit: also der sogenannten Liebeselegie des Properz, Tibull und Ovid sowie der erotischen Dichtung des Horaz. Auf der Grundlage einer Analyse der Gattungs- und Formpolitik ihrer Paraklausithyra und Recusationes wird eine neue Interpretation aufgezeigt. Jenseits von inhaltszentrierten Lesarten, die immer nur den Subversions- oder Affirmationscharakter von Literatur herausarbeiten, schlägt diese Dissertation einen dritten Weg vor: den der Ambivalenz und des Paradoxons. / At the centre of the dissertation „The Politics of Small Forms“ is the question of the politicity of ‘small forms’ in Augustan times: of the so-called love elegy of Propertius, Tibullus and Ovid as well as of the erotic poetry of Horace. On the basis of an analysis of the genre and form politics of their paraclausithyra and recusationes a new interpretation is pointed out. Beyond content-centered readings, which work out either the subversive or the affirmative character of literature, this dissertation suggests a third way: that of ambivalence and paradox.

Although Andrew Marvell wrote and published relatively little, his poetry collects from the full range of “schools” and idiosyncratic styles present in the seventeenth century: echoes of Herbert, Donne, Milton, Traherne, Herrick, Lovelace, and Jonson, among others, permeate throughout his work. Although much of his imagery seems novel, if not strange, it is clear that Marvell has a deep engagement with several important long-running traditions. His work is conversation with Ovid, Horace, and Theocritus as much as it responds directly to the poets whose lives overlapped with his own. In his engagement with such varied sources, Marvell demonstrates an astounding degree of poetic flexibility. He is a master of imitating voice and style.

Tras exponer la metáfora aristotélica, la Teoría de la Metáfora Conceptual y la Teoría de la Amalgama (blending), propongo que esta última constituye un cambio de paradigma. Con la Teoría de la Amalgama establezco un patrón conceptual con que generalizar sobre varios estudios de figuración verbal, en distintos periodos de la poesía griega de amor: lírica griega arcaica, la aparición de las flechas del amor en los periodos arcaico y clásico, canciones populares medievales, y dos poetas del siglo veinte: Ritsos y Elytis. Todas estas imágenes poéticas comparten un patrón que responde a una red genérica de integración conceptual: la EMISIÓN ERÓTICA. Los principales factores de variación son la asignación del papel de emisor a la persona amada o a un agente externo, y la especificación del esquema de imagen EMISIÓN: luz, viento, o un objeto lanzado. La cultura y el contexto fijan otras restricciones que se pueden estudiar sistemáticamente. / This dissertation discusses Aristotle's approach to metaphor, Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Blending Theory, and proposes that the latter constitutes a change of paradigm. I use Blending Theory to model a conceptual pattern generalizing over several case studies of verbal figuration, in different periods of Greek love poetry: ancient Greek lyric, the emergence of the arrows of love in the archaic and classical periods, medieval folksongs, and two 20th century poets, Ritsos and Elytis. All these poetic images share a conceptual pattern that can be modelled with a generic integration network of EROTIC EMISSION. Variation in the realization of the pattern crucially relies on assigning the role of the emitter to the loved person or to an external agent, and on the instantiation of the EMISSION image schema, like light, wind, or an object. Culture and context impose further constraints that can be studied systematically.

Although Andrew Marvell wrote and published relatively little, his poetry collects from the full range of “schools” and idiosyncratic styles present in the seventeenth century: echoes of Herbert, Donne, Milton, Traherne, Herrick, Lovelace, and Jonson, among others, permeate throughout his work. Although much of his imagery seems novel, if not strange, it is clear that Marvell has a deep engagement with several important long-running traditions. His work is conversation with Ovid, Horace, and Theocritus as much as it responds directly to the poets whose lives overlapped with his own. In his engagement with such varied sources, Marvell demonstrates an astounding degree of poetic flexibility. He is a master of imitating voice and style.