FundaÃÃo Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Cientifico e TecnolÃgico / Esta dissertaÃÃo analisa os processos da escrita literÃria de oito obras em prosa da escritora Hilda Hilst â A obscena senhora D; Kadosh; RÃtilos; Fluxo-Floema; Tu nÃo te moves de ti; O caderno rosa de Lori Lamby; Com os meus olhos de cÃo e Estar Sendo. Ter Sido â a partir do pensamento do filÃsofo-teÃrico Maurice Blanchot sobre literatura, como, por exemplo: a fragmentaÃÃo do discurso, a instabilidade da narrativa, a errÃncia dos personagens, a nÃo-verdade e o nÃo-poder, decorrentes da impossibilidade da morte no texto literÃrio. A ideia de literatura presente nesta dissertaÃÃo refere-se à ideia de literatura como autossuficiente, uma literatura que se basta, que nÃo precisa da relaÃÃo mundo real â literatura â mundo real para existir. Desse modo, nÃo fazemos nenhuma relaÃÃo das obras hilstianas com a contemporaneidade em que foram publicadas, nem com a contemporaneidade atual desta dissertaÃÃo. Ao abdicarmos do mundo prÃtico em favor do mundo literÃrio, pretendemos observar a arquitetura de escombros da linguagem hilstiana sem as implicaÃÃes de fatores extraliterÃrios, o que nos proporciona uma investigaÃÃo mais depurada do texto literÃrio.

FundaÃÃo de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Cearà / Esta pesquisa consiste fundamentalmente no estudo crÃtico de uma seleÃÃo de poemas de Henriqueta Lisboa, em especial da obra Flor da morte (1949), naquilo que ela tem de âpoesia puraâ, segundo concepÃÃes estabelecidas a partir das pesquisas de autores que se pronunciam sobre o tema, como Henri BrÃmond, Henry Decker, Paul ValÃry e Robert Penn Warren, e considerando as concepÃÃes de poesia expressas pela prÃpria poeta em seus textos ensaÃsticos. Consideramos, tambÃm, textos de estudiosos da obra de Henriqueta Lisboa e da âpoesia puraâ, como forma de enriquecer nosso estudo, buscando refletir e tentar responder a alguns questionamentos: como a âpoesia puraâ comparece na obra de Henriqueta Lisboa? A partir dessa inquisiÃÃo surgem, por conseguinte, outras indagaÃÃes: em que quantidade, em quais poemas da obra Flor da Morte, segundo qual conceito de poesia pura, em que possÃvel diversidade de manifestaÃÃes? O fundamento teÃrico da pesquisa provÃm de teÃricos como de Giorgio Agamben, Jacques Derrida, Emanuel Levinas, Maurice Blanchot, principalmente, Martin Heidegger, entre outros. Por fim, relacionamos os textos estudados para o estabelecimento das conclusÃes, acrescidas das possibilidades de descobertas geradas por essas leituras, alÃm de levantarmos questÃes relativas à arte, à literatura brasileira, à escritura, especialmente, e a crÃtica literÃria contemporÃnea, de forma enriquecida e sistematizada, tudo sob o viÃs da literatura contemporÃnea. / Esta pesquisa consiste fundamentalmente no estudo crÃtico de uma seleÃÃo de poemas de Henriqueta Lisboa, em especial da obra Flor da morte (1949), naquilo que ela tem de âpoesia puraâ, segundo concepÃÃes estabelecidas a partir das pesquisas de autores que se pronunciam sobre o tema, como Henri BrÃmond, Henry Decker, Paul ValÃry e Robert Penn Warren, e considerando as concepÃÃes de poesia expressas pela prÃpria poeta em seus textos ensaÃsticos. Consideramos, tambÃm, textos de estudiosos da obra de Henriqueta Lisboa e da âpoesia puraâ, como forma de enriquecer nosso estudo, buscando refletir e tentar responder a alguns questionamentos: como a âpoesia puraâ comparece na obra de Henriqueta Lisboa? A partir dessa inquisiÃÃo surgem, por conseguinte, outras indagaÃÃes: em que quantidade, em quais poemas da obra Flor da Morte, segundo qual conceito de poesia pura, em que possÃvel diversidade de manifestaÃÃes? O fundamento teÃrico da pesquisa provÃm de teÃricos como de Giorgio Agamben, Jacques Derrida, Emanuel Levinas, Maurice Blanchot, principalmente, Martin Heidegger, entre outros. Por fim, relacionamos os textos estudados para o estabelecimento das conclusÃes, acrescidas das possibilidades de descobertas geradas por essas leituras, alÃm de levantarmos questÃes relativas à arte, à literatura brasileira, à escritura, especialmente, e a crÃtica literÃria contemporÃnea, de forma enriquecida e sistematizada, tudo sob o viÃs da literatura contemporÃnea.

L’œuvre fictionnelle et critique de Maurice Blanchot entretient des rapports intenses avec la philosophie et la littérature allemande. Alors que la relation de Blanchot à la philosophie allemande a été largement étudiée, la thèse suivante porte sur son rapport à « l’espace littéraire »allemand – beaucoup moins analysé – et en particulier sur le « genre » fragmentaire qui fonde toute l’œuvre blanchotienne. Après un bref retour sur cette notion polysémique et complexe, on découvre dans les différents chapitres les empreintes profondes laissées par Franz Kafka et Paul Celan dans l’œuvre de Blanchot autour de cette « expérience du fragmentaire » vécue par les trois auteurs selon des modalités différentes.La première partie expose les liens qui unissent les trois auteurs afin d’explorer dans la deuxième partie les caractéristiques communes aux trois écritures fragmentaires. L’exil, la rupture imposée par la Shoah, la lecture comme processus de fragmentation, le rapport entre inconscient et écriture fragmentaire, l’esthétique du blanc et du vide, qui habite ces écritures, sont quelques uns des axes principaux de cette étude. Un des apports de cette recherche est la redéfinition du fragmentaire comme « style » à part entière. De plus, l’ensemble du travail est enrichi d’annexes regroupant notamment des manuscrits de Blanchot qui permettront au lecteur de saisir cette expérience à l’œuvre. / Both fictionnal and critical works of Maurice Blanchot have intense relations with the germanliterature and philosophy. But, whereas Maurice Blanchot’s relation to the german philosophy hasbeen widely studied, the following thesis cares about the german « literary space » – far lessanalysed – and more particularly about the fragmentary « genre » that structures the whole of Blanchot’s work. After briefly going back on this complex and polysemous notion, we discoverthrough the different chapters the deep imprints that both Franz Kafka and Paul Celan left onBlanchot’s work around this « fragmentary experience », which the three authors each livedaccording to different modalities.The first part of the work shows the links uniting the various authors so as to explore in the secondpart the common features to the three fragmentary writings. Among the various axis of this studyare the notion of exile, the breaking imposed by the Shoah, the experience of reading as a processof fragmentation, the relation between unconsciounesss and fragmentary writing, the aesthetics ofwhite and emptiness present in the works. One of the contributions of this research is that itredefines the fragmentary genre as a full-fledged style. Further more, the whole of the work is enhanced by annexes bringing together in particular some of Blanchot’s manuscripts. These willhelp the reader understanding this experience in process.

Qu’est-ce que lire ? Qu’est-ce qu’écrire ? Ou plus généralement, qu’est-ce que la littérature et comment se ‘fabrique’-t-elle ? Ce sont les questions qui obsèdent Maurice Blanchot et auxquelles il tente de répondre. Ce questionnement incessant le conduit à construire un espace littéraire pour interroger la question de la nomination, concept-clé de son œuvre.Notre thèse se propose de faire la généalogie de cette question du processus de nomination dans l’œuvre de Maurice Blanchot et de réfléchir sur l’espace littéraire qu’elle met au jour. Nous insisterons tout particulièrement sur le rapport lecteur-écrivain à travers la différence entre langage ordinaire et langage littéraire.Nous comprenons la lecture et l’écriture, non pas comme des actes mécaniques de rédaction et de déchiffrage de mots, mais comme deux processus intellectuels qui rendent possible ce que nous appellerons dans notre travail l’impossible nomination chez Blanchot. En fait, la lecture et l’écriture comme actes littéraires ne servent pas à comprendre, exprimer et influencer le monde, le but déclaré du langage ordinaire ; elles ont plutôt pour mission de réfléchir sur la prose du monde, sorte de but dissimulé du langage littéraire. Blanchot construit ainsi tout son système conceptuel à partir de l’opposition entre le langage ordinaire (la langue comme outil) et le langage littéraire (le corps de la langue et sa fabrication comme acte de création). Et c’est à partir de ce point central que nous articulons notre projet général : comment la matière brute de la langue conduit à fabriquer la littérature, ce qui revient à interroger le lire et l’écrire en littérature finalement ? / What is reading? What is writing? Or more generally, what is literature and how is it ‘manufactured’? These are Maurice Blanchot’s obsessive questions to which he tries to answer. This continuous questioning pushes him to build up a literary space in order to make queries with regard to the issue of nomination, a key concept of his works.Our thesis aims at building the genealogy of this topic of the nomination process in Maurice Blanchot’s works and at thinking about the literary space which it brings to light. We will focus specially on the relationship reader-writer through the difference between ordinary language and literary language.We do not see writing and reading as two mechanical activities of writing down words and decoding them, but as two intellectual processes which make possible what we will call in our thesis the impossible nomination from Blanchot’s works. Indeed, reading and writing as literary acts are not meant to understand, express and affect the world, which is the declared purpose of the ordinary language; their mission is rather to reflect on the prose of the world, a kind of hidden goal of the literary language. Blanchot sets up a whole system of concepts based on the opposition between ordinary language (the language as a tool) and literary language (the body of the language and its manufacturing as an act of creation). It is precisely based on this landmark that we structure our general project: how does the raw material of the language lead to the creation of literature, which in the end comes to questioning the reading and the writing in literature?

L’ambition de ce travail est de définir les conditions de possibilité d’une sociologie des œuvres littéraires. Cette démarche est illustrée par l’analyse des articles politiques, critiques littéraires et œuvres romanesques de l’écrivain Maurice Blanchot, de la période de l’entre-deux-guerres à la fin de la seconde guerre mondiale. La sociologie des œuvres littéraires doit être en mesure de produire une analyse de la forme et du contenu des œuvres. C’est en inscrivant notre travail dans la tradition compréhensive que nous tentons de dépasser les obstacles épistémologiques et méthodologiques d’une telle perspective. La compréhension des œuvres et du sens de la pratique littéraire de Blanchot passe par la reconstruction de ses expériences socialisatrices : son histoire de famille, son rapport au corps, à la maladie et à l’amour. Nous posons aussi que son passage à l’extrême droite et sa conception radicale de la pratique littéraire procèdent du même malaise existentiel. / The aim of this work is to define the conditions of possibility of a sociological approach applied to literary works. That approach is illustrated by the analysis of political and literary articles, and novels of the writer Maurice Blanchot, from the inter-war period to the end of the Second World War. We define sociology of literary works as an approach that must be able to produce knowledge about both content and style. We postulate that the theoretical framework of interpretive sociology is the most likely to answer the epistemological and methodological obstacles of such a perspective. We try to evidence that the understanding of the literary works and the literary practice of Blanchot can be achieved by the reconstruction of his socialization experiences: his family history, his relation to his body, to illness and to love. We also postulate that his political commitment at the far right and his radical view of literary practice are based on the same existential unease.

Qu'en est-il de la communication de l'impossible dans son rapport au pouvoir du langage ? En révélant la face a-dialectique du langage littéraire, Maurice Blanchot et Georges Bataille, liés par une amitié essentielle, ont redéployé l’espace désoeuvré de l’Impossible comme espace scripturaire. La présente étude s’est articulée en trois parties, regroupant chacune quatre chapitres. La première s’est intéressée à la nomination comme stricte révélation de la négativité, d’une part, et de l’altérité, d’autre part. Elle a analysé les stratégies de contestation du discours dialectique adoptées en vue de redessiner un nouvel espace communautaire grevé d’absence. Cette dernière, induisant par ailleurs le mouvement infini de la répétition, ouvre l’exigence scripturaire à l’in-fini du re-dire. La seconde a mis au centre de ses préoccupations, à l’exemple des auteurs eux-mêmes, la mort. Liée au déploiement scripturaire, la mort creuse littéralement le Dire dans lequel domine l’oscillation entre pouvoir et impouvoir. La dimension thanatique des œuvres des deux auteurs convoque les notions de limite, de transgression, de dehors, de chance et de neutre qui envisagent toutes l’ouverture de l’expérience scripturaire sur son impossible horizon. La dernière partie, quant à elle, a mis en évidence la manière dont l’écriture, en son mouvement disjoint et imaginaire, s’abstrait du domaine du possible en s’ouvrant finalement sur le silence dont elle se fait complice pour ouvrir le Dire au partage de l’Impossible. / This thesis discusses the saying of the Impossible in its relationship to the power of language in the works of Maurice Blanchot and Georges Bataille. By unveiling the a-dialectical aspect of the literary language, Maurice Blanchot and Georges Bataille, who were bound by an essential friendship, deployed anew the idle space of the Impossible as a writerly space. This study is composed of three parts, each divided into four chapters. The first part discusses nomination as a strict unveiling of negativity on the one hand, and of alterity on the other hand, before analysing the strategies of contesting the dialectical discourse which were adopted by both writers with a view of delineating a new community space marked by absence. By inducing an endless movement of repetition, absence is shown to open the writerly exigence to the infiniteness of re-saying. The second part focuses on death as explored by both writers themselves. As linked to the writerly deployment, death literally enacts a saying dominated by the oscillation between Power and Unpower. The thanatical dimension of the works of both authors relies on the notions of limits, transgression, exteriority, chance and neutre, all of which lead to the opening of the writerly experience on its impossible horizon. The third part highlights how writing, in its disjointed and imaginary movement, abstracts itself from the realm of the possible by opening itself to the silence and becoming thus its accomplice to open the saying to the sharing of the Impossible.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-28T20:37:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Manoela Farias Nogueira.pdf: 2998719 bytes, checksum: adcd4a83569f1223e905183201cb656a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-09-24 / Esta dissertação constitui-se de três partes: Anonimato e autobiografia, O carretel e De onde a terra retira o seu alimento? Na primeira parte, em Anonimato e autobiografia II, questiona-se a possibilidade de escrever um trabalho acadêmico, na área de fronteira entre a filosofia, a psicologia e a literatura. Que assunto, que tema poderia dar conta de preencher uma dissertação? Qual estudo seria capaz de manter a atenção de um pesquisador-escritor? Na parte seguinte, começa-se a investigar os escritos de Bernardo Soares, heterônimo de Fernando Pessoa. O Livro do Desassossego, a partir das pesquisas de José Gil, é encarado como um enorme diário de descrições exteriores e sensações subjetivos, formando um diário infinito. O desenrolar da paisagem cadência o acontecimento das sensações, levando Soares a uma espécie de devir-paisagem. No último texto de O carretel, em Ele Olhava pela janela algumas anotações sobre Kafka e sobre o pensamento deleuziano do cinema, em particular sobre a noção de extracampo, especulam os pontos que liberariam a imagem do devir-paisagem, ou seja, quando o carretel do diário arrebenta. Cortada abruptamente a teoria, entre-se na última parte De onde a terra retira o seu alimento? Aqui estão reunidos textos heterogêneos, que já tentavam avançar sobre a dissertação desde o princípio. São crônicas, ficções, páginas de diários, poesias, coletâneas de textos da literatura... Nesse conjunto ecoa a pergunta do cão, afinal, De onde a terra retira o seu alimento? Esses textos se pretendem uma impossibilidade de resumo das situações aqui criadas, ou seja, em seu conjunto estão antes ou além da autobiografia, do diário e da narrativa de sensações. Também não se procura responder ao cão, apesar de sempre ser possível ouvir os ecos de seus latidos, pois em Sheol Literrário, último texto dessa parte, percebe-se que nem a tentativa de escrita dará conta da pergunta-título, e assim entra mais um volume para a biblioteca. Talvez seja possível ler o texto em ordem aleatória, pois cada texto tenta ser independente em si. A própria escrita não foi sistemática, como poderá observar o leitor, e reúne-se aqui escritos de várias épocas. Apesar da dissertação não ser uma resposta à pergunta-título através da escrita, gostaria de comentar o prazer com que alguns textos foram escritos, e principalmente, o surgimento da vontade de escrever. Afinal que outra atividade se aproxima tanto do quotidiano e das caminhadas, senão a escrita e o diário? E ainda, o que é uma dissertação se não um conjunto de textos?

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-27T17:27:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Marcela Moura Almeida.pdf: 331135 bytes, checksum: 121053fe0e5299bdb060efba343fc9b0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-04-27 / This study of Maurice Blanchot s thought, specifically the books The Space of Literature, The Infinite Conversation, and The Book to Come, identifies the notions that the author develops regarding Literature and Art, such as Unworking, the Outside, and the Neutral. In order to follow Blanchot s more general theorization on the statutes of Art, it was at first necessary to contrast it with the tradition which mainly comes from Romanticism, but also from Heidegger. From a different perspective, this study explores what Blanchot considers to be the singularity of the space of literature, its impersonal dimension, which is understood to be the indelible mark that his work left among such thinkers as Foucault and Deleuze, thus affecting, beginning with Literary Theory, the field of Contemporary Philosophy / O trabalho a seguir procurar identificar no pensamento de Maurice Blanchot, mais precisamente nas obras O Espaço Literário, A Conversa Infinita e o Livro por Vir, as noções que o autor desenvolve a respeito da literatura e da arte, tais como Desobramento, Fora, Neutro. Para acompanhar a teorização mais geral de Blanchot sobre o estatuto da arte, foi preciso, inicialmente, contrastá-la com certa tradição proveniente sobretudo do Romantismo, mas também de Heidegger. Em contrapartida, ao explorar o que ele considera ser a singularidade do espaço literário , sua dimensão impessoal, entende-se a marca indelével que deixou sua obra entre pensadores tais como Foucault e Deleuze, afetando assim, a partir da crítica literária, o campo da filosofia contemporânea

Head Chop is a practice-led research project exploring the thinking of community found within the works of Georges Bataille, Jean-Luc Nancy, and Maurice Blanchot. Using the central exchange between Nancy and Blanchot, as found in the triple intersection of texts composed of Nancy's Inoperative Community, Blanchot's The Unavowable Community, and finally Nancy's recent The Disavowed Community, Head Chop draws upon the interfaces of these three works to develop a reading of community. Utilising the concept of fictioning, an imaging of possible worlds, as its primary methodology, Head Chop develops a narrativised analysis of community. The story of Acéphale, Bataille's secret society, provides the structuring fiction of the work. This story is developed from a synthesis of fragmentary accounts of the Acéphale group's sacrificial ambition, and the illustrations of the Acéphale journal. The result is a tale of a human sacrifice from which the being Acéphale subsequently arises. In tracing the relation of the work of Nancy and Blanchot to the work of Bataille, Head Chop draws attention to the role of the figure of Acéphale for Bataille, and its subsequent insinuation in the work of Nancy and Blanchot. The figure of Acéphale operates as an editorial device that structures and informs the readings of these works as a common grounding and central problematic. This situates the readings of Bataille, Nancy and Blanchot in a contested frame of reference by attempting to accommodate an alternate version of the sacrificial event. Head Chop finds a basis for its methodological investigation in Deleuze and Guattari's work What is Philosophy? Excising and developing a series of figures and conceptual tools from the works of Nancy, Blanchot and Bataille, Head Chop develops a crossing of these figures and concepts as characters within the broader narrative of Acéphale. Following this methodological approach, Head Chop traces series of connected concepts in the works of Nancy and Blanchot. In developing these connections in relation to the Acéphale narrative, conceptual structures engaged in the thinking of community are drawn out into the broader contexts of Nancy and Blanchot's work. These connections are traced in Nancy through addressing such notions as the deconstruction of the subject, the question of authenticity in Heidegger, a re-reading of Heideggeran ontology that privileges Mitsein, and the singular plural. In Blanchot conceptual connections are similarly traced, beginning from the foundational role of the other, the challenging passion of lovers, through to death, unworking, and the question of testimony. In developing a narrativised analysis of the figure of Acéphale, Head Chop aims to open new channels of inquiry into the concept of community as it arises between the works of Bataille, Blanchot and Nancy. Research questions: How does a re-imaging of the Acéphale story, in which Acéphale is begotten, engage with Bataille, Nancy and Blanchot's readings of community? What is to be gained from the use of a re-imagined Acéphale story in a thinking of community?

No description available.