Introdução: O carcinoma epidermóide de cabeça e pescoço tem na cirurgia e na radioterapia, as principais modalidades terapêuticas iniciais. Nas recidivas loco-regionais, a cirurgia é a escolha padrão de tratamento. Objetivos: Identificação de fatores prognósticos clínicos, histopatológicos e biomoleculares e a avaliação da sobrevida após cirurgia de resgate. Casuística e Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo de pacientes submetidos a tratamento cirúrgico inicial, com revisão de variáveis histopatológicas e expressão imunohistoquímica de VEGF, ciclina d1 e EGF-R no tumor inicial e no resgate. Das recidivas, 10 eram de estádio clínico precoce (I e II) e 18, avançado (III e IV). O período de seguimento médio foi de 33,4 meses. Resultados: A comparação das variáveis histológicas e dos marcadores moleculares no tumor inicial e na recidiva não apresentou alterações estatisticamente significantes. A sobrevida global após cirurgia de resgate foi superior nas recidivas com diagnóstico após seis meses (p=0,02). Conclusões: Os achados sugerem que a expressão de VEGF superior a 75% é fator preditivo para controle da doença após a recidiva. A sobrevida entre o tempo decorrido do tratamento inicial e a recidiva foi estatisticamente significante / Introduction: The usual management of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) head and neck is the surgery associated or not to post surgical radiotherapy. Salvage surgery is the first therapeutic option for recurrent tumors. Objective: The identification of prognostic factors and to assess survival interval after salvage surgery for SCC. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients treated with surgery and review of histopathological variables and immunohistochemical expression of VEGF, EGF-R and Ciclina in the initial tumor and salvage surgery. Twenty eight patients were submitted salvage surgery with 10 were staged as early tumors (I and II) and 18 as advanced ones (III and IV). The average follow-up was 33.4 months. Results: The comparison of histopathologicals variables in the initial tumor and loco regional recurrence no statistically significant changes. Survival after salvage surgery was 70% in cases with recurrences diagnosed after six months of follow-up (p=0.02). Conclusions: The findings suggest that variables immunohistopathologicals in loco regional recurrence were of minor importance in prognosis. The time between the initial treatment and recurrence loco regional was independent variable of survival

Submitted by Carvalho Dias João Paulo (joao.dias@famerp.br) on 2018-04-04T14:21:17Z No. of bitstreams: 1 leandrofreitascolturato_dissert.pdf: 2059005 bytes, checksum: 00cf44fb001e34750da28245f55440a6 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-04-04T14:21:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 leandrofreitascolturato_dissert.pdf: 2059005 bytes, checksum: 00cf44fb001e34750da28245f55440a6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-06-20 / Introduction: Ten to 15% of cervical cancer patients have had tumor recurrence in early stage (FIGO IB1 - IIA). They have presented negative lymph nodes to hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining technique. Objectives: In patients with cervical cancer in stage IB1 - IIA (FIGO): 1) to assess the prevalence of pelvic lymph node micrometastasis (MI) through the immunoreactivity of antibody anti pan - cytokeratin AE1/AE3 in lymph node tissue and its correlation with tumor recurrence and overall survival; 2) to describe, in the primary tumor of patients with recurrence tumor and/or lymph node micrometastasis, the immunohistochemical expression (IHC) of the lymphatic endothelial marker D2-40 and their correlation with histopathologic findings by conventional hematoxylin-eosin staining. Material and Method: We studied 83 medical records of patients admitted at Centro de Referência da Saúde da Mulher do Estado de São Paulo (Hospital Pérola Byington) in clinical stages IB1, IB2, and IIA. They were submitted exclusively to primary surgical treatment with hysterectomy Querleu C1 and had no lymph node metastases in the presence of Hematoxylin-Eosin. We collected data from the patients’ medical records. We studied variables, such as sociodemographic, reproductive, and histopathological characteristics, as well as the therapeutic follow-up of these patients. The histological sections of the tumors were reviewed systematically. Each lymph node was analyzed by IHC with AE1/AE3 antibody with six histological sections of three micrometers thick. The patients were divided into groups with recurrence (GCR) and without recurrence (GSR). The patients were also separated according to the presence or absence of lymph node micrometastasis or isolated tumor cells. Qualitative and quantitative variables between groups were compared using chi-square test and parametric Student's t-test. Results: Fifteen patients (18.07%) have had recurrence. At a significance level of 5%, there was significant difference between the GCR and GSR and the variables: pregnancies, size of the major axis of the tumor (cm), lymph node micrometastasis, clinical stage IB2 or IIA, and the mean number of negative lymph nodes. The direct analysis with lymph node micrometastasis or isolated tumor cells showed a significant difference among the variables clinical stage IB2 or IIA, and a stromal invasion depth greater than 2/3. Conclusions: The presence of lymph node micrometastasis is an important risk factor to tumor recurrence. These patients should be considered eligible for radiochemotherapy adjuvant treatment. / Introdução: Dez a 15% das pacientes com câncer do colo do útero em estádio clínico inicial (FIGO IB1 – IIA), com linfonodos negativos à técnica de Hematoxilina-eosina (HE), apresentam recidiva tumoral. Objetivos: Em pacientes com câncer de colo do útero nos estádios IB1 – IIA (FIGO): 1) Avaliar a prevalência de micrometástase (MI) linfonodal pélvica por meio da imunoexpressão do anticorpo anti-pan – citoqueratina AE1/AE3 no tecido linfonodal e sua correlação com recidiva tumoral e sobrevida global; 2) Descrever, no tumor primário de pacientes com recidiva tumoral e/ou MI linfonodal, a expressão imuno-histoquímica (IHQ) do marcador endotelial linfático D2-40 e sua concordância com achados histopatológicos convencionais, por meio da coloração HE. Material e Método: Estudaram-se 83 prontuários de pacientes admitidas no Centro de Referência da Saúde da Mulher do Estado de São Paulo – Hospital Pérola Byington nos estádios clínicos IB1, IB2 e IIA, submetidas ao tratamento cirúrgico primário com histerectomia Querleu C1 exclusivamente e que apresentavam ausência de metástases linfonodais à HE. A coleta de dados foi realizada nos prontuários e realizou-se levantamento das características sociodemográficas, reprodutivas, histopatológicas, terapêuticas e de seguimento dessas pacientes. Os cortes histológicos dos tumores foram revisados de forma sistemática e cada linfonodo analisado por IHQ com anticorpo AE1/AE3, com seis cortes histológicos de três micrometros de espessura. As pacientes foram divididas em grupos com recidiva (GCR) e sem recidiva do tumor (GSR). Foram também divididas de acordo com a variável presença ou ausência de MI linfonodal ou células tumorais isoladas. Para comparar os grupos em relação às variáveis qualitativas e quantitativas foi utilizado o teste Qui-quadrado e o teste paramétrico t de Student, respectivamente. Resultados: Quinze pacientes (18,07%) apresentaram recidiva tumoral. Com significância de 5%, houve diferença significante entre os GCR e GSR e as variáveis: gestações, tamanho do maior eixo do tumor (cm), MI linfonodal, estadiamento clínico IB2 ou IIA e número médio de linfonodos negativos. Na análise direta, com MI linfonodal ou CTI, houve diferença significante com as variáveis estadiamento clínico IB2 ou IIA e profundidade de invasão estromal maior do que 2/3. Conclusões: A presença de MI linfonodal é fator de risco importante para recidiva tumoral. Essas pacientes devem ser consideradas elegíveis para tratamento radioquimioterápico adjuvante.

INTRODUÇÃO: Enquanto a análise de sobrevida tradicional estima inadequadamente o prognóstico futuro dada alguma sobrevida inicial, a sobrevida condicional ajusta a sobrevida futura pela já observada, permitindo a compreensão da distribuição temporal do impacto dos preditores. OBJETIVOS: Estimar e analisar as sobrevidas global e livre de doença até o décimo ano pós-operatório; identificar preditores independentes destes desfechos; estimar e analisar as sobrevidas condicionais global e livre de doença de cinco anos dada a sobrevida até o quinto ano pós-operatório; analisar o comportamento dos preditores dos desfechos ao longo do tempo. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo envolvendo 13 centros brasileiros. Dados clínicos, radiológicos e anatomopatológicos foram considerados. Utilizou-se o método de Kaplan-Meier com o teste log-rank para comparar fatores e a regressão de Cox obteve a razão de riscos. A sobrevida condicional foi calculada a partir das tábuas de sobrevida e a diferença padronizada reavaliou as variáveis consideradas significativas. RESULTADOS: 1157 pacientes foram incluídos. A sobrevida global de 1, 3, 5, 7 e 10 anos foi 78,6%, 72,3%, 66,0%, 61,3% e 59,4%, respectivamente. Foram preditoras de sobrevida global: idade [HR 1,04 (IC 95% 1,02-1,06), p 0.000], sexo feminino [HR 1,35 (IC 95% 1,02-1,79), p 0.038], recidiva pós-operatória do CHC [HR 1,35 (IC 95% 1,08-1,79), p 0.003], diâmetro do maior nódulo viável no explante [HR 1,01 (IC95% 1,01-1,02), p 0.006], invasão vascular não discriminada [HR 3,18 (IC95% 1,48-6,85), p 0.004], invasão micro [HR 1,65 (IC 95% 1,27-2,15), p 0.001] e macrovascular [HR 2,25 (IC 95% 1,30-3,89), p 0.000]. A sobrevida condicional global de 5 anos ao final do 1°, 3° e 5° anos foi 79,5%, 82,2% e 90,0%, respectivamente. As variáveis preditoras na análise univariada tiveram comportamento errático ao longo do tempo. A sobrevida atuarial livre de doença em 1, 3, 5, 7 e 10 anos foi 94,2%, 90,1%, 89,8%, 87,5% e 87,5%, respectivamente. Foram preditoras de sobrevida livre de doença: nível sérico de alfa-fetoproteína no diagnóstico [HR 1,0 (IC 95% 1,01-1,02), p 0.000], CHC dentro do critério de Milão no diagnóstico [HR 0,42 (IC 95% 0,22-0,80), p 0.008], explante dentro do critério de Milão [HR 0,34 (IC 95% 0,17-0,68), p 0.002], explante com neoplasia pouco diferenciada ou hepatocolangiocarcinoma [HR 3,04 (IC 95% 1,75-5,30), p 0.000], invasão vascular não discriminada [HR 15,72 (IC 95% 3,44-71,83), p 0.000], invasão micro [HR 3,40 (IC 95% 1,83-6,28), p 0.000] e macrovascular [HR 11,96 (IC 95% 5,20-27,47), p 0.000]. A sobrevida condicional livre de doença de 5 anos ao final do 1°, 3° e 5° anos foi 94,1%, 97,1% e 97,4%, respectivamente. Variáveis preditoras na análise univariada em geral tem maior impacto no primeiro ou segundo ano. CONCLUSÕES: Os resultados do transplante no Brasil foram comparáveis àqueles observados nos EUA e Europa. Considerando-se as perdas precoces, as curvas de sobrevida pelo método Kaplan-Meier foram pessimistas e a análise de sobrevida condicional fornece outra perspectiva para estes dados. O comportamento das variáveis determinantes de prognóstico não é uniforme ao longo do tempo / INTRODUCTION: Traditional survival analysis provides inadequate estimates of the future prognosis for patients with accrued survival. Conversely, conditional survival adjusts future survival by the already accrued survival. It provides insights into the temporal distribution of the effect of predictors. OBJECTIVES: To estimate and to analyse overall and disease free survival until the 10th post-operative year; to identify independent predictors of these outcomes; to estimate and to analyse 5-year overall and disease free conditional survival until the 5th post-operative year; to analyse the behaviour of the predictors of outcomes during follow-up. METHODS: Retrospective cohort from 13 Brazilian transplantation centers. Clinical, radiological, and anatomopathological data were considered. The Kaplan-Meier method with the longrank test for the comparison of factors was applied and the Cox proportional hazards model provided the hazard ratios. Conditional survival was calculated through life tables, while differences between significative variables were reassessed by the standardized difference. RESULTS: 1157 patients were included. Overall survival in 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 years was 78.6%, 72.3%, 66.0%, 61.3%, and 59.4%, respectively. 350 (30.3%) deaths were observed, 240 (68.6%) in the 1st year. Overall survival was independently predicted by age [HR 1.04 (95% CI 1.02-1.06), p 0.000], female sex [HR 1.35 (95% CI 1.02-1.79), p 0.038], post-operative HCC recurrence [HR 1.35 (95% CI 1.08-1.79), p 0.003], diameter of the largest viable nodule on the explant [HR 1.01 (95% CI 1.01-1.02), p 0.006], non-discriminated vascular invasion [HR 3.18 (95% CI 1.48-6.85), p 0.004], micro [HR 1.65 (95% CI 1.27-2.15), p 0.001] and macrovascular invasion [HR 2.25 (95% CI 1.30-3.89), p 0.000]. 5-year overall conditional survival at the end of the 1st, 3rd and 5th post-operative years was 79.5%, 82.2%, and 90.0%, respectively. Predictors of overall survival identified on univariate analysis presented an erratic behaviour over time. Disease free survival in 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 years was 94.2%, 90.1%, 89.8%, 87.5%, and 87.5%, respectively. 97 (8.4%) reccurrences occurred. Disease free survival was independently predicted by serum alpha-fetoprotein upon diagnosis [HR 1.0 (95% CI 1.01-1.02), p 0.000], HCC within the Milan criteria upon diagnosis [HR 0.42 (95% CI 0.22-0.80), p 0.008], explant within the Milan criteria [HR 0.34 (95% CI 0.17-0.68), p 0.002], undifferentiated tumor or hepatocholangiocarcinoma on the explant [HR 3.04 (95% CI 1.75-5.30), p 0.000], non-discriminated vascular invasion [HR 15.72 (95% CI 3.44-71.83), p 0.000], micro [HR 3.40 (95% CI 1.83-6.28), p 0.000], and macrovascular invasion [HR 11.96 (95% CI 5.20-27.47), p 0.000]. 5-year disease free conditional survival at the end of the 1st, 3rd and 5th post-operative years was 94.1%, 97.1%, and 97.4%, respectively. Predictors of recurrence on the univariate analysis usually presented with greater impact during the 1st or 2nd post-operative year. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of liver transplantation in Brazil were comparable to those from the US and Europe. Survival estimates through the Kaplan-Meier method were pessimistic due to greater early losses. Conditional survival offers a different perspective for the same data. The behaviour of predictive values varies over time

Diss. (sammanfattning) Linköping : Linköpings universitet, 2007. / Härtill 5 uppsatser.

INTRODUÇÃO: Aproximadamente 50% dos pacientes com tumor colorretal apresentam metástase hepática e a hepatectomia é o procedimento terapêutico de escolha. Discutem-se diversos fatores prognósticos, entre eles a margem cirúrgica é um fator sempre recorrente, pois não existe consenso da distância mínima necessária entre o nódulo metastático e a linha de secção hepática. Alguns autores identificaram que a margem cirúrgica maior que 1cm é um fator de melhor prognóstico com maior sobrevida e menor recidiva. Contudo, outros estudos demonstram resultados semelhantes entre pacientes com margens cirúrgicas maiores que 1cm, exíguas e até mesmo microscopicamente acometidas. Essas controvérsias conduzem à idéia de que outros fatores biológicos possam estar envolvidos na fisiopatologia de recorrência. Assim sendo, é de grande importância a avaliação da relação das margens cirúrgicas de ressecções hepáticas de metástases de câncer colorretal com a sobrevida e recidiva da doença. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar as margens cirúrgicas e o tipo de borda tumoral nas ressecções de metástases hepáticas de câncer colorretal e sua correlação com recidiva local e sobrevida. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo, baseado na revisão dos prontuários de 91 pacientes submetidos à ressecção de metástases hepáticas de neoplasia colorretal, durante o período compreendido entre janeiro de 2000 e dezembro de 2009. Revisão histopatológica prospectiva de todos os casos com aferição da menor margem cirúrgica e classificação das bordas tumorais como expansiva ou infiltrativa. RESULTADOS: Não houve diferença estatística nas taxas de recidiva e no tempo de sobrevivência global entre as margens livres e acometidas, assim como não houve diferença entre as margens subcentimétricas e maiores de 1cm. A sobrevida livre de doença dos pacientes com margens microscopicamente acometidas foi significativamente menor do que os pacientes com margens livres (p=0,002). A análise multivariada identificou o tipo de borda infiltrativa como fator de risco para recidiva (0,05). A sobrevida livre de doença foi significativamente menor nos pacientes com borda infiltrativa em comparação com os tumores com bordas expansivas (p=0,05). CONCLUSÕES: As ressecções de metástase hepática com margens livres de doença, independentemente da distância da margem, não influencia na recidiva tumoral (hepática ou extra-hepática) ou sobrevida do paciente. A borda tumoral do tipo infiltrativa foi fator de risco para recidiva / INTRODUCTION: Approximately 50% of patients with colorectal cancer have liver metastases and hepatectomy is the therapeutic procedure of choice. Surgical margin is an ever-recurring discussed prognostic factor, because there is no consensus of the minimum required distance between the metastatic nodule and the liver section line. Some authors reported surgical margin larger than 1 cm as a better prognosis factor ensuring longer survival rates and lower recurrence. However, other studies showed similar outcomes among patients with surgical margins larger than 1 cm, narrow margins and even microscopically affected ones. These controversies led the idea that other biological factors may be involved in the pathophysiology of recurrence. Therefore, it is valuable to assess the relationship between surgical margins of liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases with survival and recurrence. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the surgical margins size and tumors growth pattern of colorectal liver metastases and its correlation with local recurrence and survival. METHODS: A retrospective study based on review of medical records of 91 patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases during the period between January 2000 and December 2009. In addition, we undertook a detailed pathologic analysis of each pathological specimen with record of the closest surgical margins and tumors growth pattern classification as pushing or infiltrative. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in recurrence rates and overall survival time between positive or negative margins, as well as no difference between the margins of 1cm width or more with subcentimeter margins. The disease-free survival of patients with microscopically positive margins was significantly lower than patients with negative margins (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis identified infiltrative tumor growth pattern as a risk factor for recurrence (p=0.05). Disease-free survival was significantly lower in patients with infiltrative growth pattern compared to tumors with expansive margins (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal liver metastases resection with negative margins, regardless of width, has no influence on recurrence (hepatic or extrahepatic), neither on patient survival. The infiltrative tumor growth pattern type was a risk factor for recurrence

Introdução: O carcinoma epidermóide de cabeça e pescoço tem na cirurgia e na radioterapia, as principais modalidades terapêuticas iniciais. Nas recidivas loco-regionais, a cirurgia é a escolha padrão de tratamento. Objetivos: Identificação de fatores prognósticos clínicos, histopatológicos e biomoleculares e a avaliação da sobrevida após cirurgia de resgate. Casuística e Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo de pacientes submetidos a tratamento cirúrgico inicial, com revisão de variáveis histopatológicas e expressão imunohistoquímica de VEGF, ciclina d1 e EGF-R no tumor inicial e no resgate. Das recidivas, 10 eram de estádio clínico precoce (I e II) e 18, avançado (III e IV). O período de seguimento médio foi de 33,4 meses. Resultados: A comparação das variáveis histológicas e dos marcadores moleculares no tumor inicial e na recidiva não apresentou alterações estatisticamente significantes. A sobrevida global após cirurgia de resgate foi superior nas recidivas com diagnóstico após seis meses (p=0,02). Conclusões: Os achados sugerem que a expressão de VEGF superior a 75% é fator preditivo para controle da doença após a recidiva. A sobrevida entre o tempo decorrido do tratamento inicial e a recidiva foi estatisticamente significante / Introduction: The usual management of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) head and neck is the surgery associated or not to post surgical radiotherapy. Salvage surgery is the first therapeutic option for recurrent tumors. Objective: The identification of prognostic factors and to assess survival interval after salvage surgery for SCC. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients treated with surgery and review of histopathological variables and immunohistochemical expression of VEGF, EGF-R and Ciclina in the initial tumor and salvage surgery. Twenty eight patients were submitted salvage surgery with 10 were staged as early tumors (I and II) and 18 as advanced ones (III and IV). The average follow-up was 33.4 months. Results: The comparison of histopathologicals variables in the initial tumor and loco regional recurrence no statistically significant changes. Survival after salvage surgery was 70% in cases with recurrences diagnosed after six months of follow-up (p=0.02). Conclusions: The findings suggest that variables immunohistopathologicals in loco regional recurrence were of minor importance in prognosis. The time between the initial treatment and recurrence loco regional was independent variable of survival

INTRODUÇÃO: Recidivas locais e loco-regionais são as principais causas de falha do tratamento em pacientes portadores de carcinomas epidermóides de boca e orofaringe. A cirurgia de resgate é geralmente a melhor opção terapêutica para esses pacientes. Esse estudo tem por objetivo avaliar a importância prognóstica da expressão das proteínas EGFR, MMP-2, MMP-9 e VEGF em pacientes com recidiva local submetidos à cirurgia de resgate. CASUÍSTICA E MÉTODOS: Os prontuários de 111 pacientes portadores de recorrência local de carcinomas epidermóides de boca e orofaringe foram analisados de forma retrospectiva. A localização do tumor primário foi o lábio em 10 casos (9%), a cavidade oral em 68 (61%) e a orofaringe em 33 (30%). O tratamento prévio foi cirurgia em 33 casos (30%), radioterapia associada ou não à quimioterapia baseada em cisplatina em 46 (41%) e cirurgia com radioterapia adjuvante em 32 (29%). A expressão das proteínas EGFR, MMP-2, MMP-9 and VEGF foi avaliada com a técnica do Tissue Microarray. RESULTADOS: O intervalo livre de doença variou de 0,89 a 140,9 meses, com uma mediana de 6,87 meses. As recidivas foram diagnosticadas em intervalo de tempo inferior a 1 ano em 69 pacientes (62,2%) e após 1 ano em 42 (37,8%). Os pacientes com intervalo livre de doença inferior a 1 ano apresentaram pior resultado de sobrevida (p=0,01). O estádio clínico da recidiva (rEC) foi I ou II em 31 casos (27,9%) e III ou IV em 80 (72,1%). Pacientes com doença em estádio clínico mais avançado (rEC III ou IV) apresentaram piores taxas de sobrevida específica por câncer (p=0,04). Hiper-expressão do EGFR foi associada a pior resultado do tratamento. Os casos com EGFR positivo obtiveram sobrevida específica por câncer em 3 anos de 27,2%, enquanto pacientes com EGFR negativo alcançaram 64,3% de sobrevida em 3 anos (p=0,001). A expressão das proteínas MMP-2, MMP-9 e VEGF não se mostrou significativa para o prognóstico (p=0,83, p=0,15 e p=0,86, respectivamente). Na análise multivariada, apenas o intervalo livre de doença e a expressão do EGFR foram associadas à maior risco de morte. CONCLUSÕES: Recidivas locais de carcinomas epidermóides de boca e orofaringe são associadas a mau prognóstico. Intervalo livre de doença superior a 1 ano e ausência de expressão do EGFR foram os principais fatores associados a melhores resultados de sobrevida específica por câncer em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de resgate. / INTRODUCTION: Local and regional relapses are the main sites of treatment failure in patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. In these instances, salvage surgery is the most widely used treatment approach. The aim of this study is to analyze the prognostic effect of the expression of EGFR, MMP-2, MMP-9 and VEGF in patients with recurrent cancer sumitted to salvage surgery. METHODS: The charts of 111 patients with local recurrence of oral or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas were retrospectively analyzed. The tumor sites were: the lip in 11 cases (9%), the oral cavity in 68 (61%) and the oropharynx in 33 (30%). The previous treatment was: Surgery in 33 patients (30%), radiotherapy with or without cisplatin based chemotherapy in 46 (41%) and surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy in 32 (29%). EGFR, MMP-2, MMP-9 and VEGF expressions were analyzed with tissue microarray immunohistochemical technique. RESULTS: The disease-free interval ranged from 0.89 to 140.9 months with a median of 6.87 months. The patients were categorized into two groups: Those with recurrence in less than 1 year (69 patients - 62.2%) and those with recurrence after 1 year (42 - 37.8%). The group with the shorter disease-free interval presented a worse prognosis (p=0.01). The clinical stage of recurrence (rCS) was I/II in 31 cases (27.9%) and III/IV in 80 cases (72.1%). Patients with more advanced diseases (rCS III/IV) had worse rates of cancer specific survival (CSS) than patients with rCS I/II (p=0.04). An over-expression of EGFR was associated with worse treatment results. Positive EGFR cases had a 3 year CSS of 27.2%, while EGFR negative patients had 64.3% (p=0.001). The MMP-2 and MMP-9 over-expression were also associated with a worse prognosis but without statistical significance (p=0.83 and p=0.15). VEGF expression did not show prognostic significance in this group of patients. In a multivariate analysis only the disease-free interval and over-expression of EGFR were associated with a higher risk of death. CONCLUSION: Local recurrence in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas usually indicates an unfavorable prognosis. A disease-free interval greater than 1 year and a negative EGFR expression are the main prognostic factors which indicate a better cancer specific survival rate in patients submitted to salvage surgery.

INTRODUÇÃO: Recidivas locais e loco-regionais são as principais causas de falha do tratamento em pacientes portadores de carcinomas epidermóides de boca e orofaringe. A cirurgia de resgate é geralmente a melhor opção terapêutica para esses pacientes. Esse estudo tem por objetivo avaliar a importância prognóstica da expressão das proteínas EGFR, MMP-2, MMP-9 e VEGF em pacientes com recidiva local submetidos à cirurgia de resgate. CASUÍSTICA E MÉTODOS: Os prontuários de 111 pacientes portadores de recorrência local de carcinomas epidermóides de boca e orofaringe foram analisados de forma retrospectiva. A localização do tumor primário foi o lábio em 10 casos (9%), a cavidade oral em 68 (61%) e a orofaringe em 33 (30%). O tratamento prévio foi cirurgia em 33 casos (30%), radioterapia associada ou não à quimioterapia baseada em cisplatina em 46 (41%) e cirurgia com radioterapia adjuvante em 32 (29%). A expressão das proteínas EGFR, MMP-2, MMP-9 and VEGF foi avaliada com a técnica do Tissue Microarray. RESULTADOS: O intervalo livre de doença variou de 0,89 a 140,9 meses, com uma mediana de 6,87 meses. As recidivas foram diagnosticadas em intervalo de tempo inferior a 1 ano em 69 pacientes (62,2%) e após 1 ano em 42 (37,8%). Os pacientes com intervalo livre de doença inferior a 1 ano apresentaram pior resultado de sobrevida (p=0,01). O estádio clínico da recidiva (rEC) foi I ou II em 31 casos (27,9%) e III ou IV em 80 (72,1%). Pacientes com doença em estádio clínico mais avançado (rEC III ou IV) apresentaram piores taxas de sobrevida específica por câncer (p=0,04). Hiper-expressão do EGFR foi associada a pior resultado do tratamento. Os casos com EGFR positivo obtiveram sobrevida específica por câncer em 3 anos de 27,2%, enquanto pacientes com EGFR negativo alcançaram 64,3% de sobrevida em 3 anos (p=0,001). A expressão das proteínas MMP-2, MMP-9 e VEGF não se mostrou significativa para o prognóstico (p=0,83, p=0,15 e p=0,86, respectivamente). Na análise multivariada, apenas o intervalo livre de doença e a expressão do EGFR foram associadas à maior risco de morte. CONCLUSÕES: Recidivas locais de carcinomas epidermóides de boca e orofaringe são associadas a mau prognóstico. Intervalo livre de doença superior a 1 ano e ausência de expressão do EGFR foram os principais fatores associados a melhores resultados de sobrevida específica por câncer em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de resgate. / INTRODUCTION: Local and regional relapses are the main sites of treatment failure in patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. In these instances, salvage surgery is the most widely used treatment approach. The aim of this study is to analyze the prognostic effect of the expression of EGFR, MMP-2, MMP-9 and VEGF in patients with recurrent cancer sumitted to salvage surgery. METHODS: The charts of 111 patients with local recurrence of oral or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas were retrospectively analyzed. The tumor sites were: the lip in 11 cases (9%), the oral cavity in 68 (61%) and the oropharynx in 33 (30%). The previous treatment was: Surgery in 33 patients (30%), radiotherapy with or without cisplatin based chemotherapy in 46 (41%) and surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy in 32 (29%). EGFR, MMP-2, MMP-9 and VEGF expressions were analyzed with tissue microarray immunohistochemical technique. RESULTS: The disease-free interval ranged from 0.89 to 140.9 months with a median of 6.87 months. The patients were categorized into two groups: Those with recurrence in less than 1 year (69 patients - 62.2%) and those with recurrence after 1 year (42 - 37.8%). The group with the shorter disease-free interval presented a worse prognosis (p=0.01). The clinical stage of recurrence (rCS) was I/II in 31 cases (27.9%) and III/IV in 80 cases (72.1%). Patients with more advanced diseases (rCS III/IV) had worse rates of cancer specific survival (CSS) than patients with rCS I/II (p=0.04). An over-expression of EGFR was associated with worse treatment results. Positive EGFR cases had a 3 year CSS of 27.2%, while EGFR negative patients had 64.3% (p=0.001). The MMP-2 and MMP-9 over-expression were also associated with a worse prognosis but without statistical significance (p=0.83 and p=0.15). VEGF expression did not show prognostic significance in this group of patients. In a multivariate analysis only the disease-free interval and over-expression of EGFR were associated with a higher risk of death. CONCLUSION: Local recurrence in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas usually indicates an unfavorable prognosis. A disease-free interval greater than 1 year and a negative EGFR expression are the main prognostic factors which indicate a better cancer specific survival rate in patients submitted to salvage surgery.

<p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:DocumentProperties> <o:Author>ilija vogel</o:Author> <o:Version>16.00</o:Version> </o:DocumentProperties> <o:OfficeDocumentSettings> <o:AllowPNG/> </o:OfficeDocumentSettings></xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:TrackMoves/> <w:TrackFormatting/> <w:PunctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:DoNotPromoteQF/> <w:LidThemeOther>EN-US</w:LidThemeOther> <w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian> <w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w:DontGrowAutofit/> <w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark/> <w:EnableOpenTypeKerning/> <w:DontFlipMirrorIndents/> <w:OverrideTableStyleHps/> </w:Compatibility> <m:mathPr> <m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math"/> <m:brkBin m:val="before"/> <m:brkBinSub m:val="&#45;-"/> <m:smallFrac m:val="off"/> <m:dispDef/> <m:lMargin m:val="0"/> <m:rMargin m:val="0"/> <m:defJc m:val="centerGroup"/> <m:wrapIndent m:val="1440"/> <m:intLim m:val="subSup"/> <m:naryLim m:val="undOvr"/> </m:mathPr></w:WordDocument></xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="false" DefSemiHidden="false" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99" LatentStyleCount="371"> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="0" QFormat="true" Name="Normal"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 7"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 8"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 9"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 7"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 8"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 9"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 7"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 8"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 9"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Normal Indent"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="footnote text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="annotation text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="header"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="footer"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index heading"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="35" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="caption"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="table of figures"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="envelope address"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="envelope return"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="footnote reference"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="annotation reference"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="line number"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="page number"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="endnote reference"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="endnote text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="table of authorities"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="macro"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toa heading"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Bullet"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Number"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Bullet 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Bullet 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Bullet 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Bullet 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Number 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Number 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Number 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Number 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="10" QFormat="true" Name="Title"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Closing"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Signature"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Default Paragraph Font"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Body Text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Body Text Indent"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Continue"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Continue 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Continue 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Continue 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Continue 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Message Header"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="11" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Salutation"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Date"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Body Text First Indent"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Body Text First Indent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Note Heading"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Body Text 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Body Text 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Body Text Indent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Body Text Indent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Block Text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Hyperlink"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="FollowedHyperlink"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="22" QFormat="true" Name="Strong"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="20" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Document Map"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Plain Text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="E-mail Signature"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Top of Form"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Bottom of Form"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Normal (Web)"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Acronym"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Address"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Cite"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Code"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Definition"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Keyboard"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Preformatted"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Sample"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Typewriter"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Variable"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Normal Table"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="annotation subject"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="No List"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Outline List 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Outline List 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Outline List 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Simple 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Simple 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Simple 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Classic 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Classic 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Classic 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Classic 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Colorful 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Colorful 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Colorful 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Columns 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Columns 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Columns 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Columns 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Columns 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Grid 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Grid 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Grid 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Grid 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Grid 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Grid 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Grid 7"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Grid 8"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table List 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table List 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table List 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table List 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table List 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table List 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table List 7"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table List 8"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table 3D effects 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table 3D effects 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table 3D effects 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Contemporary"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Elegant"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Professional"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Subtle 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Subtle 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Web 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Web 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Web 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Balloon Text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="Table Grid"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Theme"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" Name="Placeholder Text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" Name="Revision"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="34" QFormat="true" Name="List Paragraph"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="29" QFormat="true" Name="Quote"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="30" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Quote"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 4"/ / <p>Free radicals are produced in our body under physiological conditions. Although in very low concentrations, they can show some toxic effects. While trying to bind electrons, in the chemical reaction of oxidation, they rapidly and unpredictably bind to adjacent molecules- proteins, lipids, carbohydrates and nucleic acids from which the structural elements of the cell are made, triggering the internal pathway of apoptosis. Antioxidants are substances that prevent or significantly reduce the oxidation of biomolecules. Oxidative stress is a condition that occurs when the production of free radicals exceeds the capacity of antioxidant enzymes to neutralize them. The antioxidant enzymes include: superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), glutathione reductase (GR), and glutathione-S-transferase (GST). Lipid Peroxidation (LP) is the process of oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids by free radicals. Malondialdehyde is a biochemical marker by which it is possible to measure the degree of oxidative damage of cell membranes. The oxidative modification of DNA leads to a change in DNA structure that results in genetic damage. The most commonly used marker of oxidative stress is urinary 8-hydroxy-2-deoxiguanosine (8-OHdG). The damage to proteins, lipids and DNA is an important basis for many diseases such as atherosclerosis, neurodegenerative diseases, diabetes, obesity, aging, retinopathy, chronic inflammatory disease and cancer. Starting from the hypothesis that these biomolecules are different at different stages of the disease, they could represent a prognostic marker of the progression of the disease. The aim of the study was to examine whether there were differences between the control group (healthy women), the patients with precancerous lesions on the cervix (HSIL), the patients with early stage cervical cancer (FIGO Ia-Ib) and the patient with locally advanced cervical cancer (IIa - IV) in the indicators of DNA damage (determining the value of 8-OHdG), indicators of oxidative stress (by determining the lipid peroxidation intensity (TBARS)), indicators of antioxidant defense (by determining the activity of antioxidative enzymes of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase GPx), glutathione reductase (GR), and glutathione-S-transferase (GST)). In addition, the aim of the study was to compare the values of 8- OHdG, lipid peroxidation products (TBARS) and the activity of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, GST, GPx, GR) within the group of patients with early stage cervical cancer divided into two subgroups- with low and high risk in relation to the relapse of the disease. The research was performed at the Clinic for operative oncology, Department of Gynecology at the Institute of Oncology of Vojvodina, Medical Faculty in Novi Sad, Department of Pharmacy and the Institute for Health Care of Novi Sad in the period from 2013 to 2017. Samples of blood and urine of the patients were collected, prepared adequately and stored at -80 &deg; until the analysis. The activity of the antioxidant enzymes as well as the lipid peroxidation were determined by spectrophotometric methods, and the concentration of 8-OHdG was determined by gas chromatography with mass detection. The approval of the Ethical Committee of the Institute for Oncology of Vojvodina was obtained before conducting the research. It has been shown that there are statistically significant differences between the control group (healthy women), patient with precancerous cervical lesions (HSIL), the patients with early stage cervical cancer (FIGO Ia-Ib) compared to a group of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (IIa-IV) in indicators of damage to DNA (concentration of 8-OHdG), indicators of oxidative stress (lipid peroxidation (TBARS)), indicators of antioxidant defense (activities of antioxidant enzymes SOD, CAT and GST). There was no difference between the groups in activity of glutathione peroxidase enzyme (GPx) and glutathione reductase (GR). There were no differences in the concentration of 8-OHdG, lipid peroxidation products (TBARS) and the activity of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, GST, GPx and GR) within the group of patients with locally restricted cervical cancer divided into two subgroups with low and high risk in relation on relapses of the disease. CAT and GST activities were the best predictors of disease recurrence among defined groups. Based on the activities of these two oxidative enzymes, the separation of the group of patients who did not experience disease recurrence after a follow-up period from the other two groups in which recurrence of the disease occurred was possible. Based on the obtained results it is concluded that it is possible to use the studied biomarkers as diagnostic markers in patients with cervical cancer. These biomolecules can help in the patient&#39;s classification into certain groups according to the stage of the disease, and consequently the more efficient choice of appropriate treatment. In addition, CAT and GST enzyme activity have been shown to be predictors of disease recurrence in defined patient groups.</p>

Diss. (sammanfattning) Linköping : Linköpings universitet, 2005. / Härtill 4 uppsatser.