Giessen, Universiẗat, Diss., 2005.

« Socrate, dit-on, n’allait pas à la tragédie », écrit Clément Rosset dans son livre Philosophie tragique. Selon la philosophe américaine Martha C. Nussbaum, c’est spécifiquement cette pulsion anti-tragique qui caractériserait la philosophie dès Platon. Au XIXe siècle, le Nietzsche de La naissance de la tragédie avait déjà déclaré le meurtre de la tragédie par la philosophie ; bien que Nussbaum soit généralement en accord avec le diagnostic du philosophe allemand, elle y apporte un élément novateur. De fait, elle voit dans la philosophie aristotélicienne une brèche dans la tradition : un contre-argument à la théorie platonicienne ainsi qu’une continuité de la pensée tragique. Premier penseur de la tragédie, Aristote accordait déjà une part importante à la fortune (tuchè) dans sa théorie éthique. Or, cette vulnérabilité ontologique, c’est-à-dire le fait que l’être humain soit jusqu’à un certain point à la merci de forces qui le dépassent, phénomène que nous tenterons de penser sous le mode de la teneur tragique de l’existence, serait précisément ce qui permettrait, selon notre auteure, de fonder une philosophie contemporaine « pleinement humaine ». Cependant, pour appréhender le tragique, l’être percevant doit présenter une organisation du monde lui permettant de le voir comme tel. Pour Nussbaum, cette reconfiguration du vécu serait possible par l’imagination ; plus spécifiquement, par la littérature. Plus encore, l’imagination morale ici proposée par notre auteur serait à proprement parler cette rencontre avec la composante fondamentalement tragique de la vie. Nous pouvons donc dire que, en s’appuyant sur la méthode aristotélicienne ainsi que sur l’expérience tragique, l’auteure se situe dans la tradition d’un questionnement sur la notion d’imagination morale, et y apporte une contribution riche et particulière. / “Socrates, it is said, did not attend to tragedies,” wrote Clement Rosset in his book Tragic Philosophy. According to the American philosopher Martha C. Nussbaum, it is specifically this anti-tragic impulse that has characterized philosophy since Plato. In the nineteenth century, the Nietzsche of The Birth of Tragedy had already declared the murder of tragedy by philosophy; although Nussbaum generally agrees with the diagnosis of the German philosopher, she adds an innovative element to it. Indeed, she sees in Aristotelian philosophy a breach in tradition: a counterargument to Platonist theory as well as a continuity of tragic thought. Aristotle, the first great thinker of tragedy, had already given an important role to fortune (tuchè) in his ethical theory. However, this ontological vulnerability, that is the fact that human beings are to a certain extent at the mercy of forces beyond their control, a phenomenon that we will try to think of as the tragic content of existence, would be precisely what, according to our author, would make it possible to found a contemporary philosophy that is “fully human”. However, in order to apprehend this tragic component, the perceiving being must present an organization of the world that allows him to see it as such. For Nussbaum, this reconfiguration of experience would be possible through imagination; more specifically, through literature. Moreover, the moral imagination hereby proposed by our author is, specifically, the encounter with life’s fundamentally tragic components. We can therefore say that, by relying on the Aristotelian method as well as on tragic experience, Nussbaum belongs to a tradition that addresses the notion of moral imagination and makes a rich and particular contribution to it.

La présente thèse propose une réflexion sur les valeurs du travail à partir de l’œuvre de Martha C. Nussbaum, de sa conception des capacités, de la vie bonne et de la justice. Nous y définissions la valeur du travail en fonction de ses effets sur les capacités du travailleur et des autres partie-prenantes. Penser les valeurs du travail à partir des capacités relationnelles permet de rendre compte de dimensions essentielles que le travail permet de développer et que chaque être humain valorise : le respect de soi, la qualité des relations inter-personnelles ou les interactions positives avec le milieu naturel et culturel, de façon à préserver le bien vivre aujourd’hui et demain. Nous éclairons ainsi les enjeux et des finalités du bien vivre au travail, en s’appuyant sur une anthropologie et une éthique relationnelles inspirées d’Aristote et de Kant. Suivant cette approche, le travail s’inscrit aussi dans un cadre institutionnel qui vise à garantir à tous l’accès aux capacités, et en particulier à ceux qui en sont exclus.En contrepoint des approches purement instrumentales de la valeur du travail, d’inspiration utilitariste et néoclassique, cette conception des valeurs du travail est centrée ses finalités, en termes de fonctionnements humains et de vie bonne, à une échelle individuelle et collective.La portée pratique de cette recherche consiste à mettre en évidence les tensions dont le travail contemporain est l’objet et à proposer une démarche pour évaluer, de façon plus juste, les capacités des êtres humains qui y sont engagées. Elle ouvre ainsi la voie à une réflexion pour des acteurs économiques – équipes, entrepreneurs, investisseurs - qui souhaiteraient s’inspirer du cadre proposé pour faire évoluer leurs pratiques et leurs modèles économiques, en promouvant une économie qui serait davantage attentive à la qualité relationnelle entre les parties prenantes. / This thesis proposes a reflection on the values of work based on the work of Martha C. Nussbaum, her conception of capabilities, good life and justice. We defined the value of work in terms of its effects on the abilities of the worker and other stakeholders. Defining work values based on relational capacities makes it possible to account for essential dimensions that work allows to develop and that each human being values: self-respect, the quality of interpersonal relations or positive interactions with the natural and cultural environment, so as to preserve the good life today and tomorrow. In this way, we shed light on the challenges and aims of good working life, based on an anthropology and relational ethics inspired by Aristotle and Kant. Following this approach, the work is also part of an institutional framework that aims to guarantee access to capacities for all, and in particular for those excluded from them.As a counterpoint to purely instrumental approaches to the value of work, utilitarian and neoclassical in inspiration, this conception of work values is centred on its aims, in terms of human functioning and good life, on an individual and collective scale.The practical scope of this research consists in highlighting the tensions to which contemporary work is subjected and in proposing an approach to evaluate, in a more accurate way, the capacities of the human beings who are committed to it. It thus opens the way to reflection for economic players - teams, entrepreneurs, investors - who would like to draw inspiration from the proposed framework to change their business practices and models, by promoting an economy that would be more attentive to the quality of relationships between stakeholders.

Thesis (MPhil (Philosophy))--University of Stellenbosch, 2010. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: This study finds its roots in the ancient quarrel, as mentioned by Plato 400 BC, between poets (artists) and philosophers on the nature of our ethical existence. The ancient philosophers participating in the ancient quarrel, such as Plato, had a metaphysical understanding of our existence and they believed that we should communicate about our ethical existence through a style which acknowledges the transcendental nature of our human existence. The styles and language used by the philosophers of the ancient quarrel were therefore often very abstract, and mostly concerned with the rationality of human reasoning. The ancient poets participating in this quarrel, however, did not share the metaphysical worldview of their philosophical rivals. They denied the transcendental nature of our existence, and argued that our ethical existence should be portrayed and communicated through a style which acknowledges the fact that we are humans with a concrete existence. The poets of the ancient quarrel also promoted a style which acknowledges humans as beings with both rational and emotional faculties. It is for this reason that we find today in literature concerned with moral matters, both the abstract style of moral philosophy which is concerned with the rational aspects of our existence, and the concrete style of fictional literature which is concerned with the emotive aspects of our existence. The quarrel on how to communicate about the nature of our ethical existence is, however, an ongoing debate which is still prevalent in our modern times. This study turns to the modern argument of Martha Nussbaum on how to communicate about the nature of our ethical existence. Nussbaum argues that the abstract style of philosophical texts on morality acknowledges the abstract and rational aspects of our human nature and existence, but that it often fails to fully acknowledge the fact that we are concrete human beings for whom emotions play an integral part in our ethical existence. She therefore believes that moral philosophy should be presented in combination with fictional literature in order to give a true and complete picture of our ethical existence. This study thus enters into a critical dialogue with Nussbaum on her proposal to combine fictional literature with moral philosophy. Accordingly, this study focuses on three specific aspects of our ethical existence, which Nussbaum argues, are acknowledged through fictional literature such as novels, but not through the typical style of abstract moral philosophy. They are; 1) that human values are plural and often incommensurable; 2) that the particulars of situations play an important role in ethical deliberation; and 3) that human emotions and the imagination form a big part of our ethical existence. The fundamental aim of this study is thus to answer the question whether the style of fictional literature actually acknowledges the three above mentioned aspects of our ethical existence. The novel which is used to determine this is Alan Paton’s Cry the Beloved Country. Nussbaum classifies the three above mentioned aspects of our ethical existence as 1) The Non- Commensurability and Plurality of Values; 2) Priority of the Particular; and 3) Ethical Value of the Emotions and Imagination. These three aspects are, however, derived from Aristotle’s ethics and they form, as Nussbaum has argued, the bases of the Aristotelian ethical position – a position from which practical knowledge can be obtained. The aim of this study is therefore not only to determine whether certain fictional literature acknowledges the three fundamental aspects of the Aristotelian ethical position, but it also aims to answer the question whether the Aristotelian ethical position (and therefore practical wisdom) can be obtained through the reading of fictional literature such as novels. The study concludes that some fictional literature, such as the novel Cry, the Beloved Country, does in fact adequately portray the three fundamental features of the Aristotelian ethical position, and that Nussbaum’s proposal should receive serious consideration, since the inclusion of some fictional literature into moral philosophy my lead to deeper ethical understanding from which practical wisdom can be obtained. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Hierdie studie vind sy oorsprong in die eeue oue stryd, soos al reeds geïdentifiseer deur Plato 400 vC, tussen digters (kunstenaars) en filosowe oor die aard van ons etiese bestaan. Die antieke filosowe wat deelgeneem het aan hierdie eeue oue vete, soos byvoorbeeld Plato, het ‘n metafisiese verstaan van ons bestaan gehad, en het daarom geglo dat ons oor ons etiese bestaan moet kommunikeer deur middel van style wat erkenning gee aan die transendentale aard van ons menslike bestaan. Die style en taal wat deur die filosowe van hierdie eeue oue vete gebruik is, was dus dikwels baie abstrak en uiters bemoeid met die mens se rasionele denkvermoëns. Die antieke digters wat deelgeneem het aan hierdie vete het egter nie, soos die filosowe, ‘n metafisiese wêreldbeskouing van ons bestaan gehad nie. Hulle het die transendente aard van ons bestaan ontken, en het daarom daarop aangedring dat ons etiese bestaan voorgestel en oor gekommunikeer moet word deur style wat erkenning gee aan die feit dat ons mense is met ‘n konkrete bestaan. Hulle het egter ook aangedring op ‘n styl wat erkenning gee dat mense beide rasionele en emosionele wesens is. Dit is weens hierdie rede dat ons vandag, in literatuur aangaande morele kwessies, die abstrakte en meer rasioneel geöriënteerde styl van morele filosofie, sowel as die konkrete en meer emosioneel geöriënteerde styl van fiktiewe literatuur aantref. Daar is egter vandag steeds nie klaarheid oor hoe daar oor ons etiese bestaan gekommunikeer moet word nie, en onenigheid is dus steeds te bespeur in huidige debatte oor hierdie tema. Hierdie studie ondersoek ‘n moderne argument, soos voortgestaan deur Martha Nussbaum, oor die wyse waarop daar oor die aard van ons etiese bestaan gekommunikeer moet word. Nussbaum neem die standpunt in dat die abstrakte styl van morele filosofiese tekste erkenning gee aan die abstrakte en rasionele aard van ons menslike aard en bestaan, maar dat dit nie altyd daarin slaag om erkenning te gee dat ons mense is met ‘n konkrete etiese bestaan waarin emosies (eerder as net rasionele denke) ook ‘n baie belangrike rol speel nie. Hierdie studie neem dus die vorm aan van ‘n kritiese dialoog met Nussbaum aangaande haar voorstel om fiktiewe literatuur te kombineer met morele filosofie. Gevolglik fokus hierdie studie op drie spesifieke aspekte van ons etiese bestaan, wat Nussbaum glo wel deur fiktiewe literatuur aangespreek word maar nie altyd deur tekste van morele filosofie nie. Hierdie drie aspekte is 1) dat menslike waardes uiteenlopend en dikwels onversoenbaar is; 2) dat die partikuliere elemente van situasies ’n belangrike rol speel in etiese besluitneming; en 3) dat ons menslike emosies en verbeelding ’n groot deel uitmaak van ons etiese bestaan. Die fundamentele doel van hierdie studie is dus om te bepaal of die styl van fiktiewe literatuur wel erkenning gee aan die drie bogenoemde aspekte van ons etiese bestaan. Die fiktiewe werk wat gebruik is om dit te bepaal, is Alan Paton se Cry, the Beloved Country. Nussbaum klassifiseer die drie bogenoemde aspekte van ons etiese bestaan as 1) Onversoenbaarheid and Pluraliteit van Waardes; 2) Prioriteit van die Partikuliere; en 3) Etiese Waarde van die Emosies en Verbeelding. Hierdie klassifikasie vind egter sy oorsprong in die etiek van Aristoteles, en vorm dus volgens Nussbaum die basis van die Aristoteliaanse etiese posisie – ‘n posisie van waaruit praktiese wysheid geput kan word. Die doel van hierdie studie is dus nie net om te bepaal of fiktiewe literatuur erkenning gee aan die drie fundamentele aspekte van die Aristoteliaanse etiese posisie nie, maar die doel is ook om te bepaal of die Aristoteliaanse etiese posisie (en dus praktiese wysheid) bekom kan word deur die lees van fiktiewe literatuur. Die studie kom tot die gevolgtrekking dat sekere fiktiewe literatuur, soos die werk Cry, the Beloved Country, inderdaad wel bevredigende erkenning gee aan die drie eienskappe van ons etiese bestaan, soos veronderstel deur die Aristoteliaanse etiese posisie, en dat Nussbaum se voorstel ernstige aandag behoort te geniet, aangesien die insluiting van sekere fiktiewe literatuur in morele filosofie ‘n dieper etiese verstaan teweeg kan bring, waaruit praktiese wysheid geput kan word.

Amartya Sen y Martha Nussbaum son dos de los principales teóricos que le dieron origen a la propuesta del desarrollo humano, también entendido como el enfoque de las capacidades y ampliación de libertades. Sus presupuestos filosóficos se han ido acentuando con el tiempo, siendo los más destacados aquellos que hacen referencia a la teoría aristotélica acerca del buen vivir. Desde esta perspectiva, el desarrollo de las capacidades del ser humano tiene por fin último la εὐδαιμονία, entendida como el florecimiento humano o la felicidad. Desde el enfoque, se propone que los individuos tengan acceso a las oportunidades básicas que le permitan tener libertad de elección para optar por el tipo de vida que tiene razones para valorar. En este sentido, la democracia y la deliberación pública cobran un rol fundamental para alcanzar los fines del desarrollo humano, en el marco de la ampliación de la libertad política. El principal objetivo de esta tesis reside, en este sentido, en una ampliación de la línea de investigación del enfoque de desarrollo humano en relación a la democracia y la deliberación pública. Para ello, en el desarrollo de esta investigación también se hará una fundamental referencia a las investigaciones de Iris Marion Young, quien por su parte, realiza una propuesta más inclusiva de la democracia. / Tesis

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Oregon, 2005. / Typescript. Includes vita and abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 256-273). Also available for download via the World Wide Web; free to University of Oregon users.

Submitted by Cristiane Oliveira (cristiane.oliveira@fgv.br) on 2011-06-13T16:38:53Z No. of bitstreams: 1 63090100005.pdf: 331649 bytes, checksum: 5122d76995faa7ff4aefdc426d5dba13 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Vera Lúcia Mourão(vera.mourao@fgv.br) on 2011-06-13T16:45:06Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 63090100005.pdf: 331649 bytes, checksum: 5122d76995faa7ff4aefdc426d5dba13 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Vera Lúcia Mourão(vera.mourao@fgv.br) on 2011-06-13T16:56:14Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 63090100005.pdf: 331649 bytes, checksum: 5122d76995faa7ff4aefdc426d5dba13 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2011-06-13T17:51:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 63090100005.pdf: 331649 bytes, checksum: 5122d76995faa7ff4aefdc426d5dba13 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-04-29 / O propósito deste trabalho é apresentar algumas das mais controversas questões da teoria das capacidades de Martha Nussbaum. Ela sugere que sua abordagem deve ser usada como base para princípios fundamentais e políticos voltados para as mulheres dos países em desenvolvimento. Desta forma, no primeiro capítulo, foram delineados os conceitos da teoria de Nussbaum. Depois de descrever a versão de Nussbaum sobre a abordagem das capacidades, o diálogo da autora com Amartya Sen foi apresentado, pois estes possuem visões particulares sobre a idéia de capacidades. No terceiro capítulo, o debate de Nussbaum com os relativistas culturais revelou o lado universal de sua teoria. A lista de capacidades de Nussbaum busca fornecer o suporte filosófico para a implementação de princípios constitucionais básicos que devem ser respeitados por todas as nações, como o mínimo que o respeito à dignidade humana requer. Por conta disso, este trabalho tentou também descobrir porque Nussbaum nega a importância do welfarismo subjetivo. No último capítulo desta dissertação, foram apresentados os debates de Nussbaum com Judith Butler, Susan Moller Okin e Alison Jaggar porque eles revelam diferentes pontos de vista e conclusões sobre a teoria das capacidades de Nussbaum.

Made available in DSpace on 2013-08-07T18:56:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 000400345-Texto+Completo-0.pdf: 1011202 bytes, checksum: 6008dffe2a42780b7b8266dc80ec8321 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 / This dissertation is dedicated to a critical analysis of the merits involved in the work done by Martha C. NUSSBAUM in her book “Frontiers of Justice”, in which a new theory of justice is proposed by means of the adoption of her theses of the Central Human Capabilities. The Author of “Frontiers of Justice” has the intention to present a theory of justice that uses some of the basic elements obtained from the contractualist doctrine of John RAWLS, but that doesn’t stay restricted to the formal structure of the pure procedimentalism suggested in the Rawlsian work. That is why NUSSBAUM proposes that Rawlsian contractualism should be complemented in those elements that are positive in it with the substantial elements that are present in the Aristotelian Ethics. With this the Author tries to elaborate some sort of “Aristotelian contractualism”, by means of which theoretical elements of three philosophical traditions (classical, modern and post-modern traditions) are mixed into one theory of justice. This being so, the present study has the specific objective of analyzing the viability of the project that intents to combine distinct philosophical traditions, each having their own basic concepts and fundamental elements that could even be interpreted as incompatible with each other. Following some of the lessons of Alasdair MACINTYRE concerning the incommensurability and untranslatability of the concepts that are elaborated by different philosophical traditions, this study will try to evaluate NUSSBAUM’s success in presenting a theory of justice that combines the Aristotelian realism with the Rawlsian constructivism. For this it will be necessary to demonstrate that there exists between those philosophical traditions sufficient elements that are common and compatible with each other, which allows the organization of a new model of thought that is superior to both of the traditions of the past and that presents a theoretical structure that is more complex and that explains with higher coherence the defects and partialities of the points of view that are being superseded. / Esta dissertação dedica-se a avaliar criticamente os méritos do empreendimento realizado por Martha C. NUSSBAUM na sua obra “Frontiers of Justice”, em que se propõe elaborar uma nova teoria da justiça escorada em sua tese das Capacidades Humanas Centrais. Pretende a Autora elaborar uma teoria da justiça que parta dos elementos básicos extraídos da doutrina contratualista desenvolvida por John RAWLS, mas que não se mantenha adstrita a estrutura formal do puro procedimentalismo sugerido na obra rawlsiana. Para tanto, sugere NUSSBAUM seja o contratualismo rawlsiano complementado naquilo que possui de positivo por meio de elementos substanciais que são extraídos da Ética aristotélica, produzindo, com isso, uma espécie de “contratualismo aristotélico”. Mescla a Autora, desse modo, dentro de uma única teoria de justiça elementos teóricos que são extraídos de três tradições filosóficas distintas e possivelmente rivais, quais sejam: a tradição clássica, a moderna e a pós-moderna. Nesses termos, o presente estudo assume como objetivo específico analisar a viabilidade do projeto que pretende conjugar tradições filosóficas distintas e que possuem conceitos básicos e elementos fundantes que poderiam ser interpretados, inclusive, como inconciliáveis entre si. Assim, seguindo os ensinamentos de Alasdair MACINTYRE acerca das dificuldades de comensuração e tradução de conceitos oriundos de tradições filosóficas distintas, pretende-se avaliar o sucesso de NUSSBAUM ao apresentar uma teoria da justiça que combina o realismo aristotélico com o construtivismo rawlsiano, sendo que, para tanto, será necessário demonstrar que entre uma e outra tradição existem elementos suficientemente comuns e compartilháveis que permitem a estruturação de um novo modelo de pensamento que seja superior às duas tradições anteriores, fornecendo uma estrutura teórica mais complexa e que explique com maior coerência os defeitos e a eventual parcialidade dos pontos de vista sendo superados.

Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T13:54:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 400345.pdf: 1011202 bytes, checksum: 6008dffe2a42780b7b8266dc80ec8321 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-03-31 / Esta disserta??o dedica-se a avaliar criticamente os m?ritos do empreendimento realizado por Martha C. NUSSBAUM na sua obra Frontiers of Justice, em que se prop?e elaborar uma nova teoria da justi?a escorada em sua tese das Capacidades Humanas Centrais. Pretende a Autora elaborar uma teoria da justi?a que parta dos elementos b?sicos extra?dos da doutrina contratualista desenvolvida por John RAWLS, mas que n?o se mantenha adstrita a estrutura formal do puro procedimentalismo sugerido na obra rawlsiana. Para tanto, sugere NUSSBAUM seja o contratualismo rawlsiano complementado naquilo que possui de positivo por meio de elementos substanciais que s?o extra?dos da ?tica aristot?lica, produzindo, com isso, uma esp?cie de contratualismo aristot?lico. Mescla a Autora, desse modo, dentro de uma ?nica teoria de justi?a elementos te?ricos que s?o extra?dos de tr?s tradi??es filos?ficas distintas e possivelmente rivais, quais sejam: a tradi??o cl?ssica, a moderna e a p?s-moderna. Nesses termos, o presente estudo assume como objetivo espec?fico analisar a viabilidade do projeto que pretende conjugar tradi??es filos?ficas distintas e que possuem conceitos b?sicos e elementos fundantes que poderiam ser interpretados, inclusive, como inconcili?veis entre si. Assim, seguindo os ensinamentos de Alasdair MACINTYRE acerca das dificuldades de comensura??o e tradu??o de conceitos oriundos de tradi??es filos?ficas distintas, pretende-se avaliar o sucesso de NUSSBAUM ao apresentar uma teoria da justi?a que combina o realismo aristot?lico com o construtivismo rawlsiano, sendo que, para tanto, ser? necess?rio demonstrar que entre uma e outra tradi??o existem elementos suficientemente comuns e compartilh?veis que permitem a estrutura??o de um novo modelo de pensamento que seja superior ?s duas tradi??es anteriores, fornecendo uma estrutura te?rica mais complexa e que explique com maior coer?ncia os defeitos e a eventual parcialidade dos pontos de vista sendo superados.

¿Pueden las artes servir como una estrategia para estimular el desarrollo de capacidades? ¿De qué manera la participación en proyectos de Teatro Aplicado permite a quienes hacen parte de éstos la ampliación de sus libertades? A través del diálogo entre la propuesta teórica de Martha Nussbaum y la experiencia de vida de personas de diversas edades y proveniencias, que tienen en común haber participado de proyectos teatrales, se dará cuenta del efecto que tiene esta práctica en la afirmación de la identidad individual. En un contexto global caracterizado por el individualismo y la competencia, la afirmación de la identidad de quienes han participado de proyectos de Teatro Aplicado se sustenta en el reconocimiento y valoración de los otros. De esta manera, “ser uno mismo desde los zapatos del otro” se constituye como una capacidad que permite generar una idea de “nosotros” que es expresión empírica de los conceptos de “Imaginación Narrativa”, “Ciudadanía Global” y “Afiliación” que la filósofa norteamericana desarrolla desde su enfoque. A través del análisis de los testimonios de los entrevistados y de la identificación de las características específicas de la práctica teatral, se reconocerán los alcances que ésta tiene respecto al cultivo de algunas de las “Capacidades Centrales” que Nussbaum propone, y específicamente, al desarrollo de emociones públicas que puedan contribuir al fortalecimiento de las democracias y al florecimiento de las personas. En consecuencia, a partir del diálogo entre experiencias de vida concretas y las reflexiones teóricas de Nussbaum, se propone una manera de llevar a políticas y programas el Enfoque de las Capacidades, reconociendo en la experimentación y apreciación artística una dimensión fundamental para el Desarrollo Humano. / Tesis