No description available.

Many studies on inheritance in barley have been made, but very little progress has as yet been obtained. Barley in many ways is an attractive plant with which to make inheritance studies. Unlike common wheat with 21 chromosome pairs and few distinct characters, barley has only 7 chromosome pairs and consequently only 7 possible linkage groups and many distinct characters that may be readily recognized. The chief difficulty is that many of these characters cannot be readily classified because a number of factors may be responsible for their production. The purpose of this project has been to study in considerable detail the Mendelian inheritance of several character pairs as they appear in barley crosses and to study possible linkage relationships between factors. The characters studied are rough versus semi-smooth awn, black versus white color of the flowering glumes and pericarp, long-haired vergus short-haired rachilla, fertility of the lateral florets and hulled versus naked caryopsis.

Brown trout (Salmo trutta), demonstrated an avoidance response to a range of intensities of artificial ultraviolet radiation in a laboratory setting. UV field measurements were made under a variety of riparian canopies in a mountain river system. UV values at various depth regimes were compared with laboratory response values. Results suggested that ultraviolet light could be a factor in the absence of brown trout in particular habitat types at various times during the daylight hours. Visible light intensity response values were also obtained under the same experimental and field conditions. These data suggested that visible light also could be a contributing factor in the absence of brown trout in different habitat types. Visible light may be of equal importance to ultraviolet light in eliciting an avoidance response in brown trout.

京都大学 / 0048 / 新制・論文博士 / 博士(農学) / 乙第13183号 / 論農博第2862号 / 新制||農||1061(附属図書館) / 学位論文||H30||N5105(農学部図書室) / (主査)教授 村上 章, 教授 藤原 正幸, 教授 渦岡 良介 / 学位規則第4条第2項該当 / Doctor of Agricultural Science / Kyoto University / DFAM

Scholars of Jewish literature consistently ask what it means to "write Jewishly". Strangers in a Strange Land posits that eight short works of Jewish fiction by authors in different times and places construct a consistent narrative realm of possibilities. I employ Possible Worlds literary theory to argue for this hypothesis. I argue that the narrative realm of these eight short stories is defined by liminal zones and liminal figures, marked most intensely by an implied porousness in the veil between the natural and the supernatural. My argument is based on a close analysis of major liminal themes: transit and wandering; dreamstates and visions; darkness and night; (un)death; and others. I contextualize these themes in two ways: first, by connecting them to the genres of Fantastic and Paranormal fiction in non-Jewish Western literature; and second, by bringing earlier Jewish tales into the discussion, illustrating that they have been and remain present in Jewish writing, in some cases as distant temporally as the Israelite literature of the Hebrew Bible. This panorama of ambiguous zones and characters unable to find steady footing would contribute to discussions of the nature of Jewish literature and its ability to create a virtual literary Home for a population that has been dispersed across the continents.

No description available.

No description available.

[pt] Este trabalho investiga a história que Leibniz acrescenta à narrativa do humanista italiano Laurent Valla, transformando-a de uma anedota a respeito da liberdade humana diante presciência e vontade divinas em um estudo sobre a natureza da criação. Na história, os infinitos mundos possíveis são apresentados a Teodoro, em sonho, por Palas Atena, filha de Júpiter. O que ele vê pelos cômodos do palácio são infinitas histórias alternativas ao destino infeliz de Sexto Tarquínio, filho do último dos reis da monarquia romana. Esses mundos possíveis estão organizados em ordem decrescente de perfeição, sendo que o mais rico em variedade se encontra no alto da pirâmide, que é a forma geométrica a que Leibniz identifica o lugar em que Deus delibera sobre o melhor. Este trabalho percorre a estrutura da pirâmide para compreender o que Teodoro vê em cada cômodo e o que garante a própria divisória entre os cômodos. Nesse trajeto, verifica-se que um dos cálculos envolvidos na arquitetura da pirâmide é a dissemelhança entre a parte e o todo no melhor dos mundos. Sexto participa da variedade do mundo existente com seu infortúnio. No interior de um dos cômodos, Teodoro é introduzido aos problemas da análise infinita ao folhear o livro dos destinos. Por fim, este trabalho mostra que a natureza distópica da pirâmide não se restringe às histórias alternativas que Teodoro encontra em cada cômodo, mas há também outros mundos no interior do próprio mundo existente. O mundo mais perfeito se distingue por conter mais variedade que os demais, o que faz dele um mundo denso. É possível transitar pela densidade desse mundo através das distopias, ora entendidas como uma imitação da estrutura da lei do contínuo, ora consideradas como um suporte corporal que permite percorrer, alternadamente, os mundos fenomênicos. / [en] This thesis investigates the story that Leibniz adds to the narrative of the Italian humanist Laurent Valla, transforming it from an anecdote about human freedom in face of divine foreknowledge and will in a study about the nature of creation. In the story, the infinite possible worlds are presented to Theodorus in a dream by Pallas Athena, daughter of Jupiter. What he sees through the rooms of the palace are infinite alternative stories to the unfortunate fate of Sextus Tarquinius, son of the last king of the Roman monarchy. These possible worlds are organized in descending order of perfection, so that the richest in variety is at the top of the pyramid, which is the geometric form to which Leibniz identifies the place where God deliberates on the best. This work traverses the structure of the pyramid to understand what Theodore sees in each room and what ensures the very partition between the rooms. On this route, it is verified that one of the calculations involved in the architecture of the pyramid is the dissimilarity between the part and the whole in the best of the worlds. Sextus participates in the variety of the existing world with its misfortune. Inside one of the rooms, Theodorus is introduced to the problems of infinite analysis by leafing through the book of fates. Finally, this work shows that the dystopic nature of the pyramid is not restricted to the alternative stories that Theodorus finds in each room, but there are also other worlds within the existing world itself. The most perfect world stands out for containing more variety than the others, which makes it a dense world. It is possible to transit through the density of this world through dystopias, understood firstly as an imitation of the structure of the law of the continuum and, secondly, as a bodily support that allows one to traverse, alternately, the phenomenal worlds.

Cette thèse contient un commentaire et une traduction complète d’un ouvrage polémique peu connu intitulé "La Quintessence des intellects en vue de réfuter les philosophes en matière de science des fondements (Lubāb al-‘uqūl fī al-radd ‘alā al-falāsifa fī ‘ilm al-uṣūl)". L’auteur, Abū al-Ḥaǧǧāǧ al-Miklātī, est un théologien aš‘arite de la deuxième moitié du XIIème siècle et du premier tiers du XIIIème, qui évolue entre le Maroc actuel et l’Andalousie musulmane. Il se situe à un moment clé de l’histoire de la pensée andalouse : celui de la condamnation de la philosophie en général et de celle d’Averroès en particulier. Par les usages variés qu’il fait de l’oeuvre rušdienne, al-Miklātī est un témoin rare à la fois de la réception d’Averroès par ses coreligionnaires et de ce que pouvait être l’opposition théologique que combattait Ibn Rušd. La cible principale de sa réfutation n’est toutefois pas le Cordouan mais bien Avicenne, incarnation à cette période de la falsafa. Al-Miklātī est par là pleinement l’héritier de l’aš‘arisme post-avicennien et l’influence d’al-Ğuwaynī, d’al-Ġazālī et d’al-Šahrastānī est manifeste. Pour mener à bien sa réfutation, al-Miklātī n’hésite pas à se servir d’Averroès, autre grand critique – bien que pour des raisons opposées – du philosophe persan. C’est ainsi que l’auteur de la Quintessence des Intellects reprend la présentation du système avicennien qu’il trouve dans le traité d’Averroès Sur le Premier Moteur, perdu aujourd’hui, nous offrant par là deux passages cruciaux pour la compréhension de la controverse qui opposa ce dernier à Avicenne concernant la preuve de l’existence de Dieu. / This PhD thesis is composed of a commentary and a full translation of a polemic work entitled The Quintessence of the intellects in response to philosophers on the science of principles (Lubāb al-‘uqūl fī al-radd ‘alā al-falāsifa fī ‘ilm al-uṣūl). The author, Abū al-Ḥaǧǧāǧ al-Miklātī, is an Aš‘arite theologian of the second half of the XIIth century, first third of the XIIIth, who evolved between present-day Morocco and Muslim Andalusia. He lives at a key point in the history of the Andalusian thought: that of the condemnation of philosophy in general and Averroes’ philosophy in particular. Through the various uses he makes of Averroes’ works, al-Miklātī is a rare witness of both the reception of the former by his own co-religionists and of the kind of theologians whom he must have been confronting. However, the main target of al-Miklātī’s refutation is not Averroes but Avicenna, who is at the time the incarnation of falsafa. In this sense, al-Miklātī is a true heir of post-Avicennian Aš‘arism and the influence of al-Ğuwaynī, al-Ġazālī and al-Šahrastānī is undeniable. To accomplish his refutation, he does not hesitate to use Averroes, another great critique – though for opposite reasons – of the Persian philosopher. He quotes the presentation of the Avicennian system he finds in Averroes’ treatise On the First Mover, which is lost today, thus offering us two crucial passages for the understanding of the controversy that opposed Averroes to Avicenna on the proof of God’s existence.

South Africa has been going through severe social changes over the past two decades. In light of these changes the present study aimed to understand adolescents’ expectations of their personal future. Based on the Theory of Possible Selves (Markus & Nurius, 1986) the present research addressed the overall question whether adolescents’ personal future plans incorporate the views they share about the present and the future of their social context. Social context was not only limited to factors such as gender, ethnicity and school environment, but also included both the daily lived experiences of inequality, as is the case in South Africa, and the projected social context of the future. A total of 631 pupils from four Gauteng high schools took part in this cross sectional study. The results support the hypotheses especially within the possible selves’ domain of academic achievement. The interrelatedness between possible selves and shared beliefs about the future of South Africa could, however, not be demonstrated. / Grow Your Own Timber Programme of the University of South Africa / Psychology / M.A. (Psychology (Research Consultation))