Global ETD Search

1	Vybrané otázky přístupu k soudům v ochraně životního prostředí / Selected issues of access to justice in environmental protection Chejn, Štěpán January 2013 (has links) Štěpán Chejn - Diplomová práce Název práce v českém jazyce: Vybrané otázky přístupu k soudům v ochraně životního prostředí Název práce v anglickém jazyce: Selected issues of access to justice in evironmental protection Abstrakt: Cílem diplomové práce je zhodnotit platnou právní úpravu přístupu k soudům v otázkách životního prostředí ve světle nálezu Výboru pro dodržování Aarhuské úmluvy. Práce nejprve stručně pojednává o teoretických přístupech a obecných otázkách, které jsou pro zhodnocení platné právní úpravy nezbytné, a poté popisuje hlavní body stížnosti. V závěru se pak věnuje tématu odkladného účinku, jelikož v této části nebyla dle Výboru Úmluva porušena. Součástí práce je také autorův vlastní výzkum dle zákona 106/1999 Sb. Klíčová slova: Soudní ochrana životního prostředí, Aarhuská úmluva, odkladný účinek Abstract: The aim of this thesis is to evaluate the legal regulation of access to justice in environmental matters in the light of findings of the Compliance Committee of the Aarhus Convention. The thesis briefly discusses theoretical approaches and general issues that are necessary to evaluate existing legislation, and then describes the main points of the complaint. The conclusion is devoted to the topic of suspensive effect, as in this section according to the Compliance Committee the Convention...
2	O efeito suspensivo aos embargos à execução fiscal após o advento da Lei 11.382/2006 / The suspensive effect to the stays of tax execution after the advent of Law 11.382/2006 Ferreira, Olívia Tonello Mendes 16 November 2009 (has links) Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:30:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Olivia Tonello Mendes Ferreira.pdf: 1463232 bytes, checksum: c758e7d9d4f55e7bc7c6b795e217f575 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-11-16 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / The present work has the objective of analyzing if the stays of tax foreclosure should always be received with suspensive effect or if, after the advent of Law 11.382/2006, which had altered significantly the Code of Civil Procedure, mainly concerning the discipline of civil execution by means of extrajudicial title, the concession of the suspensive effect is conditioned to the presence of fumus boni iuris, periculum in mora and judgment security, in the terms of the new art. 739-A and its first paragraph. Since this is a study with scientific aims, we will first discourse about the issues related to Law Philosophy and the General Theory of Law, in which the adopted reference system will be identified, as well as establishing the premises to be adopted along the study, going through the notion of juridical system, characterization of antinomies and the ways of solving those conflicts. Afterwards, some requirements to the achievement of the execution and of some of the applying principles to the process mentioned will be approached. Next, the systematic of embargos to the civil execution of extrajudicial executive title will be analyzed, tracing a comparative analysis of the main changes made by the advent of law 11.382/2006. Then, some notes about the objective responsibility of the State will be made so that the specificities of the executive juridical-tributary relation formed between the State and the Private in the process of tax execution can be analyzed. Once these specificities are analyzed, we will discourse about the norms to be applied / O presente trabalho tem por objetivo analisar se os embargos à execução fiscal devem ser recebidos, sempre, com efeito suspensivo ou se, após o advento da Lei 11.382/2006, que alterou significativamente o Código de Processo Civil, especialmente no que tange à disciplina da execução cível por título extrajudicial, a concessão do efeito suspensivo está condicionada à presença do fumus boni iuris, periculum in mora e garantia do juízo, nos termos em que prescreve o novo art. 739-A e seu parágrafo primeiro. Tratando-se de um estudo com pretensões científicas, discorremos inicialmente sobre questões atinentes à Filosofia do Direito e à Teoria Geral do Direito, identificando o sistema de referência adotado, bem como estabelecendo as premissas a serem adotadas ao longo do desenvolvimento do estudo, passando pela noção de sistema jurídico, a caracterização de antinomias, bem como os modos de solução de tais conflitos. Após, cuidamos de abordar alguns requisitos para realização da execução, bem como alguns princípios de aplicação ao mencionado processo. Em seguida, cuidamos de analisar a sistemática dos embargos à execução cível de título executivo extrajudicial, traçando uma análise comparativa das principais mudanças provocadas pelo advento da Lei 11.382/2006. Traçamos breves noções acerca da responsabilidade objetiva do Estado para, então, analisarmos as especificidades da relação jurídico tributária executiva que se forma entre o Estado e o Particular no processo de execução fiscal. Uma vez analisadas tais especificidades, passamos a discorrer sobre a norma a ser aplicada Execução cível Execução fiscal Efeito suspensivo Embargos à execução Embargos (Processo civil) -- Brasil Civil execution Tax foreclosure Suspensive effect Stays of execution
3	Le principe de l'absence d'effet suspensif des recours contentieux en droit administratif / The non-suspensive effect principle of dispute actions in french administravive law Lei, Maxime 17 March 2018 (has links) Dans le cadre de la procédure administrative contentieuse, les recours ne sont pas pourvus d’un effet suspensif. Par conséquent, les autorités administratives ont la possibilité d’exécuter les décisions contestées jusqu’à la décision juridictionnelle. Cette situation, constitutive d’un principe, est le produit d’une philosophie contentieuse marquée par un déséquilibre à l’avantage de l’administration. Le principe de l’absence d’effet suspensif en est une des formes d’expression les plus directes tant il est susceptible de grever la protection des droits des requérants. Son étude permet indirectement de questionner la pertinence contemporaine des fondements idéologiques du droit et du contentieux administratif. Sa déconstruction fait apparaitre son caractère désuet au regard des évolutions en cours. Celles-ci, qu’elles soient propres au phénomène juridique ou qu’elles le dépassent, servent à déterminer les caractéristiques attendues des recours contentieux. La recherche d’une solution équilibrée, à mi-chemin entre efficacité administrative et protection des requérants, devient un impératif. Celui-ci sera atteint à partir d’une reconstruction de cet aspect épineux de la procédure administrative contentieuse en s’appuyant sur une analyse matérielle de la situation litigieuse. / In contentious administrative disputes, appeal actions do not trigger any suspensive effect on the case. As a consequence, the administrative authorities can enforce the appealed decisions until the court gives its final decision. This position constitutes a principle and is due to a highly unbalanced dispute philosophy, as it tends to be favourable to the administration. The non-suspensive effect principle is one of the most direct expressions of this phenomenon as it is most likely to encumber the protection of the plaintiff rights. Studying this principle allows to question the relevance, nowadays, of the ideological basis on which law and administrative disputes are built. A deconstructive analysis shows that, due to several evolutions, this principle seems to be “outdated”. These developments, whether they are part of the legal dimension or part of something bigger, help shaping the expected features of the dispute actions. Finding a balanced solution, between administrative effectiveness and protection of plaintiffs, has become an essential requirement. And this may be reached through rebuilding this rather thorny aspect of the administrative proceedings from a legal analysis of the position in controversy. Contentieux administratif Procédure admistrative contentieuse Principe Effet suspensif Recours Office du juge Protection des citoyens Démocratie administrative Administrative dispute Contentious administrative procedure Principle Suspensive effect Appeal Court Protection of citizens Administrative democracy 342.066
4	Aktuální problémy soudního řízení ve věcech mezinárodní ochrany / Current issues of judicial proceedings in cases of international protection Křižáková, Markéta January 2017 (has links) The aim of the diploma thesis "Current issues of judicial proceedings in cases of international protection" is the evaluation whether the amendment of Asylum Act sufficiently fulfils requirements of the procedural Directive 2013/32/EU regarding the right to effective remedy. Namely these requirements are full and ex nunc examination of both fact and points of law that composes large part of this thesis, suspensive effect and time limits. In order to reach the goal of this thesis several questions are given which one of them relates to the right to effective remedy in international, European and national law. Hence the chapter two deals with the right to effective remedy in European Convention on Human Rights, Convention against Torture and International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights same as in EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms of the Czech Republic. Afterwards the thesis presents the main principles of administrative judiciary such as cassation principle and principle ex tunc and specifics of judicial proceedings in cases of international protection. Crucial part of the thesis is the chapter four that analyses above mentioned requirements of procedural Directive 2013/32/EU and transposition of these requirements by the amendment of Asylum Act....
5	Les principes directeurs du procès dans la jurisprudence du Conseil Constitutionnel / The Trial’s guiding principles in the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Council Lestrade, Éric 21 November 2013 (has links) Malgré le peu de fondements écrits consacrés à la justice dans le texte de la Constitution du 4 octobre 1958, le Conseil constitutionnel, en réalisant un travail d’actualisation à partir de la Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen, a permis l’émergence d’un droit constitutionnel processuel, construit autour de principes directeurs. Ceux-ci peuvent être répartis dans trois catégories : deux principales, selon que l’acteur du procès prioritairement concerné soit le juge ou les parties et une troisième, complémentaire, celle des garanties procédurales, permettant de favoriser les qualités essentielles du juge et de contrôler le respect des droits des parties. Une gradation des exigences du Conseil constitutionnel est discrètement perceptible entre les deux premières catégories de principes, plus facilement identifiable entre celles-ci et la dernière famille. Cette échelle décroissante de « densité » des principes directeurs du procès témoigne d’une véritable politique jurisprudentielle en matière de droit constitutionnel processuel, qui met l’accent sur l’accès au juge, doté des qualités indispensables à l’accomplissement de sa mission juridictionnelle. Toutefois, aussi satisfaisante que soit l’action du juge constitutionnel français à l’égard du droit du procès, celle-ci nécessiterait aujourd’hui le relais du constituant, afin de moderniser le statut constitutionnel de la justice. / In spite of a relatively low number of written dispositions dedicated to justice inside of the body of the Constitution of October 1958 4th, the constitutional Council, while updating this text through the Declaration of Human Rights, contributed to the development of a procedural constitutional law, which is structured around guiding principles. Those principles can be classified within three different categories : two major categories depend on the trial actor that is primarily concerned, either the judge or the parties; a third and additional category pertaining to procedural protections, fosters the essential qualities of the judge and secure the protection of the parties’ rights. A gradation of the requirements of the constitutional Council is discreetly perceptible between the first two categories of principles, and more easily identifiable between those first two categories and the last one. This decreasing scale of “density” yoked to the trial guiding principles highlights a genuine judicial policy when it comes to procedural constitutional law, emphasizing access to the judge, whom is given essential qualities in order to achieve its judicial duty. However, the action of the French constitutional judge, as satisfactory as it is towards the rights of the trial, would easily support the intervention of the constituent power in order to update Justice’s constitutional status. Accès au juge Actes de gouvernement Action en justice Appel Autorité de la chose jugée Avocat Cassation Conseil constitutionnel Conseil supérieur de la magistrature Contradictoire Collégialité Délai raisonnable de jugement Déni de justice Double degré de juridiction Droits de la défense Droit au recours juridictionnel effectif Effet dévolutif de l’appel Effet suspensif de l’appel Égalité des armes Égalité devant la justice Garde à vue Impartialité Inamovibilité Injonction pénale Indépendance Instance Instruction Intérêt pour agir Juge unique Juridiction Magistrat Ministère public Motivation Parquet Partie au procès Présomption d’innocence Principes directeurs Procès Publicité des audiences Recours administratif préalable Siège Validations législatives Voies de recours Access to the judge Acts of government Adversarial proceedings Appeal Argumentation Authority Cassation Collegiality Constitutional Council Constitutionnalization of procedural law Criminal injunction Denial of justice Equality before the law Equality of arms Force of res judicata Guiding principles High Council of the Judiciary Impartiality Independence Independent administrative authorities Instruction Interest to act Judge Jurisdiction Lawyer Legal proceedings Legal remedies Legislative validations Party to the proceedings Plea-bargaining Police custody Preliminary administrative appeal Presumption of innocence Prosecutor Public prosecutor Publicity of hearings Rights of the defense Single judge Sitting judge Tenure The devolutive effect of appeal The right to a second hearing The right to effective judicial review The suspensive effect of appeal Trial 340

1

Page generated in 0.0648 seconds