La poétique du dénouement pré-moderne, dans les tragédies italiennes, françaises et espagnoles, est liée à un souci éthique: la fin de l'intrigue est le lieu attendu qui en dévoile le sens et qui dit sa morale. Or, le dénouement tragique répond à une double exigence: s'il conclut la tragédie, il doit aussi renverser le sort du héros. Pour achever la tragédie, le dénouement doit réaliser un équilibre moral; pour renverser l'intrigue, il doit susciter un excès pathétique. Ces deux exigences sont issues de deux modèles théoriques opposés: la logique de l'exemplarité et l'efficacité pathétique. La thèse analyse les stratégies poétiques que théoriciens et dramaturges mettent en place pour concilier ces deux modèles poétiques, au sein des trois critères qui définissent le dénouement (son orientation, ses modalités et sa structure) et des problèmes éthiques qu'ils posent (l'enchaînement de la causalité, la faute et la rétribution du héros). Les efforts pour concilier exemplarité et pathétique se soldent par un échec. En dépit de leurs différences, les trois traditions nationales dénoncent les faiblesses de la logique de l'exemplarité, qui ne permet pas de justifier, par une règle de conduite universelle, l'expérience du malheur, du désordre, de l'injustice. Le dénouement tragique incite alors le spectateur à un déchiffrement herméneutique pour trouver des raisons à la misère inexplicable du héros, que manifeste le renversement de fortune. / The poetics of early modern denouement in Italian, Spanish and French tragedies implies an ethical issue. The ending of the plot is the expected climax which reveals the meaning and the moral of the story. The aim of the tragic denouement is twofold: it concludes the play and it reverses the hero's fate. In order to conclude the tragedy, the denouement restores a moral balance; in order to reverse the plot, it gives rise to a pathetic excess. Two divergent theoretical models underlie this dual requirement: the logic of exemplarity and the poetics of pathos. I propose to examine the strategies displayed by theorists and dramatists in order to bring together these two theoretical models. I therefore consider the three main features of the denouement (its direction, mode and structure) and the ethical issues to which they give rise (the sequence of causality, the tragic flaw and its atonement). The conciliation between exemplarity and pathos proves an impossibility: Italian, Spanish and French tragedy, despite their differences, denounce the logic of exemplarity as inadequate and unfit to justify, through the expression of a theoretical rule, the experience of misfortune, injustice and chaos. The tragic denouement leads the spectator to a hermeneutic deciphering that may uncover the reasons for the hero's inexplicable misfortunes.

Pour les citoyens d’Athènes au Ve siècle, l’expérience de la tragédie n’avait pas son début lorsque les spectateurs prenaient leur place dans le théâtre de Dionysos : en tant qu’expérience rituelle, la tragédie s’inscrit dans le contexte festif des Grandes Dionysies, point de référence fondamental pour comprendre les interactions entre le drame et les spectateurs en tant que πολῖται.Au cours des rites accomplis aux Dionysies, et en général au cours de chaque rituel accompli dans d’autres contextes, le rôle de spectateur constituait une activité rituelle à tous égards. Lorsqu'un rituel fait partie de l’intrigue du drame, un mécanisme de mise en abyme est activé en fonction des compétences et des expériences rituelles des spectateurs, qui étaient capables de reconnaître la forme, les implications et les marges d'efficacité du rite. Les rites tragiques présentent donc une efficacité rituelle, déterminée par la comparaison avec le rite réel, et une efficacité dramatique, liée aux dynamiques de l’intrigue. Les images des rituels de la tragédie sont construites en tant qu'images polyvalentes, connectées aux événements dramatiques et associées à l'expérience rituelle des πολῖται.Le rituel est également inséré dans les dynamiques de la performance tragique ; certains rites (supplications, lamentations, offrandes non sanglantes) sont particulièrement « bons à représenter » sur la scène, tandis que d'autres (notamment le sacrifice sanglant) se déroulent dans des espaces invisibles aux spectateurs. L'observation des mécanismes par lesquels l'espace de l'orchestre est modelé par la représentation du rite, et mis en communication avec les espaces rituel invisibles permet de comprendre comment les détails de l'action rituelle sont utilisé pour obtenir un effet dramatique. D'autre part, isoler les caractéristiques des rituels représentés dans l'orchestre du théâtre de Dionysos permet de réfléchir à la nature de la tragédie grecque en tant qu'expérience rituelle. / The experience of ancient Greek tragedy did not begin, for the 5th century Athenians, when the spectators took their place in the theatre of Dionysus: as a ritual experience, Greek tragedy is part of the ritual context of the Great Dionysia. During the festival, and in general during every ritual performed on a small or large scale, the role of spectator constituted a ritual activity in all respects.When a ritual is part of the tragic plot, it generates a mechanism of mise en abyme based on the skills and the ritual experiences of the spectators, who are able to recognize the form, the implications and the efficacy of the rite. The dramatic rites have their ritual efficacy, determined by the comparison with the actual rite, and their dramatic efficacy, depending on the dynamics of the tragic plot. The ritual sequences in Greek tragedy are represented as polyvalent images, connected to the interweaving of dramatic events, and associated with the ritual experience of the πολῖται.The ritual is also part of the dynamics of the tragic performance: some rites (supplication, funeral lamentations, bloodless offerings) are embedded on the tragic scene, while others (especially blood sacrifices) are performed offstage, and are therefore invisible to the spectators.Focusing on how dramatic rituals influence the construction of the dramatic space, and observing the mechanisms of ritual communication between the space of the theatre and the invisible ritual spaces, can help us understand how the representation of ritual actions can be used to activate the ritual competences and experiences of the spectators of ancient Greek Tragedy.On the other hand, observing the characteristics of the rituals that are suitable to be represented onstage, and embedded in the orchestra of the theatre of Dionysus, can clarify some aspects of ancient Greek tragedy as a ritual experience. / L’esperienza della tragedia non iniziava, per gli Ateniesi del quinto secolo, nel momento in cui gli spettatori prendevano posto nel teatro di Dioniso: in quanto esperienza rituale, la tragedia si inserisce nel contesto festivo delle Grandi Dionisie, punto di riferimento fondamentale per comprendere come il dramma interagiva con gli spettatori in quanto πολῖται. Nel corso dei rituali delle Dionisie, e di ogni rito compiuto su piccola o grande scala, l’attività di spettatore costituiva un’attività rituale a tutti gli effetti.Quando un rito si inserisce nel μῦθος del dramma, viene attivato un meccanismo di mise en abyme basato sulle competenze e le esperienze rituali degli spettatori, che sono in grado di riconoscere la forma, le implicazioni e l’orizzonte di efficacia del rito. I riti presentano un’efficacia rituale, determinata dal confronto col rito reale, e un’efficacia drammatica, connessa alle dinamiche degli eventi tragici. Le immagini dei rituali in tragedia si costruiscono come immagini polivalenti, che si connettono all’intreccio di vicende drammatiche, e si associano all’esperienza rituale dei πολῖται.Il rituale si inserisce, inoltre, nelle dinamiche della performance: alcuni riti (supplica, lamentazione funebre, offerte incruente) sono particolarmente adatti a essere rappresentati sulla scena, mentre altri (in particolare il sacrificio cruento) sono relegati negli spazi invisibili agli spettatori.Osservare i meccanismi con cui lo spazio dell’orchestra viene modellato dal rito, e messo in comunicazione con gli spazi rituali invisibili, permette di comprendere come i dettagli dell’azione rituale vengono evocati, sfruttando le esperienze rituali degli spettatori, per ottenere un effetto drammatico.Dall’altra parte, isolare le caratteristiche dei rituali rappresentati nell’orchestra del teatro di Dioniso permette di riflettere sulla natura della tragedia greca come esperienza rituale.

In this study of Lev Shestov, the biographical method is used to explain his philosophy. The grave crisis or nervous breakdown Shestov went through caused a total transformation of his - convictions and values. It was probably this drama that led to his repudiation of the common life and traditional philosophy with its emphasis on reason, knowledge, and ethics in favour of an extreme individualism and religious transcendence. The aim of the dissertation is to examine, amongst the great number of philosophers and writers Shestov analysed, mainly those in his view “marginal thinkers”, who were of the greatest interest to him – Fyodor Dostoevsky, Lev Tolstoy, Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin Luther, and Søren Kierkegaard. On the basis of this analysis the character of Shestov’s philosophy is defined. According to Shestov, like his own crisis, the crises that these thinkers experienced occasioned a total transformation of their convictions and values. Šestov does not let his life find complete expression in his philosophy. Instead he projects his crisis into the five thinkers’ crises and philosophy. To characterize the previous and new modes of thinking, the concepts of alienation (degeneration, degradation, depravity) and authenticity (deliverance from alienation) are used. Shestov’s judgment of the consistency of the five thinkers’ new attitudes is presented, i.e. deliverance from the common life with its emphasis on rational eternal truths and moralism. Authentic life is in Shestov’s opinion the from the individual’s everyday life concealed experience of despair in extreme situations. This constitutes a grave crisis that leads to the repudiation of all hitherto held convictions and cherished hopes. The contrast between the Russian philosopher’s personal, (after his crisis) mainly tranquil, harmonious life and his philosophy is glaring. Analyzing the five thinkers, Shestov finds that they did not persevere with their new convictions, instead they complied with the by everybody accepted and everywhere valid truths. Shestov’s “theoretical”, uncompromising and consistent stance on one side and the lack of these characteristics with the aforementioned thinkers on the other side, to a great extent places Shestov in another category than these. In Shestov’s view freedom is in the region of tragedy, which nobody enters on his own will and in the incomprehensible trust in a capricious, “inhuman” God. According to Shestov, only the philosopher, who derives his thinking from a situation, where he experiences extreme despair and hopelessness, can claim to be a true philosopher. / <p>Examinator: docent Julie Hansen; Uppsala universitet</p>

Disney's Hercules is an apt modern reception of the ancient mythology of Herakles, acknowledging ancient and modern sources surrounding three types of classical hero: the archetypal hero, influenced by the ideas of Joseph Campbell; the Pan-Hellenic hero, distilled from ancient Greek exempla of heroism from epic and other genres of ancient literature; and the tragic hero, inspired by the heroic criteria presented in Aristotle's Poetics. By adapting these heroic types from their traditional ancient source myths, Disney's Hercules produces a new, contemporary definition of heroism—one informed by modern, Western family values. This adaptation renews the power of the myth of Herakles for a modern era, whose image and characteristics have been changed and adapted since ancient times to suit each receiving culture's conception of true heroism.

[pt] Considerando as ameaças existenciais à humanidade no mundo contemporâneo, sobretudo as armas nucleares e as mudanças climáticas de origens antrópicas, a presente dissertação objetiva analisar as formas pelas quais estas são enunciadas nas declarações do Relógio do Juízo Final [Doomsday Clock] escritas pelo Boletim dos Cientistas Atômicos [Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists], no período entre 1947 e 2020. Para tanto, será analisada a rede conceitual utilizada pelo Boletim e como esta é indicativa de uma experiência do tempo. Acredita-se que, com isso, será possível identificar o protagonismo do conceito de catástrofe em relação a outros termos chaves para se compreender a temporalidade histórica contemporânea. / [en] Considering the existential threats to humanity in the contemporary world, especially nuclear weapons and anthropic climate change, this dissertation aims to analyze the ways in which these are enunciated in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Doomsday Clock, in the period between 1947 and 2020. In order to do so, the conceptual web used by the Bulletin will be analyzed as na experience of time. I believe that it will be possible to identify the protagonism of the concept of catastrophe in comparison with other key terms to understand the contemporary historical temporality.

No description available.

[pt] Este trabalho apresenta a hipótese de que o processo analítico implica na perdição criadora. Com esta expressão busca destacar tanto a experiência da perda como o despertar do desejo, presentes na análise. Ambos provocam sensação de desordem, vivida como experiência traumática. No entanto, constituem condição necessária para a invenção de nova maneira de viver e perceber o mundo. Parte do conceito de pulsão de morte, formulado por Sigmund Freud e reelaborado pelos psicanalistas Jacques Lacan e MD Magno, para pensar o fenômeno da criação, tanto na cultura como na clínica psicanalítica. Ao associar a pulsão de morte ao caráter trágico da existência, o trabalho estabelece diálogo entre a psicanálise e o pensamento de Friedrich Nietzsche. / [en] This thesis presents the hypothesis that psychoanalytic process implicates in creative perdition. By this expression it intends to emphasize the loss experience as much as the awakening of desire. Both incite a sensation of disorder, associated to a traumatic experience. Nevertheless, they are necessary to promote the invention of an original way of living. The thesis starts with the study of the death drive, formulated by Freud and elaborated anew by the psychoanalysts Jacques Lacan and MD Magno, in order to investigate the creation phenomenon, as related both to culture and psychoanalytic clinic. By associating death drive to the tragic character of existence, this thesis establishes a dialogue between psychoanalysis and Friedrich Nietzsche s thought.

This dissertation is the application of counterfactual criticism to Shakespearean tragedy—supposing we are to ask, for example, “what if” Hamlet had done the deed, or, “what if” we could somehow disinherit our knowledge of Lear’s madness before reading King Lear. Such readings, mirroring critical practices in history, will loosely be called “counterfactual” readings. The key question to ask is not why tragedies are no longer being written (by writers), but why tragedies are no longer being felt (by readers). Tragedy entails a certain urgency in wanting to imagine an outcome different from the one we are given. Since we cannot change events as they stand, we feel a critical helplessness in dealing with feelings of tragic loss; the critical imperative that follows usually accounts for how the tragedy unfolded. Fleshing out a cause is one way to deal with the trauma of tragedy. But such explanation, in a sense, merely explains tragedy away. The fact that everything turns out so poorly in tragedy suggests that the tragic protagonist was somehow doomed, that he (in the case of Shakespearean tragedy) was the victim of some “tragic flaw,” as though tragedy and necessity go hand in hand. Only by allowing ourselves to imagine other possibilities can we regain the tragic effect, which is to remind ourselves that other outcomes are indeed possible. Tragedy, then, is more readily understood, or felt, as the playing out of contingency. It takes some effort to convince others, even ourselves, that the tragic effect resonates best when accompanied by an understanding that the characters on the page are free individuals. No amount of foreknowledge, on our part or theirs, can save us (or them) from tragedy’s horror.

This dissertation is the application of counterfactual criticism to Shakespearean tragedy—supposing we are to ask, for example, “what if” Hamlet had done the deed, or, “what if” we could somehow disinherit our knowledge of Lear’s madness before reading King Lear. Such readings, mirroring critical practices in history, will loosely be called “counterfactual” readings. The key question to ask is not why tragedies are no longer being written (by writers), but why tragedies are no longer being felt (by readers). Tragedy entails a certain urgency in wanting to imagine an outcome different from the one we are given. Since we cannot change events as they stand, we feel a critical helplessness in dealing with feelings of tragic loss; the critical imperative that follows usually accounts for how the tragedy unfolded. Fleshing out a cause is one way to deal with the trauma of tragedy. But such explanation, in a sense, merely explains tragedy away. The fact that everything turns out so poorly in tragedy suggests that the tragic protagonist was somehow doomed, that he (in the case of Shakespearean tragedy) was the victim of some “tragic flaw,” as though tragedy and necessity go hand in hand. Only by allowing ourselves to imagine other possibilities can we regain the tragic effect, which is to remind ourselves that other outcomes are indeed possible. Tragedy, then, is more readily understood, or felt, as the playing out of contingency. It takes some effort to convince others, even ourselves, that the tragic effect resonates best when accompanied by an understanding that the characters on the page are free individuals. No amount of foreknowledge, on our part or theirs, can save us (or them) from tragedy’s horror.

Consacré à la tétralogie Le Sang des promesses — composée des pièces Littoral, Incendies, Forêts et Ciels — de Wajdi Mouawad, le présent mémoire s’appuie sur un retour remarqué de la catharsis dans les discours sur le théâtre contemporain pour questionner la capacité du théâtre à développer une pensée du vivre-ensemble. Il est divisé en trois chapitres : le premier porte sur la place du genre de la tragédie et du concept du tragique dans la tétralogie ainsi que la réappropriation par Mouawad de certaines figures de la mythologie grecque ; le second s’intéresse au devenir contemporain de la catharsis, à son articulation autour des émotions de peur et compassion et à l’importance de la parole-action au sein de l’œuvre. Enfin, le troisième chapitre cherche à définir les rapports entre le cathartique et le concept de « solidarité des ébranlés » théorisé par Jan Patočka avant d’analyser la réception critique des pièces pour y trouver des exemples concrets de l’effet cathartique propre au théâtre de Mouawad. / This master's dissertation addresses Wajdi Mouawad's Blood Promises tetralogy, composed of the plays Tideline, Scorched, Forests, and Skies. As it focuses on the return of the concept of catharsis in discourses on contemporary theater, it aims to question theater's capacity to develop a thought of the living-together (vivre-ensemble). The first chapter focuses on the status of tragedy and the tragic as well as on the revisiting of several mythological Greek characters in Mouawad's tetralogy, whereas the second chapter takes an interest in contemporary manifestations of catharsis, as they involve the emotions of fear and compassion, and, in the case of Mouawad's work, particularly depend on the importance of acts of language. Finally, the third chapter attempts to link the cathartic to Jan Patočka's concept of the solidarity of the shaken, before it proceeds to analyze the critical reception of Mouawad's plays in order to underline their specific cathartic effect.