Studiens syfte är att beskriva hur en konflikt mellan en salladsbarsägare i Göteborg och ett fackförbund framställdes på nyhetsplats i tidningarna Aftonbladet, Dagens Nyheter och Göteborgs-Posten under tiden 5 december 2006 till 31 mars 2007. Fackförbundet satte salladsbaren i blockad den 5 november 2006 eftersom ägaren inte ville teckna kollektivavtal. Detta fick stor uppmärksamhet i media och flera högt uppsatta politiker uttalade sig om händelsen. Konflikten liknades vid flera tillfällen vid den bibliska berättelsen om David och Goliat. För att undersöka hur tidningarna rapporterade och hur de olika aktörerna framställdes gjorde vi en kvalitativ diskursanalys. Våra teoretiska utgångspunkter är till exempel teorier om nyhetsframställning och språk. Vi kom efter vår undersökning fram till att de tre olika tidningarna rapporterade om konflikten på ett liknande sätt. I de flesta fall framställdes salladsbarens ägare Sofia Appelgren som David och facket som Goliat. Alla tidningarna använder sig i flera fall av medieforskaren Hvitfeldts kriterier för vinkling i media. De vanligaste vinklingarna var personifiering, den enskilde mot myndigheten och konfliktvinkeln. Händelsen beskrevs med ett språk som var rikt på metaforer. Vi hittade två typer av metaforer som förekom frekvent i alla tidningarna. Det var krigsmetaforer och politiska metaforer. Den största skillnaden vi kunde se mellan tidningarnas rapportering var att Aftonbladet var de enda som i vissa fall vinklade konflikten till fackets fördel och Sofia Appelgrens nackdel. Vi såg också att Aftonbladets artiklar i större utsträckning var vinklade. En annan skillnad var att Dagens Nyheter fokuserade mer på de politiska aktörerna. / The purpose of this study is to analyze how a conflict between a restaurant owner in Gothenburg and a labor union is described in the newspapers Aftonbladet, Dagens Nyheter and Göteborgs-Posten during the time from the 5th of December 2006 until the 31st of March 2007. The labor union put the restaurant in a blockade on the 5th of December 2006 because the owner did not comply with the collective labor agreement. The media paid a great deal of attention to the conflict and high ranking politicians got involved. The conflict was frequently compared to the biblical David and Goliath story. In order to discover how the three newspapers had portrayed the conflict we made a qualitative discourse analysis. We used theories about news production and language as starting-points. Our conclusion was that the newspapers all reported news about the conflict in similar ways. In most cases the restaurant owner Sofia Appelgren was described as David and the labor union as Goliath. All three newspapers used media scientist Hvitfeld’s criteria for view points in media on several occasions. The most common view points were personification, the individual against the collective authority and the conflict view point. The incident was described using many metaphors. We found two types of metaphors used frequently in all three newspapers: metaphors of war and of politics. The biggest difference that we discovered was that Aftonbladet was the only publication that in some cases made the story reflects well upon the labor union and badly upon the restaurant owner. Another difference was that Dagens Nyheter placed more focus upon the political figures involved.

<p>Studiens syfte är att beskriva hur en konflikt mellan en salladsbarsägare i Göteborg</p><p>och ett fackförbund framställdes på nyhetsplats i tidningarna Aftonbladet, Dagens</p><p>Nyheter och Göteborgs-Posten under tiden 5 december 2006 till 31 mars 2007.</p><p>Fackförbundet satte salladsbaren i blockad den 5 november 2006 eftersom ägaren inte</p><p>ville teckna kollektivavtal. Detta fick stor uppmärksamhet i media och flera högt</p><p>uppsatta politiker uttalade sig om händelsen. Konflikten liknades vid flera tillfällen</p><p>vid den bibliska berättelsen om David och Goliat.</p><p>För att undersöka hur tidningarna rapporterade och hur de olika aktörerna framställdes</p><p>gjorde vi en kvalitativ diskursanalys. Våra teoretiska utgångspunkter är till exempel</p><p>teorier om nyhetsframställning och språk.</p><p>Vi kom efter vår undersökning fram till att de tre olika tidningarna rapporterade om</p><p>konflikten på ett liknande sätt. I de flesta fall framställdes salladsbarens ägare Sofia</p><p>Appelgren som David och facket som Goliat. Alla tidningarna använder sig i flera fall</p><p>av medieforskaren Hvitfeldts kriterier för vinkling i media. De vanligaste vinklingarna</p><p>var personifiering, den enskilde mot myndigheten och konfliktvinkeln. Händelsen</p><p>beskrevs med ett språk som var rikt på metaforer. Vi hittade två typer av metaforer</p><p>som förekom frekvent i alla tidningarna. Det var krigsmetaforer och politiska</p><p>metaforer. Den största skillnaden vi kunde se mellan tidningarnas rapportering var att</p><p>Aftonbladet var de enda som i vissa fall vinklade konflikten till fackets fördel och</p><p>Sofia Appelgrens nackdel. Vi såg också att Aftonbladets artiklar i större utsträckning</p><p>var vinklade. En annan skillnad var att Dagens Nyheter fokuserade mer på de</p><p>politiska aktörerna.</p> / <p>The purpose of this study is to analyze how a conflict between a restaurant owner in</p><p>Gothenburg and a labor union is described in the newspapers Aftonbladet, Dagens</p><p>Nyheter and Göteborgs-Posten during the time from the 5th of December 2006 until</p><p>the 31st of March 2007. The labor union put the restaurant in a blockade on the 5th of</p><p>December 2006 because the owner did not comply with the collective labor</p><p>agreement.</p><p>The media paid a great deal of attention to the conflict and high ranking politicians</p><p>got involved. The conflict was frequently compared to the biblical David and Goliath</p><p>story. In order to discover how the three newspapers had portrayed the conflict we</p><p>made a qualitative discourse analysis. We used theories about news production and</p><p>language as starting-points.</p><p>Our conclusion was that the newspapers all reported news about the conflict in similar</p><p>ways. In most cases the restaurant owner Sofia Appelgren was described as David and</p><p>the labor union as Goliath. All three newspapers used media scientist Hvitfeld’s</p><p>criteria for view points in media on several occasions. The most common view points</p><p>were personification, the individual against the collective authority and the conflict</p><p>view point. The incident was described using many metaphors. We found two types of</p><p>metaphors used frequently in all three newspapers: metaphors of war and of politics.</p><p>The biggest difference that we discovered was that Aftonbladet was the only</p><p>publication that in some cases made the story reflects well upon the labor union and</p><p>badly upon the restaurant owner. Another difference was that Dagens Nyheter placed</p><p>more focus upon the political figures involved.</p>

No description available.

Alfred Thayer Mahan and Julian Stafford Corbett, two of the most influential and important strategists of sea power in the beginning of the twentieth century. Their theories today form the basis for several of the theories of sea power that exist today. The societal changes have led to the development of the naval warfare´s character until today. Despite developments in the history of naval warfare and it´s characteristics over the century there are being debated about the principles of sea power that Mahan and Corbett wrote might still be valid or not. The aim of this essay is to investigate whether Mahan and Corbetts principles of sea power during the Falklands war as a case study might still be valid or not. The examination is carried out by analysing Mahan and Corbetts principles of blockade, establish of sea command and exercise of sea command respectively to extract variables in the theory and examine on the case Falklands war. The results of this case study shows that the theories military blockade, naval blockade and establish of sea command are still valid to a certain extent but more research is needed to determine the principles general validity in the naval warfare today.

The protests and strikes in Västervik 1917 have been considered to be the start of the hunger movement in Sweden. The events have been called the Swedish revolution. The Swedes who participated were inspired by the February revolution in Russia, and there were similarities, but the reformist side won and the outcome was the equal vote for most men and women. This essay analyzes the way four newspapers report from the events in relation to the political orientation of the newspapers, the involvement of women in the strikes and protests, and how the events in Västervik can be used for educational purposes. The two right wing newspapers wrote negatively about the worker´s movement and, the two left wing newspapers published articles that acknowledged the struggle of the workers and the abuse against the workers by the factory owners. Three of the newspapers (Smålands Allehanda, Smålands Folkblad and Västerviks Veckoblad) initially have relatively neutral articles and the comments about the opposing political side are relatively subtle. The revolutionary syndicalist newspaper Syndikalisten has a more aggressive tone because it functions as the official paper of SAC, the Swedish workers central organization. The inquiry shows that women were not that much involved in the strikes and protests in Västervik. They were active in the certain sectors, such as foodstuff, where they, in certain cases, could make a big difference. The events in Västervik 1917 can be used in school when the students work with the history of their local communities in a social learning environment.

<p>De klassiska sjökrigsteorierna har åtskilliga år på nacken. Fortfarande anses emellertid Julius S. Corbetts och Alfred T. Mahans idéer äga sin giltighet – trots att den tidigare var verksam under första halvan 1900-talet och den senare under framförallt den andra halvan av 1800-talet. Syftet med arbetet har varit att undersöka huruvida dessa teoretikers syn på strategier i sjökriget som fenomen kan anses relevanta i det moderna sjökriget. Slaget om Falklandsöarna i början 1980-talet har betecknats som en av de första drabbningarna till sjöss som utspelats i en modern telekrigsmiljö. Utgångspunkt har varit att studera i vilken utsträckning Corbetts och Mahans teorier kan skönjas i utförandet av den brittiska operationsplanen i Falklandskriget. Genom en kvalitativ textanalys av Mahans och Corbetts litterära verk, och litteratur om dessa, har adekvata indikatorer tagits fram. Dessa har jämförts med en fallstudie som utgjorts av Falklandskriget. Slutsatsen blev att teorierna – och då framförallt Corbetts tankar – äger sin giltighet, om än inte bokstavligen och i varje detalj, men som en övergripande förklaring på vilket sätt framgång i modern sjökrigsföring kan uppnås.</p> / <p>The classic naval theories have been around for a considerable sum of time. Despite of these circumstances the ideas of Julius S. Corbett and Alfred T. Mahan are still regarded to be obligated their validity – even though that the foremost of them was active under the first part of the 1900 and the latter active particularly during the second part of the 1800. The purpose of the paper has been to examine whether these naval thinker view on strategy in naval warfare could be considered to be relevant in the modern naval warfare. The battle for the Falklands islands in the beginning of 1980 have been designated as one of the first encounters on the high seas that was situated in a modern electronic warfare environment. The starting point has been to study in which extension Corbett’s and Mahan’s theories could be notices in the execution of the British campaign plan in the Falklands war. Through a qualitative text study of Mahan’s and Corbett’s literary creation, and literature about them, adequate indicators have been brought forward. These have been comprehended with a case study consisting of the Falklands war. The conclusion where that the theories – particularly Corbett’s thoughts – still posses, if not figuratively and in every aspect, but as an overlooking clarification through in which way the success in modern navel warfare ought to be accomplished.</p>

De klassiska sjökrigsteorierna har åtskilliga år på nacken. Fortfarande anses emellertid Julius S. Corbetts och Alfred T. Mahans idéer äga sin giltighet – trots att den tidigare var verksam under första halvan 1900-talet och den senare under framförallt den andra halvan av 1800-talet. Syftet med arbetet har varit att undersöka huruvida dessa teoretikers syn på strategier i sjökriget som fenomen kan anses relevanta i det moderna sjökriget. Slaget om Falklandsöarna i början 1980-talet har betecknats som en av de första drabbningarna till sjöss som utspelats i en modern telekrigsmiljö. Utgångspunkt har varit att studera i vilken utsträckning Corbetts och Mahans teorier kan skönjas i utförandet av den brittiska operationsplanen i Falklandskriget. Genom en kvalitativ textanalys av Mahans och Corbetts litterära verk, och litteratur om dessa, har adekvata indikatorer tagits fram. Dessa har jämförts med en fallstudie som utgjorts av Falklandskriget. Slutsatsen blev att teorierna – och då framförallt Corbetts tankar – äger sin giltighet, om än inte bokstavligen och i varje detalj, men som en övergripande förklaring på vilket sätt framgång i modern sjökrigsföring kan uppnås. / The classic naval theories have been around for a considerable sum of time. Despite of these circumstances the ideas of Julius S. Corbett and Alfred T. Mahan are still regarded to be obligated their validity – even though that the foremost of them was active under the first part of the 1900 and the latter active particularly during the second part of the 1800. The purpose of the paper has been to examine whether these naval thinker view on strategy in naval warfare could be considered to be relevant in the modern naval warfare. The battle for the Falklands islands in the beginning of 1980 have been designated as one of the first encounters on the high seas that was situated in a modern electronic warfare environment. The starting point has been to study in which extension Corbett’s and Mahan’s theories could be notices in the execution of the British campaign plan in the Falklands war. Through a qualitative text study of Mahan’s and Corbett’s literary creation, and literature about them, adequate indicators have been brought forward. These have been comprehended with a case study consisting of the Falklands war. The conclusion where that the theories – particularly Corbett’s thoughts – still posses, if not figuratively and in every aspect, but as an overlooking clarification through in which way the success in modern navel warfare ought to be accomplished.