L'objet de cette thèse est de développer une approche d’aide à la constitution et aux choix des équipes multidisciplinaires. Deux méthodologies ont été développées afin d’apporter une contribution au le domaine du management des équipes d’une manière générale et aux systèmes hospitaliers particulièrement. Nous nous sommes intéressés dans la conception de ces méthodologies aux méthodes d’aide à la décision multicritère et aux méthodes cognitives. La première méthodologie TBS 1, se base sur les expériences des opérations passées afin de fournir l’équipe adéquate pour une nouvelle opération. Nous développons une hybridation entre un outil d’aide à la décision multicritères AHP et une méthode cognitive RàPC. Dans une deuxième méthodologie TBS 2, nous combinons deux méthodes d’aide à la décision multicritères AHP et ELECTRE afin de proposer aux responsables la meilleure équipe et les liens avec les autres équipes. Pour valider ces deux démarches, nous les avons expérimentées en bloc opératoire de CHU Habib Bourguiba. Bien qu’un certain nombre de limites ait pu être mis en évidence, les retours terrain nous amènent à penser que l’intérêt des deux démarches d’aide à la constitution et au choix des équipes dans le bloc opératoire semble validé. / The subject of this thesis is to develop a support approach to the constitution and to the choices of the multidisciplinary teams. Two methodologies have been developed in order to provide a contribution to the domain of the team management in a general manner and to the hospital systems particularly. We are interested in the conception of these methodologies in the support method to the multi-criterion decision and to the cognitive methods.The first methodology TBS 1, is based on the experiences of the past operations in order to supply the adequate team for a new operation. We develop hybridization between the support tool to the multi-criterion decision AHP and a cognitive method CBR. In a second methodology TBS 2, we combine two support methods to the multi-criterion decision AHP and ELECTRE in order to suggest to the persons in charge the best team and the links with the other teams.In order to approve these two approaches, we have experimented them in the operating theatre of CHU Habib Bourguiba. Even though certain number of limits could be highlighted, the operation issues lead us to think that the interest of the two support approaches to the constitution and to the choices of the teams in the operating theatre seems to be approved.

Submitted by Caroline Falcao (caroline.rfalcao@ufpe.br) on 2017-06-01T17:19:38Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 811 bytes, checksum: e39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34 (MD5) Patricia TESE.pdf: 2509023 bytes, checksum: 8b18c1c702d02a05b1c449ff04234257 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-06-01T17:19:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 811 bytes, checksum: e39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34 (MD5) Patricia TESE.pdf: 2509023 bytes, checksum: 8b18c1c702d02a05b1c449ff04234257 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-06-18 / Para que o processo colaborativo ocorra de forma eficiente, as atividades de identificar os melhores fornecedores para um novo produto ou serviço ou avaliar o desempenho de um fornecedor antigo são tarefas essenciais no gerenciamento da cadeia de suprimentos. O problema de seleção de fornecedores se enquadra no contexto multicritério por envolver diversos critérios qualitativos e quantitativos na tomada de decisão. Esta pesquisa tem como principal objetivo propor um modelo de apoio à decisão para a classificação de fornecedores em níveis de colaboração no gerenciamento da cadeia de suprimentos de uma forma estruturada, utilizando o método ELECTRE TRI. Diversos trabalhos têm explorado o problema de seleção de fornecedores no contexto multicritério. A maioria destes estudos aborda as problemáticas de escolha e ordenação e são propostos métodos específicos para este fim. A problemática de classificação não é muito explorada e, além disso, existem poucos trabalhos que tratam especificamente do assunto colaboração com fornecedores no contexto multicritério. Considerando que na maioria dos casos, em diversos ramos de atuação, as empresas possuem em sua base, fornecedores com características e graus de desempenho diferentes, torna-se necessário decidir em que nível colaborar com cada tipo de fornecedor. Com a utilização do modelo proposto torna-se possível gerenciar os fornecedores, considerando suas diferenciação em termos de desempenho, classificando-os em níveis de colaboração apropriados, de forma a viabilizar a adoção de estratégias distintas com cada categoria. Desta forma, é possível que a decisão no contexto apresentado ocorra de forma sistematizada, e tendo em vista a natureza repetitiva deste problema, o modelo proposto se constitui em uma ferramenta útil de apoio à decisão, a qual pode ser utilizada periodicamente de acordo com as necessidades do decisor, a fim de fornecer feedback da avaliação dos fornecedores, acompanhar a evolução do desempenho nos critérios definidos e rever a estratégia adotada se necessário. / The processes of identifying the best suppliers for a new product or service or even to evaluate the performance of an existing supplier are essential tasks in managing the supply chain, in order to enable that the collaborative process occurs in an efficient manner. The supplier selection problem (SSP) fits the multicriteria context due to involve several qualitative and quantitative criteria in the decision making process. So, the main objective of this research is to propose a model of multiple criteria decision aid for suppliers sorting in levels of collaboration in supply chain management, using ELECTRE TRI method. Several studies have approached the supplier selection problem in multicriteria context. Most of these studies address the choice and ranking problems and specific methods are proposed for this purpose. However, the sorting problem is not much explored, and in addition, there are few studies that specifically address the subject of collaboration with suppliers considering multicriteria context. Whereas in most cases, in several business segments, companies have at their base, suppliers with different features and degrees of performance, it becomes necessary to decide at what level to collaborate with each type of supplier. Thus, using the proposed model makes it possible to manage suppliers, considering their differentiation in terms of performance, sorting them into appropriate levels of collaboration in order to facilitate the adoption of different strategies with each category. Moreover, with the use of this model, it is possible that the decision in this context occurs in a systematic manner and, considering the repetitive nature of this problem, the proposed model constitutes a useful tool for decision aid. This tool can be used periodically in accordance with the needs of the decision maker in order to provide feedback of the evaluation to suppliers, monitoring the performance in the defined criteria set and, reviewing the strategy adopted if necessary.

The thesis describes the application of several methods of multicriterial evaluation of alternatives (MEoA) in various phases of the recruitment process for the position Corporate Account Manager in Telefónica O2 Czech Republic, a.s. In the first round, the group of all enrolled candidates is reduced using aspiration levels. In the second round, this narrowed down group goes through the Assessment Centre. Using other methods of MEoA, the most suitable candidate for the position is chosen.

Diploma thesis deals with analysis of energy resources. The aim is to map the potential of renewable resources in the Czech Republic and through multicriteria decision making to assess the potential investment options in renewable energy in the Czech Republic.

No description available.