En granskning har avslöjat att många svenska ungdomar lockas med att köpa dyra utbildningar för att lära sig handel med riskfyllda finansiella instrument. Med argument att slippa traditionella heltidsarbeten samt drömmen om ekonomisk frihet väljer allt fler ungdomar att tillträda börsen och handla med finansiella instrument. Antalet svenska aktieinvesterare har de senaste fem åren ökat från 2,1 till 2,7 miljoner där största faktorn är att unga hittat till börsen. Hoppet om god avkastning är anledningen till att personer väljer att placera tillgångar i värdepapper i stället för att spara på sparkontot. Sammantaget i takt med att investeringsalternativen blivit allt fler bör det finnas en ökad ofrivillig riskbenägenhet hos unga investerare. Då risktagande är en av de mest centrala delarna vid investering av finansiella instrument kan en monetär förlust avskräcka en ung investerare från börsen om inte risk tas med i beaktningen. Syftet med studien är därmed att undersöka unga människors attityd till risktagande gällande investeringar på börsen. Vidare undersöks unga investerares syn på risk för att bilda en förståelse kring varför allt fler unga agerar som de gör på börsen. Denna studies syfte besvaras med hjälp av en kvantitativ forskningsmetod och med utgångspunkt i portföljteorin, prospektteorin, beslutsteorin och det kulturella riskperspektivet. Studien har gjorts i syfte att bidra med kunskap och förståelse kring unga människors investeringsstrategi för att kunna öka riskmedvetenheten bland unga investerare. Datamaterialet har inhämtats via en enkätundersökning som belyser hur de 611 respondenter ser på risk. Studiens resultat påvisar att det finns högmod bland unga investerare vilket betyder att de underskattar sitt risktagande eller rentav inte förstår vilken risk de utsätter sig för. Studien bekräftar att lockelsen av att tjäna snabba pengar genom handel med riskfyllda finansiella instrument kan komma att ta över den unga investerares rationella och välgrundade investeringsbeslut. / An investigation has revealed that many Swedish young people are lured into buying expensive training courses to learn how to trade risky financial instruments. With the argument of avoiding traditional full-time jobs and the dream of financial freedom, more young people choose to join the stock exchange and trade in financial instruments. In the last five years, the number of Swedish investors has increased from 2.1 to 2.7 million, where the biggest factor is that young people have found the stock market. The hope of a good return is the reason why people choose to invest assets in financial instruments instead of holding it at a savings account. Overall, as the investment alternatives have become more abundant, there should be an increased involuntary risk propensity among young investors. As risk taking is one of the most central parts of investing in financial instruments, a monetary loss can discourage a young investor from the stock market if risk is not taken into consideration. The purpose of the study is thus to examine young people's attitude to risk-taking regarding investments on the stock market. Furthermore, young investors' view of risk is examined to form an understanding of why more and more young people act as they do on the stock market. The purpose of this study is answered using a quantitative research method and based on portfolio theory, prospect theory, decision theory and the cultural risk perspective. The study has been done with the aim of contributing knowledge and understanding about young people's investment strategy in order to increase risk awareness among young investors. The data has been collected through a survey that highlights how the 611 respondents view risk. The results of the study show that there is arrogance among young investors, which means that they underestimate their risk-taking or even do not understand the risk they are exposing themselves to. The study confirms that the lure of making quick money by trading in risky financial instruments can overtake the young investor's rational and informed investment decisions.

Access to finance is often a vital tool for a company to make investments which in turn leads to increased generation of income. In 2022, the amount of lending to non-financial companies increased by around 13 %. Banks' traditional lending channels have recently been challenged by DeFi. Within DeFi, no central intermediary is used, the security provided is cryptocurrencies and the transaction history is public. The most common cryptocurrency used in DeFi is bitcoin. At the time of writing, bitcoin has a market capitalization of approximately $521 million. The use of DeFi has grown rapidly in 2022 as cryptocurrencies worth just under $110 billion were pledged in DeFi as collateral for credit. The EBA has previously warned about the risks of cryptocurrencies. Despite warnings, neither case law nor any clear legislation regarding cryptocurrencies and creditors protection has thus been created. Though, there is a proposal from EU that will create a uniform regulation for cryptocurrencies that are not currently covered by the EU's existing regulatory framework for financial services, the so-called MiCA regulation. In Swedish legislation, there is an ongoing investigation on how to handle cryptocurrencies. However, neither the proposals at EU-level nor national level deal with substantive legal aspects such as creditors protection. The purpose of the thesis is to present a proposal for what bitcoin as property is classified as according to Swedish law and to identify the most appropriate legal aspect when bitcoins are used within DeFi. Based on the purpose, the following questions arise (i) What type of property should the cryptocurrency bitcoin be legally classified as? (ii) How can creditor protection be achieved when a transaction with bitcoin is made? (iii) How can creditor protection be achieved when bitcoin is used as collateral? In this thesis, the legal dogmatic method and law analogies will be used to answer the questions. The conclusions are that bitcoin should first be seen as a financial instrument according to MiFID II and creditor protection in the case of acquired ownership of bitcoins can basically never be achieved. Creditor protection in case of retained ownership can be achieved with analogous application of RVL and using registration as an element of property rights. When bitcoin is used as collateral, creditor protection can be achieved through the property right element of registration or tradition. In the case of three-party escrow, notification of transfer of claim must be made to the person who holds the pledged property in accordance with the 1936 Pawn Law.

This thesis evaluates and constructs a general, product-neutral legal concept and model of financial instruments, as opposed to the product-dependent definitions currently employed in contemporary capital markets law. Through a combination of law and economics perspectives, legal history, and comparative analysis, the study examines the various types of financial instruments currently and previously in use. The legal characteristics and features of these instruments are evaluated and compared, leading to the identification of commonalities that can be used to define a product-neutral concept. The thesis argues that such a concept is more beneficial to the function of the capital markets by removing obstacles for financial innovation while also providing a consistent way to ensure that new financial products are governed by the same regulatory framework as comparable instruments.The thesis also examines the historical evolution of financial instruments and how it has been driven by the evolution of international trade and the demand and surplus of available capital. The proposed concept is applied to current financial instruments, including equity and debt, as well as pre-modern markets, and evaluated in terms of regulation, practical use, and legal characteristics such as transferability and negotiability.The research of this thesis encountered several challenges and limitations. Firstly, the historical and comparative analysis proved difficult to carry out, due to limitation in available source material and language related restrictions, respectively. These limitations were overcome by limiting the scope and by employing contacts with law firms in the respective jurisdictions. Secondly, several key issues proved to require further research to be able to provide definitive conclusions. Such research would have been out of scope and as such, simplified explanations and models were employed. The thesis concludes with a discussion of the practical implications of the proposed concept, including its application to cryptocurrencies and similar assets, and identifies potential areas for future research.