Bakgrund: I dagsläget finns det brist på studier som innefattar hur vårdnadshavare upplever barnens korsettbehandling. Behandlingen är effektiv men barnens psykiska- och fysiska hälsa påverkas negativt. Vårdnadshavare har en essentiell roll i korsettbehandlingen, därför är det betydelsefullt att identifiera de problem som upplevs av dem.   Syfte och frågeställningar: Syftet med studien är att redogöra för barnens upplevelse av korsettbehandlingen, ur vårdnadshavarnas perspektiv. Genom att identifiera det som anses vara mest problematiskt och vilka aspekter som kan åtgärdas kan upplevelsen av korsettbehandlingen förbättras.   Metod: En kvalitativ innehållsanalys i form av semistrukturerade intervjuer utgjorde studien. Fem vårdnadshavare intervjuades i Jönköping. Inklusionskriterierna innefattade vårdnadshavare till barn som behandlats med korsett samt som inte har några funktions- eller kognitiva nedsättningar.   Resultat: Ur analysen identifierades fyra olika huvudteman: destruktiva faktorer, konstruktiva faktorer samt information och tillgänglighet. Vårdnadshavarna uttryckte att korsettens design var den mest problematiska faktorn som påverkade barnets upplevelse av behandlingen.               Slutsats: Samtliga vårdnadshavare upplevde korsettbehandlingen olika. Det genomgående temat för samtliga var destruktiva faktorer som påverkat upplevelsen. Identifiering av problematiken kan förbättra upplevelsen av korsettbehandlingen. / Background: There is a lack of studies that include how parents experience their children's brace treatment. The treatment is effective but contributes to negative impact on children's mental and physical health. Parents have an essential role in the brace treatment, therefore it is important to explore their experience.  Purpose: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the children's experience of the brace treatment, from the parent’s perspective. By addressing what is considered most problematic and what aspects that can be changed, it may improve the experience of the brace treatment.    Method: A qualitative analysis based on semi-structured interviews composed the study. Five parents were interviewed in Jönköping. The inclusion criteria included parents of children treated with brace who had no functional or cognitive impairments.   Results: Four main themes appeared from the analysis: destructive factors, constructive factors, information and accessibility. The design of the brace was expressed as the most problematic factor that affected children's experience of the treatment according to the parents.   Conclusion: All parents experienced the brace treatment differently. The main topic was destructive factors that affected their experience. Future studies should identify problems associated with the treatment so the experience can be improved.

The purpose of this law-sociological study was to, on the basis of the District Court's decree to single custody, analyze the District Court’s comprehensive ideas and fall-oriented interpretations of the concept of the best interest of the child and the way they are constructed in connection with the District Court's application of the new law regulation of 6kap. 5§ FB regarding collaboration between parents. Our empirical data consisted of ten decrees to single custody. The decrees were examined and analyzed on the basis of social constructionism as a theory and the idea-analysis as the study's method. Legal sources such as law and its legislative history and the law inSwedenandScandinaviain general, with both domestic and international previous research, gave us initial knowledge in the area which gradually grew during the study. Results show that sweeping presumptions for single custody, with vague connections between single child's best interest and decisions about single custody based on the parents' lack of cooperation, can be glimpsed in several of the judges' texts. The District Court’s ideas/interpretations of the concept of the best interest of the child reach for the most part in the decrees where an individual assessment has been made.

I denna studie är syftet att synliggöra, och på så sätt bidra med mer kunskap kring, vilka uppfattningar vårdnadshavare till barn i förskolan har kring yrkesrollerna barnskötare och förskollärares olika ansvar och innebörder, samt hur dessa relaterar till de mål och riktlinjer kring ansvar och arbetsfördelning som skrivs fram i förskolans läroplan. Fem vårdnadshavare från tre olika kommuner i västra Sverige har deltagit i den kvalitativa studien där metodansatsen är diskursanalys. Kvalitativa semistrukturerade intervjuer har använts för datainsamling och en diskursanalys vid analysering av materialet. Resultatet visar att det finns en diskurs som handlar om att vårdnadshavare uppfattar att barnskötare innefattas av arbetet med barnen och ansvarar för deras omsorg, och en annan diskurs som handlar om att förskollärare uppfattas som den av rollerna som ansvarar för barnens utbildning och organisering av förskolans verksamhet. Det framkommer även att vårdnadshavarna i studien visar sig ha lite kännedom om hur förskolans läroplan relaterar till yrkesrollernas ansvar och arbetsuppgifter. Den uppgift som förskolans personal har ålagts gällande att upplysa vårdnadshavare om dess innehåll verkar därav inte prioriteras i den dagliga kommunikationen. Detta då studien visar att vårdnadshavares uppfattningar om förskolans yrkesroller skiljer sig åt från hur barnskötare och förskollärare beskrivs utifrån Skolverket (2018), vilket kan ge konsekvenser för samverkan mellan förskola och hem. / The purpose of this study is to visualize what perceptions parents of children in preschool have about the professional role’s childcare workers and preschool teacher’s different responsibilities and meanings, and how these relate to the goals and guidelines regarding responsibility and division of work that are written in the preschool curriculum. Five parents from three different municipalities in western Sweden have participated in the qualitative study where the method approach is a discourse analysis. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were used to collect data and a discourse analysis for analyzing the material. The results show that there is a discourse regarding to how parents perceive childcare workers as included in the work with the children and are responsible for their care, and another discourse about how preschool teachers are perceived as those responsible for the children’s education and the organization of the preschool. It also emerges that the parents in the study appear to have little knowledge of how the preschool curriculum relates to the professional role’s responsibilities and tasks. The assignment that are required by the preschool staff as to inform parents about its content, do therefore not seem to be prioritized in the daily communication. This as the study shows that parent’s perceptions of the professional roles in preschool are different from Skolverket’s (2018) description of childcare workers and preschool teachers, which can have consequences for the collaboration between preschool and home.

The purpose of this study was to explore if and how the Swedish Supreme Court are using the concept “the child’s best interest”. This concept is used a lot in Swedish legislation, but it needs interpretation every time it´s used and is often perceived as unclear. This makes it interesting to see how this affects the individual child´s legal rights. Furthermore I want to see if the Supreme Court listen to the child´s own opinion and if not, are there any justifications to why not. The study has a quantitative starting point, where I have gone through a number of judgments and then chosen seven out of a qualitative point where there has been a discussion from the Supreme Court around the individual and the best interest of the child for the individual child and the methods of analysis used in this study are social constructionism, legal sociology and analysis of the idea. The study shows a lack of consistency among the professionals of what the concept really stands for, which negatively affects the legal rights for the individual child. The solution is a closer collaboration between social workers, judges and lawyers to make the concept clearer and more applicable.