Occlusion is a frequently occuring challenge in vision systems for autonomous driving. The density of objects in the field-of-view of the vehicle may be so high that some objects are only visible intermittently. It is therefore beneficial to investigate ways to predict the paths of objects under occlusion. In this thesis, we investigate whether trajectory prediction methods can be used to solve the occlusion prediction problem. We investigate two different types of approaches, one based on motion models, and one based on machine learning models. Furthermore, we investigate whether these two approaches can be fused to produce an even more reliable model. We evaluate our models on a pedestrian trajectory prediction dataset, an autonomous driving dataset, and a subset of the autonomous driving dataset that only includes validation examples of occlusion. The comparison of our different approaches shows that pure motion model-based methods perform the worst out of the three. On the other hand, machine learning-based models perform better, yet they require additional computing resources for training. Finally, the fused method performs the best on both the driving dataset and the occlusion data. Our results also indicate that trajectory prediction methods, both motion model-based and learning-based ones, can indeed accurately predict the path of occluded objects up to at least 3 seconds in the autonomous driving scenario.

The basic idea of this diploma thesis is to look into one the area of financing czech company, which is member of french holding, with aim to introduce to public the important financial tool in the area of cash management including assessment of the accounting, tax and law aspects associated with it.

The graduation thesis is targeted at the issue of accounting methods for business combinations. The main goal of the thesis is to describe and compare tree basic accounting methods for business combinations -- purchase method, pooling of interests method and new entity method, especially in terms of the International Financial Reporting Standards and the U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Essential part of the thesis is dedicated to the historical development of harmonization of business combination accounting. Changes in calculation of goodwill are also included.

The basic aim of the diploma thesis is to cover the issue of accounting for business combinations, especially focus on accounting methods for business combinations -- concretely purchase method, new-entity method and pooling of interests method. The basis of the whole work is to focus on the methods, their historical development, set them in context with IFRS, US GAAP and czech accounting environment and finally to compare the methods.

Uma combinação de empresas ocorre quando duas ou mais empresas distintas se unem de uma única vez para formar uma nova entidade contábil. Dois métodos de contabilização das combinações de empresas são geralmente aceitos no mercado internacional - o Método de União de Participações (Pooling of Interests) e o Método de Compra (Purchase Method). Mas esses dois métodos não devem ser vistos como alternativas contábeis para uma mesma combinação. Para se determinar qual dos dois métodos deve ser utilizado em uma combinação é necessário que se analise a natureza da transação, se ela é uma compra ou uma união de interesses. Sob o Método de União de Participações (Pooling of Interests), os ativos e passivos das empresas combinantes são combinados na nova entidade pelos seus valores históricos. Pelo Método de Compra (Purchase Method), os ativos e passivos da empresa adquirida são combinados pelo fair value na nova entidade. Além desses métodos, mais dois métodos são usados, mas de forma menos freqüente - o Método Fresh-Start e o Método Push-Down Accounting. Pelo Método Fresh-Start, os ativos e passivos das empresas combinantes são combinados pelo fair value. Pelo Método Push-Down Accounting, os ativos e passivos da empresa adquirida são avaliados e contabilizados pelo fair value em sua contabilidade, para em seguida serem combinados na nova entidade. Este estudo tem por objetivo principal explorar os métodos utilizados no mercado internacional e principalmente norte-americano, a fim de combinar as Demonstrações Contábeis de empresas fusionadas ou incorporadas, e aplicar os métodos de União de Participações, de Compra e o Push-Down Accounting em um único caso hipotético, para se conhecer os seus reflexos nas Demonstrações Contábeis da entidade combinada. Na comparação aplicada dos três métodos, o Push-Down Accounting revelou-se como uma variante do Método de Compra (Purchase Method). O Método de União de Participações (Pooling of Interests) sugere uma completa comunhão dos interesses das empresas combinantes sem o reconhecimento de qualquer aumento da potencialidade de geração de benefícios futuros. Já o Método de Compra se assemelha a uma simples transação de compra que reconhece de forma objetiva, na data da combinação, o potencial mínimo de geração de benefícios futuros da empresa adquirida para a entidade combinada. / A business combination occurs when two or more companies merge at one single time to form a new accounting entity. Two accounting methods for business combinations are generally accepted in the international market - the Pooling of Interests Method and the Purchase Method. But these two methods should not be considered as accounting alternatives for the same combination. To determine which of the two methods should be used in a business combination the nature of the transaction should be analyzed, that is, whether it is a purchase or a pooling of interests.On the one hand, in accordance with the Pooling of Interests Method, the assets and liabilities of the combining companies are combined in the new entity making use of their historical value. In accordance with the Purchase Method, on the other hand, the purchased company\'s assets and liabilities are combined in the new entity making use of their fair value.Apart from these two methods, two other methods are used, even though less frequently - the Fresh-Start Method and the Push-Down Accounting Method. In accordance with the Fresh-Start Method, the combining companies\' assets and liabilities are combined making use of their fair value. In accordance with the Push-Down Accounting Method, the purchased company\'s assets and liabilities are first re-evaluated by its accounting making use of their fair value, in order to be subsequently combined in the new entity.The main objective of this study is an exploration of the methods used in the international and mainly North-American markets for combining the Financial Statements of merged or acquired companies, and an application of the Pooling of Interests, Purchase and Push-Down Accounting Methods to one single hypothetical case, in order to know its effects on the Combined Financial Statements. In the comparison of the three methods, the Push-Down Accounting Method proved to be a variant of the Purchase Method. The Pooling of Interests Method suggests a complete pooling of the combining companies\' interests, without recognizing any increase in the potential for generating future benefits. The Purchase Method in turn is similar to a simple purchase transaction which objectively recognizes, at the combination date, the minimum potential of the purchased company for generating future benefits for the combined entity.

À cause des stratégies de production et de marketing de plus en plus ambitieuses tellesque le Juste-À-Temps et la production adaptée au client, les approches de collaboration logistique verticale qui sont courantes atteignent une limite d'efficacité notamment en transport. La collaboration logistique horizontale (CLH) et plus particulièrement la mutualisation, dont l'efficacité a été prouvée dans la littérature et dans les cas réels, a attiré l'attention des chercheurs ainsi que des praticiens. Cependatn, un des obstacles principaux à la mise en œuvre des CLHs est l'absence d'un mécanisme de collaboration raisonné, en particulier un mécanisme de partage des gains. Nous identifions deux formes d'organisation des CLHs : centralisée limité en pratique à de petites coalitions et décentralisée pouvant comprendre de nombreux participants. Pour des CLHs centralisées, nous proposons un modèle de collaboration qui est un processus de conduite qui intègre les outils d'aide à la décision. Nous développons également un mécanisme de partage par la théorie des jeux. Ce mécanisme est applicable aux différentes catégories des CLHs centralisées, qui peuvent être modélisées par des jeux coopératifs super-additif et non-super-additifs. Afin de proposer un plan de partage crédible aux collaborateurs, ce mécanisme de partage prend en compte la contribution de chacun des collaborateurs, la stabilité de la coalition et leur pouvoir de négociation. Ce cadre est illustré par des exemples numériques issus de cas logistiques. Pour la mise en œuvre des CLHs décentralisées, nous proposons un cadre de travail de logistique collaborative qui est ouvert aux participants potentiels, et avons conçu des protocoles fondés sur le mécanisme d'enchère combinatoire, qui spécifient l'allocation de demande de livraison et la détermination de paiement pour faciliter les collaborations. Cette dernière partie s'appuie sur la théorie dite de Mechanism design. / As the result of the more and more ambitious production and marketing strategies,such as Just-In-Time and increasing customization of products, the current vertical logistics collaboration approaches based on single supply chain seems insufficient to achieve further improvements in transportation efficiency. The horizontal logistics collaboration (HLC), which has been proved an effective approach to efficiency improvement, has attracted both academics and practitioners. One of the main barriers to the implementation of HLCs is the lack of feasible collaboration mechanism, in particular the gain sharing mechanism. We identify two organizational forms of HLCs: the centralized and decentralized ones. For centralized HLCs, we propose a collaboration model that is a collaboration conducting process integrating decision-aiding tools to guide the implementation of the collaboration. We also develop a generally applicable game-theoretic sharing mechanism for different categories of centralized HLCs modeled as super-additive and non-super-additive cooperative games. This sharing mechanism takes into account the collaborators' contribution, the coalition stability, and the bargaining power to propose a credible sharing scheme for collaborators. The approach is illustrated by numerical example taken from logistics cases. For the implementation of the decentralized HLCs, we propose an open collaborative logistics framework, and design the system protocols as the collaboration mechanism that specifies the combinatorial-auction-based request allocation and payment determination to foster the collaborations.

Le droit de l’Union, avant tout économique, soumet les services publics des Etats membres à une profonde démarche d’efficacité reposant sur leur soumission à la concurrence. Cette logique libérale, a priori étrangère à ces activités protégées, imprègne dorénavant l’intérêt général qui les anime. Elle a pour objectif fondamental d’assurer la pleine satisfaction de l’usager qui voit son rôle renouvelé dans cet ordre juridique supranational. Afin de garantir la qualité du service public, les institutions imposent également aux autorités une optimisation de leurs moyens dont la gestion doit être efficiente. Cette recherche d’efficacité implique alors une utilisation accrue de l’évaluation qui modifie la philosophie du service public en lui fournissant une nouvelle légitimité mais aussi une nouvelle juridicité dans les droits nationaux. / European law, mainly economic, submit public services of European members to efficiency logical with submission to themselves to liberalization. This free-market policy, in theory unconcerned by public services, now affect these services of general interest. This libearal dynamic set the aim of satisfaying customers who have a updated role in European Union. For quality of public service, European institutions require to States, as well, a cost optimization for an efficient administration of their public services. This goal involve to use more frequently evaluation process and to modify public services philosophy for a legitimization, including juridical legitimization, in States law.

L'ampleur de la Grande Récession a suscité un regain d'intérêt pour l'analyse conjoncturelle, plus particulièrement du cycle économique. Notre thèse participe de ce renouveau d'attention pour l'étude des fluctuations économiques.Après une présentation générale des modèles à changements de régime dans le chapitre 1, le chapitre suivant propose une chronologie du cycle des affaires de l'économie française sur la période 1970-2009. Trois méthodes de datation sont utilisées à cette fin : la règle des deux trimestres consécutifs de croissance négative, l'approche non paramétrique de Bry et Boschan (1971) et le modèle markovien à changements de régime de Hamilton (1989). Les résultats montrent que l'existence de ruptures structurelles peut empêcher ce dernier modèle d'identifier correctement les points de retournement cycliques. Cependant, quandces ruptures sont prises en considération, le calendrier des récessions françaises obtenu à l'aide du modèle d'Hamilton coïncide largement avec celui obtenu par les deux autres méthodes. Le chapitre 3 développe une analyse de la non-linéarité dans le modèle à changements de régime en utilisant un ensemble de tests non-standards. Une étude par simulation Monte Carlo révèle qu'un test récemment proposé par Carrasco, Hu et Ploberger (2013) présente une faible puissance pour des processus générateurs des données empiriquement pertinents et ce, lorsqu'on tient compte de l'autocorrélation sous l'hypothèse nulle. En revanche, untest "bootstrap" paramétrique basé sur le rapport des vraisemblances a, pour sa part une puissance plus élevée, ce qui traduit l'existence probable de non-linéarités significatives dans le PIB réel trimestriel de la France et des Etats-Unis. Quand il s'agit de tester un changement de régime en moyenne ou en constante, il est important de tenir compte de l'autocorrélation sous l'hypothèse nulle de linéarité. En effet, dans le cas contraire, un rejet de la linéarité pourrait simplement refléter une mauvaise spécification de la persistance des données, plutôt que d'une non-linéarité inhérente.Le chapitre 4 examine une question importante : la considération de ruptures structurelles dans les séries améliore-t-elle la performance prédictive du modèle markovien relativement à son homologue linéaire ? La démarche adoptée pour y répondre consiste à combiner les prévisions obtenues pour différentes périodes d'estimation. Voici le principal résultat dû à l'application de cette démarche : la prise en compte des données provenant des intervalles de temps précédant les ruptures structurelles et la "Grande Modération" améliore les prévisions basées sur des données tirées exclusivement de ces épisodes. De la sorte, les modèles à changements de régime s'avèrent capables de prédire la probabilité d'événements tels que la Grande Récession, avec plus de précision que ses homologues linéaires.Les conclusions générales synthétisent les principaux acquis de la thèse et évoqueplusieurs perspectives de recherche future. / The severity of the Great Recession has renewed interest in the analysis of business cycles. Our thesis pertains to this revival of attention for the study of cyclical fluctuations. After reviewing the regime-switching models in Chapter one, the following chapter suggests a chronology of the classical business cycle in French economy for the 1970-2009 period. To that end, three dating methodologies are used: the rule of thumb of two consecutive quarters of negative growth, the non-parametric approach of Bry and Boschan (1971), and the Markov-switching approach of Hamilton (1989). The results show that,omitted structural breaks may hinder the Markov-switching approach to capture business-cycle fluctuations. However, when such breaks are allowed for, the timing of the French recessions provided by the Markov-switching model closely matches those derived by the rule-based approaches.Chapter 3 performs a nonlinearity analysis inMarkov-switching modelling using a set of non-standard tests. Monte Carlo analysis reveals that a recently test proposed by Carrasco, Hu, and Ploberger (2013) for Markov switching has low power for empirically-relevant data generating processes when allowing for serial correlation under the null. By contrast, a parametric bootstrap likelihood ratio (LR) test of Markov switching has higher power in the same setting, providing stronger support for nonlinearity in quarterly French and U.S. real GDP. When testing for Markov switching in mean or intercept of an autoregressive process, it is important to allow for serial correlation under the null hypothesis of linearity.Otherwise, a rejection of linearity could merely reflect misspecification of the persistence properties of the data, rather than any inherent nonlinearity.Chapter 4 examines whether controlling for structural breaks improves the forecasting performance of the Markov-switching models, as compared to their linear counterparts.The approach considered to answer this issue is to combined forecasts across different estimation windows. The outcome of applying such an approach shows that, including data from periods preceding structural breaks and particularly the "Great Moderation" improves upon forecasts based on data drawn exclusively from these episodes. Accordingly, Markov-switching models forecast the probability of events such as the Great Recession more accurately than their linear counterparts.The general conclusions summarize the main results of the thesis and, suggest several directions for future research.

Uma combinação de empresas ocorre quando duas ou mais empresas distintas se unem de uma única vez para formar uma nova entidade contábil. Dois métodos de contabilização das combinações de empresas são geralmente aceitos no mercado internacional - o Método de União de Participações (Pooling of Interests) e o Método de Compra (Purchase Method). Mas esses dois métodos não devem ser vistos como alternativas contábeis para uma mesma combinação. Para se determinar qual dos dois métodos deve ser utilizado em uma combinação é necessário que se analise a natureza da transação, se ela é uma compra ou uma união de interesses. Sob o Método de União de Participações (Pooling of Interests), os ativos e passivos das empresas combinantes são combinados na nova entidade pelos seus valores históricos. Pelo Método de Compra (Purchase Method), os ativos e passivos da empresa adquirida são combinados pelo fair value na nova entidade. Além desses métodos, mais dois métodos são usados, mas de forma menos freqüente - o Método Fresh-Start e o Método Push-Down Accounting. Pelo Método Fresh-Start, os ativos e passivos das empresas combinantes são combinados pelo fair value. Pelo Método Push-Down Accounting, os ativos e passivos da empresa adquirida são avaliados e contabilizados pelo fair value em sua contabilidade, para em seguida serem combinados na nova entidade. Este estudo tem por objetivo principal explorar os métodos utilizados no mercado internacional e principalmente norte-americano, a fim de combinar as Demonstrações Contábeis de empresas fusionadas ou incorporadas, e aplicar os métodos de União de Participações, de Compra e o Push-Down Accounting em um único caso hipotético, para se conhecer os seus reflexos nas Demonstrações Contábeis da entidade combinada. Na comparação aplicada dos três métodos, o Push-Down Accounting revelou-se como uma variante do Método de Compra (Purchase Method). O Método de União de Participações (Pooling of Interests) sugere uma completa comunhão dos interesses das empresas combinantes sem o reconhecimento de qualquer aumento da potencialidade de geração de benefícios futuros. Já o Método de Compra se assemelha a uma simples transação de compra que reconhece de forma objetiva, na data da combinação, o potencial mínimo de geração de benefícios futuros da empresa adquirida para a entidade combinada. / A business combination occurs when two or more companies merge at one single time to form a new accounting entity. Two accounting methods for business combinations are generally accepted in the international market - the Pooling of Interests Method and the Purchase Method. But these two methods should not be considered as accounting alternatives for the same combination. To determine which of the two methods should be used in a business combination the nature of the transaction should be analyzed, that is, whether it is a purchase or a pooling of interests.On the one hand, in accordance with the Pooling of Interests Method, the assets and liabilities of the combining companies are combined in the new entity making use of their historical value. In accordance with the Purchase Method, on the other hand, the purchased company\'s assets and liabilities are combined in the new entity making use of their fair value.Apart from these two methods, two other methods are used, even though less frequently - the Fresh-Start Method and the Push-Down Accounting Method. In accordance with the Fresh-Start Method, the combining companies\' assets and liabilities are combined making use of their fair value. In accordance with the Push-Down Accounting Method, the purchased company\'s assets and liabilities are first re-evaluated by its accounting making use of their fair value, in order to be subsequently combined in the new entity.The main objective of this study is an exploration of the methods used in the international and mainly North-American markets for combining the Financial Statements of merged or acquired companies, and an application of the Pooling of Interests, Purchase and Push-Down Accounting Methods to one single hypothetical case, in order to know its effects on the Combined Financial Statements. In the comparison of the three methods, the Push-Down Accounting Method proved to be a variant of the Purchase Method. The Pooling of Interests Method suggests a complete pooling of the combining companies\' interests, without recognizing any increase in the potential for generating future benefits. The Purchase Method in turn is similar to a simple purchase transaction which objectively recognizes, at the combination date, the minimum potential of the purchased company for generating future benefits for the combined entity.

La recherche de coopération entre collectivités territoriales est ancienne. Depuis la création de ces institutions décentralisées, ces dernières, encouragées par le législateur, ont largement participé au développement de procédés juridiques coopératifs dont la mutualisation des services fait partie intégrante. Plusieurs procédés juridiques permettant la coopération entre collectivités ont vu le jour au fil des réformes relatives à la décentralisation ; tout d’abord par la création d’intermédiaires permettant d’assurer ces coopérations, puis par la possibilité pour les personnes publiques locales de mettre en oeuvre leurs propres coopérations. Par ailleurs, l’intérêt du droit de l’Union européenne pour les contrats entre personnes publiques s’est porté par ricochet sur les procédés de mutualisation des services, impactant les dispositifs nationaux. Un droit spécifique se développe ainsi autour de la notion doctrinale de mutualisation des services. Pour autant, la grande hétérogénéité des outils juridiques permettant la mutualisation des services et la constante évolution de leurs régimes juridiques rendent difficile un regard ordonné sur ces modes de gestion coopératifs, et sur la nature même de cette notion de mutualisation des services. / The research on cooperation between local authorities goes back a long way. Since the creation of decentralized institution, motivated by the legislator, they widely took part in the development of the legal cooperative processes, pooling of services of which is an integral part. Number of legal processes may also enable the cooperation between local authorities have been built over decentralized reforms ; first and foremost through the creation of intermediate allowing the implementation of these cooperation’s, then by the possibility for local authorities to operate their own cooperation’s. Furthermore, the interest of the European Union law for the contracts between local authorities were worn by implication on pooling of services, impacting the national devices. Nowadays a specific law develops around the doctrinal notion of pooling services. The great heterogeneity of laws ‘skill allowing the pooled service and the constant evolution of legal system make difficult a measured look on these modes of cooperative management, and on the nature of this notion of pooling of services.