Cette thèse se propose d'examiner la place occupée par la transtextualité biblique dans les discours romanesquesde Pierre Jean Jouve, et notamment les enjeux littéraires que cette omniprésence des Écritures engendre. Parcequ'elle est au fondement d'une religion dogmatique, mais aussi parce qu'elle se révéle être une oeuvre empreintede littérarité, la Bible constitue un texte fondamental, qui a particulièrement influencé l'homme comme l'écrivain.En témoigne l'usage qu'en fait le romancier poète, qu'il s'agisse de mettre en branle la notion de relecture ou cellede réécriture.Ainsi les thèmes de prédilection de l'auteur, qui rejoignent régulièrement ceux de la Bible, sont-ils étudiés selonun angle bien précis : parce que l'acte d'écriture lui permet à son tour de se faire créateur, Pierre Jean Jouvereprend, à son compte, des motifs et symboles du texte sacré, pour mieux les adapter à son monde romanesque.Les composants génériques témoignent également de cette volonté spécifique : la structuration des espaces,comme celle de la temporalité, se met au service d'un acte de création qui se veut mimétique de celui de Dieu.C'est pourtant à travers les personnages que la notion de transtextualité prend tout son sens et se déploye pourfaire de chaque roman un itinéraire spirituel mêlant découverte de soi, destruction et quête de salut.Les oeuvres se donnent à lire comme des écrits qui demandent méditation, réflexion et interprétation. La placelaissée au lecteur atteste de la grande liberté que Pierre Jean Jouve tend à accorder à ce dernier, même si l'écrituredes romans semble essentiellement et avant tout tournée vers la figure de l'auteur. L'acte de création devient lemoyen d'un développement personnel, artistique et religieux, dont l'ultime objectif demeure le rapprochementavec les sphères sacrées. / This thesis intends to investigate the place occupied by biblical transtextuality in Pierre Jean Jouve’s novelisticdiscourse, and in particular the literary issues that the omnipresence of the Scriptures entails. Because it is thefoundation of a dogmatic religion, and also because it proves to be a work with literary qualities, the Bible is afundamental text which particularly influenced both the man and the writer. As it is shown in the way the poetnovelist makes use of it, when stirring up either the notions of rereading or rewriting.So the author’s favourite themes, frequently closely akin to those of the Bible, are studied from a specific angle:because the act of writing allows him in his turn to become a creator, Pierre Jean Jouve takes up the motifs and thesymbols of the sacred text, in order to fit them to his novelistic universe. The generic components moreover showthis specific desire: the structuring of spaces, as well as that of temporality, serving an act of creation mimeticwith God’s. Nevertheless, it is through the characters that the notion of transtextuality makes sense and developsto turn each novel into a spiritual path combining self-discovery, destruction and quest for salvation.His works can be read as pieces of writing requiring meditation, reflection and interpretation. The place left to thereader attests to the great freedom Pierre Jean Jouve grants to the latter, even if the writing of his novels seems tobe essentially turned towards the author. The act of creation becomes a means of personal, artistic and religiousdevelopment, with the ultimate aim of getting closer to the sacred spheres.

The essay compares Madeline Miller's books The Song of Achilles and Circe to their antique originals: the Iliad and the Odyssey. The main focus is the relationship the characters in Miller's books hold to their homeric counterparts and the evolution of the heroic and masculinity ideals they represent. The ideals they carry are examined through western history and compared to Miller's contemporary autorship to observe what adaptations are being performed. The paper considers the texts through Genettes terms of transtextual relationships, including hypotextual, hypertextual relationships and transpositioning to examine the changes in both character and theme. The results show that some aspects of the heroes and theme remain intact through Millers books, while particularly the masculine and heroic aspects differ and that they do so intentionally through the media of historical fiction.

The objective of this paper is to examine narrative techniques used by the Swedish author Stig Claesson, especially his transformations of texts out of the own authorship into new stories. In order to achieve my objective, I will specifically study two novels; Rosine (1991) and Efter oss syndafloden (2002) and the method practiced will be intentional reading, as described by H. Porter Abbott. For the analysis I will, with the complementary support of Abbott and Beata Agrell, turn to Gerard Genette and his theories concerning transformation and transtextuality, in particular its sub idiom hypertextuality. As a result of my analysis, various subgroups of transformation used by Claesson are identified, but also proven is how Claesson, largely by utilizing two of them; transvocalisation and transvaluation, provides the reader with the implied author of his own choice. Moreover, my investigation demonstrates how Claesson when reusing narratives already told by himself, i.e. transforming hypotexts of his own into hypertexts, recycles characters;  reprocesses master as well as sub plots; alters trivial details; re-interprets events; switches from one narrative view to another, all well documented techniques described by Genette as elements of transformation.

<p>The objective of this paper is to examine narrative techniques used by the Swedish author Stig Claesson, especially his transformations of texts out of the own authorship into new stories. In order to achieve my objective, I will specifically study two novels; <em>Rosine</em> (1991) and <em>Efter oss syndafloden</em> (2002) and the method practiced will be intentional reading, as described by H. Porter Abbott. For the analysis I will, with the complementary support of Abbott and Beata Agrell, turn to Gerard Genette and his theories concerning transformation and transtextuality, in particular its sub idiom hypertextuality. As a result of my analysis, various subgroups of transformation used by Claesson are identified, but also proven is how Claesson, largely by utilizing two of them; transvocalisation and transvaluation, provides the reader with the implied author of his own choice. Moreover, my investigation demonstrates how Claesson when reusing narratives already told by himself, i.e. transforming hypotexts of his own into hypertexts, recycles characters;  reprocesses master as well as sub plots; alters trivial details; re-interprets events; switches from one narrative view to another, all well documented techniques described by Genette as elements of transformation.</p>

Desde la fundación de los primeros institutos de ciencias teatrales en Alemania en el primer tercio del siglo XX y de la introducción de esta disciplina como carrera universitaria en Colonia en 1938 y en Berlín en 1943, así como desde la creación de un número considerable de institutos y cátedras de ciencias del teatro en los años 70 y la inauguración de un amplio y profundo debate teórico en este campo, no se logró establecer un lazo y un contexto de trabajo mutuo entre las ciencias teatrales y las literarias. Mientras la ciencia teatral – luego de una primera época empírica e historicista – fundamentó su análisis principalmente en el hecho escénico y, con el tiempo, fue incluyendo en forma más intensa diversos aspectos culturales, antropológicos, históricos y sociales1; la ciencia literaria y las diversas filologías, por el contrario, se concentraron especialmente en el análisis del texto dramático, analizando el teatro como un objeto literario. Así, ambas disciplinas permanecen hasta la fecha divididas y sin conexión mayor a pesar de tener un objeto en común y de basarse, desde los años 70, en teorías similares como el estructuralismo y la semiótica.

Mémoire numérisé par la Division de la gestion de documents et des archives de l'Université de Montréal.

Mémoire numérisé par la Division de la gestion de documents et des archives de l'Université de Montréal

Néstor Perlongher (1949 Buenos Aires - 1992 Sao Paulo) est l'auteur d'une oeuvre poétique aussi impressionnante par ses thèmes que par son style. Sa poétique est fondée sur des opérations linguistiques variées tels qu'une mixité des niveaux de langue, l'utilisation des jargons et des argots régionaux, l'exaltation du pouvoir suggestif du son, la prolifération des références ambiguës dans le cadre d'une esthétique néobaroque, entre autres. Nous estimons que son oeuvre constitue un des travaux les plus intéressants dans le domaine de l'écriture néo-baroque argentine, tant par la radicalité de son travail avec la matérialité du signe linguistique que par la construction d'une poétique qu'actualise les valeurs esthétiques néo-baroques en les combinant avec des faits historiques et épiques. Cette étude propose de lire l'oeuvre de Néstor Perlongher à la lumière des concepts théoriques en provenance du néo-baroque cubain, ainsi que des ouvrages issus de philosophes poststructuralistes. L'analyse de cette problématique sera faite moyennant l'identification et la description des opérations symboliques et sémantiques que constitue le processus d'artificialisation de l'énoncé et qui finalement permettent l'inscription de ces oeuvres dans le style « néobarroso ». / Néstor Perlongher (1949 Buenos Aires - Sao Paulo in 1992) is the author of a work of impressive themes and tones. His poetry is based on various linguistic operations such as mixing levels of language, the use of jargon and regional slang, the exaltation of the suggestive power of sound, the proliferation of ambiguous references in the context of an aesthetic Neo-Baroque, among others. We believe that his writing is one of the most interesting work in the field of literature Argentine neo-baroque, considering that his work is radical to the materiality of the linguistic sign and build a vision that combines neo-baroque aesthetics with historical facts. This study proposes to read the work of Nestor Perlongher in the light of the theoretical concepts of the Cuban neo-baroque and post-structuralist philosophers. The analysis of this issue is made through the identification and description of the symbolic and semantic operations of artificiality process that allows the inclusion of these works in the style "neobarroso".

O presente trabalho explora a questão da interdisciplinaridade e da transposição de obras literárias para o cinema. Focalizando a adaptação de textos dramáticos ao cinema, o estudo propõe em um primeiro momento uma investigação teórica sobre gênero ficcional mimético; drama, a partir da perspectiva do jogo dramático como elemento construtor do metadrama implícito e explícito; transtextualidade e cinema. Num segundo momento, a investigação analisa dois textos dramáticos, Who’s afraid of Virginia Woolf? , de Edward Albee, e Closer , de Patrick Marber, e suas respectivas transposições para o cinema pelo diretor Mike Nichols, examinando os elementos e recursos que os autores utilizam para construir o jogo dramático. Posteriormente, realizase uma análise comparativa entre os textos dramáticos e entre suas adaptações cinematográficas, buscando pontos de contato e de afastamento entre as obras, priorizando elementos denotadores do jogo dramático, além de características transtextuais que possibilitam a manutenção ou a alteração de significados entre os textos dramáticos e seus respectivos filmes. / This paper explores interdisciplinary aspects related to the transposition of dramatic texts into films. First, a theoretical investigation is conducted on mimetic genre, transtextuality; on drama, from the point of view of the game as a dramatic element to build implicit and explicit metadrama, and film adaptation. Secondly, this dissertation analyzes two plays, Who's afraid of Virginia Woolf? , by Edward Albee, and Closer , by Patrick Marber, as well as their film adaptations by director Mike Nichols, and examines the elements and features that the authors use to create the dramatic games. Later, the plays and their film adaptations are contrasted in order to investigate elements of dramatic games, and transtextual characteristics that allow the maintenance or the alteration of meaning between the plays and their correspondent films.

O presente trabalho explora a questão da interdisciplinaridade e da transposição de obras literárias para o cinema. Focalizando a adaptação de textos dramáticos ao cinema, o estudo propõe em um primeiro momento uma investigação teórica sobre gênero ficcional mimético; drama, a partir da perspectiva do jogo dramático como elemento construtor do metadrama implícito e explícito; transtextualidade e cinema. Num segundo momento, a investigação analisa dois textos dramáticos, Who’s afraid of Virginia Woolf? , de Edward Albee, e Closer , de Patrick Marber, e suas respectivas transposições para o cinema pelo diretor Mike Nichols, examinando os elementos e recursos que os autores utilizam para construir o jogo dramático. Posteriormente, realizase uma análise comparativa entre os textos dramáticos e entre suas adaptações cinematográficas, buscando pontos de contato e de afastamento entre as obras, priorizando elementos denotadores do jogo dramático, além de características transtextuais que possibilitam a manutenção ou a alteração de significados entre os textos dramáticos e seus respectivos filmes. / This paper explores interdisciplinary aspects related to the transposition of dramatic texts into films. First, a theoretical investigation is conducted on mimetic genre, transtextuality; on drama, from the point of view of the game as a dramatic element to build implicit and explicit metadrama, and film adaptation. Secondly, this dissertation analyzes two plays, Who's afraid of Virginia Woolf? , by Edward Albee, and Closer , by Patrick Marber, as well as their film adaptations by director Mike Nichols, and examines the elements and features that the authors use to create the dramatic games. Later, the plays and their film adaptations are contrasted in order to investigate elements of dramatic games, and transtextual characteristics that allow the maintenance or the alteration of meaning between the plays and their correspondent films.