Spelling suggestions: "subject:"« philosophy off science »"" "subject:"« philosophy oof science »""
561 |
Modularité massive ou construction sociale? : une analyse de l'approche psychoévolutionniste de Cosmides et ToobyLoignon, Guillaume 08 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
562 |
Bounded Rationality and Mechanism DesignZhang, Luyao January 2018 (has links)
No description available.
|
563 |
Abductive Humanism: Comparative Advantages of Artificial Intelligence and Human Cognition According to Logical InferenceLittlefield, William Joseph, II 23 May 2019 (has links)
No description available.
|
564 |
Worlds of Musics: Cognitive Ethnomusicological Inquiries on Experience of Time and Space in Human Music-makingCheong, Yong Jeon 30 August 2019 (has links)
No description available.
|
565 |
Subjective Moral Biases & Fallacies: Developing Scientifically & Practically Adequate Moral Analogues of Cognitive Heuristics & BiasesHerman, Mark Howard 31 May 2019 (has links)
No description available.
|
566 |
Chemical Characterization and Biological Evaluation of Secondary Metabolites Isolated from <i>Glycosmis ovoidea</i>Blanco Carcache, Peter Josephin January 2020 (has links)
No description available.
|
567 |
How Well Can We Measure Well-Being?Lu-Lerner, Lily X. 21 May 2020 (has links)
No description available.
|
568 |
Alternatives to the Calculus: Nonstandard Analysis and Smooth Infinitesimal AnalysisHouchens, Jesse P. 13 June 2013 (has links)
No description available.
|
569 |
"Our Primate Materials" Robert M. Yerkes and the Introduction of the Primate to Problems of Human Betterment in the American Eugenics MovementCaitlin Marie Garcia-Feehan (15348619) 27 April 2023 (has links)
<p>My thesis examines how eugenicist and psychologist Robert M. Yerkes’ experimental intelligence research helped to situate the non-human primate as the ideal research subject for human betterment research in the twentieth century U.S. Yerkes believed that the primate was the ideal research subject to address questions of human betterment and social welfare, specifically best to create methods of evaluating the imagined threat of intellectual disability. While Yerkes has been studied extensively in the history of psychology, primatology, and eugenics, rarely have his separate contributions to these fields been placed in conversation with one another. Placing the primate at the center of Yerkes’ work allows for all three fields to engage with one another in a new perspective. By analyzing Yerkes’ publications about the Multiple-Choice Experiment within the context of the American eugenics’ movement, we can see how the primate came to hold a central position in U.S. scientific research, the advancement of human welfare and betterment, and as a means of defining what it means to be human. This story offers a glimpse into this longer process of how the primate came to occupy this position, but even a glimpse offers historians of the American eugenics’ movement new questions. What was the role of the non-human animal in the formulation of American eugenic theories? How have we historically used the natural world in our attempts to separate ourselves from it? And can we truly reconcile a history with eugenics if we continue to ignore the role of animals within it, they who today exist unquestionably within the status of the sub-human?</p>
|
570 |
Books with Bodies: Experientiality in post-1980s Multimodal Print LiteratureGhosal, Torsa 19 October 2017 (has links)
No description available.
|
Page generated in 0.0625 seconds