Spelling suggestions: "subject:"colosseum"" "subject:"kolosseum""
1 |
A Computer-Generated Model of the Construction of the Roman ColosseumTan, Adrian Hadipriono January 2012 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
Auferstanden aus RuinenPfeiffer, Stefan 09 April 2013 (has links) (PDF)
Nach dem Tod Neros im Jahr 69 n. Chr. begann in Rom ein Bürgerkrieg, der nacheinander vier Kaiser hervorbrachte – Galba, Otho, Vitellius und Vespasian. Nachdem Vespasian Vitellius besiegt hatte, konnte er das Imperium unter seiner Herrschaft einen und die flavische Dynastie begründen. Im Jahr 79 folgte ihm sein Sohn Titus auf dem Caesarenthron und diesem 81 n. Chr. der zweite Sohn Vespasians, Domitian, der bis 96 n. Chr. regierte. Die Familie stammte aus einer unbedeutenden Familie, so dass die faktische Macht ausschließlich auf den militärischen Fähigkeiten Vespasians und der Akzeptanz seiner Herrschaft durch das Heer beruhte. Von Anfang an bemühte sich Vespasian aber, das Volk und den Senat von seiner Herrschaft zu überzeugen. Gerade die kaiserliche Baupolitik ist ein Spiegel des Bemühens um Akzeptanz durch die drei entscheidenden Gruppen Roms, als Heer, Volk und Senat. Der Beitrag zeichnet die Baupolitik Vespasians und Titus’ nach und zeigt, wie die Bauten der Legitimation der Herrschaft dienten. / After the death of emperor Nero in 69 AD Rome has fallen into a civil war which saw four legitimate emperors. Having defeated the third one, Vitellius, Vespasian united Rome under his sole rule and founded the Flavian dynasty. He was followed in 79 by his son Titus. Descending from an unimportant family of unknown ancestry and his rule basing only on the strengh of his legions, Vespasian had to legitimise his rule in different ways, because a legitimate emperor had to be accepted by the three major groups in Rome, the Senate, the people of Rome and the Roman legions. In these times, royal building policy was of high importance for gaining acceptance by propagating ideas, which might achieve a consense of all subjects and which respond to the needs of all three groups. The article takes a look at the buildings that were erected by Vespasian and his successor Titus. In analysing them, we can find out in which way they helped to legitimise the rule of the new dynasty.
|
3 |
Auferstanden aus Ruinen: Roms Bauten in der Zeit des Vespasian und des TitusPfeiffer, Stefan 09 April 2013 (has links)
Nach dem Tod Neros im Jahr 69 n. Chr. begann in Rom ein Bürgerkrieg, der nacheinander vier Kaiser hervorbrachte – Galba, Otho, Vitellius und Vespasian. Nachdem Vespasian Vitellius besiegt hatte, konnte er das Imperium unter seiner Herrschaft einen und die flavische Dynastie begründen. Im Jahr 79 folgte ihm sein Sohn Titus auf dem Caesarenthron und diesem 81 n. Chr. der zweite Sohn Vespasians, Domitian, der bis 96 n. Chr. regierte. Die Familie stammte aus einer unbedeutenden Familie, so dass die faktische Macht ausschließlich auf den militärischen Fähigkeiten Vespasians und der Akzeptanz seiner Herrschaft durch das Heer beruhte. Von Anfang an bemühte sich Vespasian aber, das Volk und den Senat von seiner Herrschaft zu überzeugen. Gerade die kaiserliche Baupolitik ist ein Spiegel des Bemühens um Akzeptanz durch die drei entscheidenden Gruppen Roms, als Heer, Volk und Senat. Der Beitrag zeichnet die Baupolitik Vespasians und Titus’ nach und zeigt, wie die Bauten der Legitimation der Herrschaft dienten. / After the death of emperor Nero in 69 AD Rome has fallen into a civil war which saw four legitimate emperors. Having defeated the third one, Vitellius, Vespasian united Rome under his sole rule and founded the Flavian dynasty. He was followed in 79 by his son Titus. Descending from an unimportant family of unknown ancestry and his rule basing only on the strengh of his legions, Vespasian had to legitimise his rule in different ways, because a legitimate emperor had to be accepted by the three major groups in Rome, the Senate, the people of Rome and the Roman legions. In these times, royal building policy was of high importance for gaining acceptance by propagating ideas, which might achieve a consense of all subjects and which respond to the needs of all three groups. The article takes a look at the buildings that were erected by Vespasian and his successor Titus. In analysing them, we can find out in which way they helped to legitimise the rule of the new dynasty.
|
4 |
Canonizing the Colosseum: Remembering, Manipulating, and Codifying Memory in the Eternal CityMehrmand, Sonia M 01 April 2013 (has links)
The study of social memory is not purely a historical or anthropological endeavor. Archaeology can provide a considerable amount of evidence about how and why people remembered. In this case study, the Colosseum will be studied in the broader sense of being a monument of damnatio memoriae and commemorative memory; the very act of building it can be seen as a form of “recutting” the landscape to fit the image Vespasian wanted to convey of his predecessor. The Colosseum will also be studied in an even larger historical context. This will involve analyzing the manner in which it was memorialized during the Middle Ages, the Renaissance, and by British visitors during the Victorian era. I will end the case study with an analysis of Benito Mussolini’s use of antiquity and the Colosseum to propagate Fascism.
Lastly, the concept of cultural heritage and the institutions that uphold it, particularly UNESCO, will be put into question. In illustrating the fluidity of interpretations of the past, in this case through material culture, I argue that the endeavor to codify them by establishing World Heritage sites is problematic because of their subjectivity to modern agendas. However, in order to understand changing attitudes and memories associated with a single monument, one must first explore the nature of social memory.
|
5 |
While Stands the Colosseum: A Ground-Up Exploration of Ancient Roman Construction Techniques using Virtual RealityTan, Adrian Hadipriono 14 May 2015 (has links)
No description available.
|
Page generated in 0.0392 seconds