Le droit de la famille constitue un sujet très sensible dans les pays musulmans et donne lieu à une controverse récurrente, principalement structurée autour des pôles islamique et féministe. C’est le cas au Sénégal et au Maroc où l’option retenue par le législateur - qui vise à renforcer les droits des femmes dans le cadre d’un texte cherchant à concilier impératifs islamiques et injonction à la modernité - est loin de faire l’unanimité. En prenant les débats sur le droit de la famille comme point de départ, ce travail se propose - à partir d’une analyse croisant action publique et sociologie politique du droit - de voir comment l’Etat cherche à réguler l’intime pour s’affirmer comme entreprise totale de domination dans un contexte marqué par un fort pluralisme normatif. La comparaison par contrastes dramatiques permet de centrer l’analyse sur le différentiel de capacité et de légitimité des Etats marocain et sénégalais pour mieux saisir le processus différencié d’institutionnalisation de l’Etat au sud. Dans les deux cas, l’Etat cherche à tirer avantage de la controverse en jouant sur les différents systèmes normatifs et en impliquant l’ensemble des acteurs qui le reconnaissent comme arbitre légitime, ce qui lui permet de conserver le pouvoir déterminant de la mise en forme juridique. Afin de pallier les difficultés d’application du droit, l’Etat s’appuie également sur les acteurs non étatiques pour le diffuser, ce qui confirme le caractère co-produit de la politique du droit de la famille. Si le droit étatique ne constitue pas la norme unique mais une norme mobilisable parmi d’autres, il contribue néanmoins à l’orientation des schèmes de perception et d’action des individus et renforce ainsi la prétention de l’Etat à constituer l’autorité politique ultime. / In Muslim countries, Family Law is a highly sensitive matter, which generates recurrent controversy, mainly polarised around Islamic and feminist positions. This is, for instance, what can be observed in Senegal and Morocco. In both countries, the legislator tried to mediate this tension by strengthening Women’s Rights within a text that conciliates Islamic imperatives and injunction to modernity. But this solution is far from receiving unanimous support.Taking the Family Law debate as a starting point, this work combines public policy studies and political sociology of law to analyse how the State tries to regulate the intimate sphere in order to be viewed as the sole domination apparatus within a context of strong normative pluralism. The comparison between the Moroccan and the Senegalese States - a comparison based on ‘dramatic contrasts’- allows to focus the analysis on the differences between the Morocco and Senegalese states in terms of capacity and legitimacy, and thus helps us in better understanding the specificity of state-institutionalisation processes in developing countries.In both cases, the State tries to take advantage from the controversy. It plays on the different normative systems and involves all the actors who acknowledge it as the legitimate arbitrator in order to keep and consolidate its power of law framing. Furthermore, in order to overcome the difficulties linked to law enforcement, the State relies on non-state actors to apply the law. This evidences and confirms the fact that Family Law is the result of a process of co-production. Even if State jurisprudence does not constitute the only normative order, but one amongst others, it nevertheless importantly influences individual behaviour on both the cognitive and the experiential levels. It thus reinforces the State’s pretention to constitute the ultimate political authority.

Private international law from a comparative perspective(comparison of a particular segment in Czech law and the law of a selected country) This thesis works with a comparison of conflict rules in the field of international family law in the Czech Republic and in the Federal Republic of Germany. It is focused concretely on questions of marriage, register partnership and adoption, in which is included an international element. The topic has been taken into account in addition to the national rules of international private law also rules at international and European level. Includes is also future progress in this field. Thesis is divided into eight chapters. The introduction is followed by first chapter, which deals with general classification of international family law as a part of international private law and their definition. Following chapter is focused on conflict rules, determingfactores which may be used to determine the applicable law. Included are terms as public policy, remise or transmise. Chapter three is about general definition of court's jurisdiction to hear the dispute with an international element. Fourth chapter is devoted to marriage, included are sources of legal regulation, jurisdiction of courts in matrimonial matters and comparison of conflict rules in the case of...

A thesis deals with perception of the value of marriage and of the status of divorced person in Czech and German society. Student observes in her research supposed trend of deviation from the traditional value of marriage by current young generation - potential parents. With this is connected also a supposed change in attitude for divorce. Aim of the theses is to compare that attitude by Czech and German generation. For the final results were used available sources in Czech and German language, which are dealing with this topic and also a method of quality research - unstandardized interviews with people born in 70s and 80s in the area of Czech republic and Germany.

This thesis is a theoretical study that characterizes shared childcare after divorce as the most suitable post-divorce arrangement. This assumption is based on developmental changes in the European family from the time of the French Revolution, the development of family law and important aspects of family law, as well as on the needs of children, and definitions of maternal and paternal love. This hypothesis is also supported by the results of foreign research, which compares the lives of children in different post-divorce arrangements. The following paper discusses mediation as an appropriate way of helping parents achieve a solution that is suitable for all participants in the dispute. In the conclusion some case studies are presented.

Esta tese analisa a questão da legitimidade das relações de família que se deslocou do direito positivo para a esfera judicial. Por conseguinte, sob o ângulo da justiça, esse deslocamento possibilitou contemplar alguns dos aspectos da fissura social brasileira que separa os ricos dos pobres, na medida em que a lei passou a reconhecer novas formas de família além daquela constituída pelo casamento civil. Atualmente, a questão social do direito de família revela-se num contexto de reforma do Poder Judiciário, no qual se procura buscar soluções para que as barreiras sociais, econômicas e culturais que impedem o acesso ao direito e à justiça sejam superadas. Logo, neste estudo, impõe-se a questão geral de compreender como públicos distintos percebem seus direitos, procuram exercer sua cidadania e como suas demandas são apresentadas ao Estado. As análises desenvolvidas nesta tese seguem a teoria weberiana do direito e têm por objetivo estudar as diferentes sistematizações legais e as diferentes representações de uma ordem legítima a fim de se verificar como o conjunto de normas de direito se repercute nas condutas sociais. Nesse sentido, examina-se o processo histórico de codificação civil e as transformações do direito de família brasileiro, cujos reflexos são observados a partir da organização da justiça no município de São Paulo (2000-2005). Conclui-se que as demanda de família apresentadas à justiça, na forma de processos judiciais, dependem do perfil socioeconômico dos litigantes: quanto mais baixo o nível socioeconômico, menores são as chances de ingresso nos tribunais. Nesse cenário, as informações a respeito das formas de conjugalidade e do estado civil, bem como os dados referentes aos processos de separação, divórcio, guarda de menores e alimentos, são indicadores da desigualdade de acesso ao direito e à justiça no Brasil. / This thesis analyses the question of legitimacy in family relationships and its relation to judicial proceedings. This question reveals the Brazilian social inequality that became evident when the family law recognized new manners of family constitution other than that based on civil marriage. At present, the question of family law displays in a judiciary transformation context in that new solutions are necessary to overcome the social, economical and cultural barriers that block the access to justice. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to understand how people of different social origins realize their rights, exercise their citizenships and have their expectancies treated by the State. This analysis follows the Weberian theory of law whose objective is to study the different law systematizations and the different representations of the legitimacy in a certain order to verify how the law affects the social order. In this regard, the thesis considers the history of the civil codification and the transformation of the family law, whose consequences have been examined through the justice organization at São Paulo city (2000-2005). In conclusion, the study reveals that the nature of the family claims depends on the claimers socioeconomic status: the less the socioeconomic status, the less are the opportunities to reach the courts. In this context, the information about conjugality and civil status, as well as the information about decisions on divorce, legal separation, custody and alimonies, are indicators about the inequality of access to justice in Brazil.

Confronter le lien familial au droit pénal peut sembler paradoxal. La contradiction s'efface cependant devant le caractère inéluctable et nécessaire de cette rencontre. L'étude de l'impact spécifique de la présence du lien de famille sur les règles répressives s'inscrit dans une perspective pluridisciplinaire et propose de mettre en présence deux objets dont les frontières évoluent constamment. À travers une double perspective d'observation et de prospection, cette recherche propose d'analyser le phénomène actuel de mutation de la protection pénale de la famille et de découvrir les principes qui lui sont propres, dans le but de mieux le saisir et de pouvoir en réorienter les applications futures. L'examen révèle l'existence d'un désintérêt répressif global à l'encontre du lien familial à l'endroit où sa prise en compte constitue un atout fondamental pour l'édification et la mise en œuvre cohérente des règles pénales. Cette étude propose d'analyser l'arsenal répressif existant et se donne pour objectif l'édification théorique d'une classification inédite des infractions familiales. La réalisation d'une typologie fonctionnelle de l'infraction familiale en droit pénal permet de pouvoir lui attribuer un outil de traitement procédural adapté à ses spécificités et d'aboutir à la mise en œuvre d'une politique pénale familiale spécifique. Cette ambition questionne la réalité du lien familial pénal et appelle, d'une part, à réinsérer le droit pénal dans le lien familial au stade de la classification des infractions familiales, et, d'autre part, à intégrer le lien familial dans le droit pénal au stade du traitement des infractions familiales. / Studying the family link from a criminal law perspective may seem paradoxical at first sight. Yet this is not the case since the confrontation between these two concepts is as ineluctable as is it necessary. The examination of the impacts of the family link on the repressive rules falls within a multidisciplinary approach and sheds light on two conceptions, whose limits are constantly changing. The purpose of this study is to analyse the current phenomenon of transformation in the criminal protection of families through observation and research; and to break down the principles governing it, so as to better grasp the situation and to give a new orientation towards future implementations. The study reveals the existence of an overall disinterest of the repressive field in the family link precisely where its consideration is a fundamental criterion in the construction and consistent implementation of criminal rules. The purpose of this research is to analyse the existing body of repressive laws and regulations currently in use as well as to establish an unprecedented classification of family offenses. The creation of a functional typology of family offenses in criminal law will make it possible to provide tailored legal tools to deal with this dilemma and to implement a specific criminal policy regarding the family. This endeavour challenges the very existence of the family link in criminal justice and demands not only that it be reintegrated into criminal law at the initial stage of classifying family offenses, but also that it be subsequently taken into consideration when dealing with these offenses.

Le couple au sens du droit musulman est conçu par le lien matrimonial, ce qui exclut toutes autres formes d’unions. Les profondes mutations en la matière de certains pays musulmans font que l'institution familiale est traversée par des courants contradictoires faisant d’elle un champ de lutte propice entre l'ancienne et la nouvelle, entre la tradition et la moderne.Les réformes apparues, il y a une dizaine d’années, dans certains pays musulmans témoignent la volonté des législateurs musulmans de répondre au souci de l’égalité homme-femme, en particulier le rééquilibrage des droits entre les époux. Ainsi, de nombreuses institutions ont connu des mutations soit par leur prohibition, soit par leurs restrictions les rendant difficilement applicables.Ce travail a le mérite de dresser le bilan de l’accueil de ces institutions réformées dans l’ordre juridique français et, ainsi démontrer les tergiversations jurisprudentielles en la matière.L’européanisation du droit international privé et l’influence libérale de la famille en droit français ont accru la diversité des règles et des méthodes applicables aux couples.En analysant la méthodologie du droit international privé français, un certain relativisme découle dans l’application de ses modalités ce qui envoie à s’interroger sur les limites du respect des valeurs fondamentales du for. Un relativisme qui se débat entre poursuivre le but du droit international privé d’harmoniser deux systèmes et respecter les valeurs essentielles du pays d’accueil.Néanmoins, apprécier les réformes du droit étranger dans leur globalité et leur profondeur permettra de renforcer la coordination entre les différents systèmes en jeu. / The couple under Muslim law is designed by the marriage bond, which excludes all other forms of union. However. The profound changes are making Family crossed by contradictory speeches that makes it a field of struggle between the old family and the new one, between tradition and modernity.The recent reforms that have appeared in many Muslim countries, over a decade for the majority, show the concern of the Muslim legislator for the question of equity between men and women, especially the husband and wife. Thus, many institutions have experienced mutations either by their prohibition or by their reluctance involving their difficulties of application.The position of the French judge is marked by the concern to exclude the application of foreign rules only to situations that have close ties with French territory. This "proximist" conception of public order is going against a relativistic approach to divergences between legal systems., and above all the emergence of a new rule of conflicts with the phenomenon of “Europeanisation” in French domestic law.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:27:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Mercedes Cristina Rodrigues Vera.pdf: 941704 bytes, checksum: 38d0c1f45de37741e3a4b648a6474b6f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-05-13 / According to current legislation, partnerships and conjugal relations may be amicable or litigious dissolved. Since 04 Jan 2007 and after some requirements filled out, a couple that intends a divorce or an amicable separation has the extrajudicial formality as another option for reaching their aim. During the search for the roots of divorce and separation guilt, an introspection in canon and roman laws was realized. Modern law was reached as Middle Age ended. The family law received a severe influence from the protestant reform and as consequence, the secularization of law and a definitive separation of State and Church took place. In the research of guilt evolution in matrimony dissolution and under the paternal system, the first regulations were initiated, when the matrimony was still considered an indissolvable institution, and after, the divorce maked the relation rupture possible Before the promulgation of the Federal Constitution in 1988 an analysis of guilt was realized, facing the fundamental principle of human dignity and its reflex in matrimony dissolutions as well as the strengthening of the idea of conjugal life rupture and the weakness of guilt idea for judicial separations motivation. In this context, a doctrinal debate takes place considering the convenience of the guilt maintenance in the national juridical system. This questioning grows in importance as the consequences of guilt elimination in family law are analyzed, and the possibility to litigate the reparation of damages eventually suffered from the violation of matrimony duties, and understood as a necessary illicit act in the configuration of civil responsibility for moral and material damages. We may conclude by saying that the guilt strong presence in the separation acts motivation is unfeasible, at least in this present moment, for its total elimination from the national juridical scenario / Pela atual legislação, a sociedade e o vínculo conjugal podem ser dissolvidos de modo consensual ou litigioso. Desde 04.01.2007, o casal que pretende se separar ou se divorciar consensualmente dispõe de mais uma forma para atingir seu intento, a modalidade extrajudicial, desde que preenchidos certos requisitos. Na busca das raízes da culpa na separação e no divórcio, realiza uma introspecção no direito romano e no direito canônico, chegando ao direito moderno, que marcou o fim da Idade Média e sofreu, no âmbito do direito de família, severa influência da reforma protestante, que culminou com a secularização do direito, separando em definitivo o Estado da Igreja. A pesquisa sobre a evolução da culpa na dissolução do matrimônio no ordenamento pátrio inicia-se na vigência das primeiras regulamentações, quando o casamento era considerado uma instituição de caráter indissolúvel, passando à possibilidade de ruptura do vínculo do casamento através do divórcio. Ante a promulgação da Constituição Federal em 1988, analisa a culpa frente ao princípio fundamental da dignidade da pessoa humana e seus reflexos nas dissoluções matrimoniais, bem como o fortalecimento do conceito de ruptura da vida em comum, frente ao enfraquecimento da idéia de culpa, a motivar as separações judiciais. Nesse contexto, apresenta o debate doutrinário sobre a conveniência de se manter a culpa no ordenamento jurídico nacional, questionamento que cresce em importância, na medida que se analisam as conseqüências decorrentes da eliminação da culpa do direito de família e a possibilidade de se pleitear a reparação de danos eventualmente sofridos pela violação dos deveres do casamento, entendida essa como ato ilícito necessário à configuração da responsabilidade civil, tanto por danos morais, como materiais. Conclui ao final que a forte presença da culpa a motivar as ações de separação torna inviável, ao menos no momento atual, a sua total eliminação do panorama jurídico nacional

Com o crescente número de separações e divórcios verificados nas últimas décadas no Brasil e no mundo assistiu-se, também, a um exponencial aumento nas disputas envolvendo a guarda dos filhos menores e o direito de visitas. Essa situação de grave conflito familiar se mostra solo fértil para o acirramento de ânimos das partes, que frequentemente não são capazes de perceber que a falência do seu relacionamento conjugal em nada altera sua relação parental com os filhos comuns. Nesse cenário, em que as desavenças familiares já chegaram aos umbrais do Judiciário, não raro se verifica a tentativa, notadamente movida por sentimentos de vingança, de se afastar o genitor não-guardião dos seus filhos, através de táticas e manobras geralmente levadas a cabo pelo genitor guardião aptas a efetivar tal distanciamento. A essa conduta se deu o nome de Alienação Parental, tema abordado pelo legislador brasileiro através da Lei 12.318, de 2010, que estabelece a reprovação estatal à conduta alienadora e fornece ao julgador elementos para identificá-la e repreendê-la. O presente trabalho visa, dessa maneira, por meio da análise dos estudos já realizados acerca da Alienação Parental e da Síndrome da Alienação Parental, identificar na conduta alienadora a configuração de verdadeiro abuso moral cometido contra a criança e o adolescente, por atentar contra o seu fundamental direito à convivência familiar com ambos os genitores. / With the increasing number of separations and divorces in recent decades in Brazil and throughout the world there was also an exponential increase of disputes involving custody of the children and visitation rights. This situation of severe family conflict provides fertile ground to the intensification of hostilities between the parties, who often fail to realize that their connubial relationships failure does not change their parental relationship with the mutual children. In this scenario, in which family quarrels have already reached the threshold of the judiciary, one can often see the attempt, notably motivated by feelings of revenge, to separate the non-custodial parent from his (her) children, through tactics and maneuvers usually carried out by the custodial parent that are able to accomplish such an estrangement. This behavior was named Parental Alienation, a subject addressed by the Brazilian act n. 12.318 of 2010, which established the state disapproval of the alienating actions and allowed the judge to identify and admonish them. Therefore, the present work aims, through the analysis of existing studies about Parental Alienation and Parental Alienation Syndrome, to consider alienating behaviors as a genuine form of moral abuse against children and adolescents, by undermining its fundamental right to family with both parents.

Les juges appelés à connaître des affaires familiales sont nombreux. Le juge aux affaires familiales, le juge des enfants, le juge des tutelles, le tribunal d’instance et de grande instance, le juge du tribunal d’instance, le président du tribunal de grande instance ont tous une part de compétence. Les compétences de ces différentes juridictions peuvent s’entrecroiser et ainsi créer des conflits de compétence d’attribution. Afin d’appréhender de manière raisonnée les questions soulevées, nous proposons de distinguer trois types de conflits : les conflits réels, les conflits apparents et les pseudo-conflits. Les conflits réels naissent lorsque deux juridictions, ayant un pouvoir juridictionnel identique, peuvent se déclarer compétentes pour une même affaire. Dans les conflits apparents, les juridictions semblent avoir les mêmes compétences et un pouvoir juridictionnel identique, mais l’étude des dispositions légales clarifie leur intervention et évite le conflit. En présence de pseudo-conflits, il ne s’agit pas de compétence mais de pouvoir. L’étude des conflits est importante car si la pluralité de juridictions évite une standardisation des rapports familiaux, une meilleure lisibilité des compétences s’impose en droit de la famille. / In France, many judges and courts intervene in family. Sometimes it becomes very difficult to know to which judge or court one must turn to. All these courts and judges may be in competition for the same matter, thus creating confusion and conflicts of jurisdiction between themselves. In order to study the outcome of these conflicts, we suggest to distinguish between three types of conflicts: real conflicts, seeming conflicts and pseudo-conflicts. Real conflicts occur when two courts having the same jurisdictional power decide that they are both capable to judge the same case. Seeming conflicts occur each time two courts seem to have the same jurisdiction but further study of legal provisions quickly shows that all conflict is easily avoided. Pseudo conflicts are related to the power to judge. In other words there is no legal base enabling the judge or court (no matter which) to render a decision. Studying these conflicts is important. Indeed, a plurality of courts and judges is necessary so that family cases are not always tried in a standard way. Nevertheless it is also necessary to have a clear view of the different jurisdictions involved in family law.