近幾年由於「山寨手機」的興起，吸引了大家對於山寨產品的注意力，改變了一般民眾對山寨產品的想法，然而，山寨手機的出現，已經不單是一個社會的獨特現象，它更影響了手機產業供應鏈的生態。因此本研究透過個案研究方法，以B公司做為研究對象，從收集的初級及次級資料中，利用SWOT分析與五力分析作為分析方法，試圖回答下列兩個問題：（1）瞭解「山寨產業」對於PCB產業有何衝擊？（2）面對「山寨產業」的衰退，台灣PCB廠商應如何因應？ 本研究發現，由於B公司初期的企業能力能夠滿足山寨手機的需求，因此能夠在山寨手機興起時從中獲利，然而，隨著山寨手機產業的衰退，本研究認為B公司須採用下列策略因應：（1）淡出山寨手機供應鏈，不再陷入削價競爭的窘境，將目標客戶轉為「白牌手機」廠商，（2）善用大陸市場與低價勞力，由於大陸市場已經從「世界工廠」轉變為「世界市場」，為了服務廣大的消費者，國際大廠紛紛在大陸設立據點，因此B公司應繼續增加昆山廠的生產線，同時，（3）要提高手機用PCB的研發費用，由於傳統山寨手機產業已經衰減，新的需求轉向高階智慧型手機，因此B公司必須手機產品主力從低階四層板，提升為高階的HDI板，除了可以回應智慧型手機的需要外，也慢慢將目標客戶轉移至品牌手機廠商。 本研究主要貢獻是提供企業深入了解山寨手機對手機產業供應鏈之影響，雖然仿冒抄襲是一個新興產業成長的必經之路，然而大陸的山寨手機產業所產生的影響不容小覷，因此本研究以一個曾經受惠於在山寨手機的PCB廠作為研究對象，試圖提出面對後山寨時代的來臨，企業應該用如何回應。 / The rise of bandit mobile phone industry has attracted people’s eye and change people’s mind on bandit products. “Bandit” is not just a unique social phenomenon, but an impact on the outside environment of mobile phone supply chain. This research used case study to investigate the B company, a Taiwanese PCB company as our research object. We utilized SWOT analysis and Porter’s five force analysis as tools with our primary and secondary data to clarify the following two questions: (1) what the influence did bandit industry arise on the PCB industry, and (2) what is the PCB company’s strategy when facing downturn of the bandit mobile phone industry. Our study has found that the B company’s capability matched the need of bandit mobile phone industry at the early stage. However, with the industry declined, we suggest the B company should adapt the following strategies in order to maintain its profit: (1) fade out from bandit mobile phone industry, and turn to white-box mobile phone industry; (2) take advantage of cheap labor cost in China and extend existing production lines; (3) enhance the R&D investment on mobile phone PCB. The major contribution of this research is to help firms understand the influence of bandit mobile phones on mobile phone’s supply chain. Although copy is the necessary evil in the developing industry, however, the impact from it still can’t be ignored. We choose a Taiwanese PCB company, which has been benefited from bandit mobile phones, as our case to identify what’s next for the PCB companies in post bandit mobile phone age.

The presented thesis aim is to establishment a competitive business on a basis of a well prepared, viable business plan. A sport center will be designed for its purpose. The sport center wíll offer physical activities, space rental, its own sales and hospitanty. Porter’s Five Force Analysis, SLEPTE Analysis, Market Survey by Questionnaire Survey and SWOT Analysis were used to solve the problem. Privotal chapter is Custom design solutions, which are devided according to the individual subchapter of the business plan. The aim of the thesis is to create a small business.

This diploma thesis drafts concept of winery based on business network of small wineries using synergetic effect. Critical analysis of macro and micro environment together with explorative research of small wineries was used as a starting point. Based on obtained information, concept of mentioned winery is proposed as an outcome of this thesis.

文具的歷史源遠流長，許多數百年老店，至今屹立不搖。國際文具市場的規模約六千億美金，以歐、美、亞太為三大市場。目前世界文具市場年成長僅約4%，歐、美、日更低於此數字，可見已有飽和趨勢。而台灣的現代文具產業，起始於二次大戰後。最早的業者有兩種: 一為台籍人士接下日人留下的設備與技術；另一則是從大陸播遷來台的文具商人另起爐灶。隨著70年代台灣出口導向型的經濟成長，文具業者開始進軍國際。挾日系技術、及當時低工資的優勢，搶下一席之地。然自1980年代後期起，大陸、東南亞的製造商，從低價市場搶進，藉由模仿開始做起。近年來更在不斷引進新設備及技術下，開始有足以與台灣文具業抗衡的業者出現。至此，台灣的文具業不得不開始改變策略，一部分開始外移到東南亞或大陸，尋找製造成本更低的生產地；一部分則投入研發，尋求高附加價值；更有業者是兩種策略都採取。顯然，在總體經濟環境改變、內外在競爭優劣勢消長的情形下，台灣文具業者的策略也跟著在因應、變動。然而，文具產品雖消耗數量大，但單價低，產值亦偏低，故多不受政府、學界重視，相關研究付之闕如。 / 自波特於1980年發表競爭策略(Competitive Strategy)一書以來，競爭優劣勢分析，成為現代企業策略訂定時必做之功課。本文對台灣文具產業的發展做一回顧，並詳述並分析目前市場環境，再以波特的競爭策略理論(五力分析、國家競爭優勢—鑽石體系)，分析個案P公司的競爭優劣勢，及未來策略的建議。研究結果顯示：(1)資訊流通的容易、技術門檻降低，易吸引文具業新進者，造成產業飽和；(2)現有業者的背景、實力相近，又為成熟產業，又本地文具業者多為家族企業，在情感包袱下無人輕易退出，造成競爭激化。再者，全球文具市場成長趨緩的情形，導致市佔率掠奪戰；(3)大型通路取得議價力量。且文具規格已定型化，網路搜尋又日益便利，買主轉換供應商的難度低。又各國不斷推出的新法規，大幅增加了成本；(4)個人電腦侵入了傳統文具的空間。但傳統文具的易攜帶性與低廉價格、美術顏料技法的多變性，仍非電腦設備所能取代；(5)我國文具上游廠商精密技術不足，關鍵零件掌握先進國家手中。但近年韓、大陸供應商漸成氣候，或許可扭轉此情勢。又，文具業多為中小型企業，採購量低，難取得議價力量。 / 最後，對P公司及文具業者的建議：(1)持續研發，創造新利基，建立難以模仿的核心能耐(core capability)；(2) 在低階大量產品市場，如無意繼續投資，則即應選擇退出(或淡出)；反之，可考慮製程外包，或考慮使用替代原物料以降低成本，更可努力提升生產自動化程度；(3)於高階市場，品牌行銷有賴耕耘，若中小型企業財力不足，可考慮自小區域做起，另更可考慮以OEM/ODM形式為歐、美品牌代工；(4)為對買主提升其轉移成本，應努力降低道德危機成本與建立共同資產；(5)專注電子產品尚無法取代的功能加以發揮，並進一步與電子產品結合；(6)持續尋求原物料來源分散；(7)善用專業經理人協助管理。又，對政府的建議為：(1)加強總體競爭力；(2)特別加強對中小企業的輔導；(3)協助廠商開拓大陸市場。 / Modern stationery industry of Taiwan sprouted since the end of World War II. Early industry players could be roughly divided into two kinds: (1) those stationery dealers emigrated from mainland China after Chinese Civil War; (2) locals that bought out manufacturing facilities left over by departing Japanese. With the roaring up of Taiwan’s export-oriented economy, stationery players extend their business into the international markets. With their Japan-rooted technologies and low labor costs, Taiwanese stationery makers became major suppliers for the world, elbowing their way through German and Japanese competitors. / With the economic reform and liberalization of mainland China since late 1980’s, however, Taiwan’s stationery industries went over a turning point. Those low-cost mainland Chinese makers, providing products mainly copying advanced counterparts in other countries, first entered low-price markets. After years of imitation, learning, and introduction of new facilities and technologies, they gradually establish capability strong enough to compete with Taiwanese. To cope with this change, Taiwan’s stationers either move to Southeast Asia or China to gain cheaper production cost or stay home and invest more in innovation for upgrading their produce and making more added values. Obviously, the change in macroeconomic environment and competition has forced Taiwanese stationers to adjust themselves accordingly. Studies on this developing progress, however, can hardly found within governmental authorities or academic communities. The absence of research on stationery industries could most likely be attributed to the fact that this business accounts for a truly tiny part of the world’s economic production. / In view of this, it arouses the interest in discussing the competitive advantages and disadvantages—an idea brought about by Michael Porter, with his publication of Competitive Advantages in 1980—of Taiwan’s stationery industries for finding a new way. Thus, this thesis is intended to provide an overview of Taiwan’s stationery industries—their history, development, and analysis of current environment. And then, through Porter’s competitive theories—five forces analysis and diamond of national competitive advantages—it looks into the current competitive advantages and disadvantages of Taiwan’s stationery industries and tries to find strategic suggestions for Taiwan’s stationers as well as government. / The conclusion is:(a) for the industries: (1) keep on investing in innovation and finding new niches in order to establish sustainable core capabilities; (2) as to low-end markets, either fade out or stay but pursue low cost by production outsourcing, using alternative materials, and automation; (3) for high-end markets, branding marketing could cost a great deal, a regional, small-scale trial to begin is a safer way; besides, OEM/ODM for existing foreign brands can be a choice; (4) for enhancing switching cost of buyers, lower their moral hazard risk and build up common assets; (5) focus on functions that electronic alternative products haven’t covered, and further incorporate electronic functions with traditional stationery; (6) diversify sources of materials; (7) make good use of professional managers;(b) for the government: (1) keep on enhancing macroeconomic competitive advantages; (2) render more assistances to small- and middle-sized business like stationery industries; (3) render more assistance to business planning to enter mainland China market.

近年來因雲端運算(Cloud Computing)、智慧型行動載具(Smart handheld Device)等資訊與通訊技術的整合與匯流，再加上金融證券產業政策開放、國際化與自由化、證劵業在中國大陸發展的限制逐步鬆綁等諸多因素，原本各有自己領域的資訊服務廠商都開始磨拳擦掌，紛紛在手持式裝置上推出各種證券服務商品，這對過往在Ｂ２Ｃ領域獨佔鰲頭的E公司無異是最大的衝擊。 本研究將藉由探討E公司現行定位、分析因智慧型行動載具之演進，對金融資訊服務廠商所產生的市場改變、衝擊與競爭，進而找出新的市場商機、訂定新的市場定位與策略，期盼能為該公司發展再造藍海市場商機。 主要結論為：金融證券資訊服務產業已經是一紅海市場。為解決E公司面臨的產業困境，思考E公司未來發展走向，重新定位E公司的核心競爭力(Core Competence)，如何利用現有智慧型行動載具的特性化阻力為助力，在金融證券資訊服務產業這一片紅海中開闢新藍海。本研究將依據波特(Michael E. Porter)的五力分析及競爭論(On Competition)與洪順慶教授之新產品開發流程，提出新舊產品策略及商業模式(Business Model與Go-To-Market Model)的建議：  舊產品:運用該公司在證券資訊市場的領先地位，作業流程核心管理能力，通路優勢與客戶特性，為進入衰退期的既有產品(專業股票機)發展社群服務，增加老客戶黏著度，並搶食競爭對手市場，以延續該產品生命週期。  新產品:善用既有的雲端優勢及智慧型手持式裝置資通訊整合匯流與Web2.0的新技術，開發客製化(Tailor-Made)、主動揭露(Event Push、Calendar Push)，推出智慧的(Smart)、簡易的(Simple)、方便的(Convenience)的理財生活管家服務，開闢新藍海。 / During the past few years, the information service industry of the securities market has change hugely and the competition becomes more and more intensely, due to the opening and internationalization of the government industry policy and the rapid development of the ICT technology--includes cloud computing, evolution of mobile communication and smart handheld device, and ICT convergence…. Because of these changes, the information service vendors of the securities market have started penetrating their services into mobile device with low-price or price-free strategy. The impact to the E-Corp, the leading company with the B2C business model, is most fiercely. First, the study will analysize the change, impact and competition of the information service industry of the securities market, and will apply E-Corp as the case-study-company and probe the current positioning of E-Corp. Finally, the study will try to find out the new business opportunities for vendors, and will make suggestions on marketing repositioning and product development and business strategy to E-Corp. Exectuctive summary:The information service industry of securities market is a red ocean market. The study will utilzie the theories of Five-Force-Analysis (Michael E. Porter), Product Life Cycle (SC Horng, NCCU Taiwan), Core Competence (Gary Hamel & C.K. Parhalad), and will also think how to apply new technologies, such as cloud computing, smart handheld device, Web2.0,…to solve E-Corp dilemma and to help E-Corp to creat new blue ocean business and market. The suggestions are:  For current product: To extend the product life cycle. First, to apply the strength of the leading position in industry, channel strength and procedure management core competence to develop community network service to increase customers’ loyalty and to low down the rate of loss. Second, to seize the competitors’ customers.  For new product:Apply the strength of cloud computing the E-Corp has, and utilize ICT convergence and smart handheld devices, Web2.0 technologies to extend the service from securities to financial/wealth management service with the functional characters of event push/calendar driven, and smart/simple/convenience.