No description available.

Domain swapping is a wide spread phenomenon which involves the association between two or more protein subunits such that intra-molecular interactions between domains in each subunit are replaced by equivalent inter-molecular interactions between the same domains in different subunits. This thesis is devoted to the analysis of the factors that drive proteins to undergo such association modes. The specific system analyzed is the monomer to swapped dimer formation of the B1 domain of the immunoglobulin G binding protein (GB1). The formation of this dimer was shown to be fostered by 4 amino acid substitutions (L5V, F30V, Y33F, A34F) (Byeon et al. 2003). In this work, computational protein design and molecular dynamics simulations, both with detailed atomic models, were used to gain insight into how these 4 mutations may promote the domain swapping reaction.<p>The stability of the wt and quadruple mutant GB1 monomers was assessed using the software DESIGNER, a fully automatic procedure that selects amino acid sequences likely to stabilize a given backbone structure (Wernisch et al. 2000). Results suggest that 3 of the mutations (L5V, F30V, A34F) have a destabilizing effect. The first mutation (L5V) forms destabilizing interactions with surrounding residues, while the second (F30V) is engaged in unfavorable interactions with the protein backbone, consequently causing local strain. Although the A34F substitution itself is found to contribute favorably to the stability of the monomer, this is achieved only at the expense of forcing the wild type W43 into a highly strained conformation concomitant with the formation of unfavorable interactions with both W43 and V54.<p>Finally, we also provide evidence that A34F mutation stabilizes the swapped dimer structure. Although we were unable to perform detailed protein design calculations on the dimer, due to the lower accuracy of the model, inspection of its 3D structure reveals that the 34F side chains pack against one another in the core of the swapped structure, thereby forming extensive non-native interactions that have no counterparts in the individual monomers. Their replacement by the much smaller Ala residue is suggested to be significantly destabilizing by creating a large internal cavity, a phenomenon, well known to be destabilizing in other proteins. Our analysis hence proposes that the A34F mutation plays a dual role, that of destabilizing the GB1 monomer structure while stabilizing the swapped dimer conformation.<p>In addition to the above study, molecular dynamics simulations of the wild type and modeled quadruple mutant GB1 structures were carried out at room and elevated temperatures (450 K) in order to sample the conformational landscape of the protein near its native monomeric state, and to characterize the deformations that occur during early unfolding. This part of the study was aimed at investigating the influence of the amino acid sequence on the conformational properties of the GB1 monomer and the possible link between these properties and the swapping process. Analysis of the room temperature simulations indicates that the mutant GB1 monomer fluctuates more than its wild type counter part. In addition, we find that the C-terminal beta-hairpin is pushed away from the remainder of the structure, in agreement with the fact that this hairpin is the structural element that is exchanged upon domain swapping. The simulations at 450 K reveal that the mutant protein unfolds more readily than the wt, in agreement with its decreased stability. Also, among the regions that unfold early is the alpha-helix C-terminus, where 2 out of the 4 mutations reside. NMR experiments by our collaborators have shown this region to display increased flexibility in the monomeric state of the quadruple mutant.<p>Our atomic scale investigation has thus provided insights into how sequence modifications can foster domain swapping of GB1. Our findings indicate that the role of the amino acid substitutions is to decrease the stability of individual monomers while at the same time increase the stability of the swapped dimer, through the formation of non-native interactions. Both roles cooperate to foster swapping. / Doctorat en sciences, Spécialisation biologie moléculaire / info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished

Le VIP (ou vasoactive intestinal peptide) est un neuropeptide actif au niveau du syst¨¨me nerveux central et p¨¦riph¨¦rique (syst¨¨mes cardiovasculaire, respiratoire, tractus gastro-intestinal¡­). Il agit sur ces tissus cibles par interaction avec les r¨¦cepteurs VPAC1 et VPAC2, pour lesquels il poss¨¨de une haute affinit¨¦. Ces r¨¦cepteurs appartiennent ¨¤ la classe II des r¨¦cepteurs ¨¤ 7 h¨¦lices transmembranaires coupl¨¦s aux prot¨¦ines G, distincte de celle des r¨¦cepteurs apparent¨¦s ¨¤ la rhodopsine. En r¨¦ponse au VIP, ils stimulent pr¨¦f¨¦rentiellement l'ad¨¦nylate cyclase. Seul le r¨¦cepteur VPAC1 est capable, lorsqu'il est exprim¨¦ ¨¤ haute concentration, d¡¯augmenter les concentrations de calcium intracellulaire :G*i participe ¨¤ cette interaction. L'exposition des deux r¨¦cepteurs au VIP n'aboutit pas seulement ¨¤ leur activation :elle induit une succession de m¨¦canismes cellulaires intrins¨¨ques responsables d'une diminution de la capacit¨¦ du r¨¦cepteur ¨¤ r¨¦pondre ¨¤ un agoniste :la d¨¦sensibilisation. <p>Diff¨¦rents processus peuvent contribuer ¨¤ la d¨¦sensibilisation d¡¯un r¨¦cepteur :le d¨¦couplage du r¨¦cepteur de la prot¨¦ine G, la s¨¦questration du r¨¦cepteur, ou encore leur "down regulation", r¨¦sultat ¨¤ plus long terme de la perte d'une partie du pool total de r¨¦cepteurs. Les m¨¦canismes impliqu¨¦s d¨¦pendent du r¨¦cepteur consid¨¦r¨¦ et de l'¨¦quipement prot¨¦ique de la cellule. <p>Il a ¨¦t¨¦ r¨¦cemment montr¨¦ que le r¨¦cepteur VPAC1 humain ¨¦tait phosphoryl¨¦ (en position S447) en r¨¦ponse ¨¤ l¡¯agoniste, que la ¦Â-arrestine ¨¦tait transloqu¨¦e ¨¤ la membrane plasmique et que l¡¯internalisation qui s¡¯en suivait induisait un ph¨¦nom¨¨ne dynamine-d¨¦pendant. Aucune information plus pr¨¦cise n¡¯est r¨¦f¨¦r¨¦e dans la litt¨¦rature. <p>Ce travail de th¨¨se a donc consist¨¦ en une ¨¦tude plus approfondie de la phosphorylation, l¡¯internalisation et la r¨¦cup¨¦ration du r¨¦cepteur VPAC1 humain.<p><p>Dans un premier temps, nous nous sommes consacr¨¦ ¨¤ l¡¯¨¦laboration d¡¯un anticorps monoclonal sp¨¦cifique anti-r¨¦cepteur afin de visualiser le r¨¦cepteur. Nous avons eu recours ¨¤ l¡¯immunisation g¨¦n¨¦tique qui consiste ¨¤ injecter l¡¯antig¨¨ne sous forme d¡¯ADN. <p>Une majorit¨¦ des souris immunis¨¦es ont produit des anticorps. L¡¯une d¡¯entre-elle a permis de g¨¦n¨¦rer un anticorps monoclonal, lequel a ¨¦t¨¦ compl¨¨tement caract¨¦ris¨¦ :les r¨¦sultats obtenus par FACS montrent qu¡¯il est sp¨¦cifique, s¨¦lectif et que son ¨¦pitope est localis¨¦e au sein de l¡¯extr¨¦mit¨¦ amino-terminale du r¨¦cepteur (figure 1). Il n¡¯interf¨¨rent pas avec la liaison du ligand et ne modifie en rien l¡¯activation du r¨¦cepteur par celui-ci. Cet anticorps monoclonal ne permet pas de d¨¦tecter le r¨¦cepteur par Western Blott, mais est capable de l¡¯immunopr¨¦cipiter. <p><p>Dans un second temps, nous avons abord¨¦ l¡¯¨¦tude de la phosphorylation, de l¡¯internalisation et du trafficking du r¨¦cepteur VPAC1 humain.<p> / Doctorat en sciences médicales / info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished

L’hémostase primaire est un processus permettant la formation d’un clou plaquettaire qui sera stabilisé par un réseau de fibrine. Ce caillot est également consolidé grâce à des phases tardives de l’hémostase primaire résultant des fonctions plaquettaires ; il s’agit principalement de la rétraction qui diminue la taille du caillot afin de le stabiliser. Cette phase est déclenchée par une signalisation « outside-in », consécutive à l’activation de l’intégrine αIIbβ3 et à l’agrégation plaquettaire, et est dépendante d’une réorganisation du cytosquelette. Le premier objectif de ce travail a été d’étudier la signalisation impliquée dans la rétraction, et en particulier l’implication des protéines ROCK, MLCK, Rac-1 et de l’actine dans l’activité de la chaine légère de la myosine (MLC) . MLC est en effet une protéine clé de la réorganisation du cytosquelette. Nous avons mis en évidence une phosphorylation biphasique de MLC dont le deuxième pic, corrélé à la rétraction, est dépendant de Rac1 et de la polymérisation de l’actine. Cette étude a été appliquée à une pathologie, le syndrome de Lowe. Il s’agit d’une maladie génétique rare, également appelée OCRL (Oculo cérébro rénal de Lowe) en référence aux organes majoritairement touchés. Suite à l’observation d’événements hémorragiques per et postopératoires suggérant une instabilité du caillot et l’observation dans une étude précédente d’un temps d’occlusion allongé au PFA100®, nous avons mis en place une étude sur 15 patients et 15 témoins pour lesquels nous avons étudié les différentes phases de l’hémostase primaire. Outre une anomalie et un retard de maturation des mégacaryocytes, nous avons mis en évidence pour la première fois chez ces patients un défaut de la voie « outside-in » responsable d’une anomalie de l’étalement plaquettaire et de la rétraction du caillot. Ce défaut de rétraction, dû à un défaut d’activation de MLC, pourrait être en partie responsable des événements hémorragiques observés chez ces patients. / Primary hemostasis is a mechanism allowing platelet clot formation that is thereafter stabilized by a fibrin network. Fibrin clot is also consolidated following post occupancy events, mainly clot retraction that decrease clot size and thus strengthen it. This phase is triggered by « outside-in » signaling. It is consecutive to αIIbβ3 integrin activation and platelet aggregation, dependent on cytoskeleton organization. Our first objective was to investigate signaling events underlying retraction, and particularly the involvement of ROCK, MLCK, Rac-1, and actin in MLC (Myosin Light Chain) phosphorylation. Indeed, MLC, involved in cytoskeleton rearrangement, is a key protein of this mechanism. We described a MLC biphasic phosphorylation profile, which second peak was dependent of Rac1 and actin polymerization. In a second part, we studied clot retraction signaling in patients with the Lowe syndrome. It is a rare genetic disease, caused by absence of OCRL (oculo cerebro renal of Lowe) protein in reference to the majority of affected organs. The rationale of this study was a previous observation of hemorrhagic events during and after surgeries, suggesting clot instability. A thrombopathy was suggested by a closure time lengthening in the PFA-100 system. The study enrolled 15 patients and 15 controls. Besides a defect of megakaryocyte maturation, we described a defect of « outside-in » signaling responsible for spreading and clot retraction abnormality. This retraction defect, caused by a MLC activity defect, could be partly responsible for hemorrhagic events reported in these patients.

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / Background: Previous studies show that prazosin, an α1-adrenergic receptor antagonist, decreases alcohol drinking in animal models of alcohol use and dependence and in alcohol-dependent men. These studies extended previous findings by using a paradigm that allows for separate assessment of prazosin on motivation to seek versus consume ethanol or sucrose in selectively bred rats given acute or chronic prazosin treatment. Methods: Alcohol-preferring P rats were trained to complete an operant response that resulted in access to either 2% (Exp. 1) or 1% (Exp.2) sucrose or 10% ethanol. In Experiment 1, a 4-week consummatory testing phase consisted of rats bar-pressing to “pay” a specified amount up front to gain access to unlimited ethanol (or sucrose) for a 20-minute period. A 4-week appetitive testing phase examined how much the rats would bar-press for ethanol in an extinction session when no reinforcer could be obtained. In Experiment 2, during testing, the response requirement was dropped to a 1 and daily session cycles of drug (3 weeks/ 14 sessions from Tues to Fri) or vehicle (2 weeks/ 9 sessions from Tues to Fri) treatment were alternated per drug dose for a total of 3 drug doses (3 cycles) per rat. After each drug cycle, a single non-reinforced extinction session was conducted with no drug ‘on board’ and no reinforcer access. On test days, rats were given IP injections of either vehicle or one of three doses of prazosin (Exp 1: 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 mg/kg; Exp 2: 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 mg/kg; balanced design; -30 min). Results: In Experiment 1, prazosin significantly decreased ethanol-seeking at all doses tested. The highest dose decreased ethanol intake and increased the latency to first lever-press and first lick. Sucrose-seeking and intake were decreased by the same doses of prazosin. In Experiment 2, prazosin significantly decreased reinforcer-seeking at the lowest and highest doses while ethanol intake was not decreased by prazosin. Conversely, sucrose-seeking was decreased at the highest dose of prazosin tested while sucrose consumption was decreased by all doses. Latency to lever-press for sucrose was increased by the lowest dose of prazosin compared to vehicle. Conclusions: These findings extend previous research and indicate that prazosin decreases motivation to seek ethanol and sucrose. The specificity of prazosin on different behaviors and over different reinforcers suggests that these findings are not due to prazosin-induced motor-impairment or malaise. These data suggest that prazosin may work by decreasing the reinforcing properties of reinforcers in general.

Src family kinases (SFKs) are key regulators of cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival. The expression of these non-receptor tyrosine kinases is strongly correlated with cancer development and tumor progression. Thus, this family of proteins serves as an attractive drug target. The activation of SFKs can occur via multiple signaling pathways, yet many of them are poorly understood. Here, we summarize the current knowledge on G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)- mediated regulation of SFKs, which is of considerable interest because GPCRs are among the most widely used pharmaceutical targets. This type of activation can occur through a direct interaction between the two proteins or be allosterically regulated by arrestins and G proteins. We postulate that a rearrangement of binding motifs within the active conformation of arrestin-3 mediates Src regulation by comparison of available crystal structures. Therefore, we hypothesize a potentially different activation mechanism compared to arrestin-2. Furthermore, we discuss the probable direct regulation of SFK by GPCRs and investigate the intracellular domains of exemplary GPCRs with conserved polyproline binding motifs that might serve as scaffolding domains to allow such a direct interaction. Large intracellular domains in GPCRs are often understudied and, in general, not much is known of their contribution to different signaling pathways. The suggested direct interaction between a GPCR and a SFK could allow for a potential immediate allosteric regulation of SFKs by GPCRs and thereby unravel a novel mechanism of SFK signaling. This overview will help to identify new GPCR–SFK interactions, which could serve to explain biological functions or be used to modulate downstream effectors.

Les Récepteurs Couplés aux Protéines-G forment la plus importante famille de protéines membranaires chez l’homme et sont impliqués dans de nombreux processus de signalisation cellulaire. Aussi, ils forment un vivier très important de cibles thérapeutiques, déjà identifiées ou potentielles. L’activation d’un RCPG est amorcée par la liaison d’un ligand dans sa partie extra-cellulaire, modifiant ainsi ses propriétés dynamiques intrinsèques. Ces changements structuraux vont alors se répercuter le long des domaines trans-membranaires et promouvoir la dissociation de la Protéine-G hétéro-trimérique, de l’autre côté de la membrane, propageant ainsi le signal au compartiment intra-cellulaire. Ce processus peut être modulé par la liaison de nombreux autres partenaires des RCPGs. Malgré de nombreuses données structurales existantes, ces mécanismes restent encore mal connus à l’échelle moléculaire. Ainsi, la dynamique moléculaire s’est révélée être un outil formidable pour mieux comprendre ces mécanismes. Toutefois, les échelles de taille et de temps requises pour discuter de la dynamique de ces systèmes membranaires limitent ces études aux laboratoires ayant accès à une très grande puissance de calcul. L’objectif des travaux présentés dans ce manuscrit a été de prédire et de mieux comprendre la dynamique d’interaction de différents récepteurs de cette famille avec leurs partenaires, en développant un protocole de dynamique moléculaire, peu coûteux en ressources de calcul, combinant le champ de forces gros-grains MARTINI à un protocole de dynamique moléculaire « Replica-Exchange ».Dans un premier temps, nous présentons la validation de notre protocole pour la prédiction de la liaison de peptides à leur récepteur avec l’étude des peptides Neurotensine, agoniste du Récepteur de la Neurotensine-1, et CVX15, antagoniste du Récepteur Chemokine C-X-C de type-4. Nous montrons également que notre protocole est capable de prédire la sélectivité de plusieurs peptides dérivés de la Neurotensine envers plusieurs récepteurs sauvages et mutés, ne présentant qu’un résidu de différence.Dans un second temps, nous nous sommes intéressés à la dynamique de formation d’un hétéro-dimère de RCPGs impliquant le Récepteur de la Ghréline et le récepteur de la Dopamine D2, couplés aux protéines Gq et Gi respectivement. Ce modèle validé au laboratoire par des mesures LRET montre une interface impliquant une forte complémentarité entre les protéines-G. En se basant sur notre modèle, nous avons conçu et synthétisé des peptides inhibiteurs de la formation de cet hétéro-dimère de protéines-G.Enfin, nous présentons d’autres exemples d’applications de notre protocole et comment il peut être utilisé de concert avec l’expérience avec : la prédiction de la liaison de toxines de serpents aux Récepteurs de la Vasopressine-1a et V2 ; la prédiction de la liaison des peptides Ghréline et Leap2 au Récepteur GHSR-1a et la prédiction de la sélectivité de couplage de différents récepteurs aux peptides C-terminaux de la sous-unité α des protéines-G. / G-Protein Coupled Receptors form the largest family of human membrane proteins and are involved in many cellular signaling processes. Thus, they constitute a pool of already identified or potential pharmacological targets. The activation of a GPCR starts with the binding of a ligand in its extra-cellular part, further modifying its intrinsic dynamical properties. These structural rearrangements are then transmitted along the transmembrane domains and promote the dissociation of the G-protein on the other side of the bilayer, thus propagating the signal into the intra-cellular compartment. This activation process can be modulated by the binding of many other partners of GPCRs. Despite many structural data now available, these mechanisms are still badly known at the molecular scale. In agreement, molecular dynamics simulations appear to be a method of choice to get a better description of these mechanisms. Nevertheless, the size and the time scales required for the simulation of these membrane systems limit such studies to laboratories having access to large computational facilities.The objective of this work was to predict and get a dynamical view of the interactions of several GPCRs with their partners, by developing an affordable molecular dynamics protocol that combines the coarse-grained MARTINI force field to Replica-Exchange MD simulations.In a first step, we validated our protocol by showing its ability to predict the dynamical binding of peptides to their receptors, through the study of Neurotensin, an agonist of the Neurotensin-1 receptor and CVX15, an antagonist of the CXCR4 chemokine receptor. We also show that the same protocol is able to predict the selectivity of several Neurotensin derived peptides against several wild-type/mutated receptors differing by a single residue.In a second step, we were concerned by the dynamical assembly of a GPCR heterodimer involving the Ghrelin and the Dopamine D2 receptors, respectively coupled to Gq and Gi proteins. Our model was validated by LRET measurements confirming a large protein:protein interface and a high complementarity between G-proteins. Based on this model, we designed and synthesized some peptides able to inhibit the assembly of this G-proteins heterodimer.Finally, we describe other applications of our protocol and how it can be employed and confronted to experiments to : predict the dynamical binding of toxins from snake’s venom to the Vasopressin-1a and Vasopressin-2 receptors ; predict the binding of the Ghrelin and Leap2 peptides to their GHSR-1a receptor and predict the coupling selectivity of several receptors to peptides mimicking the C-terminus of the α subunit of G-proteins.

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a key regulator of protein synthesis. Dysregulation of mTOR signaling occurs in many human cancers and its inhibition causes arrest at the G1 cell cycle stage. However, mTOR’s impact on mitosis (M-phase) is less clear. Here, suppressing mTOR activity impacted the G2-M transition and reduced levels of M-phase kinase, Aurora A. mTOR inhibitors did not affect Aurora A mRNA levels. However, translational reporter constructs showed that mRNA containing a short, simple 5’-untranslated region (UTR), rather than a complex structure, is more responsive to mTOR inhibition. mTOR inhibitors decreased Aurora A protein amount whereas blocking proteasomal degradation rescues this phenomenon, revealing that mTOR affects Aurora A protein stability. Inhibition of protein phosphatase, PP2A, a known mTOR substrate and Aurora A partner, restored mTOR-mediated Aurora A abundance. Finally, a non-phosphorylatable Aurora A mutant was more sensitive to destruction in the presence of mTOR inhibitor. These data strongly support the notion that mTOR controls Aurora A destruction by inactivating PP2A and elevating the phosphorylation level of Ser51 in the “activation-box” of Aurora A, which dictates its sensitivity to proteasomal degradation. In summary, this study is the first to demonstrate that mTOR signaling regulates Aurora-A protein expression and stability and provides a better understanding of how mTOR regulates mitotic kinase expression and coordinates cell cycle progression. The involvement of mTOR signaling in the regulation of cell migration by its upstream activator, Rheb, was also examined. Knockdown of Rheb was found to promote F-actin reorganization and was associated with Rac1 activation and increased migration of glioma cells. Suppression of Rheb promoted platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) expression. Pharmacological inhibition of PDGFR blocked these events. Therefore, Rheb appears to suppress tumor cell migration by inhibiting expression of growth factor receptors that in turn drive Rac1-mediate actin polymerization.

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / Gain-of-function mutations in the KIT receptor tyrosine kinase have been associated with highly malignant human neoplasms. In particular, an acquired somatic mutation at codon 816 in the second catalytic domain of KIT involving an aspartic acid to valine substitution is found in patients with systemic mastocytosis (SM) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The presence of this mutation in SM and AML is associated with poor prognosis and overall survival. This mutation changes the conformation of the KIT receptor resulting in altered substrate recognition and constitutive tyrosine autophosphorylation leading to constitutive ligand independent growth. As there are currently no efficacious therapeutic agents against this mutation, this study sought to define novel therapeutic targets that contribute to aberrant signaling downstream from KITD816V that promote transformation of primary hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells in diseases such as AML and SM. This study shows that oncogenic KITD814V (murine homolog) induced myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) occurs in the absence of ligand stimulation, and that intracellular tyrosines are important for KITD814V-induced MPN. Among the seven intracellular tyrosines examined, tyrosine 719 alone has a unique role in regulating KITD814V-induced proliferation and survival. Residue tyrosine 719 is vital for activation of the regulatory subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), p85α, downstream from KITD814V. Downstream effectors of the PI3K signaling pathway, in of leukemic cells bearing KITD814V with an allosteric inhibitor of Pak or its genetic inactivation results in growth repression due to enhanced apoptosis. To assess the role of Rac GEFs in KITD814V induced transformation, EHop-016, an inhibitor of Rac, was used to specifically target Vav1, and found to be a potent inhibitor of human and murine leukemic cell growth. In vivo, the inhibition of Vav or Rac or Pak delayed the onset of MPN and rescued the associated pathology in mice. These studies provide insight on mechanisms and potential novel therapeutic targets for hematological malignancies harboring an oncogenic KIT mutation.

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) is a bioactive sphingolipid that has proven to be an important signaling molecule both as an extracellular primary messenger and as an intracellular second messenger. Extracellular S1P acts through a family of five S1P receptors, S1PR1-5, all of which are G protein-coupled receptors associated with different G proteins. Previous work from our laboratory shows that externally applied S1P increases the excitability of small-diameter sensory neurons by enhancing the action potential firing. The increased neuronal excitability is mediated primarily, but not exclusively, through S1PR1. This raises the question as to which other S1PRs mediate the enhanced excitability in sensory neurons. To address this question, the expression of different S1PR subtypes in small-diameter sensory neurons was examined by single-cell quantitative PCR. The results show that sensory neurons express the mRNAs for all five S1PRs, with S1PR1 mRNA level significantly greater than the other subtypes. To investigate the functional contribution of other S1PRs in augmenting excitability, sensory neurons were treated with a pool of three individual siRNAs targeted to S1PR1, R2 and R3. This treatment prevented S1P from augmenting excitability, indicating that S1PR1, R2 and/or R3 are essential in mediating S1P-induced sensitization. To study the role of S1PR2 in S1P-induced sensitization, JTE-013, a selective antagonist at S1PR2, was used. Surprisingly, JTE-013 by itself enhanced neuronal excitability. Alternatively, sensory neurons were pretreated with FTY720, which is an agonist at S1PR1/R3/R4/R5 and presumably downregulates these receptors. FTY720 pretreatment prevented S1P from increasing neuronal excitability, suggesting that S1PR2 does not mediate the S1P-induced sensitization. To test the hypothesis that S1PR1 and R3 mediate S1P-induced sensitization, sensory neurons were pretreated with specific antagonists for S1PR1 and R3, or with siRNAs targeted to S1PR1 and R3. Both treatments blocked the capacity of S1P to enhance neuronal excitability. Therefore my results demonstrate that the enhanced excitability produced by S1P is mediated by S1PR1 and/or S1PR3. Additionally, my results indicate that S1P/S1PR1 elevates neuronal excitability through the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase. The data from antagonism at S1PR1 to regulate neuronal excitability provides insight into the importance of S1P/S1PR1 axis in modulating pain signal transduction.