Submitted by Marianna Sampaio (mariannasampaio@gmail.com) on 2017-03-19T17:22:31Z No. of bitstreams: 1 170312 plano geral de atuação vdepósito.pdf: 1542625 bytes, checksum: 50bc0664453e840327476faf065a20d0 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Pamela Beltran Tonsa (pamela.tonsa@fgv.br) on 2017-03-20T11:22:23Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 170312 plano geral de atuação vdepósito.pdf: 1542625 bytes, checksum: 50bc0664453e840327476faf065a20d0 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-03-20T11:25:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 170312 plano geral de atuação vdepósito.pdf: 1542625 bytes, checksum: 50bc0664453e840327476faf065a20d0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-02-21 / This thesis has as empirical object the General Plan of Action of the Public Prosecutor's Office of the State of São Paulo, instrument through which the annual priority goals are set and which prosecutors are required to take into account in the performance of their duties. The background and track record of the General Plan, as well as the classification of the type of goal that it is comprised of, are examined in order to carry out an analysis on the internal organization of the Public Prosecutor's Office and the possible contribution of prosecutors to the phenomenon of judicialization of politics. It also seeks to understand how the relationship is set between the formalization of an institutional policy such as the General Plan of Action and the constitutional principle of the functional independence of the Public Prosecutor's Office. / Esta dissertação tem como objeto empírico o Plano Geral de Atuação do Ministério Público do Estado de São Paulo, instrumento por meio do qual são fixadas as metas prioritárias anuais que promotores e procuradores devem levar em conta no desempenho de suas funções. Os antecedentes e o histórico do Plano Geral, assim como a classificação do tipo de meta que o integra, são examinados com o intuito de realizar uma análise acerca da organização interna do Ministério Público e da eventual contribuição de promotores e procuradores para o fenômeno da judicialização da política. Também se busca compreender como se dá a relação entre o estabelecimento de uma política institucional como o Plano Geral de Atuação e o princípio constitucional da independência funcional do Ministério Público.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-06-02T19:14:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 5241.pdf: 1672530 bytes, checksum: 272ea32b45a734852b26951c2355498c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-04-04 / Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos / The purpose of this doctorate thesis is to understand the achievement of the rights to public health in Brazil through the Judiciary Branch. Our hypothesis is that the constituient political actors in 1987-88 have assigned greater political power to the Judiciary Branch, turning it into a veto player, able to suspend the decisions of local executives and change the legislative status quo. Aiming the accomplishment of this research, we will study the competences of the Judiciary Branch in the constitucions of 1934 e 1946 and, afterwards, we will procede to the analysis os the Annals of the Subcomissions of the Judiciary Branch e of the Public Ministry of the Constituient of 1987-88. Eventually we will evaluate the sentences produced by the Justice Court of São Paulo to understand the content of the decisions made by the judges that managed to make effective the rightsto public health. / O objetivo desta tese de doutorado é compreender a efetivação de direitos à saúde pública no Brasil por meio do Poder Judiciário. Nossa hipótese é de que os atores políticos constituintes em 1987-88 tenham atribuído maior poder político ao Poder Judiciário, transformando-o em um ator com poder de veto, capaz de suspender as decisões dos executivos locais e mudar o status quo legislativo. Para a realização da pesquisa, estudaremos as competências do Poder Judiciário nos textos constitucionais democráticos de 1934 e 1946 e, posteriormente, faremos a análise dos Anais da Subcomissão do Poder Judiciário e do Ministério Público da Constituinte de 1987-88. Finalmente vamos avaliar os acórdãos produzidos pelo Tribunal de Justiça de São Paulo para compreender o teor das decisões tomadas pelos desembargadores que efetivam os direitos à saúde pública.

O Brasil tem visto um forte processo de judicialização de sua vida pública. Hoje, a Justiça exerce um papel político importante no país, mas é marcada pela ineficiência na solução de disputas e cobrança de créditos. Críticas à expansão desse papel político são, pois, abundantes. Diz-se que (i) geraria instabilidade institucional e um ambiente hostil ao desenvolvimento (crítica institucional); (ii) produziria resultados ilegítimos (preferências judiciais substituiriam decisões majoritárias - crítica de legitimidade) e (iii) resultaria em ações inefetivas, pois o aparato das cortes não é adequado a resolver conflitos policêntricos e prospectivos (crítica instrumental). Este trabalho analisa o processo brasileiro de judicialização e os argumentos centrais da crítica instrumental. Sugere que ela refere-se a um modelo de direito e justiça que está em transformação. No modelo emergente, a justiça distributiva é reintroduzida na dinâmica legal e a administração de interesses sobrepuja, aos poucos, a tutela de direitos. Essas mudanças, mais a judicialização, levam a alterações importantes no processo judicial. Reconhecendo os problemas daí decorrentes, a tese sugere um caráter virtuoso desse novo contencioso de direito público emergente. Ele parece forjar um mecanismo de reforço de participação política que pode avançar a democracia e melhorar condições de igualdade política. / From democratization in the mid 80? on, Brazilian public life has been forced into an increasingly intense process of judicialization. Lack of confidence in representative institutions, a very open-texted charter of social and economic rights, an important political use of the Judiciary by the oppositions, and other related factors seem to be implicated in this. Brazilian justice holds today a considerable political power, but that is just part of a story. It is also astonishingly inefficient as a services provider, and fails to respond to most of its dispute-solving and credit-enforcement functions. Criticism about the expansion of the political role of the Judiciary in this context is profuse. First, it is said to generate institutional instability, which in turn would bring out a hostile environment for economic growth. Second, it is said to be illegitimate, as far as politicized judges may often replace majoritarian decisions by their own. Third, it is said that litigation involving political issues and social reform tend to be erratic and ineffective, because the institutional designs of both courts and their processes are not adequate to regulate polycentric and prospective conflicts. This work puts Brazilian judicialization into context, and analyses the main arguments of the institutional capacity critique (which is called in here the instrumental critique). The author suggests that the instrumental critique refers to a certain model of law and justice that has been changing (both globally and in Brazil) since the end of the last century. In the emergent model, distributive justice is reintroduced into the dynamics of law, and the administration of diffuse interests slowly replaces the adjudication of individual rights as the paradigmatic activity of the Judiciary. Those changes in both law and justice, along with judicialization, are argued to have lead to other important changes in the design of the judicial process in Brazil. Despite the many problems related to those changes, the ending notes of this work point to a possible virtuous character of the new Brazilian public law litigation. As stated herein, this litigation seems to be creating a participation-reinforcing device that in the long run may foster democracy and political equality.

Submitted by Ana Lúcia Torres (bfmhuap@gmail.com) on 2017-10-26T14:06:28Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) TESE_MARCELO.MAYERNYIK_VERSÃO.FINAL.pdf: 2684171 bytes, checksum: 0f58c64a11267f042717eaad623a6249 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Ana Lúcia Torres (bfmhuap@gmail.com) on 2017-10-26T14:06:37Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) TESE_MARCELO.MAYERNYIK_VERSÃO.FINAL.pdf: 2684171 bytes, checksum: 0f58c64a11267f042717eaad623a6249 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-10-26T14:06:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) TESE_MARCELO.MAYERNYIK_VERSÃO.FINAL.pdf: 2684171 bytes, checksum: 0f58c64a11267f042717eaad623a6249 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 / Universidade Federal Fluminense. Instituto de Saúde Coletiva / A judicialização da política de medicamentos oncológicos de alto custo, fruto da complexidade da vida e das relações humanas, suscita questões de ordem econômica, social e política, que efluem de uma cadeia de eventos que envolvem o cidadão, o sistema de saúde e o sistema de justiça, no contexto da microjustiça de medicamentos oncológicos de alto custo, que, por sua vez, perpassa todas as etapas sucessórias de um contencioso, ou seja, desde o início do conflito, o manejo, até o seu desfecho, mobilizando diversos protagonistas que agem e deliberam, em uma dinâmica consecutiva de decisões que impactam diretamente e determinam o cuidado produzido com o cidadão-vulnerado. Neste sentido, tornou-se relevante a operacionalização de uma pesquisa que procurasse desvelar, compreender e contrastar as distintas percepções, sentidos, argumentos e modos de agir, dos diversos protagonistas envolvidos nesses litígios, bem como as suas intencionalidades e contribuições para a defesa da vida e para a promoção de um cuidado resolutivo em saúde. O objetivo geral deste estudo foi investigar a ideia de cuidado estabelecido com o cidadão-vulnerado, na perspectiva dos representantes do Judiciário e do Executivo, à luz da biopolítica, para compreender a dinâmica entre a política da vida e a política sobre a vida, e, entre a biopotência e o biopoder, que se expressam na microjustiça de medicamentos. Os participantes dessa pesquisa são profissionais, do sistema de justiça ou do sistema de saúde, envolvidos, direta ou indiretamente, nos cinco processos-casos selecionados entre os anos 2012 e 2014, julgados em segunda instância pelo Tribunal de Justiça do Rio de Janeiro, cujo pleito era medicamentos oncológicos de alto custo. A operacionalização desta investigação contou com três etapas distintas e sucessivas: a exploração inicial dos argumentos processuais, categorizando as partes de acordo com a afinidade argumentativa, através da dialética, para a elaboração e personalização do roteiro de entrevista; o trabalho de campo, com a aplicação do roteiro para entrevista semiestruturada junto aos participantes; e, a apresentação dos resultados, análise e discussão, que integra, metodologicamente, a dialética, a análise da retórica, o fluxograma descritor e a abordagem qualitativa em profundidade. De acordo com os resultados, observa-se a adoção de distintos parâmetros éticos, contrários ou complementares, tais como os parâmetros de uma ética biomédica, centrada na medicalização; uma ética de mercado, centrada na mercantilização da doença ou da vida; uma ética utilitarista, centrada na maximização do bem-estar comum; ou, propriamente, uma ética de cuidado, centrada na defesa da vida e do direito à saúde; os quais fundamentam a argumentação e orientam o agir deliberativo dos protagonistas envolvidos, podendo promover a potência da vida pelo exercício de uma política em defesa da vida, quando o cuidado produzido é reconhecidamente resolutivo, expressando um compromisso ético com a vida qualificada; ou, podendo promover a potência de morte pelo exercício de uma política sobre a vida, quando, em defesa de interesses avessos a um cuidado singular, os atos resultam em uma assistência insatisfatória e ineficiente ou, na pior das hipóteses, resultam em desassistência, acelerando ou contribuindo para a finitude da vida. Deste modo, conclui-se que todo cuidado é ético, pois toda a ação dos envolvidos, comprometidos com o cuidado, é orientada por parâmetros éticos, mas nem todo cuidado é reconhecido como ético, pois pode resultar na satisfação de interesses divergentes aos propostos nos pactos de cuidados estabelecidos entre os profissionais e o cidadão / The judicialization of politics of high cost oncological drugs, result of the complexity of life and human relations, raises issues of an economic, social and political order, which emanate from a chain of events involving the citizen, the health system and the justice system, in the context of the microjustice of high cost oncological drugs, which, in turn, runs through all successive stages of a litigation, that is, from the beginning of the conflict, handling, until its denouement, mobilizing several protagonists who act and deliberate, in a consecutive dynamics of decisions that directly impact and determine the care produced with the vulnerable citizen. In this sense, it became relevant to operationalize a research that seeks to unveil, understand and contrast the different perceptions, meanings, arguments and ways of acting, the various protagonists involved in these health litigations, as well as their intentions and contributions for the defense of life and for the promotion of resolutive health care. The general objective of this study was to investigate the idea of care established with the vulnerable citizen, from the perspective of the representatives of the Judiciary and the Executive, in the light of biopolitics, to understand the dynamics between politics of life and politics about life, and, between biopotency and biopower, which are expressed in the microjustice of drugs (medicines). The participants in this research are professionals, the justice system or the health system, involved, directly or indirectly, in the five lawsuits-cases selected between the years 2012 and 2014, judged in the second instance by the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro, whose demand was high cost oncology drugs. The operation of this investigation had three distinct and successive stages: the initial exploration of arguments of lawsuits, categorizing the parts according to argumentative affinity, through the dialectic, for the elaboration and personalization of the interview script; the fieldwork, with the application of the script for semi-structured interview with the participants; and, the presentation of results, analysis and discussion, which integrates, methodologically, the dialectic, rhetorical analysis, descriptive flowchart and qualitative approach in depth. According to the results, it is observed the adoption of different ethical parameters, contraries or complementary, such as the parameters of a biomedical ethics, centered in the medicalization; an ethics of market, centered on the commodification of disease or life; a utilitarian ethics, centered on the maximization of the common welfare; or, properly, an ethics of care, centered on the defense of life and the right to health; which ground the argument and guide the deliberative action of the protagonists involved, being able to promote the power of life by the exercise of a policy in defense of life, when the care produced is recognized as resolutive, expressing an ethical commitment to a qualified life; or, by promoting the power of death through the exercise of a politics about life, when, in defense of interests that are averse to singular care, the acts result in unsatisfactory and inefficient care or, at worst, result in lack of assistance, accelerating or contributing to the finitude of life. That way, it is concluded that all care is ethical, since all the action of those involved, committed to care, is guided by ethical parameters, but not all care is recognized as ethical, as it can result in the satisfaction of interests divergent from those proposed in the pacts of care established between professionals and the citizen

Cette thèse dégage, à partir de l'étude des mutations du droit constitutionnel thaïlandais et des doctrines qui le sous-tendent depuis ses plus lointaines origines, le point cardinal de l'ordre politique thaïlandais, identifié comme étant la souveraineté du roi. La construction de la souveraineté monarchique s'est appuyée sur des emprunts étrangers formant, par sédimentations successives, une doctrine proprement thaïlandaise du pouvoir royal l'érigeant en constituant suprême, seul interprète du dharma et de la coutume, auxquels le droit positif serait par nature inféodé. Si, en Europe, le « constitutionnalisme médiéval » a soustrait au roi le pouvoir de modification des lois fondamentales du royaume, le constitutionnalisme moderne a eu tendance à le dépouiller de sa « majesté », et enfin, le néoconstitutionnalisme a transféré son rôle de gardien de la constitution au pouvoir judiciaire ou à un organe spécialisé de contrôle de la constitutionnalité des lois, au Siam puis en Thaïlande, la royauté a su utiliser les innovations constitutionnelles occidentales pour s'institutionnaliser et se transformer tout en maintenant l'affirmation doctrinale de sa souveraineté et son exercice effectif. L'instabilité constitutionnelle chronique qui en résulte a pour effet de neutraliser le développement du parlementarisme nécessaire à la convergence du régime politique thaïlandais vers son modèle britannique. Sont ainsi posés les jalons d'une réflexion sur l'impossibilité du transfert des conventions de la constitution, règles non-écrites qui forment le cœur du droit parlementaire britannique, en tant que cristallisation de contraintes juridiques propres à une histoire constitutionnelle spécifique. / Based on the study of the evolution of Thai constitutional law and its underlying doctrines from its very origins onwards, this dissertation identifies the core principle of the Thai polity as being royal sovereignty. It was built on material and doctrinal constitutional borrowings, that have, through successive sedimentation, created a specifically Thai doctrine of royal power making the King the supreme constituant power, the interpret of dharma and custom, to which positive law is subordinate. In Europe « medieval constitutionalism » took from the King the power to modify the fundamental laws of the realm, modern constitutionalism tended to take his « Majesty» away, and finally, « new constitutionalism » transferred his role as guardian of the constitution to the judicial power or a constitutional court. In Siam and later in Thailand, the monarchy used Western constitutional ideas and mechanisms to institutionalize and transform while at the same time maintaining the doctrine of royal sovereignty and its effective practice. As a result, constitutional instability has neutralized the development of parliamentarism necessary to make the Thai political regime converge towards its official British constitutional model. This finding opens the question of the transferability of the Bristish constitutional conventions unwritten rules at the heart of British parliamentary system, as they are but a crystallization of legal constraints proper to a specific constitutional history. / วิทยานิพนธ์นี้สกัดประเด็นปัญหาอันเป็นหัวใจสำคัญของระบบการเมืองไทยในเรื่องอำนาจอธิปไตยเป็นของกษัตริย์ โดยศึกษาการปรับตัวของกฎหมายรัฐธรรมนูญไทยและลัทธิวิชาการซึ่งช่วยสร้าคำอธิบายที่เกี่ยวข้องนับตั้งแต่เริ่มต้น การก่อร่างสร้างตัวของอำนาจอธิปไตยแบบกษัตริย์อาศัยการหยิบยืมจากต่างประเทศมาอย่างต่อเนื่องจนตกผลึก โดยลัทธิวิชาการในแบบฉบับของไทยโดยเฉพาะเพื่อยืนยันว่ากษัตริย์เป็นผู้ทรงอำนาจสูงสุดในการสถาปนารัฐธรรมนูญ กษัตริย์แต่เพียงผู้เดียวที่เป็นผู้ตีความธรรมะและประเพณี และกฎหมายที่ใช้บังคับในรัฐต้องจำนนต่อธรรมะและประเพณี ในยุโรป “รัฐธรรมนูญนิยมในยุคกลาง” ทำให้กษัตริย์ไม่มีอำนาจในการแก้ไขเปลี่ยนแปลงกฎหมายพื้นฐานของราชอาณาจักร รัฐธรรมนูญนิยมสมัยใหม่พยายามตัดขาดอำนาจสูงสุดเด็ดขาดของกษัตริย์ และในท้ายที่สุด “รัฐธรรมนูญนิยมใหม่” ก็ได้ถ่ายโอนบทบาทในการพิทักษ์รัฐธรรมนูญให้แก่ศาลหรือองค์กรพิเศษที่จัดตั้งขึ้นโดยเฉพาะเพื่อทำหน้าที่ตรวจสอบความชอบด้วยรัฐธรรมนูญของกฎหมาย แต่ในสยาม ซึ่งต่อมากลายเป็นประเทศไทยนั้น กษัตริย์ได้ใช้นวัตกรรมทางรัฐธรรมนูญของตะวันตกเพื่อทำให้ตนเองกลายเป็นสถาบันและทำให้ตนเองเปลี่ยนรูป โดยอาศัยลัทธิวิชาการที่ยืนยันว่าอำนาจอธิปไตยเป็นของกษัตริย์และกษัตริย์ใช้อำนาจอธิปไตยนั้นอย่างแท้จริง ความไร้เสถียรภาพทางรัฐธรรมนูญที่เกิดอย่างต่อเนื่องส่งผลให้การพัฒนาระบบรัฐสภาในระบอบการเมืองไทยเพื่อให้เป็นไปตามรูปแบบอังกฤษนั้นสะดุดลง เช่นกัน เป็นไปไม่ได้ที่จะถ่ายโอนธรรมเนียมปฏิบัติทางรัฐธรรมนูญหรือกฎเกณฑ์ที่ไม่เป็นลายลักษณ์อักษรซึ่งเป็นหัวใจสำคัญของระบบรัฐสภาอังกฤษ มายังประเทศอื่น เพราะสิ่งเหล่านี้บ่มเพาะขึ้นได้จากเหตุปัจจัยบังคับทางกฎหมายซึ่งเป็นไปตามประวัติศาสตร์รัฐธรรมนูญของแต่ละประเทศโดยเฉพาะ

Submitted by Danilo Valença Hernandes Vila (danilovhv@yahoo.com.br) on 2018-05-08T23:42:45Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertação_versão_final.pdf: 1192731 bytes, checksum: 7477c22036ef1b94b0fcd1bded38d99c (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Pamela Beltran Tonsa (pamela.tonsa@fgv.br) on 2018-05-09T22:24:39Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertação_versão_final.pdf: 1192731 bytes, checksum: 7477c22036ef1b94b0fcd1bded38d99c (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Suzane Guimarães (suzane.guimaraes@fgv.br) on 2018-05-10T12:49:15Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertação_versão_final.pdf: 1192731 bytes, checksum: 7477c22036ef1b94b0fcd1bded38d99c (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-05-10T12:49:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertação_versão_final.pdf: 1192731 bytes, checksum: 7477c22036ef1b94b0fcd1bded38d99c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-03-28 / Esta dissertação tem como objetivo estudar o controle concreto de constitucionalidade dos processos de crime comum contra prefeitos, definidos pelo art. 1º do Decreto-Lei 201/67, julgados pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal desde 1968 até 2016. Para tal, examinamos a literatura sobre o DL 201 e Poder Judiciário nas áreas do direito, ciência política e administração pública. Coletamos do site do Supremo 190 casos de recursos, inquéritos e ações penais originárias referentes ao art.1º do DL 201. Os processos foram lidos e extraímos informações para montagem de uma base de dados que nos permitisse analisar o processo de judicialização desse instrumento jurídico. Nosso achado é que, em via de controle concreto como recurso somado a uma decisão precedente de ação penal originária do DL 201, entre 1971 e 1987, ocorreu uma judicialização do tipo arbitragem de interesses em conflito, criando uma jurisprudência sobre o DL 201 com força vinculante sobre a primeira instância, para 'salvar' os prefeitos de um suposto uso politizado desse Decreto-Lei em nível local. A partir de 2003, em controle concreto de ação penal originária, não constatamos força vinculante para o Supremo nem para instâncias inferiores. Ao assumir cargos de deputado federal e fazer o processo subir ao Supremo, os ex-prefeitos praticam uma judicialização como tática de oposição, que tem como conseqüência grande número de prescrições e arquivamentos desses processos, um aumento de decisões majoritárias dos órgãos colegiados e queda da correlação entre voto do relator e resultado do julgamento. / This dissertation aims to study the concrete control of constitutionality of common crime proceedings against mayors defined by art. 1 of Decree-Law 201/67, judged in the Federal Supreme Court from 1968 to 2016. To this end, we have examined the literature on DL 201 and Judiciary in the areas of law, political science and public administration. We collected from the Supreme's website 190 cases of appeals, inquiries and criminal prosecutions referring to DL 201’s article 1. The cases were read and we extracted information to set up a database that would allow us to analyze the judicial process of this legal instrument. Our finding is that, through concrete control as a resource, added to a previous decision of criminal action originating in DL 201, between 1971 and 1987, there was a judicialization of the type of arbitration of conflicting interests, creating a jurisprudence on DL 201 with binding force on the lower courts to 'save' the mayors from an alleged politicized use of this Decree at the local level. As of 2003, in concrete control of the originating criminal action, we did not find a binding force either for the Supreme Court or for lower instances. In assuming positions of federal deputy, and bringing the process rise to the Supreme, the former mayors pratice a judicialization as a tactic of opposition, which has as consequence a great number of prescriptions and fillings of these actions, an increase of majority decisions of the collegiate organs and fall of correlation between the rapporteur's vote and the outcome of the trial.