本文主要運用博奕理論，分析全民健保法中各涉入者的議價行為，包括政黨及利益團體兩個層次之互動。主要探討下列問題：1、瞭解議價行為之動態賽局結構。2、參與者如何運用策略及其資源，以達到其偏好的理想點。3、如何透過議價來調節分歧的利益，規避社會衝突。4、如何透過理性的計算，如移動、反制、反反制的過程，達柏雷圖邊界。 第一章說明研究範圍與方法，及本文研究架構等。 第二章為理論基礎，先對傳統博奕理論提出修正，再介紹本文所採用之移動理論。 第三章說明本研究範圍內之行為者的立場、偏好等，並採二階賽局之觀點對兩層次之行為者的互動做一分析。 第四章把健保法立法過程依重要事件分為三段，分別運用賽局結 構分析其議價過程與結果。 第五章在針對第四章之均衡結果提出更進一步之分析，以康多賽贏家、中間選民定理、空間理論等來分析議題之社會選擇結果。 第六章提出研究限制和檢討，及本文結論。 / In the thesis , the author use game theory to analysis thebargaining behavior of the actors,including political parties and interest groups,in the Nationl Health Care Law-making. The purpose of this thesis contains four points.First of all,to figure out the structure of bargaining game.Second,how does the actors use their strategies and resourse to reach their ideal point.Third,how does the bargaining goes to come to an agreement, and avoid social conflict.forth and last,how can the rational actors use their strategies like move,counter-move,even counter counter-move to reach Pareto frontier.

Submitted by Tatiana Lima (tatianasl@ufba.br) on 2015-03-30T19:51:17Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Abraham, Adrián Sánchez.pdf: 1137350 bytes, checksum: 7fb3ba581cff0629bf2648d21a6b3b54 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Tatiana Lima (tatianasl@ufba.br) on 2015-04-06T17:54:02Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Abraham, Adrián Sánchez.pdf: 1137350 bytes, checksum: 7fb3ba581cff0629bf2648d21a6b3b54 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-06T17:54:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Abraham, Adrián Sánchez.pdf: 1137350 bytes, checksum: 7fb3ba581cff0629bf2648d21a6b3b54 (MD5) / O processo legislativo que acontece nas assembleias legislativas dos Estados é resultado do exercício da soberania popular na elaboração de leis, por meio dos deputados estaduais, que são os representantes ou delegados eleitos pelo povo. Na democracia brasileira, com “presidencialismo de coalizão” e “ultrapresidencialismo” dos Governadores, o Chefe do Poder Executivo tem instrumentos institucionais e força política para dirigir a agenda política e legislativa. A Advocacia Pública de Santa Catarina, exercida pela Procuradoria Geral do Estado (PGE/SC), tem a função institucional de opinar acerca da sanção ou veto de autógrafo, denominação dada ao documento submetido ao Chefe do Poder Executivo com o texto final de um projeto de lei aprovado na casa legislativa, para sanção ou veto. Este trabalho, a partir de abordagem quantitativa, analisou a produção legislativa catarinense a partir do acervo de 1.178 pareceres sobre autógrafos expedidos pela PGE/SC e respectivos autógrafos, de 1995 a 2012, mais uma amostra aleatória de 610 autógrafos dentre aqueles que não passaram pela PGE/SC, no período. O objetivo foi conhecer os fatores que levaram o Governador a sancionar ou vetar um autógrafo. Como resultado, verificou-se que o conteúdo da legislação aprovada pelo deputado estadual e sancionada pelo Governador beneficia o reduto eleitoral do parlamentar, assim entendido tanto o local geográfico como a classe, categoria ou coletividade específica que suporta eleitoralmente o deputado. Os achados do trabalho sugerem que, quando a iniciativa legislativa é parlamentar, deputados com carreira política mais longa, com mais de um mandato, no mínimo, tendem a ter seus projetos aprovados e sancionados pelo Governador. Quanto ao alinhamento entre a recomendação da PGE/SC e o ato do Governador, a conclusão é a de que, em linhas gerais, no período houve alinhamento, com exceção de casos em que a iniciativa legislativa foi de parte do Poder Executivo e o autógrafo beneficiava classe, categoria ou coletividade específica. Assim, os resultados obtidos lançam luzes sobre a dinâmica do processo legislativo brasileiro, com possíveis implicações para a teoria e para a prática política. The legislative process that takes place in the states parliaments at the subnational level in Brazil is a result of the exercise of popular sovereignty in the drafting of laws, by means of state legislators, who are the representatives or delegates elected by the people. In Brazilian democracy with "coalition presidentialism" and "ultrapresidentialism" of States Governors, the Governors count on institutional and political power to direct the political and legislative agenda. The Santa Catarina public advocacy, exercised by the General Prosecuter of the State of Santa Catarina (PGE/SC), has the institutional role of issuance of legal opinion about sanction or veto of the bill, which is the document submitted to the Governor with the final text of a bill approved in the legislative house, to sanction or veto. This study analyzed the legislative production of Santa Catarina State from a collection of 1,178 legal opinions on bills issued by PGE/SC and their respective bill, covering the period from 1995 to 2012, plus a random sample of 610 bills of those who have not been submitted to PGE/SC for issuance of a legal opinion in the period. The purpose was to understand the factors that lead the Governor to sanction or veto a bill. As result, it was found that the content of the bill approved by state parliament representative and sanctioned by the Governor benefits the representative constituencies, thus understood both the geographic location as the class, category or specific community that supports electorally the representative. The findings of this study suggest that when the legislative initiative is parliamentary, members with longer political career, with at least more than one term, tend to have their projects approved and sanctioned by the Governor. As for the alignment between the recommendation of the PGE/SC and the act of the Governor, the conclusion is that, in general, in the period there has been alignment, except for cases in which the legislative initiative was by the executive and the bill benefited class, category or specific community. Thus, the results shed light on the dynamics of the Brazilian legislative process, with possible implications for theory and political practice.

O Legislativo é vital para o autogoverno coletivo e para a contenção do poder. Impõe-se revigorá-lo. Esta dissertação traz propostas para incrementar a legitimidade do Poder Legislativo que independem da reforma política. A primeira proposta consiste na correção de algumas práticas comprometedoras da atuação do Legislativo, quais sejam, a falta de apreciação do veto, a atual forma de elaboração e execução da lei orçamentária, o poder excessivo dos líderes e a tutela jurisdicional limitada do devido processo legislativo. A segunda proposta reside no fortalecimento das comissões temáticas, arenas mais adequadas do que o Plenário para desenvolver o potencial deliberativo do Parlamento. Esses órgãos fracionários podem empregar a avaliação de impacto, recurso que se destina a aprimorar a legislação. A terceira proposta corresponde à regulamentação do lobby. A institucionalização dessa atividade revela-se essencial para imprimir-lhe transparência, de modo a possibilitar o controle, e para minimizar o desequilíbrio no acesso aos tomadores de decisão. / The Legislative Branch is vital to collective self-government and to restrain power. It is necessary to reinvigorate it. This dissertation brings proposals to increase the legitimacy of the Legislative Branch that are independent from the political reform. The first proposal consists in correcting some practices that compromise the performance of the Legislative, which are, the lack of appreciation of veto, the current form of budget preparation and execution, the excessive power of the leaders and the limited jurisdictional review of the due process of law. The second proposal aims at the strengthening of the committees, which are arenas more adequate than the Plenary to develop the deliberative potential of the Parliament. These fractional organs can use the impact assessment, which is a tool intended to improve legislation. The third proposal corresponds to the regulation of lobbying. The institutionalization of this activity is essential to imprint transparency to the process so as to allow control and to minimize the imbalance in access to decision makers.

The doctoral thesis examines process of IFRS development, endorsement and enforcement from the perspective of accounting regulation on global scale, identifies nature of IFRS due process in all its phases and compares IFRS due process with accounting regulation in Czech Republic, especially with legislative process of creating Czech accounting legislation. The due process of any accounting rules, whether standards or legislation, determines quality of these rules and consequently also potential level quality of financial statements prepared in accordance with such rules. Process of IFRS development and endorsement is to guarantee quality of standards that are the output of such a process. For global accounting harmonization, which requires transparent, reliable and comparable information in financial reporting across countries of the world, the IFRS due process is essential. The whole process of IFRS development, endorsement and enforcement, which develops IFRS as global accounting standards, also is connected with several obstacles associated to political and social aspects as well as to cultural differentiation. In the thesis the legal systems, as determinants of the nature of accounting regulation, are used for analysis and identification of possible natures of accounting regulation from global perspective. For global accounting regulation it is necessary its acceptance by major interested parties, specification of the range of entities for which it is meaningful and desirable, establishment of an independent, reliable and respected international professional organization in the role of standard-setter and development of a sophisticated, transparent and comprehensive standard setting process. Besides the thorough analysis of particular phases of IFRS due process, the thesis also maps current acceptance of IFRS in the world and describes endorsement process in Europe Union applied for the adoption of IFRS within its area, what provides an integrated view of current evolution in global accounting harmonization. Global accounting regulation, which requires the adoption and application of IFRS in their original range, still faces many obstacles. Less than half countries of G20 (ie 9 countries) requires the use of IFRS in their original form for listed companies. Problem with such acceptance of IFRS especially have the countries with tradition based on Roman law (continental European legal culture), where the creation of rules is exclusive subject to state. Quantitative analysis of IFRS due process performed on three selected projects of IASB agenda is a core of application part of the thesis. On the basis on the timeline the analysis follows particular steps of IFRS due process, especially from the perspective of particular comment periods quantified through the comments received, not only in number but also the composition of comments by geographical region and respondent type. The analysis showed the due process as complicated and time-consuming process leading to global consensus of opinions and also showed the importance of compliance of its complexity, which leads to general agreement on adopted solutions and to global acceptance of these solutions by all of the interested parties. The analysis of IASB due process leads into its comparison with legislative process of creating accounting legislation in Czech Republic. The comparison of both of the processes enables to identify the weaknesses of Czech due process and provides specific recommendations for its improvement and increase efficiency. From the perspective of nature of accounting regulation the delegation of creating accounting rules from the state to the accounting profession is important especially to strengthen the quality, understanding and acceptance of accounting rules, which can be effectively ensured through the due process different from that legislative. The IFRS due process is an inspiration in this case.

The aim of the master thesis "The role of the European Council in the pre-legislative phase of the European legislative process" is to analyse position and influence of the European Council before proposing an official legislative proposal by the European Commission in the EU's legislative process. This pre-legislative phase of a designing of a European legislation is important, though informal. The aim of this master thesis it to find out how strong is the European Council in an agenda setting when it comes to a European legislation and to what extent the Commission is inspired or follows the European Council's conclusions when proposing a legislation. According to many authors who this thesis referring to and their research that this thesis follows, an importance and influence of the European Council has been growing a lot, recently. In their view, it has been happening primarily during serious political or economic crisis. The Commission's position as the only official proposer of a European legislation weakens in that moments while influence of the EU summits grows. The question is if it is true and how much we can really argue that during European crisis the EU's executive power is so weakened that it does not - without ex ante "permission" and ex ante "consultation" with the summits - allow...

Aim of this Diploma Thesis is to have a closer look at current powers of National Parliaments of the Member States to influence legislative process of the European Union. The main question is how do National Parliaments control legislative process in practise. Theoretical Framework is based on a debate about Democratic Legitimacy of the European Union. First the term needs to be defined and basic arguments about the (non)existence of Democratic deficit need to be introduced, then the research question can be introduced. The main focus is on Early Warning Mechanism and a process of issueing of reasoned opinions. An assumption is that through a process of issueing those reasoned opinions by National Parliaments that consist of a democratic elected political parties a Democratic Legitimacy of the European Union could be strenghtened. It is a one-case study of Czech Parliament. All the reasoned opinions, that Czech Senate and Czech Chamber of Deputies issued, will be analysed.

This thesis is embedded in the theoretical approach of multilevel governance and presumption of the rational behaviour of actors. Using the method of process tracing it aims to uncover the legislative process in the European Union. It is a single case study and as a case was chosen the negotiation of the regulation of the citizens' initiative. Various actors were involved in the negotiations, this thesis focuses on the main one - European Commission, European Parliament, the Council, interest organisations and national parliaments. The thesis presumed, that all actors will try to push through their interests based on their rational choice. This presumption was verified, although the success rate of the players varied a lot. As the most successful should be considered the European Parliament, who defended the interests of the individuals and the Council, which apparently represented the interests of the governments of the member states (especially in the issues of lowering the bureaucratic burden). The interest organisations showed their positions clearly, however the Commission did not take their positions much into account while preparing the draft regulation. The position of the national parliaments was different then presumed. Although the thesis expected them to be directly involved in the...

The thesis titled " The activities of selected non-profit organizations dealing with domestic violence ", as the name suggests, deals with the mapping of all areas of activity, which the selected organizations creates, that have set themselves the objective of struggle against domestic violence. Selected organizations are engaged in both secondary and tertiary prevention of domestic violence, which mainly involves working with clients - victims of domestic violence and primary prevention. Primary prevention involves working with the public and participation in the legislative process. These three activities are operated independently. This corresponds to the first part of my work, the theoretical part. It describes in the general organization of the civil sector and their sorting by type of activity , the involvement of these organizations in influencing public policy and making laws and public relations of these organizations. In the second part of the theoretical part is a theoretical framework regarding domestic violence as a social problem, including current legislation related to domestic violence. The empirical part deals with the concrete description of the activities of selected non-profit organizations and also try to answer the question about influencing gendered view of domestic violence of this...

Submitted by Luís Gustavo Henrique Augusto (luis.augusto@gvmail.br) on 2015-05-14T19:21:50Z No. of bitstreams: 1 dissertacao final Luis 3.pdf: 1591218 bytes, checksum: 39270cfb55e3e1df45035d3c5e50830c (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Suzinei Teles Garcia Garcia (suzinei.garcia@fgv.br) on 2015-05-14T19:23:24Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 dissertacao final Luis 3.pdf: 1591218 bytes, checksum: 39270cfb55e3e1df45035d3c5e50830c (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-05-14T19:26:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 dissertacao final Luis 3.pdf: 1591218 bytes, checksum: 39270cfb55e3e1df45035d3c5e50830c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-04-17 / This research aims to determine whether the Participative Legislation Committees of the Câmara dos Deputados and the Senado Federal facilitated social participation in legislative process comparing to the traditional institute of the Law Popular Initiative. To provide the basis that guide the investigation of these mechanisms of participation was undertaken a dogmatic study of the federal legislative process; investigation of how social participation is prescribed in the Constitution and Bylaws of the Legislative Houses, aiming to see how political participation is implemented in legislative procedures; besides the study of the relationship between representation and participation. For this were used the literature review, document analysis, data collection, case studies and interviews. According to the study the Committees facilitated social participation in the legislative process with regard to the disposal of part of the formal requirements that hamper the participation via Popular Initiative; besides expanding the types of legislative proposals that society can provide. However, these new mechanisms reproduced other limitations that the Popular Initiative has, in addition to disregard, in their structure, essential elements to achieve a legislative process effectively participatory, which are covered by the traditional institute, allowing then to say that the Committees are institutional innovations limited front of the institute of Popular Initiative. / Esta pesquisa tem como objetivo verificar se as Comissões de Legislação Participativa da Câmara dos Deputados e do Senado Federal facilitaram a participação social no processo legislativo frente ao tradicional instituto da Iniciativa Popular de lei. Essa investigação será pautada pelo estudo dogmático do processo legislativo federal; pela investigação de como a participação social está prescrita na Constituição Federal e nos Regimentos Internos das Casas do Legislativo, visando constatar como a participação política se implementa no processo de produção legislativa; ademais do estudo sobre a relação entre representação e participação. Para tanto, foi utilizada revisão bibliográfica, análise documental, levantamento de dados, estudo de caso e entrevistas. A pesquisa realizada permite afirmar que as Comissões facilitaram a participação social na produção legislativa no que se refere à eliminação de parte dos requisitos formais que a obstaculizavam via Iniciativa Popular; além de ampliar o rol dos tipos de proposições legislativas que a sociedade pode apresentar. Entretanto, esses novos mecanismos reproduziram limitações que a Iniciativa Popular apresenta, ademais de desconsiderar na sua estruturação elementos essenciais à consecução de um processo legislativo efetivamente participativo, os quais são contemplados pelo instituto tradicional, permitindo, então, afirmar que as Comissões são inovações institucionais limitadas frente ao instituto da Iniciativa Popular.

[pt] O trabalho examina os elementos centrais do procedimento legislativo resultante da atribuição, pela Constituição de 1988, de poder decisório às comissões parlamentares para aprovar e rejeitar projetos de lei. Investiga os precedentes do mecanismo no Brasil e os modelos italiano e espanhol, que serviram de inspiração ao constituinte brasileiro. Busca, ainda, apontar as falhas de regulação interna, na Câmara dos Deputados e no Senado Federal, que têm impedido melhor aproveitamento do novo instituto legislativo como canal de deliberação alternativo aos respectivos plenários. / [en] The dissertation looks into the core elements of the new legislative procedure created by the Brazilian Constitution of 1988 that gives the decision power to approval and rejection laws to the committees. It investigates the precedents of the mechanism in Brazil and the Italian and Spanish models, which served as the base of inspiration to the Brazilian constituent. It also points out the flaws of the internal regulation of the legislative houses which have prevented better use of the new institute as an alternative channel for making laws.