Major depression is a highly prevalent mood disorder with chronic debilitating effects. Additional to a rising rate in incidence, depression is highly co–morbid with other psychiatric disorders, but also chronic cardiometabolic illnesses that present with an inflammatory component. The exact aetiology of depression is still unknown, being multifactorial in its possible aetiology. Various hypotheses have attempted to shed light on both endogenous and exogenous risk factors as well as the underlying pathology that may lead to the development of the disease. This has led to a wide range of mediators being implicated, including biogenic amines, the HPA–axis, neurotrophic factors, inflammatory agents, the cholinergic system and circadian rhythm, to name a few. The mechanisms of action of current treatment strategies, except for a few atypical and novel treatment approaches, are limited to interactions with monoamines and are at best only 65% effective. Many of these are also plagued by troubling side–effects, relapse and recurrence. It has therefore become imperative to explore novel targets for the treatment of depression that may produce more rapid, robust and lasting antidepressant effects with a less daunting side–effect profile. The strong co–morbidity between depression and various cardiometabolic disorders, including cardiovascular disease, atherosclerosis, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) has led to the proposal that a metabolic disturbance may be a vital component that drives inflammatory and immunological dysfunction in depression. Supporting of this is evidence for a role of inflammatory cytokines and neurotrophic factors in the pathogenesis of depression. It has also been demonstrated that a link exists between insulin– and nitric oxide (NO)– mediated pathways in the brain, which further highlights the role of oxidative stress and cell damage. Furthermore, evidence supports a role for oxidative stress and NO in T2DM and/or insulin resistance. Insulin has also been implicated in various physiological processes in the central nervous system (CNS) and may also influence the release and reuptake of neurotransmitters. Preclinical and clinical evidence has provided support for the antidepressant–like effects of insulin–sensitizing peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR)– agonists, such as rosiglitazone and pioglitazone. In preclinical studies, however, these effects are limited to acute treatment with pioglitazone or sub–chronic (5 days) treatment with rosiglitazone. It is well–recognized that such findings need to be confirmed by chronic treatment paradigms. The aim of the current study was therefore to further investigate the proposed antidepressant–like effects of pioglitazone in a genetic animal model of depression, the Flinders sensitive line (FSL) rat, using a chronic treatment protocol. The FSL rat model was reaffirmed as presenting with inherent depressive–like behaviour compared to its more resilient counterpart, the Flinders resistant line (FRL) rat. Moreover, imipramine demonstrated a robust and reliable antidepressant–like effect in these animals using the forced swim test (FST), thus confirming the face and predictive validity of the FSL rat model for depression. In contrast to previous preclinical studies, acute dose–ranging studies with pioglitazone in Sprague Dawley rats delivered no significant anti–immobility effects in the FST, whereas results similar to that seen in the dose–ranging studies were observed following chronic treatment using FSL rats. Since altered pharmacokinetics could possibly influence the drug’s performance, another route of administration, viz. the subcutaneous route, was utilized as an additional measure to exclude this possibility. The results of the subcutaneous study, however, were congruent with that observed after oral treatment. In order to confirm an association between altered insulin sensitivity and antidepressant action and demonstration by recent studies that thiazolidinediones may augment the efficacy of existing antidepressants, we therefore investigated whether concomitant treatment with gliclazide (an insulin releaser and insulin desensitizer) or pioglitazone (an insulin sensitizer) may alter the antidepressant–like effects evoked by chronic treatment with imipramine. Pioglitazone did not positively or negatively affect the antidepressant effect of imipramine, although gliclazide tended to decrease the anti–immobility effects induced by this antidepressant. Taken together and considering the current available literature, this finding supports evidence linking the insulin–PPAR pathway to depression. However, further explorative studies are required to delineate the role of insulin sensitivity and glucose homeostasis in depression and antidepressant response. / Thesis (M.Sc. (Pharmacology))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2012.

Major depression is a highly prevalent mood disorder with chronic debilitating effects. Additional to a rising rate in incidence, depression is highly co–morbid with other psychiatric disorders, but also chronic cardiometabolic illnesses that present with an inflammatory component. The exact aetiology of depression is still unknown, being multifactorial in its possible aetiology. Various hypotheses have attempted to shed light on both endogenous and exogenous risk factors as well as the underlying pathology that may lead to the development of the disease. This has led to a wide range of mediators being implicated, including biogenic amines, the HPA–axis, neurotrophic factors, inflammatory agents, the cholinergic system and circadian rhythm, to name a few. The mechanisms of action of current treatment strategies, except for a few atypical and novel treatment approaches, are limited to interactions with monoamines and are at best only 65% effective. Many of these are also plagued by troubling side–effects, relapse and recurrence. It has therefore become imperative to explore novel targets for the treatment of depression that may produce more rapid, robust and lasting antidepressant effects with a less daunting side–effect profile. The strong co–morbidity between depression and various cardiometabolic disorders, including cardiovascular disease, atherosclerosis, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) has led to the proposal that a metabolic disturbance may be a vital component that drives inflammatory and immunological dysfunction in depression. Supporting of this is evidence for a role of inflammatory cytokines and neurotrophic factors in the pathogenesis of depression. It has also been demonstrated that a link exists between insulin– and nitric oxide (NO)– mediated pathways in the brain, which further highlights the role of oxidative stress and cell damage. Furthermore, evidence supports a role for oxidative stress and NO in T2DM and/or insulin resistance. Insulin has also been implicated in various physiological processes in the central nervous system (CNS) and may also influence the release and reuptake of neurotransmitters. Preclinical and clinical evidence has provided support for the antidepressant–like effects of insulin–sensitizing peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR)– agonists, such as rosiglitazone and pioglitazone. In preclinical studies, however, these effects are limited to acute treatment with pioglitazone or sub–chronic (5 days) treatment with rosiglitazone. It is well–recognized that such findings need to be confirmed by chronic treatment paradigms. The aim of the current study was therefore to further investigate the proposed antidepressant–like effects of pioglitazone in a genetic animal model of depression, the Flinders sensitive line (FSL) rat, using a chronic treatment protocol. The FSL rat model was reaffirmed as presenting with inherent depressive–like behaviour compared to its more resilient counterpart, the Flinders resistant line (FRL) rat. Moreover, imipramine demonstrated a robust and reliable antidepressant–like effect in these animals using the forced swim test (FST), thus confirming the face and predictive validity of the FSL rat model for depression. In contrast to previous preclinical studies, acute dose–ranging studies with pioglitazone in Sprague Dawley rats delivered no significant anti–immobility effects in the FST, whereas results similar to that seen in the dose–ranging studies were observed following chronic treatment using FSL rats. Since altered pharmacokinetics could possibly influence the drug’s performance, another route of administration, viz. the subcutaneous route, was utilized as an additional measure to exclude this possibility. The results of the subcutaneous study, however, were congruent with that observed after oral treatment. In order to confirm an association between altered insulin sensitivity and antidepressant action and demonstration by recent studies that thiazolidinediones may augment the efficacy of existing antidepressants, we therefore investigated whether concomitant treatment with gliclazide (an insulin releaser and insulin desensitizer) or pioglitazone (an insulin sensitizer) may alter the antidepressant–like effects evoked by chronic treatment with imipramine. Pioglitazone did not positively or negatively affect the antidepressant effect of imipramine, although gliclazide tended to decrease the anti–immobility effects induced by this antidepressant. Taken together and considering the current available literature, this finding supports evidence linking the insulin–PPAR pathway to depression. However, further explorative studies are required to delineate the role of insulin sensitivity and glucose homeostasis in depression and antidepressant response. / Thesis (M.Sc. (Pharmacology))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2012.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a mood disorder majorly responsible for disability and mortality worldwide. With a lifetime prevalence of 15-20%, it is the main cause of functional impairment in Western societies as well as the fourth most debilitating illness in the world. Although the pathophysiology of MDD is not yet fully understood, some evidence that suggest the presence of a neuroanatomical deficiency have given rise to the theory of a specific imbalance in the monoamine neurotransmitters noradrenaline (NA) and/or serotonin (5-HT) levels in the brain. Overall, the various classes of antidepressant agents that have been developed to increase monoamine levels on the basis of this proposal have been successful. However, facts relating to prevalent escalation in the illness and recurring episodes of depression point towards a need to enhance clinical treatment. Most conventional antidepressants such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and selective serotonin and noradrenaline inhibitors (SNRI) pose problems in symptomatic improvement. These include therapeutic lag, safety and tolerability issues, making more than 30% patients with MDD unable to reach adequate relief. In this respect, the action mechanism has moved beyond conventional SSRI and lead to the introduction of vilazodone, a novel antidepressant with an additional 5-HT1A partial agonist profile argued to be of potential benefit for a greater efficacy, faster onset of action and better tolerability. Using secondary data, this project aimed to evaluate the role of vilazodone as a SPARI-drug in the overall clinical treatment of MDD as well as its potential in addressing some of the most common obstacles in antidepressant treatment. Study results proved vilazodone’s efficacy to be superior to placebo. Patients across all studies showed significant improvement in depressive symptoms measured in MADRS and HAMD17. Vilazodone was also shown to be generally safe and tolerable but was not positively distinguished from placebo with regards to adverse effects. An overall, meaningful improvement in depressive symptoms was demonstrated in vilazodone, which reinforces its merit as an important treatment option for patients with MDD.

Background: Patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) suffer from instability of their relationships, their affectivity and their identity. The purpose of the study was to investigate negative affects and identity disturbance in patients with BPD and in patients without personality disorder using questionnaire data and interview data. Sampling and Methods: Twelve patients with BPD and 12 patients with major depressive disorder without any personality disorder were assessed with the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO) and questionnaires (Inventory of Personality Organization, Beck Depression Inventory, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory). They were compared with respect to the frequency of negative affective verbal expressions using computerized content analysis methods. Results: BPD patients showed higher levels of anxiety, depression and identity diffusion in the questionnaires than major depressive disorder patients without personality disorder. However, they did not report more negative affective expressions in the interview. Patients with identity disturbance of both groups showed higher values of negative mood in the questionnaires, but less anger, less anxiety and less affective intensity in the interview. Conclusion: The preliminary findings indicate that patients with identity disturbance show high levels of negative affects in questionnaires but only few negative affects in the interview situation. More studies are needed to enhance the understanding of negative affects and identity disturbance in BPD. / Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

Background: Lithium augmentation is a first-line strategy for depressed patients resistant to antidepressive therapy, but little is known about patients’ subsequent long-term course or outcome predictors. We investigated long-term outcomes of unipolar depressed patients who had participated in a study on the effects of lithium augmentation on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical system using the combined dexamethasone/corticotrophin-releasing hormone (DEX/CRH) test. Methods: Twelve to 28 months (mean 18.6 ± 4.6 months) after lithium augmentation, 23 patients were assessed with a standardized interview, of which 18 patients had complete DEX/CRH test results. Relapse was diagnosed by DSM-IV criteria (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV; SCID I). Results: Only 11 patients (48%) had a favorable follow-up, defined as absence of major depressive episodes during the observation period. Patients with a favorable and an unfavorable course did not differ in clinical or sociodemographic parameters, endocrinological results or continuation of lithium. However, fewer previous depressive episodes tended to correlate (p = 0.09) with a favorable course. Conclusion: Results from studies using the DEX/CRH test to predict relapse in depressed patients treated with antidepressants were not replicated for lithium augmentation. Our finding could reflect the elevation of DEX/CRH results by lithium, independent of clinical course. Limitations of the study are its small sample size, the heterogeneous clinical baseline conditions and the lack of lithium serum levels. The fact that lithium continuation did not predict the course might be related to the difference between the efficacy of lithium in controlled studies and its effectiveness in naturalistic settings. / Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

No description available.

Background Lack of coordination between screening studies for common mental disorders in primary care and community epidemiological samples impedes progress in clinical epidemiology. Short screening scales based on the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), the diagnostic interview used in community epidemiological surveys throughout the world, were developed to address this problem. Method Expert reviews and cognitive interviews generated CIDI screening scale (CIDI-SC) item pools for 30-day DSM-IV-TR major depressive episode (MDE), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), panic disorder (PD) and bipolar disorder (BPD). These items were administered to 3058 unselected patients in 29 US primary care offices. Blinded SCID clinical reinterviews were administered to 206 of these patients, oversampling screened positives. Results Stepwise regression selected optimal screening items to predict clinical diagnoses. Excellent concordance [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)] was found between continuous CIDI-SC and DSM-IV/SCID diagnoses of 30-day MDE (0.93), GAD (0.88), PD (0.90) and BPD (0.97), with only 9–38 questions needed to administer all scales. CIDI-SC versus SCID prevalence differences are insignificant at the optimal CIDI-SC diagnostic thresholds (χ2 1 = 0.0–2.9, p = 0.09–0.94). Individual-level diagnostic concordance at these thresholds is substantial (AUC 0.81–0.86, sensitivity 68.0–80.2%, specificity 90.1–98.8%). Likelihood ratio positive (LR+) exceeds 10 and LR− is 0.1 or less at informative thresholds for all diagnoses. Conclusions CIDI-SC operating characteristics are equivalent (MDE, GAD) or superior (PD, BPD) to those of the best alternative screening scales. CIDI-SC results can be compared directly to general population CIDI survey results or used to target and streamline second-stage CIDIs.

No description available.

Affective disorders, specifically Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Disorders, show high prevalence, relapse rates, and a high likelihood to develop a chronic course. For the past two decades, research has investigated the neural correlates of emotion processing and emotion regulation in patients with affective disorders. Putative underlying causal mechanisms of dysregulated affect have been informed by knowledge from the intersection of neuroimaging and clinical psychology. More recent investigations also consider processing the role of mostly negative, self-blaming social emotions, which have been linked to treatment resistance and, hence, provide a prolific target for intervention. Several psychotherapeutic treatment approaches already focus on emotion, and here specific knowledge about the mechanisms underlying persistent changes in affect bears the potential to improve the treatment of affective disorders. In this narrative review, we delineate why and how our insights into the neural correlates of emotion processing and regulation can be applied to the treatment of patients with affective disorders. / Affektive Störungen, insbesondere die Major Depression und bipolare Störungen, weisen eine hohe Prävalenz, häufige Rückfälle und eine hohe Rate an chronischen Krankheitsverläufen auf. In den letzten zwei Jahrzehnten hat die Forschung die neuronalen Korrelate der Emotionsverarbeitung und -regulation bei Patient_innen mit affektiven Störungen untersucht. Die mutmaßlichen Mechanismen der gestörten Affektregulation wurden durch Erkenntnisse aus der biologischen und klinischen Psychologie untermauert. Neuere Untersuchungen befassen sich auch mit selbstbeschuldigenden sozialen Emotionen, die mit Behandlungsresistenz in Verbindung gebracht werden und daher ein ergiebiges Ziel für Interventionen darstellen. Psychotherapeutische Behandlungsansätze konzentrieren sich bereits auf die emotionale Verarbeitung, jedoch birgt hier spezifisches Wissen über die Mechanismen, die anhaltenden affektiven Veränderungen zugrunde liegen, das Potenzial, die Behandlung von affektiven Störungen zu verbessern. In dieser narrativen Übersichtsarbeit wird dargelegt, warum und wie unsere Erkenntnisse über die neuronalen Korrelate der Emotionsverarbeitung und -regulation bei der Behandlung von Patient_innen mit affektiven Störungen eingesetzt werden können.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a mood disorder majorly responsible for disability and mortality worldwide. With a lifetime prevalence of 15-20%, it is the main cause of functional impairment in Western societies as well as the fourth most debilitating illness in the world. Although the pathophysiology of MDD is not yet fully understood, some evidence that suggest the presence of a neuroanatomical deficiency have given rise to the theory of a specific imbalance in the monoamine neurotransmitters noradrenaline (NA) and/or serotonin (5-HT) levels in the brain. Overall, the various classes of antidepressant agents that have been developed to increase monoamine levels on the basis of this proposal have been successful. However, facts relating to prevalent escalation in the illness and recurring episodes of depression point towards a need to enhance clinical treatment. Most conventional antidepressants such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and selective serotonin and noradrenaline inhibitors (SNRI) pose problems in symptomatic improvement. These include therapeutic lag, safety and tolerability issues, making more than 30% patients with MDD unable to reach adequate relief. In this respect, the action mechanism has moved beyond conventional SSRI and lead to the introduction of vilazodone, a novel antidepressant with an additional 5-HT1A partial agonist profile argued to be of potential benefit for a greater efficacy, faster onset of action and better tolerability. Using secondary data, this project aimed to evaluate the role of vilazodone as a SPARI-drug in the overall clinical treatment of MDD as well as its potential in addressing some of the most common obstacles in antidepressant treatment. Study results proved vilazodone’s efficacy to be superior to placebo. Patients across all studies showed significant improvement in depressive symptoms measured in MADRS and HAMD17. Vilazodone was also shown to be generally safe and tolerable but was not positively distinguished from placebo with regards to adverse effects. An overall, meaningful improvement in depressive symptoms was demonstrated in vilazodone, which reinforces its merit as an important treatment option for patients with MDD.