Global ETD Search

1	Le discours de l’enrôlement dans la poésie militante des guerres de religion. Pierre de Ronsard et Agrippa d'Aubigné / The speech of the enlistment in the militant poetry of the wars of religion. Pierre de Ronsard and Agrippa d’Aubigné Ndong, Sangoul 21 May 2019 (has links) Avec Les Tragiques, Aubigné démolit les accusations de sédition et d’hérésie véhiculées sur le compte des huguenots par Ronsard. Surgissent entre cette œuvre et les Discours des clivages politiques et religieux où la création poétique est, pour le compte du camp de chaque poète, le moyen de favoriser quelques dispositions sur les allocutaires. La question de la réception occupe ainsi une place centrale dans ces deux œuvres antagonistes. Elle pose le problème de l’enrôlement. Celui-ci est un ensemble de ressources rhétoriques dont l’enjeu consiste à convaincre l’adversaire de ses erreurs, à raffermir les partisans et à conquérir l’opinion publique. Quelles sont ces ressources qui permettent à Ronsard et à Aubigné d’inscrire leurs allocutaires dans des rôles précis en faveur de leurs partis respectifs ? Dans notre thèse, nous nous sommes intéressés aux questions suivantes : sous quels traits éthiques Ronsard et Aubigné parlent-ils chacun pour subordonner ses allocutaires à ses convictions ? Qui sont ces allocutaires ? Avec quels procédés discursifs les deux poètes agissent-ils sur les pensées et sur les comportements de ces destinataires ? Vers les thèses de quel poète risque de se pencher les lecteurs ? Avec ces questions, nous avons observé les rôles de la représentation de l’énonciateur et ses figures dans le discours d’enrôlement, les catégories d’allocutaires et les styles oratoires mis en marche pour produire la persuasion, le raffermissement et la mobilisation. / With The Tragics, Aubigné demolishes the accusations of sedition and heresy conveyed on the account of the Huguenots by Ronsard. Arises between this work and the Discourses of political and religious cleavages where the poetic creation is, on behalf of the camp of each poet, the means to favor some provisions on the allocutaries. The question of reception thus occupies a central place in these two antagonistic works. It poses the problem of enlistment. This is a set of rhetorical resources whose challenge is to convince the adversary of his mistakes, to strengthen the partisans and to conquer public opinion. What are these resources that allow Ronsard and Aubigné to put their speakers in specific roles for their respective parties ?In our thesis, we are interested in the following questions : under what ethical traits do Ronsard and Aubigné speak each to subordinate his allocutaries to his convictions ? Who are these allocutaries ? With what discursive processes do the two poets act on the thoughts and behaviors of these recipients? Towards the theses of what poet is likely to lean readers ?With these questions, we have observed the roles of the enunciator's representation and his figures in the enlistment discourse, the categories of allocutaries and the oratorical styles set in motion to produce persuasion, firmness and mobilization. Conjuration d'Amboise Bèze (Théodore de) Bible Lecteur Médicis Pamphlet Poissy (colloque de) Saint-Barthélémy Amboise (conspiracy) Beza ( theodore) Bible Reader Medicis Pamphlet Poissy (colloquium) St-Barthelemy
2	La construction des représentations genrées et racialisées de Catherine de Médicis par les Monarchomaques et les Malcontents (1573-1576) Hamelin, Gabrielle 08 1900 (has links) No description available. Catherine de Médicis Représentations Intersectionnalité Monarchomaques Malcontents Genre Parvenu Italiens Absolutisme Caterina de’ Medicis Representations Intersectionnality Gender Italians Absolutism
3	Kronor, kransar och diadem som rollsymboler i Rubens målningar över Maria de’ Medicis liv / Crowns, wreaths and diadems as role symbols in Rubens’s Marie de’ Medici Cycle af Klinteberg, Kristina January 2022 (has links) This is a study on crowns, wreaths and diadems as role symbols in Peter Paul Rubens’s 24 paintings for Marie de’Medici in Paris, 1622 – 1625. In these paintings, historic facts are shown with the addition of mythological gods and their symbols giving allegorical scenes, where sometimes also Christian symbols or subjects can be traced. A reader of these painted motifs therefore can choose to see the symbols as regal, Christian or mythological. The crown and the wreaths rarely present a challenge in modern interpretations, but the magnificent diadem does. Rubens chooses this diadem for higher goddesses, and for the queen a couple of times too. For some reason, this symbol is mostly misread in analyses. At this point in history, the crowns and the wreaths have been collected from divine spheres and turned into physical objects on earth used by the high and mighty. The large diadem has not; it is still only a symbol on a goddess. If and when put on a human in a portrait, the symbol gives the lady the abilities and characters of a goddess. Rubens uses his own design when turning this symbol into a physical picture;it is a high, pointed diadem with pearls and coloured gems set in gold. He has used it on goddesses both before and after the Medici commission. Today, we have seen numerous spectacular headpieces like this from late 18th century an onwards, wherefore it is an easy mistake to believe that Rubens copied what he saw instead of, as he actually did, foreboding a coming fashion. In addition to confirming this, I also suggest that it is the highest goddess Juno queen Marie is personifying. Juno is mostly known today as a goddess for women and childbirth. But she had far more masculine tasks in earlier days: she was seen as the saviour of the country and a special counsellor of the state. These two important roles are exactly what Marie de’ Medici took on when acting as regent for her young son, Louis XIII,after the murder of her husband, the late Henry IV. By putting Juno’s diadem on Marie’s head, when sitting on a throne, the divine abilities are manifested according to how a historic period could be transferred to the allegorical language in a painting at the time. Peter Paul Rubens Marie de’ Medici Maria de’ Medici Henri IV Henry IV Louis XIII crown wreath diadem role symbol Juno Roman mythology goddess Luxembourg Palace Louvre regent regency Peter Paul Rubens Marie de’ Medicis Maria de’ Medici Henri IV Henrik IV Louis XIII Ludvig XIII krona krans diadem rollsymbol Juno romersk mytologi gudinna Luxembourgpalatset Louvren regent änkedrottning Humanities and the Arts Humaniora och konst

1

Page generated in 0.0356 seconds