A fim de compreender como um narrador que tem tendência para a perspectiva única e para o monólogo permite que outras vozes se manifestem a ponto de serem ouvidas pelo leitor, o presente trabalho busca uma articulação entre o romance moderno e o testemunho. Entretanto, antes desta análise, foi proposta uma breve revisão sobre a produção literária brasileira na década 70, destacando-se o isolamento da obra Lavoura Arcaica em relação ao contexto literário daquela época. Ainda nesta parte inicial há a recuperação da fortuna crítica a respeito da obra de Raduan Nassar. Tendo em vista a complexidade do romance nassariano, no segundo capítulo, foi contemplado o ponto de vista de alguns teóricos literários - Mikhail Bakhtin, Problemas da poética de Dostoiévski (2002), Theodor Adorno, Posição do narrador no romance contemporâneo (1983) e Anatol Rosenfeld, Reflexões sobre o romance moderno (1985) - que, de certo modo, dialogam a respeito do papel do romance moderno. Ressalta-se, então, do estudo bakhtiniano, a noção de dialogismo que permite autonomia às personagens porque a partir dela o homem pode ser visto em sua multiplicidade e imprevisibilidade; de Anatol Rosenfeld, a negação do realismo ou o desmascaramento do mundo epidérmico do senso comum e de Theodor Adorno, a crise da objetividade. A noção de testemunho apresentada por Márcio Seligmann-Silva (2006) é vista como uma adaptação estética pertinente a um mundo já ciente da frágil condição humana. O último capítulo está dividido em três subcapítulos. No primeiro, observa-se como André foi capaz de inverter a lógica paterna, constituindo-se no elemento deflagrador que ocasionou o fim de uma forma fechada e orgânica de família patriarcal. No segundo, mostra-se como o André narrador, que surge com a morte do André personagem, acolhe e resgata, principalmente, a voz do pai e a dos irmãos. Enquanto sobrevivente, há o transbordamento do seu mundo interior e a sua evidente fragmentação. No terceiro, constata-se como a adoção de uma prosa poética pode ser vista como uma forma de conciliar a necessidade e a impossibilidade de se narrar algo que transcende a verossimilhança e que se instaura como um trauma. Foi também ressaltado que uma concepção artística que deixa vir à tona as contradições inerentes à modernidade é fundamental para se narrar em um mundo carente de sentido. / In order to understand how a narrator which has a tendency to the single perspective and to the monologue allows other voices to show to the point of being heard by the reader, this paper seeks after an articulation between the modern novel and the testimony. However, before this analysis, it proposes a brief review of the Brazilian literature from the 1970s. The isolation of the work Lavoura Arcaica is pointed out in relation to the literary context of the period. In this initial section there is also a recovery of the criticism regarding Raduan Nassar's work. Taking the complexity of Nassar's novel into account, in the second chapter, this work comprises the point of view of some literary theorists - Mikhail Bakhtin, Problemas da poética de Dostoievski (2002), Theodor Adorno, Posição do narrador no romance contemporâneo (1983), and Anatol Rosenfeld, Reflexões sobre o romance moderno (1985) - who, in a way, dialogue over the role of the modern novel. Afterwards, it is highlighted the conception of dialogism which empowers autonomy to the characters from Bakhtinian studies, because from this independence the man can be seen in his plurality and unpredictability; the negation of realism or the act of removing the mask from the epidermal world of the common sense is pointed out from Anatol Rosenfeld; and the objectivity crisis from Theodor Adorno. The conception of testimony presented by Márcio Seligmann-Silva (2006) is seen as an appropriate aesthetic adaptation to a world which is already aware of the fragile human condition. The last chapter is divided in three subchapters. In the first subchapter, it is observed how André has been able to invert the paternal logics, consisting of the turning point responsible for the end of the organic and closed pattern of the patriarchal family. In the second subchapter, it is shown how André the narrator, emerging from the death of André the character, receives and rescues mainly the voice of his father and his brothers. As long as a survivor, there is an overflow of his inner world and his evident fragmentation. In the third subchapter, it is testified how the adoption of a poetic prose can be seen as a way of conciliating the necessity and the impossibility of narrating something that transcends the verisimilitude and sets up as a trauma. It is also emphasized that an artistic conception which allows contradictions inherent to the modernity to come to the surface is essential to narrate a world which is destitute of sense.

La France littéraire du début des années 1920 connaît un engouement sans précédent pour le roman d'aventures. On ambitionne alors un roman d'aventures français qui renouvellerait le genre et égalerait les grandes réussites anglo-saxonnes : la France cherche ses Stevenson et ses Conrad ! Si l'histoire littéraire a retenu les noms de Blaise Cendrars, Pierre Mac Orlan, Joseph Kessel, André Malraux, Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, elle a longtemps passé sous silence cette « vogue du roman d'aventures », ainsi que la nomme alors la presse culturelle. Or, au lendemain de ce que Michel Raimond a décrit comme une « crise du roman », les aspirations aventurières du roman français offrent une réponse romanesque aux inquiétudes poétiques et philosophiques de la première moitiédu XXe siècle. Le roman d'aventures littéraire des années 1920-1930 est le point culminant d'une pensée littéraire qui, du symbolisme à l'existentialisme, n'a cessé de questionner les jeux et enjeux de l'action et du rêve dans le roman. Cette étude propose de retracer l'histoire de ces enjeux et d'examiner, de 1918 à 1939, du Chant de l'équipage de Mac Orlan aux Figurants de la mort de Roger de Lafforest, un ensemble de romans d'aventures qui tous partagent cette mystique moderne de l'aventure. / In the beginning of the 20's, literary France knows a craze for the adventure novel. After whatMichel Raimond called “la crise du roman” this new production of adventure novel offers ananswers to the poetical and philosophical questions of the first XXe century. From 1918 to 1939,from Pierre Mac Orlan's Le Chant de l'équipage to Roger de Lafforest's Figurants de la mort, thisstudy follows the history of the literary adventure novel and analyses a group of novels that allshare this modern adventurous mystic.

Écrite d’abord en russe puis en anglo-américain, l’œuvre romanesque de Vladimir Nabokov (1899-1977), écrivain américain d’origine russe, fascine ses lecteurs, mais leur participation à l’achèvement de cette œuvre artistique a été singulièrement restreinte par sa réception. La publication de Lolita (1955) le transforme en précurseur du postmodernisme américain. Aboutissement de la quête moderne de l’autonomie de l’art et triomphe de l’autotélisme artistique, sa création se trouve alors interprétée en poétique « tyrannique » sur laquelle règne l’auteur en « dictateur absolu ». Vladimir Nabokov, pourtant, n’a cessé d’identifier dans l’Histoire et de combattre dans son œuvre deux questions politiques du vingtième siècle : celle de la soumission de l’art à l’idéologie (quelle qu’en soit le nom) et celle de la tyrannie (actualisée par les régimes politiques nazi et soviétique). Dès l’origine, sa création de langue russe, puis anglo-américaine, est synchronisée avec les conséquences, tant en Russie qu’en Occident, de la Révolution bolchevique, l’événement historique qui change le « partage du sensible » (Jacques Rancière) vingtiémiste. La nature autotélique de sa création, dont les caractéristiques sont à redéfinir en opposition aux formes artistiques prônant l’engagement de l’art, indique en réalité que Nabokov propose une nouvelle « politique de la littérature » (Jacques Rancière) de l’émancipation qu’il a lui-même appelée du nom de « démocratie magique » et fait d’elle un « art critique » dont l’effet politique passe par sa distance esthétique, incluant « dans la forme de l’œuvre la confrontation de ce que le monde est avec ce que le monde pourrait être » (Jacques Rancière). / Vladimir Nabokov (1899-1977), American writer of Russian origin, was the author of fiction written first in Russian and then in American English. His work has been a constant source of fascination for his readers, but their interpretation has been limited by its reception. Upon the publication of Lolita (1955), Nabokov is seen as a precursor of American postmodernism. His writings are interpreted as the climax of the modernist quest for artistic autonomy and a triumph of autotelic creation, and a poetic of “tyranny” is identified in his work, with the author reigning supreme as an “absolute dictator.”However, Nabokov had never ceased to be preoccupied with two political issues in 20th century History, which he continuously denounced in his writings: the issue of the submission of art to any kind of ideology and that of tyranny illustrated by the Nazi and Soviet political regimes. From the very beginning of his career, in his Russian texts and later in his American texts, Nabokov’s work examines the consequences of the Bolshevik Revolution, seen as the historical event that changes the “distribution of the sensible” (J. Rancière) in the 20th century. The autotelic nature of his work, whose features should be defined in opposition to aesthetic forms that celebrate the commitment of art, actually indicates that Nabokov defines a new “politics of literature” (J. Rancière) based on emancipation, which Nabokov calls “a magic democracy” and considers to be a “critical art” whose aesthetic effect is predicated on its distance, thus including “in the form of the work the confrontation between what the world is and what the world may become” (J. Rancière).

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-28T19:59:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Jose Rogerio Beserra.pdf: 298707 bytes, checksum: 2efaeeb78069c69779849d86256b71e7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-04-29 / Secretaria da Educação do Estado de São Paulo / The objective of this essay is to analyze how the traditional narrative is surpassed by the paradigms from the novel ÁGUA VIVA, by Clarice Lispector, which provides the relationship between prose and proetry languages derived from heterogeneous genders. This way we have to emphasize some features (aspects) like the lack of narrative element functioning, which shows unsteadiness, in the current literature; the lyricism as the rhythm builder principle; the poetical image where the word is taken to zero degree . The essay is composed by three chapters, in which the character´s dialogical-discursive processing in the modern novel has been approached as well as the rhythm builder processing and the plurality of the image, considering that the words have no meaning (their meanings were ignored). We are have shown that these thematic subjects are aggregated by their metaphorical images tied with the multi-meaning words. For the analytical-interpretative passage, we based on Bakhtin, Barthes, Segolin, Santaella, Pearce, Sá (and others) besides some works on Clarice Lispector / Esta pesquisa tem por objetivo analisar a superação dos paradigmas da narrativa tradicional a partir do romance ÁGUA VIVA, de Clarice Lispector, que articula as relações entre as linguagens da prosa e da poesia, num hibridismo de gêneros. Para isso, fizemos um recorte em torno de alguns aspectos, como a desfuncionalização dos elementos da narrativa em uma literatura atual, feita de instabilidade; o lirismo como princípio construtor do ritmo; e a imagem poética, ou seja, a palavra levada ao grau zero . As questões foram discutidas nos três capítulos que compõem a dissertação, em que abordamos o processo dialógico-discursivo da personagem no romance moderno, o processo de construção do ritmo e a pluralidade da imagem, analisada pelo viés da palavra esvaziada de significados. Mostramos que essas temáticas integram-se pelo emprego das imagens metafóricas vinculadas à palavra polissêmica. Nesse percurso analítico-interpretativo, recorremos, entre outros, a Bakhtin, Barthes, Segolin, Santaella, Paz, Sá, além de trabalhos sobre a obra de Clarice Lispector