The article addresses the relationship between drug trafficking and subnational politics having as unit of analysis the local authorities’ speeches of the Cuzco districts of Kimbiri and Pichari form 2006 to 2010 Based in a qualitative methodology but backed by a pair of statistical tests, it is found that candidates and then authorities have a dualistic perspective about the cultivation of coca leafs, which is directed mostly to the production of cocaine Thus, also the radicalism in the defense of coca leaf is not constant in time, but rather strategic and casual Last, based on model proposal about drug trafficking networks of influence, we conclude that the closer this illegal economic activity is at the authorities, these have an ambiguous and contradictory speech on the issue / El artículo aborda la relación del narcotráfico con la política subnacional teniendo por unidad de análisis los discursos de las autoridades municipales de los distritos cusqueños de Kimbiri y Pichari de 2006 a 2010 En base a una metodología cualitativa pero respaldada de un par de pruebas estadísticas se comprueba que los candidatos y luego autoridades no tienen una perspectiva dualista sobre el cultivo de hoja de coca cuya producción se dirige en su mayoría a la producción de cocaína Así también la radicalidad en la defensa de la hoja de coca no es constante en el tiempo, sino más bien estratégica y ocasional Por último, en base a un modelo propuesto sobre las redes de influencia del narcotráfico, se concluye que mientras más cercana se encuentre esta actividad económica ilegal a las autoridades, estas tendrán un discurso ambiguo y contradictorio sobre el tema / O artigo aborda a relação do narcotráfico com a política subnacional tendo a unidade deanalise aos discursos das autoridades municipais dos distritos cusqueños de Kimbiri e Pichari dos anos 2006 aos 2010 Na base duma metodologia qualitativa, mas apoiada de duas provas estadísticas se podem comprovar o que os candidatos e logo as autoridades, não tem uma perspectiva dualista sobre o cultivo da folha de coca o que sua produção dirige, maiormente a produção da cocaína Da mesma forma, a defensa radical da folha de coca não é constante no tempo, mas é estratégica e ocasional Finalmente, na base dum modelo proposto sobre as redes de influência do narcotráfico, pode-se concluir que se a atividade econômica ilegal fica per todas autoridades, elas tem um discurso duvidoso e com contradições sobre o tema

This thesis examines selected political speeches with regard to word-formation and its processes, namely from the grammatical, semantic, and pragmatic points of view. The analyzed political speeches are the Otto von Bismarck's speech delivered on 20 July 1870, the Adolf Hitler's speech delivered on 1 September 1939, the Willy Brandt's speech delivered on 10 November 1989, and the Angela Merkel's speech from 14 December 2015. This is an interdisciplinary thesis which deals with politics, history, and linguistics. The thesis examines four different periods, namely Bismarck's era, Nazism, the Federal Republic of Germany between 1949 and 1990, and the contemporary Federal Republic of Germany. These periods are analyzed from the political, historical, and socio-cultural points of view. Subsequently, the selected political speeches are analyzed with respect to word- formation, its processes, and the period in which they were delivered. The individual results are then compared and certain conclusions are drawn from the comparison. The aim of this thesis is to highlight the importance of word-formation and its processes which are significant for political speeches from the 19th century onwards. This thesis shows and analyzes the motives, purposes, aims, and consequences of their usage in particular...

De nombreuses études concluent à la supériorité des démocraties dans la guerre. A travers notre analyse des relations unissant aujourd’hui les piliers de la trinité clausewitzienne classique – pouvoir politique, peuple et armée – notre recherche s’attache à mettre en évidence l’importance, à cet égard, de la définition du « sens de l’action ». Complexe à conceptualiser, cet objet naît de l’interaction des trois piliers de la trinité qui contribuent à le construire. Cette dynamique prend son origine dans le sens conféré, par le discours politique,à la décision de recourir à la force. Ce sens politique repose sur les intérêts nationaux tels qu’appréhendés par les décideurs, mais également, du fait de la contrainte démocratique, sur les préférences de l’opinion publique telles que perçues par le politique. Le soutien public apparaît essentiel pour alimenter la volonté politique dans le conflit, mais influence aussi le moral des militaires déployés en opérations. Notre étude s’attache donc, en second lieu, à analyser les composantes du sens conféré par les militaires à la mission qu’ils exécutent, afin de déterminer dans quelle mesure un sens politique insuffisamment clair peut influencer le soutien public et, in fine, une éventuelle perte de sens chez les soldats. Cette analyse multiscalaire cherche en définitive à répondre à la question de savoir pourquoi l’on se bat, en approfondissant deux cas d’étude : la participation de l’Armée de terre française à la FIAS, en Afghanistan, et à la FINUL renforcée, au Liban. Elle peut s’inscrire, plus largement, dans le courant d’analyse cherchant à déterminer les facteurs d’efficacité dans la guerre, en esquissant l’idée que les démocraties peuvent, du fait des contraintes qui leur sont propres, présenter une faiblesse à cet égard. / Many studies have determined that democracies perform better in war. Through our analysis of the relationship that links the pillars of today’s clasewitzian trinity – political leaders, people and soldiers – our study seeks to highlight the importance, to this regard, of defining the « meaning of the action ». In spite of a complex conceptualization, this object can be apprehended by analyzing the interactions of the three pillars, within the frame of a military intervention abroad. This interactional dynamic’s origin lies in the meaning given by the political discourse to the decision to use force. This political meaning leans on national interests (as perceived by policymakers), but also on public preferences (as perceived by policymakers), due to democratic constraint. Public support appears essential to underpin the political will during a conflict, but it also affects soldiers’ morale in the field. Secondly, our study thus seeks to analyse the components of the meaning given by soldiers to their mission,in order to determine to what extent an uncleared or blurred political meaning might affect public support and ultimately provoke a loss of meaning among the military. This multiscale approach aims to answer to the ultimate question of knowing why are we fighting, by deepening two case studies : the French Army contribution to ISAF (in Afghanistan) and UNIFIL II (in Lebanon). It can more broadly come within the framework of previous researchs studying strategic and battlefield effectiveness, by underlying that democracies might have a weakness in this regard.

The present work aims at a discursive analysis of testimonies of ex-political prisoners of the era of military dictatorship in Brazil, specifically the state of Sergipe, with the intention of exploring resistance brands. To compose the study analyzed in relation to Milton Coelho and Wellington Mangueira, since they were names of extreme representation of the fight against the military dictatorship in Sergipe, experiencing a terrible experience of the prison and torture. This study has the theoretical basis of French Speech Discourse Analysis (DA), starting from the postulates of Pêcheux (1988), Althusser (1980), Orlandi (1996, 2007, 2008, 2009) and Carvalho (2012) and the contributions of Other scholars, both from DA, and the history of Brazil and Sergipe, an example of Napolitano (2014) and Dantas (2004). We understand discourse as a social practice that has as its materiality a language and is influenced by history and ideology, producing effects of meaning. To carry out analyzes, we will use a qualitative methodology, apply theoretical categories of DA and use as corpus reports found on websites, blogs and documentaries. As a result, in the speeches of Milton Coelho and Wellington Mangueira it was possible to perceive a contradiction of what was presented by the military, of not practicing torture, and also a resistance of the ex-prisoners, which is the same of the persecutions and tortures did not surrender their Comrades and kept up the fight for ideals by publishing newspapers circulating inside the university, counting what was vetoed in the newspapers of external circulation, meetings in hiding places and small groups to demonstrate discontent with the system. As the Ideological Formations (IF) of the dominant and the dominated became evident through the regulation of the State Repressive Apparatus (SRA). Throughout the account as linguistic clues they reveal the combat to a system that used by numerous methods to stop a subversive action. Significant silence figures through discursive formations (FD) the manifestations of resistance during persecution and torture, making it clear that even so of coercion, they continue to mean; Since silence does not represent the annulment of the senses, since the subject always means through the symbolic. / O presente trabalho objetiva uma análise discursiva de depoimentos de ex-presos políticos da época da ditadura militar no Brasil, especificamente do estado de Sergipe, com o intuito de explorar marcas de resistência, decorrentes de políticas de censura no período citado. Para compor o estudo serão analisados os relatos de Milton Coelho e Wellington Mangueira, uma vez que foram nomes de extrema representação da luta contra a ditadura militar em Sergipe, vivenciando a terrível experiência da prisão e tortura. Tal estudo tem como fundamentação teórica a Análise de Discurso de linha francesa (AD), partindo dos postulados de Pêcheux (1988), Althusser (1980), Orlandi (1996, 2007, 2008, 2009) e Carvalho (2012) e das contribuições de outros estudiosos, tanto da AD, quanto da história do Brasil e de Sergipe, a exemplo de Napolitano (2014) e Dantas (2004). Entendemos o discurso como uma prática social que tem como materialidade a língua e sofre a influência da história e da ideologia produzindo, assim, efeitos de sentido. Para proceder às análises, utilizaremos a metodologia qualitativa, aplicaremos categorias teóricas da AD e utilizaremos como corpus relatos encontrados em sites, blogs e documentários. Como resultado, nos discursos de Milton Coelho e Wellington Mangueira foi possível perceber a contradição do que foi veiculado pelos militares, de não haver prática de tortura, e também a resistência dos ex-presos, que mesmo diante das perseguições e torturas não entregaram seus companheiros e mantiveram a luta pelos ideais, através da publicação de jornais que circulavam dentro da universidade, contando o que era vetado nos jornais de circulação externa, reuniões às escondidas e em grandes ou pequenos grupos para demonstrar o descontentamento com o sistema. As Formações Ideológicas (FI) do dominador e dos dominados ficaram evidentes por meio da regulação do Aparelho Repressivo de Estado (ARE). Em todo o relato as pistas linguísticas revelam o combate a um sistema que se utilizava de inúmeros métodos para deter a ação “subversiva”. O silêncio significante figura por meio das Formações Discursivas (FD) presentes nas manifestações de resistência durante as perseguições e torturas, deixando evidente que, mesmo diante da coerção, eles continuaram significando; uma vez que o silenciar-se não representa anulação dos sentidos, visto que o sujeito sempre significará por meio do simbólico.

L’objectif de cette recherche en linguistique de corpus est d’appliquer, suivant les concepts et principes de la sémantique interprétative, une méthode d’analyse contrastive de textes pour l’apprentissage de la langue arabe, en utilisant l’outil de textométrie Lexico 3. Cette étude se base sur deux corpus : l’un de discours journalistiques (thème des révolutions arabes de 2011), et l’autre de discours politiques (de Gamal Abdel Nasser et Anouar Sadate). Nous posons l’hypothèse que, d’une part, la sémantique outillée permet de caractériser les orientations idéologiques et politiques des différents énonciateurs. D’autre part, nous supposons que les analyses permettront de proposer des pistes didactiques applicables dans le cadre d’un apprentissage de la langue arabe, et en particulier pour la compréhension et la production écrites.La première partie de cette étude présente la linguistique de corpus, situe et décrit la sémantique des textes dans les sciences du langage et expose quelques caractéristiques de la langue arabe. La deuxième partie présente nos analyses de textes journalistiques et politiques et met en évidence, les positions des journaux vis-à-vis des révolutions en Égypte et au Bahreïn et expose, les différences d’énonciation des deux présidents égyptiens sur les politiques conduites en Égypte et dans le monde arabe.La troisième et dernière partie présente le volet théorique et pratique de nos pistes didactiques. Elle ancre notre positionnement sur l’interdisciplinarité, en faisant appel au paradigme des "connaissances" (qui se distingue de la notion de "compétence") en didactique des langues. Cette partie décrit, enfin, l’expérimentation avec sept étudiants de langue arabe. Elle montre les difficultés et les apports de cette expérimentation et montre qu’il est possible de penser un processus de conscientisation vis-à-vis des données langagières, qui doit, en outre, marquer une rupture avec la simple transmission d’informations à l’apprenant. / The purpose of this research in corpus linguistics is to apply, in accordance with the concepts and principals of interpretive semantics, a method of contrastive analysis of texts for learning Arabic using the Textometry tool Lexico 3. It is based on two corpora: a journalistic discourse (from Arab revolutions of 2011), and political speeches (from Gamal Abdel Nasser and Anwar Sadat). We postulate that the Corpus Semantics allows us to characterize the ideological and political orientation of the different enunciators. Furthermore we assume that the study will provide practical didactic approaches in the context of learning the Arabic language, in particular for the understanding and writing learning.The first part of this study presents the Corpus Linguistics, situates and describes the Interpretive Semantics theory in the linguistics field and shows some characteristics of the Arabic language. The second part presents our analyses of journalistic and political texts, highlighting the stance of newspapers on the revolutions in Egypt and Bahrain and exposes the differences in articulation between two Egyptian presidents regarding their policies in Egypt and in the Arab world.The third and last part presents the theoretical and practical component of our educational tracks. It anchors our work on the interdisciplinarity by drawing on the paradigm of "knowledge" in language teaching (which is distinct from the notion of "competence"). This section describes the experiment with seven students of Arabic. It shows the difficulties and the benefits of this experiment and demonstrates that it is possible to think of a process of awareness in regards to the language data, which must, amongst other points, mark a break from the simple transmission of information to the learner.