The New Basel Capital Accord (Basel II) provides added emphasis to the development of portfolio credit risk models. An important regulatory change in Basel II is the differentiated treatment in measuring capital requirements for the corporate exposures and retail exposures. Basel II allows agricultural loans to be categorized and treated as the retail exposures. However, portfolio credit risk model for agricultural loans is still in their infancy. Most portfolio credit risk models being used have been developed for corporate exposures, and are not generally applicable to agricultural loan portfolio. The objective of this study is to develop a credit risk model for agricultural loan portfolios. The model developed in this study reflects characteristics of the agricultural sector, loans and borrowers and designed to be consistent with Basel II, including consideration given to forecasting accuracy and model applicability. This study conceptualizes a theory of loan default for farm borrowers. A theoretical model is developed based on the default theory with several assumptions to simplify the model. An annual default model is specified using FDIC state level data over the 1985 to 2003. Five state models covering Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, and Nebraska areestimated as a logistic function. Explanatory variables for the model are a three-year moving average of net cash income per acre from crops, net cash income per cwt from livestock, government payments per acre, the unemployment rate, and a trend. Net cash income generated by state reflects the five major commodities: corn, soybeans, wheat, fed cattle, and hogs. A simulation model is developed to generate the stochastic default rates by state over the 2004 to 2007 period, providing the probability of default and the loan loss distribution in a pro forma context that facilitates proactive decision making. The model also generates expected loan loss, VaR, and capital requirements. This study suggests two key conclusions helpful to future credit risk modeling efforts for agricultural loan portfolios: (1) net cash income is a significant leading indicator to default, and (2) the credit risk model should be segmented by commodity and geographical location.

In recent years many works employed the topic of the estimation of the asset value correlation from the portfolio of debtors and their properties. The results vary depending on the methods used or the data sets, on which the model was applied. The Master Thesis describes the methods of estimation of the asset value correlation from 5-year default performance of small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) debtors of Komercni Banka. Each method is firstly described in detail and then applied. Estimations of the asset value correlation are performed in rating and industrial homogeneous group. The conclusion contains a comparison of resulting capital with a former Basel correlation and the capital when our estimations of the asset correlation are used as a parameters. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

This study develops a dynamic importance sampling method (DIS) for numerical simulations of rare events. The DIS method is flexible, fast, and accurate. The most importance is that it is very easy to implement. It could be applied to any multifactor copula models, which conduct by arbitrary independent random variables. First, the key common factor (KCF) is determined by the maximum value among the coefficients of factor loadings. Second, searching the indicator by the order statistics and applying the truncated sampling techniques, the probability of large losses (PLL) and the expected excess loss above threshold (EELAT) can be estimated precisely. Except for the assumption that the factor loadings of KCF do not exit zero elements, we do not impose any restrictions on the composition of the portfolio. The DIS method developed in this study can therefore be applied to a very wide range of credit risk models. Comparison of the numerical experiment between the method of Glasserman, Kang and Shahabuddin (2008) and the DIS method developed in this study, under the multifactor Gaussian copula model and the high market impact condition (the factor loadings of marketwide factor of 0.8), both variance reduction ratio and efficient ratio of the DIS model are much better than that of Glasserman et al. (2008)¡¦s. And both results approximate when the factor loadings of marketwide factor decreases to the range of 0.5 to 0.25. However, the DIS method is superior to the method of Glasserman et al. (2008) in terms of the practicability. Numerical simulation results demonstrate that the DIS method is not only feasible to the general market conditions, but also particularly to the high market impact condition, especially in credit contagion or market collapse environments. It is also noted that the numerical results indicate that the DIS estimators exit bounded relative error.

When banks lend capital to counterparties they take on a risk, known as credit risk which traditionally has been the largest risk exposure for banks. To be protected against potential default losses when lending capital, banks must hold a regulatory capital that is based on a regulatory formula for calculating risk weighted assets (RWA). This formula is part of the Basel Accords and it is implemented in the legal system of all European Union member states. The key parameters of the RWA formula are probability of default, loss given default and asset correlation. Banks today have the option to estimate the probability of default and loss given default by internal models however the asset correlation must be determined by a formula provided by the legal framework. This project is a first approach for Handelsbanken to study what would happen if banks were allowed to estimate asset correlation by internal models. We assess two models for estimating the asset correlation of a portfolio of Small and Medium Enterprices (SME). The estimates are compared with the asset correlation given by the regulatory formula and with estimates for another parameter called default correlation. The models are validated using predicted historical data and Monte-Carlo Simulations. For the studied SME portfolio, the models give similar estimates for the asset correlations and the estimates are lower than those given by the regulatory formula. This would imply a lower capital requirement if banks were allowed to use internal models to estimate the asset correlation used in the RWA formula. Default correlation, if not used synonymously with asset correlation, is shown to be another measure and should not be used in the RWA formula. / När banker lånar ut kapital till motparter tar de en risk, mer känt som kreditrisk som traditionellt har varit den största risken för banker. För att skydda sig mot potentiella förluster vid utlåning måste banker ha ett reglerat kapital som bygger på en formel för beräkning av riskvägda tillgångar (RWA). Denna formel ingår i Basels regelverk och är implementerad i rättssystemet i alla EU-länder. De viktigaste parametrarna för RWA-formeln är sannolikheten att fallera, förlustgivet fallissemang och tillgångskorrelation. Bankerna har idag möjlighet att beräkna de två variablerna sannolikheten att fallera och förlustgivet fallissemang med interna modeller men tillgångskorrelation måste bestämmas med hjälp av en standardformel givet från regelverket. Detta projekt är ett första tillvägagångssätt för Handelsbanken att studera vad som skulle hända om banker fick beräkna tillgångskorrelation med interna modeller. Vi analyserar två modeller för att skatta tillgångskorrelation i en portfölj av Små och Medelstora Företag (SME). Uppskattningarna jämförs sedan med den tillgångskorrelation som ges av regelverket och jämförs även mot en parameter som kallas fallissemangskorrelation. Modellerna som används för att beräkna korrelationerna valideras med hjälp av estimerat data och Monte-Carlo Simuleringar. För den studerade SME portföljen ges liknande uppskattningar för de båda tillgångskorrelationsmodellerna, samt visar det sig att de är lägre än den korrelationen som ges av regelverket. Detta skulle innebära ett lägre kapitalkrav om bankerna fick använda sig av interna modeller för att estimera tillgångskorrelation som används i RWA-formeln. Om fallissemangskorrelation inte används synonymt till tillgångskorrelation, visar det sig att fallisemangskorrelation är en annan mätning än tillgångskorrelation och bör inte användas i RWA-formeln.

在因子模型下，損失分配函數的估算取決於混合型聯合違約分配。蒙地卡羅是一個經常使用的計算工具。然而，一般蒙地卡羅模擬是一個不具有效率的方法，特別是在稀有事件與複雜的債務違約模型的情形下，因此，找尋可以增進效率的方法變成了一件迫切的事。 對於這樣的問題，重點採樣法似乎是一個可以採用且吸引人的方法。透過改變抽樣的機率測度，重點採樣法使估計量變得更有效率，尤其是針對相對複雜的模型。因此，我們將應用重點採樣法來估計偏常態關聯結構模型的尾部機率。這篇論文包含兩個部分。Ⅰ：應用指數扭轉法---一個經常使用且為較佳的終點採樣技巧---於條件機率。然而，這樣的程序無法確保所得的估計量有足夠的變異縮減。此結果指出，對於因子在選擇重點採樣上，我們需要更進一步的考慮。Ⅱ：進一步應用重點採樣法於因子；在這樣的問題上，已經有相當多的方法在文獻中被提出。在這些文獻中，重點採樣的方法可大略區分成兩種策略。第一種策略主要在選擇一個最好的位移。最佳的位移值可透過操作不同的估計法來求得，這樣的策略出現在Glasserman等(1999)或Glasserman與Li (2005)。 第二種策略則如同在Capriotti (2008)中的一樣，則是考慮擁有許多參數的因子密度函數作為重點採樣的候選分配。透過解出非線性優化問題，就可確立一個未受限於位移的重點採樣分配。不過，這樣的方法在尋找最佳的參數當中，很容易引起另一個效率上的問題。為了要讓此法有效率，就必須在使用此法前，對參數的穩健估計上，投入更多的工作，這將造成問題更行複雜。 本文中，我們說明了另一種簡單且具有彈性的策略。這裡，我們所提的演算法不受限在如同Gaussian模型下決定最佳位移的作法，也不受限於因子分配函數參數的估計。透過Chiang, Yueh與Hsie (2007)文章中的主要概念，我們提供了重點採樣密度函數一個合理的推估並且找出了一個不同於使用隨機近似的演算法來加速模擬的進行。 最後，我們提供了一些單因子的理論的證明。對於多因子模型，我們也因此有了一個較有效率的估計演算法。我們利用一些數值結果來凸顯此法在效率上，是遠優於蒙地卡羅模擬。 / Under a factor model, computation of the loss density function relies on the estimates of some mixture of the joint default probability and joint survival probability. Monte Carlo simulation is among the most widely used computational tools in such estimation. Nevertheless, general Monte Carlo simulation is an ineffective simulation approach, in particular for rare event aspect and complex dependence between defaults of multiple obligors. So a method to increase efficiency of estimation is necessary. Importance sampling (IS) seems to be an attractive method to address this problem. Changing the measure of probabilities, IS makes an estimator to be efficient especially for complicated model. Therefore, we consider IS for estimation of tail probability of skew normal copula model. This paper consists of two parts. First, we apply exponential twist, a usual and better IS technique, to conditional probabilities and the factors. However, this procedure does not always guarantee enough variance reduction. Such result indicates the further consideration of choosing IS factor density. Faced with this problem, a variety of approaches has recently been proposed in the literature ( Capriotti 2008, Glasserman et al 1999, Glasserman and Li 2005). The better choices of IS density can be roughly classified into two kinds of strategies. The first strategy depends on choosing optimal shift. The optimal drift is decided by using different approximation methods. Such strategy is shown in Glasserman et al 1999, or Glasserman and Li 2005. The second strategy, as shown in Capriotti (2008), considers a family of factor probability densities which depend on a set of real parameters. By formulating in terms of a nonlinear optimization problem, IS density which is not limited the determination of drift is then determinate. The method that searches for the optimal parameters, however, incurs another efficiency problem. To keep the method efficient, particular care for robust parameters estimation needs to be taken in preliminary Monte Carlo simulation. This leads method to be more complicated. In this paper, we describe an alternative strategy that is straightforward and flexible enough to be applied in Monte Carlo setting. Indeed, our algorithm is not limited to the determination of optimal drift in Gaussian copula model, nor estimation of parameters of factor density. To exploit the similar concept developed for basket default swap valuation in Chiang, Yueh, and Hsie (2007), we provide a reasonable guess of the optimal sampling density and then establish a way different from stochastic approximation to speed up simulation. Finally, we provide theoretical support for single factor model and take this approach a step further to multifactor case. So we have a rough but fast approximation that execute entirely with Monte Carlo in general situation. We support our approach by some portfolio examples. Numerical results show that such algorithm is more efficient than general Monte Carlo simulation.

衡量投資組合的稀有事件時，即使稀有事件違約的機率極低，但是卻隱含著高額資產違約時所帶來的重大損失，所以我們必須要精準地評估稀有事件的信用風險。本研究係在估計信用損失分配的尾端機率，模擬的模型包含同質模型與異質模型；然而蒙地卡羅法雖然在風險管理的計算上相當實用，但是估計機率極小的尾端機率時模擬不夠穩定，因此為增進模擬的效率，我們利用Glasserman and Li (Management Science, 51(11),2005)提出的重點取樣法，以及根據Chiang et al. (Joural of Derivatives, 15(2),2007)重點取樣法為基礎做延伸的改良式重點取樣法，兩種方法來對不同的投資組合做模擬，更是將改良式重點取樣法推廣至異質模型做討論，本文亦透過變異數縮減效果來衡量兩種方法的模擬效率。數值結果顯示，比起傳統的蒙地卡羅法，此兩種方法皆能達到變異數縮減，其中在同質模型下的改良式重點取樣法有很好的表現，模擬時間相當省時，而異質模型下的重點取樣法也具有良好的估計效率及模擬的穩定性。 / When measuring portfolio credit risk of rare-event, even though its default probabilities are low, it causes significant losses resulting from a large number of default. Therefore, we have to measure portfolio credit risk of rare-event accurately. In particular, our goal is estimating the tail of loss distribution. Models we simulate are including homogeneous models and heterogeneous models. However, Monte Carlo simulation is useful and widely used computational tool in risk management, but it is unstable especially estimating small tail probabilities. Hence, in order to improve the efficiency of simulation, we use importance sampling proposed by Glasserman and Li (Management Science, 51(11),2005) and modified importance sampling based on importance sampling which proposed by Chiang et al. (2007 Joural of Derivatives, 15(2),). Simulate different portfolios by these two of simulations. On top of that, we extend and discuss the modified importance sampling simulation to heterogeneous model. In this article, we measure efficiency of two simulations by variance reduction. Numerical results show that proposed methods are better than Monte Carlo and achieve variance reduction. In homogeneous model, modified importance sampling has excellent efficiency of estimating and saves time. In heterogeneous model, importance sampling also has great efficiency of estimating and stability.

蒙地卡羅模擬是在組合信用風險的管理上相當實用的計算工具。衡量組合信用風險時，必須以適當的模型描述資產間的相依性。常態關聯結構是目前最廣為使用的模型，但實證研究認為 t 關聯結構更適合用於配適金融市場的資料。在本文中，我們採用 Bassamboo et al. (2008) 提出的極值相依模型建立 t 關聯結構用以捕捉資產之間的相關性。同時，為增進蒙地卡羅法之收斂速度，我們以 Chiang et al. (2007) 的重要性取樣法為基礎，將其拓展到極值相依模型下，並提出兩階段的重要性取樣技巧確保使用此方法估計一籃子信用違約時，所有模擬路徑均會發生信用事件。數值結果顯示，所提出的演算法皆達變異數縮減。而在模型自由度較低或是資產池較大的情況下，兩階段的重要性取樣法將會有更佳的估計效率。我們也以同樣的思路，提出用以估計投資組合損失機率的演算法。雖然所提出的演算法經過重要性取樣的技巧後仍無法使得欲估計的事件在所有模擬路徑下都會發生，但數值結果仍顯示所提出的方法估計效率遠遠優於傳統蒙地卡羅法。 / Monte Carlo simulation is a useful tool on portfolio credit risk management. When measuring portfolio credit risk, one should choose an appropriate model to characterize the dependence among all assets. Normal copula is the most widely used mechanism to capture this dependence structure, however, some emperical studies suggest that $t$-copula provides a better fit to market data than normal copula does. In this article, we use extremal depence model proposed by Bassamboo et al. (2008) to construct $t$-copula. We also extend the importance sampling (IS) procedure proposed by Chiang et al. (2007) to evaluate basket credit default swaps (BDS) with extremal dependence and introduce a two-step IS algorithm which ensures credit events always take place for every simulation path. Numerical results show that the proposed methods achieve variance reduction. If the model has lower degree of freedom, or the portfolio size is larger, the two-step IS method is more efficient. Following the same idea, we also propose algorithms to estimate the probability of portfolio losses. Althought the desired events may not occur for some simulations, even if the IS technique is applied, numerical results still show that the proposed method is much better than crude Monte Carlo.

獨立因子模型廣泛的應用在信用風險領域，此模型可用來估計經濟資本與投資組合的損失率分配。然而獨立因子模型假設因子獨立地服從同分配，因而可能會得到估計不精確的違約機率與資產相關係數。因此我們在本論文中提出序列相關因子模型來改進獨立因子模型的缺失，同時可以捕捉違約率的動態行為與授信戶間相關性。我們也分別從古典與貝氏的角度下估計序列相關因子模型。首先，我們在序列相關因子模型下利用貝氏的方法應用馬可夫鍊蒙地卡羅技巧估計違約機率與資產相關係數，使用標準普爾違約資料進行外樣本資料預測，能夠證明序列相關因子模型是比獨立因子模型合理。第二，蒙地卡羅期望最大法與蒙地卡羅最大概似法這兩種估計方法也使用在本篇論文。從模擬結果發現，若違約資料具有較大的序列相關與資產相關特性，蒙地卡羅最大概似法能夠配適的比蒙地卡羅期望最大法好。 / The independent factor model has been widely used in the credit risk field, and has been applied in estimating the economic capital allocations and loss rate distribution on a credit portfolio. However, this model assumes independent and identically distributed common factor which may produce inaccurate estimates of default probabilities and asset correlation. In this thesis, we address a serially dependent factor model (SDFM) to improve this phenomenon. This model can capture both dynamic behavior of default risk and dependence among individual obligors. We also address the estimation of the SDFM from both frequentist and Bayesian point of view. Firstly, we consider the Bayesian approach by applying Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques in estimating default probability and asset correlation under SDFM. The out-of-sample forecasting for S&P default data provide strong evidence to support that the SDFM is more reliable than the independent factor model. Secondly, we use two frequentist estimation methods to estimate the default probability and asset correlation under SDFM. One is Monte Carlo Expectation Maximization (MCEM) estimation method along with a Gibbs sampler and an acceptance method and the other is Monte Carlo maximum likelihood (MCML) estimation method with importance sampling techniques.