Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Erlangen, 1913. / Includes bibliographical references (p. [6-7]).

Face aux limites d’un modèle social fondé sur la propriété absolue, l’usufruit, défini comme un droit de jouissance temporaire sur la chose d’autrui, apparaît aujourd’hui comme un outil fondamentalement utile. C’est aussi un droit en pleine expansion, comme en témoigne la diversification croissante de ses applications. Le quasi-usufruit, l’usufruit successif, l’usufruit temporaire, conditionnel, éventuel mais aussi l’usufruit des créances, des droits sociaux, des droits de propriété intellectuelle ou des universalités de fait sont autant d’exemples d’un usufruit que l’on peut dire « atypique » en raison de ses particularismes de régime. Ce sont ces mécanismes que la présente étude se propose d’étudier. Plus précisément, il s’agit de déterminer si les usufruits spéciaux peuvent ou non se concilier avec le modèle classique de l’usufruit, autrement dit, si une définition et un régime communs demeurent possibles. La démarche suppose alors de trancher la controverse toujours vive de la définition de l’usufruit en un démembrement de la propriété, et, ce faisant, d’apporter des solutions aux insuffisances bien connues des règles classiques de l’usufruit, telles que l’absence de relations personnelles entre les parties, et de manière générale, leur séparation trop stricte dans l’exercice de l’usufruit. De ce point de vue, la réflexion sur les usufruits atypiques crée l’occasion de repenser l’institution entière, et apparaît comme la source d’un potentiel renouvellement. / In the face of the limits of a social model organization based on absolute property rights, the right of usufruct (usufruit), which can be defined as a temporary right of use on another individual’s property, appears nowadays as fundamental tool. Usufruct is also a thriving tool, as evidenced by the growing diversification of its implementations. In this regard, the rise of atypical forms of usufruct – usufruct rights that differ substantially from the traditional form and regime of usufruct – is particularly striking. Quasi-usufruct (also known as irregular usufruct), successive usufruct, temporary, conditional or potential usufruct, as well as usufruct on debts, shares, and intellectual property rights are just examples of this booming phenomenon. They are the subject of this research. More precisely, this research seeks to determine whether such atypical rights of usufruct may be accommodated to the more traditional form of usufruct. In other word, the question is whether a characterization and legal regime common to both traditional and atypical forms of usufruct can be achieved. Therefore, this study aims at resolving past debates over the characterization of usufruct as a breaking-up of property rights and at providing remedies to the well-known insufficiencies in the traditional legal framework of usufruct rights, such as the absence of interpersonal relations between the parties, and more generally, their strict dissociation in the actual exercise of the usufruct right. In this perspective, this research on the atypical forms of usufruct is the occasion to fully rethink this legal institution, and opens the way for its prospective renewal.

Det fastighetsrättsliga rättsområdet är stort och innefattar bland annat upplåtelse avnyttjanderätter. Dessa rättigheter kan vara av olika karaktär och uppkommit på olikasätt men det gemensamma för alla nyttjanderätterna är att det grundas på avtal samtär begränsade i tid. Resurser som finns i begränsad om fattning, exempelvis mark,ger upphov till tvisterna och missnöje mellan avtalsparterna, vilket även gällernyttjanderätter. För att minska tvisterna kan en lösning vara attnyttjanderättslagstiftningen i Jordabalken ses över och moderniseras. Studiens syfte är att undersöka vilka tvister som uppstår på grund avnyttjanderättslagstiftningen samt hur tvisterna hanteras av rättsväsendet.Frågeställningarna har besvarats med relevant information som inhämtats genomanvändandet av flera metoder. Litteratur från ett flertal informationskällorbehandlades och de uppmärksammar definitionerna av nyttjanderätt i Sverigerespektive Norge samt den historiska bakgrunden till nyttjanderättslagstiftningarna.Det genomfördes en analys och jämförelse av lagstiftningarna för att identifiera vadde respektive nyttjanderättslösningarna innefattar och behandlar. Intervjuer medsakkunniga genomfördes även och genom den metoden inhämtades information vadrespondenterna anser vara det tvistiga, sämre och bra med nyttjanderättstyperna. Resultatet visar att de vanligaste tvisterna vid nyttjanderätter är vad avgiften ska varaoch hyresgästens rätt till förlängning. Vidare visar resultatet att den svenskanyttjanderättslagstiftningen är svår att förstå för gemeneman. Slutsatsen av detresulterar i ett förslag att göra lagstiftningen mer pedagogiskt skriven för att göraden mer lättförstådd och minska risken att de allmänna delarna glöms bort. / The field of real estate law is large and includes, among other things, the granting ofrights of use. These rights can be of a different character and arise in different ways,but the common denominator for all usufruct is that they are based on agreementsand are limited in time. Resources that are limited in scope, such as land, give riseto disputes and dissatisfaction between the parties to the agreement, which alsoapplies to rights of use. To reduce disputes, a solution may be to review andmodernize the usufruct in the code of land law. The purpose of the study is to investigate which disputes arise due to usufructlegislation and how the disputes are handled by the judiciary. The questions havebeen answered with relevant information obtained through the use of severalmethods. The literature from a number of sources was analysed and they drawattention to the definitions of rights of use in Sweden and Norway, as well as thehistorical background to the usufruct legislation. An analysis and comparison of thelaws was carried out to identify what the respective usufruct solutions include.Interviews with experts were also conducted and through that method informationwas obtained on what the respondents consider to be the contentious, inferior andgood aspects of the rights of use.  The result evinced that the most common disputes regarding usufruct are what thefee should be and the tenant's right to extension. Furthermore, the results show thatSwedish usufruct law is difficult for ordinary people to understand. The conclusionof that results in a proposal to make the law more pedagogically written in order tomake it easier to understand and reduce the risk of the general parts being forgotten.

Confessions of a Forager is a chronicle of Lauren Hudgins's adventures and mistakes while searching and eating wild food, and a questioning her vegetarian morals. Readers visit organized foraging projects through the Wild Food Adventures of expert John Kallas, the Mushroom Gathering at Breitenbush hot springs, and the Portland Fruit Tree Project, which turns a wasted bounty into an opportunity for public nourishment. Memoir sections of the thesis examine how food-related habits are passed down from parent to child, exploring the family's foraging history through perspective of the author's father. It is also a consideration of the community and personal relationships formed over noncommercial, hand-harvested food.

<p>Detta examensarbetes syfte är att fördjupa våra kunskaper om ledningsrätt och alternativa upplåtelseformer för ledningar samt att undersöka hur dessa används i praktiken. Inledningsvis redovisas de olika upplåtelseformerna: servitut, ledningsrätt och olika typer av nyttjanderätter. Servitut och ledningsrätt är upplåtelseformer som är obegränsade i tid, medan nyttjanderättsupplåtelserna lägenhetsarrende, anläggningsarrende och annan nyttjanderätt är begränsade på kortare eller längre tid. Denna del avslutas med en enkel skiss över de olika formernas för- och nackdelar ur ett mark- respektive ledningsägarperspektiv. Därefter följer en del som behandlar vilka intressen som bevakas samt vilka upplåtelseformer som föredras av olika intressenter. Denna del är baserad på intervjuer med nio företrädare för olika bolag och förvaltningar med verksamhet i Göteborg. Här redovisas även en del av de avtal som finns i dagsläget. Vid intervjuerna framkom att ledningsägare är intresserade av att få långvarigt skydd till låg ersättning och därför ur den synvinkeln ser ledningsrätt som en önskvärd upplåtelseform. Denna form används dock mycket sällan inom kommunalägd mark i Göteborg då företagen vill undvika tvångsåtgärder och kommunen generellt sett är negativt inställd till att låsa upp mark genom att den belastas med rättigheter som är obegränsade i tid. Kommunen erbjuder sig istället att upprätta nyttjanderättsavtal. Hur dessa sedan utformas är en förhandlingsfråga som avgörs från fall till fall. Även om avtal i stor utsträckning har kunnat upprättas är de i samtliga fall kompromisser. I enstaka fall har inte ens avtal kunnat upprättas då parternas intressen står för långt ifrån varandra. Vår slutsats är därför att vi ser ett behov av en förändrad lagstiftning. Det saknas ett mellanting mellan nyttjanderättsavtal, helt baserade på frivillighet, och ledningsrätt som i sin nuvarande form är problematisk eftersom den ger fördelar för den ena parten på den andras bekostnad.</p> / <p>The aim of this thesis is to expand our knowledge of way-leave and other forms of tenures for conduits and to study how they are adopted in practice. By way of introduction the various forms of tenures; easement, way-leave and different types of usufructs are described. Easement and way-leave are forms of tenures not limited in time, whereas usufructs as leaseholds are limited to longer or shorter periods. This part of the thesis is concluded by a short summary describing the advantages and disadvantages of the different forms of tenure seen from the perspective of the landowner and that of the owner of the conduit. This is followed by a part showing which interests are guarded by the different parties and which form of tenure they prefer. This part is based on interviews with nine representatives from different companies and committees in Gothenburg. Some of the agreements that are in use are also described. During the interviews it became clear that the owner of the conduits main interests lie in reaching agreements that guarantee a long term legal protection at a low-cost and thus they see the advantages of way-leave. Despite this, way-leave is seldom used regarding land owned by the City of Gothenburg since the companies prefer to avoid tenure with compulsory elements. Furthermore the municipality is generally negative towards locking land by allowing rights unlimited in time. The municipality offers usufruct agreements as an alternative. How those are worked out in detail is negotiable and differs from case to case. Even though agreements are often reached they are always compromises. In some exceptional cases agreements have not been established as the parties have been too far apart. Therefore we have come to the conclusion that there is a need for new legislation. There is presently no cross between usufructs, wholly based on voluntary agreements, and way-leave which, in its present form, is problematic since it gives advantages to one on the expense of the other.</p>

Detta examensarbetes syfte är att fördjupa våra kunskaper om ledningsrätt och alternativa upplåtelseformer för ledningar samt att undersöka hur dessa används i praktiken. Inledningsvis redovisas de olika upplåtelseformerna: servitut, ledningsrätt och olika typer av nyttjanderätter. Servitut och ledningsrätt är upplåtelseformer som är obegränsade i tid, medan nyttjanderättsupplåtelserna lägenhetsarrende, anläggningsarrende och annan nyttjanderätt är begränsade på kortare eller längre tid. Denna del avslutas med en enkel skiss över de olika formernas för- och nackdelar ur ett mark- respektive ledningsägarperspektiv. Därefter följer en del som behandlar vilka intressen som bevakas samt vilka upplåtelseformer som föredras av olika intressenter. Denna del är baserad på intervjuer med nio företrädare för olika bolag och förvaltningar med verksamhet i Göteborg. Här redovisas även en del av de avtal som finns i dagsläget. Vid intervjuerna framkom att ledningsägare är intresserade av att få långvarigt skydd till låg ersättning och därför ur den synvinkeln ser ledningsrätt som en önskvärd upplåtelseform. Denna form används dock mycket sällan inom kommunalägd mark i Göteborg då företagen vill undvika tvångsåtgärder och kommunen generellt sett är negativt inställd till att låsa upp mark genom att den belastas med rättigheter som är obegränsade i tid. Kommunen erbjuder sig istället att upprätta nyttjanderättsavtal. Hur dessa sedan utformas är en förhandlingsfråga som avgörs från fall till fall. Även om avtal i stor utsträckning har kunnat upprättas är de i samtliga fall kompromisser. I enstaka fall har inte ens avtal kunnat upprättas då parternas intressen står för långt ifrån varandra. Vår slutsats är därför att vi ser ett behov av en förändrad lagstiftning. Det saknas ett mellanting mellan nyttjanderättsavtal, helt baserade på frivillighet, och ledningsrätt som i sin nuvarande form är problematisk eftersom den ger fördelar för den ena parten på den andras bekostnad. / The aim of this thesis is to expand our knowledge of way-leave and other forms of tenures for conduits and to study how they are adopted in practice. By way of introduction the various forms of tenures; easement, way-leave and different types of usufructs are described. Easement and way-leave are forms of tenures not limited in time, whereas usufructs as leaseholds are limited to longer or shorter periods. This part of the thesis is concluded by a short summary describing the advantages and disadvantages of the different forms of tenure seen from the perspective of the landowner and that of the owner of the conduit. This is followed by a part showing which interests are guarded by the different parties and which form of tenure they prefer. This part is based on interviews with nine representatives from different companies and committees in Gothenburg. Some of the agreements that are in use are also described. During the interviews it became clear that the owner of the conduits main interests lie in reaching agreements that guarantee a long term legal protection at a low-cost and thus they see the advantages of way-leave. Despite this, way-leave is seldom used regarding land owned by the City of Gothenburg since the companies prefer to avoid tenure with compulsory elements. Furthermore the municipality is generally negative towards locking land by allowing rights unlimited in time. The municipality offers usufruct agreements as an alternative. How those are worked out in detail is negotiable and differs from case to case. Even though agreements are often reached they are always compromises. In some exceptional cases agreements have not been established as the parties have been too far apart. Therefore we have come to the conclusion that there is a need for new legislation. There is presently no cross between usufructs, wholly based on voluntary agreements, and way-leave which, in its present form, is problematic since it gives advantages to one on the expense of the other.

Thesis (doctoral)--Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 2009. / Thesis documentation sheet inserted. Includes appendix with reprints of two published papers and two manuscripts, three of which are co-authored with others. Includes bibliographical references. Issued also electronically via World Wide Web in PDF format; online version lacks appendix.

Les personnes publiques ne sont pas propriétaires de tous les biens qu’elles utilisent. Elles louent ou empruntent souvent les biens nécessaires à l’exercice de leurs missions. L’utilisation du bien d’autrui n’est plus envisagée comme la solution par défaut qu’elle fut longtemps. A cette fin, les personnes publiques optent pour des procédés juridiques multiples. Titulaires de la capacité à contracter, elles concluent des baux civils ou commerciaux, des prêts à usage ou des usufruits conventionnels. Elles peuvent également recourir à des procédés de droit public, tels que les marchés publics de fournitures ou les marchés de partenariat. Enfin, certains mécanismes non-conventionnels permettent également cette déconnexion entre l’usage et la propriété. En vertu d’une prérogative de puissance publique particulièrement exorbitante, l’administration est habilitée à capter unilatéralement un droit d’usage dans le patrimoine d’autrui, via son pouvoir de réquisition, par exemple. L’aptitude unique de l’administration à jouer ainsi sur plusieurs tableaux est la marque de son irréductible spécificité.L’utilisation du bien d’autrui par une personne publique est en principe le support d’une mission ou d’une tâche d’intérêt général. Pour cette raison, son exécution doit respecter les nécessités de l’action publique, ensemble de principes et exigences juridiques qui impliquent que les activités administratives soient mises en œuvre de manière efficace et sans interruption, à l’aide de moyens adaptés et dans de bonnes conditions financières. A cet égard, l’utilisation du bien d’autrui présente des atouts dont l’exercice du droit de propriété est dépourvu, au moins dans deux circonstances. Les besoins de courte durée, qu’ils soient ponctuels ou discontinus, sont mieux assouvis par la location, le prêt à usage, ou la réquisition, que par l’acquisition d’un bien. La même remarque s’applique, avec quelques nuances, à la satisfaction des besoins complexes de l’administration. Mais la difficile adaptation à l’évolution des besoins et la précarité qui caractérise un nombre important de ces techniques juridiques présente le risque d’une certaine perte de maîtrise, qui peut mettre à mal la continuité, la mutabilité, la « qualité » et la « performance » du service public auquel le bien loué est affecté. Dès lors, le droit public est appelé à réagir. Un régime juridique unifié pourrait être appliqué à l’ensemble des biens utilisés par l’administration, quel qu’en soit le propriétaire, dans le cadre de la mise en œuvre d’une activité de service public. Ces règles s’attacheraient à rendre l’utilisation inviolable, abstraction faite de l’instrument juridique qui fonde l’exercice du droit d’usage ou de jouissance par la personne publique. / Public entities do not own all the goods they use. They often rent or borrow the assets necessary for the performance of their missions. The use of the property of others is no longer considered as the default solution that it was for a long time. To this end, public entities opt for multiple legal processes. Holders of the capacity to contract, they conclude civil or commercial leases, loans or conventional usufruct. They may also use public law procedures, such as public supply contracts or partnership contracts. Finally, some non-conventional mechanisms also allow this disconnection between use and ownership. By virtue of a particularly exorbitant prerogative of public power, the administration is empowered to unilaterally capture a right of use in the patrimony of others, for example, by its power of requisition. The unique ability of the administration to play thus on several tables is the mark of its irreducible specificity.The use of the property of others by a public person is in principle the support of a mission or task of general interest. For this reason, its execution must respect the requirements of public action, a set of principles and legal requirements which imply that administrative activities must be carried out efficiently and without interruption, using appropriate and appropriate means financial conditions. In this respect, the use of the property of others presents assets whose exercise of the right of ownership is devoid, at least in two circumstances. Short-term needs, whether they are punctual or discontinuous, are better satisfied by renting, using loans, or requisitioning than by acquiring property. The same remark applies, with some nuances, to the satisfaction of the complex needs of the administration. But the difficult adaptation to changing needs and the precariousness that characterizes a large number of these legal techniques presents the risk of a certain loss of control, which can undermine continuity, mutability, "quality" and Performance "of the public service to which the leased asset is assigned. Consequently, public law is called upon to react. A unified legal regime could be applied to all property used by the administration, whatever its owner, in the context of the implementation of a public service activity. These rules would aim at making the use inviolable, apart from the legal instrument on which the exercise of the right of use or enjoyment by the public person is based.

A família sofreu, no século passado, séc. XX diversas mudanças. As próprias relações mudaram: industrialização e urbanização aceleradas, emancipação da mulher, duas Guerras Mundiais que alavancaram o tema dos direitos humanos, com evidente repercussão nos direitos da personalidade. Tudo isso alterou o perfil da família e das relações que ocorrem em seu seio. Na verdade, estabeleceu-se uma perspectiva limitadora do poder em geral, da ascendência sobre outrem, inclusive no âmbito do pátrio poder, hoje poder familiar. Sem embargo disso, passada a euforia inicial, é hora de buscar caminhos para a plena efetivação desses direitos. Isso dependerá, em grande medida, da própria interpretação judicial, já que na decisão jurisdicional o ordenamento convertido numa fórmula específica para a solução daquela lide atinge o seu ápice. Se a afetividade e a grita por justiça e ética nas relações familiares é inafastável, mais do que isso, é louvável, porque consagra a dignidade da pessoa humana, por outro lado, a ideologia e a patrulha moral em temas existenciais devem ser evitadas. Ativismo judicial não se confunde com invasividade. A intrujice do Estado na família pela função legislativa, executiva ou judiciária deve incentivar um repensar das próprias expectativas que os operadores do Direito, sobretudo do Direito de Família, possuem a respeito do potencial transformativo de seus saberes. Assim, sempre buscando o justo termo, a dissertação examina as hipóteses de intervenção judicial no exercício abusivo do poder familiar, tanto na dimensão patrimonial quanto na dimensão existencial. Na primeira, analisa-se a administração dos bens dos filhos, o usufruto que, por lei, lhe é correlato e sua interpretação à luz do princípio do melhor interesse da criança e do adolescente. Na segunda, o objeto da investigação é o ponto ótimo de equilíbrio entre a intervenção que concretiza os direitos e a intervenção invasiva, errônea. Surgem ponderações sobre a ideologia e sua influência na exegese judicial, em temas como alienação parental e abandono afetivo que habitam o novo léxico deste Direito de Família sequioso de substância o qual, entretanto, não pode abdicar de uma postura autocrítica sob pena de manietar as próprias possibilidades de realização pessoal que alega defender. / Family underwent several changes in the last century, the twentieth century. The very relationships did change: accelerated (rapid) industrialization and urbanization, women´s emancipation, two World Wars, levered the human rights subject, with obvious repercussion on the rights of personality. All of that has modified family profile and the relationships that occur within its core. Actually, in general, a limiting perspective of power was established on the ascendancy over the other, inclusively in the extent of parental power, currently said family, or parental authority. With no embargo of this, after leaving behind the initial euphoria, now is the moment to look for ways towards the thorough accomplishment of these rights. This will depend, largely, on the judicial interpretation, for in the jurisdictional decision converted into a specific formula aimed at the solution of that dispute, it reaches its climax. If, on one hand, affectivity and the outcry for justice and ethics within family relationships cannot be set apart, and, more than that, they are praiseworthy - for they consecrate dignity of the individual - on the other hand, when it comes to existential matters, ideology and moral patrolling ought to be avoided. Judicial activism does not confound with invasiveness. State intrusion on family through legislative, or executive, or judiciary activity, should encourage a review of the very expectations that Law operating professionals have particularly those in the Family Law field regarding the transformational potential of their knowledge. Therefore, looking always for the right boundary, the dissertation investigates the hypotheses for judicial intervening in abusive family authority, considering not only property dimension, but also the existential. On the first we analyze the administration of assets of sons, the usufruct that by force of law correlates to it, and its interpretation in the light of best interest for child and adolescent. On the second, the object of our investigation is the optimal balance point between intervention that makes rights concrete, and the invasive, erroneous interference. We ponder over ideology and its influence on the judicial exegesis, in subjects such as parental alienation and affective abandonment, which dwell in this Family Law new lexicon, avid for substance, but which, however, cannot waive from a self-criticism posture, under penalty of handcuffing the very own possibilities of personal fulfillment it alleges to defend.

A família sofreu, no século passado, séc. XX diversas mudanças. As próprias relações mudaram: industrialização e urbanização aceleradas, emancipação da mulher, duas Guerras Mundiais que alavancaram o tema dos direitos humanos, com evidente repercussão nos direitos da personalidade. Tudo isso alterou o perfil da família e das relações que ocorrem em seu seio. Na verdade, estabeleceu-se uma perspectiva limitadora do poder em geral, da ascendência sobre outrem, inclusive no âmbito do pátrio poder, hoje poder familiar. Sem embargo disso, passada a euforia inicial, é hora de buscar caminhos para a plena efetivação desses direitos. Isso dependerá, em grande medida, da própria interpretação judicial, já que na decisão jurisdicional o ordenamento convertido numa fórmula específica para a solução daquela lide atinge o seu ápice. Se a afetividade e a grita por justiça e ética nas relações familiares é inafastável, mais do que isso, é louvável, porque consagra a dignidade da pessoa humana, por outro lado, a ideologia e a patrulha moral em temas existenciais devem ser evitadas. Ativismo judicial não se confunde com invasividade. A intrujice do Estado na família pela função legislativa, executiva ou judiciária deve incentivar um repensar das próprias expectativas que os operadores do Direito, sobretudo do Direito de Família, possuem a respeito do potencial transformativo de seus saberes. Assim, sempre buscando o justo termo, a dissertação examina as hipóteses de intervenção judicial no exercício abusivo do poder familiar, tanto na dimensão patrimonial quanto na dimensão existencial. Na primeira, analisa-se a administração dos bens dos filhos, o usufruto que, por lei, lhe é correlato e sua interpretação à luz do princípio do melhor interesse da criança e do adolescente. Na segunda, o objeto da investigação é o ponto ótimo de equilíbrio entre a intervenção que concretiza os direitos e a intervenção invasiva, errônea. Surgem ponderações sobre a ideologia e sua influência na exegese judicial, em temas como alienação parental e abandono afetivo que habitam o novo léxico deste Direito de Família sequioso de substância o qual, entretanto, não pode abdicar de uma postura autocrítica sob pena de manietar as próprias possibilidades de realização pessoal que alega defender. / Family underwent several changes in the last century, the twentieth century. The very relationships did change: accelerated (rapid) industrialization and urbanization, women´s emancipation, two World Wars, levered the human rights subject, with obvious repercussion on the rights of personality. All of that has modified family profile and the relationships that occur within its core. Actually, in general, a limiting perspective of power was established on the ascendancy over the other, inclusively in the extent of parental power, currently said family, or parental authority. With no embargo of this, after leaving behind the initial euphoria, now is the moment to look for ways towards the thorough accomplishment of these rights. This will depend, largely, on the judicial interpretation, for in the jurisdictional decision converted into a specific formula aimed at the solution of that dispute, it reaches its climax. If, on one hand, affectivity and the outcry for justice and ethics within family relationships cannot be set apart, and, more than that, they are praiseworthy - for they consecrate dignity of the individual - on the other hand, when it comes to existential matters, ideology and moral patrolling ought to be avoided. Judicial activism does not confound with invasiveness. State intrusion on family through legislative, or executive, or judiciary activity, should encourage a review of the very expectations that Law operating professionals have particularly those in the Family Law field regarding the transformational potential of their knowledge. Therefore, looking always for the right boundary, the dissertation investigates the hypotheses for judicial intervening in abusive family authority, considering not only property dimension, but also the existential. On the first we analyze the administration of assets of sons, the usufruct that by force of law correlates to it, and its interpretation in the light of best interest for child and adolescent. On the second, the object of our investigation is the optimal balance point between intervention that makes rights concrete, and the invasive, erroneous interference. We ponder over ideology and its influence on the judicial exegesis, in subjects such as parental alienation and affective abandonment, which dwell in this Family Law new lexicon, avid for substance, but which, however, cannot waive from a self-criticism posture, under penalty of handcuffing the very own possibilities of personal fulfillment it alleges to defend.