This study explores the Impact of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) on internal control effectiveness in preventing and detecting fraud within the financial sector of a developing economy - Nigeria. Using a triangulation of questionnaire and interview techniques to investigate the internal control activities of Nigerian Internal Auditors in relation to their use of ICT in fraud prevention and detection, the study made use of cross-tabulations, correlation coefficients and one-way ANOVAs for the analysis of quantitative data, while thematic analysis was adopted for the qualitative aspects. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Omoteso et al.'s Three-Layered Model (TLM) were used to underpin the study in order to provide theoretical considerations of the issues involved. The study's findings show that Nigerian Internal Auditors are increasingly adopting IT-based tools and techniques in their internal control activities. Secondly, the use of ICT-based tools and techniques in internal control positively impacts on Internal Auditors' independence and objectivity. Also, the study's findings indicate that Internal Auditors' use of ICT-based tools and techniques has the potential of preventing electronic fraud, and such ICT-based tools and techniques are effective in detecting electronic fraud. However, continuous online auditing was found to be effective in preventing fraud, but not suited for fraud detection in financial businesses. This exploratory study sheds light on the impact of ICT usage on internal control's effectiveness and on internal auditors' independence. The study contributes to the debate on the significance of ICT adoption in accounting disciplines by identifying perceived benefits, organisational readiness, trust and external pressure as variables that could affect Internal Auditors' use of ICT. Above all, this research was able to produce a new model: the Technology Effectiveness Planning and Evaluation Model (TEPEM), for the study of ICT adoption in internal control effectiveness for prevention and detection of fraud. As a result of its planning capability for external contingencies, the model is useful for the explanation of studies involving ICT in a unique macro environment of developing economies such as Nigeria, where electricity generation is in short supply and regulatory activities unpredictable. The model proposes that technology effectiveness (in the prevention and the detection of fraud) is a function of TAM variables (such as perceived benefits, organisational readiness, trust, external pressures), contingent factors (size of organisation, set-up and maintenance cost, staff training and infrastructural readiness), and an optimal mix of human and technological capabilities

The current reform of audit was introduced in 2010, which would mean that small limited firms in Sweden have the right to choose if they want to conduct an audit. The purpose of this study is to examine the expectations of smaller limited companies in Sweden have on conducting an audit. By examining these expectations, the essay also studies the companies’ perceptions of the auditor’s role and what kind of tasks they perceive to be included in the auditor’s role. In accordance with the study’s empirical results, the smaller limited companies are satisfied with their auditor’s work. The auditor’s role is perceived mainly as positive and to include tasks that are related to the firms’ financial area. This study has also shown that smaller limited firms in Sweden do consider audit to be important, which is why they use an auditor even with regard to the current reform that exempts them from this obligation.

As responsabilidades que envolvem a atividade do auditor é um assunto muito debatido, principalmente em episódios de fraudes e outros escândalos financeiros. Em geral, são nesses momentos que a função do auditor é questionada, e o mercado atribui determinadas responsabilidades a esses profissionais que podem não corresponder com as suas atribuições (Audit Expectation Gap - AEG). Porter (1990) dividiu o AEG em dois principais componentes: (i) Gap de Desempenho e (ii) Gap de Razoabilidade. O último refere-se à diferença de expectativas sobre as quais os usuários das informações financeiras acham que os auditores devem executar determinada tarefa quando de fato eles não têm a obrigação nem o objetivo de fazê-la. Utilizando o constructo de Porter (1990), este trabalho teve como objetivo identificar a existência do AEG de razoabilidade nas decisões de litígios (acórdãos) nos quais as empresas de auditoria figuram como polo passivo. A intenção foi verificar se a diferença de expectativas com relação ao trabalho do auditor fez-se presente nos documentos de conclusão dos processos cíveis e administrativos. Para tanto, foram analisados: 11 acórdãos de processos cíveis, 19 acórdãos de processos administrativos CVM e 4 acórdãos de processos administrativos Bacen, totalizando 34 acórdãos. A metodologia empregada foi a análise documental e análise de conteúdo. Para auxiliar na organização e análise dos dados, foi utilizado o software Nvivo®. Além da análise dos acórdãos, foram realizadas entrevistas com ex-membros do Colegiado da CVM, para confirmar o entendimento de como funcionam os processos de julgamento nesse Regulador, bem como obter a perspectiva desses profissionais diretamente envolvidos em julgamentos dessa espécie. Para o total dos acórdãos analisados, foi identificada a presença de AEG de razoabilidade em 10 casos, o que representa aproximadamente 29% do total. Além da identificação AEG de razoabilidade nas argumentações dos juízes, o gap também foi identificado, de forma muito mais frequente, em diversos trechos dos documentos analisados, como, por exemplo, as argumentações da acusação e advogados envolvidos. Os achados desta pesquisa foram importantes pois a identificação da existência desse gap pôde auxiliar no endereçamento desta questão. A tomada de decisão com base em argumentos equivocados pode não apenas trazer prejuízos para as firmas de auditoria, mas também para o Sistema Financeiro Nacional e setor financeiro empresarial em geral, bem como ocasionar injustiças. Como uma das formas de endereçamento do problema, nos casos dos processos administrativos, sugere-se que a composição do Colegiado e do CRSFN seja diversificada, ou mesmo que tenha a presença de um especialista para casos de julgamentos específicos, como são os casos dos julgamentos que envolvem o auditor independente. / The responsibilities entailed in the work of the auditor are a subject of much debate, chiefly when frauds and other financial scandals occur. Frequently on these occasions the function of the auditor comes into question and the business world attributes certain responsibilities to these professionals that they may not actually have (Audit Expectation Gap - AEG). The author Porter B. A. (1990) separated AEG into two main components: (i) the performance gap, and (ii) the reasonableness gap. The latter refers to the difference between the expectations of users of financial information regarding the specific tasks they believe auditors should perform and the obligations and objectives those auditors actually have. Using the construct of Porter B. A. (1990), this work has the objective of identifying the existence of the reasonableness gap in legal rulings (decisions of appellate courts) in which audit firms were the defendant. The intention was to establish if the difference in expectations regarding the work of the auditor was present in the decisions and opinions of the civil and administrative proceedings. In order to do so, an analysis was made of 11 civil appellate court decisions, 19 administrative rulings of the Comissão de Valores Mobiliários - CVM (equivalent to the Securities and Exchange Commission in the USA) and four administrative rulings of Brazilian Central Bank; 34 judgments in all. The methodology employed was document analysis and content analysis. To aid in the organization and analysis of data, Nvivo® software was used. In addition to analysis of the judgments, interviews were conducted with former members of the CVM board to confirm the understanding of how trial procedures function at this regulator, as well as to gain the perspective of these experts, who are directly involved in judgments of this kind. From the total of the judgments analyzed, the presence of reasonableness AEG was identified in 10 cases, which represents approximately 29% of the total. In addition to identifying reasonableness AEG in the arguments of judges, this gap was also identified, and much more frequently, in various passages of the documentation on the argumentation of attorneys involved in the cases. The findings of this study are important because identifying the existence of this gap may aid in addressing the issue. Rulings based on misguided arguments can not only harm audit firms but also damage the National Financial System and the corporate financial sector in general, as well as causing injustice. As one way of addressing the issue, in administrative cases it is suggested that the composition of the panel and the CRSFN (Council of Appeals of the National Finance System) be made more diverse, and in certain cases even include a specialist, such as when judgments involve an independent auditor.

Bakgrund I juli 2018 förväntas Revisorsinspektionens förslag gällande ett förmildrande av de formella kraven på utbildningen för revisorer att träda i kraft. Företagsrepresentanter har en uppfattning om de faktiska kunskaper som revisorn besitter och saknar. Genom att få en insikt i revisorns kunskaper skapas en förståelse som kan ge mervärde vid utformning av revisorns utbildning. Syfte Syftet med studien är att skapa förståelse för företagsrepresentanters uppfattningar om revision med fokus på revisorns kunskaper och utbildning. Metod Studien har ett deduktivt angreppssätt med induktiva inslag. Kvalitativa data har inhämtats genom 20 semistrukturerade intervjuer med företagsrepresentanter på både privata och kommunala företag med olika storlek. Slutsats Studien visar på både likheter och skillnader i uppfattningar om revisorns kunskaper och utbildning. Företagsrepresentanterna uppfattas vara nöjda med revisorns kunskaper vilket tyder på att deras förväntningar i stor utsträckning överensstämmer med verkligheten. Studiens resultat visar på samband mellan de kunskaper som företagsrepresentanterna uppfattar är viktigast hos revisorn och den utbildning som efterfrågas. / Introduction In July 2018, the Swedish Inspectorate of Auditors’ proposal for a formalization of formal requirements for auditor’s education is expected to become effective. Corporate representatives has an idea of the actual knowledge that the auditor possesses and lacks. By gaining insight into the auditor's knowledge, an understanding is created that can add value to the design of the auditor’s education. Purpose The purpose of the study is to create an understanding of corporate representatives' perceptions of auditing, focusing on the auditor's knowledge and education. Method The study has a deductive approach with inductive elements. Qualitative data has been obtained through semi-structured interviews with business representatives at both private and public companies of varied sizes. Conclusion The study shows both similarities and differences in perceptions about the auditor's knowledge and education. Corporate representatives are perceived to be satisfied with the auditor's knowledge, which indicates that their expectations mainly are in line with reality. The result of the study indicates a relationship between the knowledge that the corporate representatives perceive is most important among the auditor and the education requested.

As responsabilidades que envolvem a atividade do auditor é um assunto muito debatido, principalmente em episódios de fraudes e outros escândalos financeiros. Em geral, são nesses momentos que a função do auditor é questionada, e o mercado atribui determinadas responsabilidades a esses profissionais que podem não corresponder com as suas atribuições (Audit Expectation Gap - AEG). Porter (1990) dividiu o AEG em dois principais componentes: (i) Gap de Desempenho e (ii) Gap de Razoabilidade. O último refere-se à diferença de expectativas sobre as quais os usuários das informações financeiras acham que os auditores devem executar determinada tarefa quando de fato eles não têm a obrigação nem o objetivo de fazê-la. Utilizando o constructo de Porter (1990), este trabalho teve como objetivo identificar a existência do AEG de razoabilidade nas decisões de litígios (acórdãos) nos quais as empresas de auditoria figuram como polo passivo. A intenção foi verificar se a diferença de expectativas com relação ao trabalho do auditor fez-se presente nos documentos de conclusão dos processos cíveis e administrativos. Para tanto, foram analisados: 11 acórdãos de processos cíveis, 19 acórdãos de processos administrativos CVM e 4 acórdãos de processos administrativos Bacen, totalizando 34 acórdãos. A metodologia empregada foi a análise documental e análise de conteúdo. Para auxiliar na organização e análise dos dados, foi utilizado o software Nvivo®. Além da análise dos acórdãos, foram realizadas entrevistas com ex-membros do Colegiado da CVM, para confirmar o entendimento de como funcionam os processos de julgamento nesse Regulador, bem como obter a perspectiva desses profissionais diretamente envolvidos em julgamentos dessa espécie. Para o total dos acórdãos analisados, foi identificada a presença de AEG de razoabilidade em 10 casos, o que representa aproximadamente 29% do total. Além da identificação AEG de razoabilidade nas argumentações dos juízes, o gap também foi identificado, de forma muito mais frequente, em diversos trechos dos documentos analisados, como, por exemplo, as argumentações da acusação e advogados envolvidos. Os achados desta pesquisa foram importantes pois a identificação da existência desse gap pôde auxiliar no endereçamento desta questão. A tomada de decisão com base em argumentos equivocados pode não apenas trazer prejuízos para as firmas de auditoria, mas também para o Sistema Financeiro Nacional e setor financeiro empresarial em geral, bem como ocasionar injustiças. Como uma das formas de endereçamento do problema, nos casos dos processos administrativos, sugere-se que a composição do Colegiado e do CRSFN seja diversificada, ou mesmo que tenha a presença de um especialista para casos de julgamentos específicos, como são os casos dos julgamentos que envolvem o auditor independente. / The responsibilities entailed in the work of the auditor are a subject of much debate, chiefly when frauds and other financial scandals occur. Frequently on these occasions the function of the auditor comes into question and the business world attributes certain responsibilities to these professionals that they may not actually have (Audit Expectation Gap - AEG). The author Porter B. A. (1990) separated AEG into two main components: (i) the performance gap, and (ii) the reasonableness gap. The latter refers to the difference between the expectations of users of financial information regarding the specific tasks they believe auditors should perform and the obligations and objectives those auditors actually have. Using the construct of Porter B. A. (1990), this work has the objective of identifying the existence of the reasonableness gap in legal rulings (decisions of appellate courts) in which audit firms were the defendant. The intention was to establish if the difference in expectations regarding the work of the auditor was present in the decisions and opinions of the civil and administrative proceedings. In order to do so, an analysis was made of 11 civil appellate court decisions, 19 administrative rulings of the Comissão de Valores Mobiliários - CVM (equivalent to the Securities and Exchange Commission in the USA) and four administrative rulings of Brazilian Central Bank; 34 judgments in all. The methodology employed was document analysis and content analysis. To aid in the organization and analysis of data, Nvivo® software was used. In addition to analysis of the judgments, interviews were conducted with former members of the CVM board to confirm the understanding of how trial procedures function at this regulator, as well as to gain the perspective of these experts, who are directly involved in judgments of this kind. From the total of the judgments analyzed, the presence of reasonableness AEG was identified in 10 cases, which represents approximately 29% of the total. In addition to identifying reasonableness AEG in the arguments of judges, this gap was also identified, and much more frequently, in various passages of the documentation on the argumentation of attorneys involved in the cases. The findings of this study are important because identifying the existence of this gap may aid in addressing the issue. Rulings based on misguided arguments can not only harm audit firms but also damage the National Financial System and the corporate financial sector in general, as well as causing injustice. As one way of addressing the issue, in administrative cases it is suggested that the composition of the panel and the CRSFN (Council of Appeals of the National Finance System) be made more diverse, and in certain cases even include a specialist, such as when judgments involve an independent auditor.

Bakgrund: Revision har en samhällsnyttig funktion eftersom den bland annat har som syfte att säkerställa att inga oegentligheter förekommer i redovisningen som används som beslutsunderlag. En revisor utför revisionen och en förutsättning för att denna ska kunna ske på ett korrekt sätt är att revisorn är oberoende i sina bedömningar. År 2002 infördes en lag i Sverige som bygger på en standard benämnd analysmodellen. Syftet med införandet av modellen är att säkerställa revisorns oberoende. Modellen är en självgranskningsmodell som revisorn använder för att pröva sitt oberoende genom att ta hänsyn till fem olika typsituationer som utgör ett hot mot oberoendet samt en generalklausul. Syfte: Syftet med studien är att skapa förståelse för hur analysmodellen uppfattas av revisorer samt beskriva hur revisorer agerar för att motarbeta hot mot oberoendet. Metod: Studien är genomförd med en kvalitativ metod, och närmare bestämt semistrukturerade intervjuer. Detta för att metoden är tillämplig när syftet är att beskriva samt skapa förståelse. För att uppnå syftet krävs en djup förståelse för revisorers uppfattningar av analysmodellen och hur de agerar för att motarbeta hot som finns mot oberoendet. Teoretisk utgångspunkt: Institutionell teori och teorin om meningsskapande används i studien för att analysera likheter och olikheter i uppfattningar och agerande. Institutionell teori har använts för att analysera likheter på organisatorisk nivå. Meningsskapande har tillämpats för att analysera både likheter och olikheter på individnivå. Slutsats: Studien visar att analysmodellen uppfattas på ett likartat sätt av revisorerna. Analysmodellen anses vara ett tillräckligt verktyg för att hantera oberoendefrågor. Det förelåg inga väsentliga olikheter i sätten revisorer agerar på för att motarbeta hot mot oberoendet. Studien visar dock att det föreligger mindre olikheter som framförallt kan förklaras av att revisorernas personliga erfarenheter skiljer sig åt. / Background: Auditing has a socially beneficial function because, among other things, it aims to ensure that there are no irregularities in the accountancy underlying the decision-making process. An auditor performs the audit and a prerequisite for this to be undertaken in a correct manner is that the auditor is independent in his or her assessments. In 2002, a law was introduced in Sweden based on a standard denoted “analysmodellen”. The purpose of introducing this model was to ensure the auditor's independence. The model is based on self-examination in which the auditor has to test his or her independence by taking into account five different types of situations that pose a threat to independence as well as a general legal clause. Purpose: The purpose of the study is to create an understanding of how “analysmodellen” is perceived by auditors as well as to describe how auditors act to counteract threats to their independence. Method: The study is conducted using a qualitative method; more specifically semi-structured interviews. The reason is that this method is applicable when the purpose is to create an understanding as well as a description of the process under consideration. Achieving the purpose requires a deep understanding of auditors' perceptions of ”analysmodellen” and what steps they take to counteract threats to independence. Theoretical starting point: The theories used in the study are institutional theory and the theory of sensemaking, this in order to analyze similarities and differences in perceptions and actions. Institutional theory has been used to analyze similarities at the organizational level. Sensemaking has been used to analyze similarities as well as differences at the individual level. Conclusion: The study shows that “analysmodellen” is perceived in a similar way by the auditors. The auditors consider it as a sufficient tool for dealing with the issues of independence. There were no significant differences in the way auditors acted to counter threats to independence. However, the study shows that there are minor differences that primarily can be explained by the fact that the auditors' personal experiences differ.

Background/problematization: Traditionally, the auditor’s report was a short pass-or-fail statement with a few lines of text andstandardized wording. Critics have argued that the auditor’s report was a tedious anduninformative statement, more entity-specific and relevant information was wanted in theauditor’s report. As a result, ISA 701 was implemented in 2016, which required auditors todisclose Key Audit Matters. However, skeptics were concerned that the expanded auditor’sreport following the new regulation ISA 701 would become standardized as well. Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the research on whether IAASB has achieved withits intention of ISA 701, to make the auditor’s report provide more entity-specific information,thus increasing the communicative value. By doing this, we also intend to contribute to theunderstanding of the factors that shape the disclosure of audit information. Methodology: The study was based on a positivistic philosophy together with a deductive approach. To collectdata, a quantitative method and a longitudinal design was used. 72 sample companies wereinvestigated over the time period of 2017-2021. This resulted in 359 firm-year observations.The data used was secondary data from annual reports and the database Orbis. The main test ofthe data was done in multiple linear regression models using SPSS. Findings: The findings suggest that there is no systematic standardization on a cross-national level,however there are some indications for standardization of the disclosure of KAMs on thenational level in some cases. We have identified three diving forces of standardization: country-, audit firm-, and auditor effects. Among these driving forces, the country effect was found tobe the strongest driving force.

New and revised Canadian Auditing Standards for audits of companies with fiscal periods ending on or after December 15, 2018 came into effect in April 2017. This paper examines the economic effects of one of the updates: the new auditor reporting requirement to disclose the auditor’s responsibilities over other information. We investigate the relationship between the existence of the auditor’s commentary about the MD&A within the other information paragraph on the auditor’s report and the reactions of users of the financial statements, namely investors and analysts, to the MD&A. We find that both investors and analysts do not respond to the auditor’s commentary about the MD&A within the other information paragraph present on the auditor’s report. Our result indicates that although the disclosure may not be providing additional information value to users of the financial statements as the standard setters intended, it is also not creating an increase in the audit expectation gap.

The overall purpose of this study is to establish whether auditors in South Africa also fail to issue the appropriate audit opinion on the going concern assumption underlying financial statements the reasons for auditors' failure to issue the appropriate audit opinion on the going concern assumption The hypotheses of this study are tested by examining professional auditing standards and secondary data on the going concern assumption conducting an empirical study of listed industrial compames whose listings were terminated because of financial failure This study provides evidence that auditors in South Africa fail to Issue the appropriate audit opinion on the going concern assumption advances specific reasons for this failure / Auditing / M. Comm. (Auditing)

Revisionsbranschen är en starkt reglerad bransch och styrs i dagsläget av många lagar som har som avsikt att värna om intressenter samt ge riktlinjer om god redovisningssed. Trots att dessa lagar existerar, är det många företag i obestånd som manipulerar bokföringen, vilket gör revisorns arbete att granska bokföringen mycket viktigt. Att företag får anmärkning på bokföringen är inte ovanligt och det kan finnas många orsaker till att företag som gått i konkurs får revisionsanmärkningar. Syftet med denna studie är att undersöka revisionsanmärkningar i ett företags sista årsredovisning innan konkurs. Vidare är syftet att undersöka om det finns något samband mellan företagens storlek och antal revisionsanmärkningar. I studien har den kvantitativa metoden använts där ett urval på 350 företag som gick i konkurs under 2015 och som haft revisor valts ut. Revisionsberättelser från dessa 350 har därefter samlats in från databasen Retriver för att sedan analyseras. Den genomförda studien visar att 61 % av alla företag har fått åtminstone en anmärkning i revisionsberättelsen. Enligt studiens empiriska material är den vanligaste anmärkningen att bolaget inte i rätt tid och med rätt belopp har redovisat samt betalt mervärdesskatt, avdragen skatt eller sociala avgifter. Därefter är det vanligt att årsredovisningen inte har upprättats i sådan tid att det varit möjligt att hålla årsstämma inom sex månader efter räkenskapsårets utgång och att en kontrollbalansräkning inte har upprättats. Det som vidare framkommit i studien är att i 22 % av företagen har revisorn anmärkt på företagets fortlevnad. Genom en analys av det empiriska materialet har det även framkommit att det finns ett samband mellan företagets storlek och antal anmärkningar då större företag får färre anmärkningar än vad mindre företag får. / The audit industry is highly regulated and controlled of many laws that seeks to protect stakeholders and to provide guidelines for companies so they can use generally accepted accounting principles. Although these laws exist, many companies in insolvency manipulates records, making the work of the auditor to review the accounts very important. That companies get notes on their accounting is not uncommon and it might be different causes to this. The purpose of this study is to investigate auditors notes in a company's last annual report before the bankruptcy. Furthermore, the purpose is to investigate whether there is any correlation between company size and number of notes. In this study, the quantitative method is used where a sample of 350 companies that went bankrupt in 2015 and who had an auditor has been selected. Audit reports from these 350 companies have been collected from the database Retriever and then analyzed. The survey shows that 61 % of all companies have gotten at least one note in the audit report. According to the study's empirical material, the most common complaint is that the company hasn’t, in the right time and with the right amount reported and paid tax, deducted tax or social security contributions. Next, it is common that the annual accounts have been prepared in such time that it has been impossible to hold the annual general meeting within six months after the financial years ending. The third commmon note in the audit report is that a company hasn’t done a balance sheet for liquidation. What further emerged from the study is that in 22 % of the companies the auditor have criticized the company's going concern. Through an analysis of the empirical material, it has also emerged that there is a correlation between company size and number of notes as larger companies get fewer notes from accountants than smaller companies gets.