This dissertation in practice was designed to provide an evaluation case study of two institutions, one college and one university, in the field of online learning and quality assurance. The writer evaluated these two institutions of higher learning to discover what online teaching criteria are required and what quality assurance processes are being used to assess the quality of the institutions* online courses. An analysis of the data revealed that both institutions were at the appropriate stage of development, support, training and quality assurance measures for their sizes, online populations and for the length of time they have been involved in online learning. Findings revealed that both institutions had a quality assurance process in place that is appropriate to their location, population and faculty. There is much to be learned by examining the two different credentialing and quality assurance approaches to online teaching and learning that these two different institutions employ for anyone interested in improving their institutions* processes.

Internationella studier visar att lärare inom hälso- och medicinutbildningar saknar kompetens att främja studenters interprofessionella lärande. Studiens syfte var att undersöka hur lärare, inom ramen för ett akademiskt lärarskap, arbetar med sin kompetensutveckling för att främja studenters interprofessionella lärande. Fallstudien genomfördes med semistrukturerade intervjuer av 17 lärare vid Linköpings universitet. Data analyserades med tematisk analys. Resultaten visade på behov av ökade kunskaper om akademiskt lärarskap samt samsyn kring lärarens roll och uppdrag. Kompetensutveckling genomfördes på generell nivå och ej utifrån identifierade lärbehov. Den systematiska och kontinuerliga uppföljningen av studenternas interprofessionella lärande försvårades då det saknades kompetens samt tid att kritiskt granska pedagogisk praktik. / International studies show that teachers in health and medical education needs more competence to promote students' interprofessional learning. The purpose of this study was to investigate how teachers, within the framework of scholarhip of teaching and learning work with their faculty development to promote students' interprofessional learning. The case study was conducted with semistructured interviews of 17 teachers at Linköping University. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The results showed a need for increased knowledge of scholarship of teaching and learning as well as consensus regarding the teacher's role and responsibility. Competence development was carried out on a general level and not based on identified learning needs. The systematic and continuous follow-up of the students' interprofessional learning was difficult as there was a lack of competence and time to critically examine pedagogical practice.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

Depuis les années 1990, les formations à visée professionnelle, comme l’enseignement, adoptent le paradigme du praticien réflexif. Au Québec, le référentiel de compétences proposé par le ministère de l’Éducation introduit l’idée que tout futur enseignant doit apprendre à « réfléchir sur sa pratique » (MEQ, 2001). Malgré de nombreuses études sur la réflexion, le concept reste flou et polysémique. Comment, dans ces conditions, « faire réfléchir » ? Des chercheurs contemporains, dans la mouvance éducative, humaniste et pragmatique de Dewey (1933), aboutissent à des conceptions convergentes de l’apprentissage par réflexion sur l’expérience (Osterman et Kottkamp, 2004; Brouwer et Korthagen, 2005; Loughran, 2006; Brockbank et McGill, 2007; Donnay et Charlier, 2008, entre autres). De leurs points communs est synthétisée une définition de la réflexion qui peut aider à clarifier son rôle en formation. La recherche se donne comme objectif de « saisir » des événements réflexifs pour élucider comment des formations universitaires contribuent à développer des mécanismes de réflexion favorables à un autorenouvellement professionnel à long terme. La démarche est qualitative, l’approche interprétative-compréhensive. Des entrevues semi-structurées ont permis de recueillir des données auprès de finissants en enseignement du français langue seconde (FLS), en coopération internationale, à l’Université de Montréal, ainsi que d’enseignants de FLS expérimentés d’une université québécoise. Du corpus d’« occurrences de réflexion » ont émergé les significations que les acteurs donnaient à leur expérience d’apprentissage ou de travail. Les résultats sont présentés en trois articles. Le premier décrit la méthodologie construite pour repérer des occurrences de réflexion. Le second révèle deux grandes caractéristiques de dispositifs qui la stimulent particulièrement: 1) l’agir en situation de travail authentique ou vraisemblable; 2) la confrontation interactive à l’altérité (pairs, clientèle). Le troisième article aborde les représentations plus riches, nuancées et critiques de la profession, l’Autre et soi-même sur lesquelles débouche la réflexion. L’étude documente aussi les effets de ces reconceptualisations sur l’acteur et l’action, et produit des typologies des préoccupations des (futurs) professionnels et des objets réfléchis Des pistes de recherche et d’application sont dégagées pour les formations professionnalisantes et le développement professionnel en milieu de travail. / Since the 1990’s, the paradigm of the reflective practitioner entered higher education curricula. In Quebec, the Ministry of Education introduced in its list of skills required to become a teacher the idea that one should learn ‘to reflect on one’s practice’ (MEQ, 2001). Despite many studies about reflection, the concept of ‘reflection’ itself remains vague. So the effectiveness of the pedagogical and organizational tools used to “make people reflect” is highly questionable. Nevertheless, some researchers, following the seminal educative humanistic and pragmatic ideas of Dewey (1933) come to similar conceptualizations of what learning is through the reflection on practice (Osterman & Kottkamp, 2004; Brouwer & Korthagen, 2005; Loughran, 2006; Brockbank & McGill, 2007; Donnay & Charlier, 2008, among others). An operational definition of reflection is synthetized. It can help clarify the role of reflection in professional curricula. Going beyond the challenge of ‘capturing’ reflection events, this research aims at understanding how higher education programs contribute to develop long term professional self-renewal mecanisms. This study is based on qualitative interviews, within an interpretive approach. Data came from prospective teachers in French as a second language (FSL) and in international co-operation at Université de Montréal, as well as experienced FSL teachers working in a Quebec university. The method first isolated ‘occurrences of reflection’, then extracted the meanings emerging from what the interviewees had said about their experience of learning or working. Results provide insights into the process and outcomes of reflection. Two characteristics of the higher education programs appear to stimulate it the most : 1) ‘doing’ things in an authentic workplace or in simulated situations in the classroom; 2) interactive confrontation to others (peers and clients). Different types of ‘triggers’, conditions, concerns and objects of reflection are also brought to light. It appears that reflection stimulates changes in perspective in the mind of learners or workers, which makes them see things ‘differently’, that is, in a richer, more precise, more critical way, about their work, their colleagues or clients, and themselves as professionals. The study proposes some ways of improving teacher education programs and professional development in the workplace.

At a Texas community college, stakeholders wanted to strengthen the financial literacy module offered in the student development course for undergraduates. The problem was that no formative data existed on students' financial literacy, and it was not known if knowledge of financial literacy for students who participated in a prior financial literacy class in high school differed from students who had not. The purpose of this study was to obtain formative data regarding students' needs for financial literacy education and to examine whether the knowledge of financial literacy for college students who participated in a prior financial literacy class in high school differed from students who had not. Guided by Knowles' andragogy theory, this descriptive comparative quantitative study explored students' overall financial literacy, including financial literacy subcomponents, and the relationship between students who had participated in a prior financial literacy class compared to students who had not. SurveyMonkey was used to administer the Jump$tart Coalition-® College Questionnaire to a convenience sample of 170 undergraduate students. Through descriptive data analysis (mean scores and composite scores) of the questionnaire responses, it was established that less than 70% of students were proficient in overall financial literacy. Independent samples t tests established no significant differences in financial literacy for students who participated in a prior financial literacy class compared to students who had not. The resulting project provides professional development for faculty to implement the Jump$tart Coalition-® curriculum promoting social change by developing financially competent adults, thereby contributing to fiscally sound economies.

Depuis les années 1990, les formations à visée professionnelle, comme l’enseignement, adoptent le paradigme du praticien réflexif. Au Québec, le référentiel de compétences proposé par le ministère de l’Éducation introduit l’idée que tout futur enseignant doit apprendre à « réfléchir sur sa pratique » (MEQ, 2001). Malgré de nombreuses études sur la réflexion, le concept reste flou et polysémique. Comment, dans ces conditions, « faire réfléchir » ? Des chercheurs contemporains, dans la mouvance éducative, humaniste et pragmatique de Dewey (1933), aboutissent à des conceptions convergentes de l’apprentissage par réflexion sur l’expérience (Osterman et Kottkamp, 2004; Brouwer et Korthagen, 2005; Loughran, 2006; Brockbank et McGill, 2007; Donnay et Charlier, 2008, entre autres). De leurs points communs est synthétisée une définition de la réflexion qui peut aider à clarifier son rôle en formation. La recherche se donne comme objectif de « saisir » des événements réflexifs pour élucider comment des formations universitaires contribuent à développer des mécanismes de réflexion favorables à un autorenouvellement professionnel à long terme. La démarche est qualitative, l’approche interprétative-compréhensive. Des entrevues semi-structurées ont permis de recueillir des données auprès de finissants en enseignement du français langue seconde (FLS), en coopération internationale, à l’Université de Montréal, ainsi que d’enseignants de FLS expérimentés d’une université québécoise. Du corpus d’« occurrences de réflexion » ont émergé les significations que les acteurs donnaient à leur expérience d’apprentissage ou de travail. Les résultats sont présentés en trois articles. Le premier décrit la méthodologie construite pour repérer des occurrences de réflexion. Le second révèle deux grandes caractéristiques de dispositifs qui la stimulent particulièrement: 1) l’agir en situation de travail authentique ou vraisemblable; 2) la confrontation interactive à l’altérité (pairs, clientèle). Le troisième article aborde les représentations plus riches, nuancées et critiques de la profession, l’Autre et soi-même sur lesquelles débouche la réflexion. L’étude documente aussi les effets de ces reconceptualisations sur l’acteur et l’action, et produit des typologies des préoccupations des (futurs) professionnels et des objets réfléchis Des pistes de recherche et d’application sont dégagées pour les formations professionnalisantes et le développement professionnel en milieu de travail. / Since the 1990’s, the paradigm of the reflective practitioner entered higher education curricula. In Quebec, the Ministry of Education introduced in its list of skills required to become a teacher the idea that one should learn ‘to reflect on one’s practice’ (MEQ, 2001). Despite many studies about reflection, the concept of ‘reflection’ itself remains vague. So the effectiveness of the pedagogical and organizational tools used to “make people reflect” is highly questionable. Nevertheless, some researchers, following the seminal educative humanistic and pragmatic ideas of Dewey (1933) come to similar conceptualizations of what learning is through the reflection on practice (Osterman & Kottkamp, 2004; Brouwer & Korthagen, 2005; Loughran, 2006; Brockbank & McGill, 2007; Donnay & Charlier, 2008, among others). An operational definition of reflection is synthetized. It can help clarify the role of reflection in professional curricula. Going beyond the challenge of ‘capturing’ reflection events, this research aims at understanding how higher education programs contribute to develop long term professional self-renewal mecanisms. This study is based on qualitative interviews, within an interpretive approach. Data came from prospective teachers in French as a second language (FSL) and in international co-operation at Université de Montréal, as well as experienced FSL teachers working in a Quebec university. The method first isolated ‘occurrences of reflection’, then extracted the meanings emerging from what the interviewees had said about their experience of learning or working. Results provide insights into the process and outcomes of reflection. Two characteristics of the higher education programs appear to stimulate it the most : 1) ‘doing’ things in an authentic workplace or in simulated situations in the classroom; 2) interactive confrontation to others (peers and clients). Different types of ‘triggers’, conditions, concerns and objects of reflection are also brought to light. It appears that reflection stimulates changes in perspective in the mind of learners or workers, which makes them see things ‘differently’, that is, in a richer, more precise, more critical way, about their work, their colleagues or clients, and themselves as professionals. The study proposes some ways of improving teacher education programs and professional development in the workplace.

Depuis peu la question de la pédagogie universitaire en général, et du développement professionnel pédagogique (DPP) des universitaires en particulier est une question d’actualité en France. Toutefois ce concept reste polysémique et protéiforme. Qui plus est, d’aucuns attribuent à la France une spécificité à propos de ce DPP.Cette recherche appréhende le concept par le prisme de trois dimensions : les pratiques pédagogiques que déclarent mettre en œuvre les universitaires, leurs conceptions à propos de ce qui constitue un « bon » et un « mauvais » cours et enfin les attentes et besoins qu’ils expriment pour se développer pédagogiquement. Ce travail se réalise via un dispositif méthodologique mixte qui combine démarches qualitative et quantitative, et interroge des enseignants universitaires de disciplines et années d’expériences variées. Tant à propos de leurs pratiques, que de leurs conceptions ou encore de leurs attentes et besoins, les répondants ne forment pas un groupe homogène et leur DPP s’avère pouvoir être abordé sous différents aspects. Nos résultats font le constat que les pratiques d’enseignement et les conceptions sont encore très majoritairement inscrites dans un modèle magistral et transmissif. Mais avec une prise en compte de l’apprenant. Ce qui conduit les enseignants à identifier un besoin de soutien au DPP, mais une difficulté à identifier ce qui pourrait concourir à le satisfaire. Ce DPP apparaît comme un processus solitaire qui s’exerce dans un « isolement pédagogique ».Nous revenons sur la possibilité d’une spécificité française. Laquelle ne peut être démontrée si on analyse uniquement l’axe «enseignants». Ce qui conduit à envisager des perspectives d’analyse situationnelle. / Recently, teaching and learning in higher education, Faculty and educational development (FED) in particular, have become topical issues in France. However, the concepts are polysemic and protean. Moreover, some argue that there is a French specificity about FED. This research approaches the FED concept from three angles: teaching practices, faculty beliefs on what constitutes "good" or "bad" teaching, and their stated expectations and needs for professional development. This work was carried out with a mixed methodology combining qualitative and quantitative approaches, based on a survey of 174 academics of the same university, distributed across disciplines and various lengths of teaching experience. On the three accounts of practices, beliefs or expectations and needs, the population of respondents is heterogeneous and their FED may be approached in different ways. Our results point out that their teaching practices and views still predominately refer to the transmission model of teaching, blended with a consideration for the learner. This leads them to identify a need for support towards FED, but with a difficulty to identify what might contribute to satisfy it. FED appears as a solitary process that takes place in a "pedagogical isolation." When contemplating a possible French specificity, we concluded that it could not be established from the only perspective of academics. This leads to consider the prospects of a contextual analysis.

This quantitative study analyzed the influence of individual factors and institutional context on faculty participation in online teaching at public higher education institutions in the United States. Through an ex post facto design, cause and effect relationships were explored using statistical analysis of a large national data set. Variables in the data set directly related to the areas of interest in this study included interest in teaching, student-centered pedagogy, autonomy and control, instructional support, and institutional climate. Factors related to interest in teaching and institutional reward were statistically significant (p