Africa still has the lowest electrification rates in the world with over 600 million people estimated to be living without access to electricity. What makes the challenge even greater for Africa is that the continent is so sparsely populated that building grid infrastructure is not viable in many cases. However, “pay-as-you-go” solar home systems have provided the continent with the opportunity to correct its electrification deficit. These innovations are not new and many of the costs of operating these systems have reached grid parity when one considers the Levelized Cost of Energy Model. However, these projects still fail to meet institutional investors' bankability criteria. The aim of this study is to try and understand whether solar home systems provide the investor with an opportunity to make a larger risk-adjusted return versus existing grid-based power station projects being considered on the continent. This study uses Ghana's recently built Kpone power station as a case study to complete this analysis. The study also seeks to assess what viability criteria is employed by a broad base of investors if they were to consider funding off-grid power. The study makes use of the Net Present Value model to compare the returns for Kpone and Zola Electric's Infinity solar home system. The study also conducts inductive qualitative analysis to try and ascertain what criteria is assessed for project viability and then builds a conceptual framework for assessing future projects. The study found that Kpone provided a better risk-adjusted return to that of Zola Electric's solar home system, largely because of Kpone's project finance structure reducing the risk of the investment. Our findings also show that investment ticket size, company track record and management track record are among the most highly considered criteria for investments into off-grid companies.

Idag finns det cirka en halv miljon bostäder från miljonprogrammet som är i behov av renovering och modernisering. Bostadsföretagen som äger dessa fastigheter har problem med att finansiera renoveringen som krävs för att höja standarden och förlänga livslängden på fastigheterna. Denna uppsats handlar om hur direktägande fastighetsfonder kan fungera som ett alternativ till finansieringen av renoveringen av miljonprogrammet. Fördelen med att använda direktägande fastighetsfonder som finansiellt verktyg till upprustningen av miljonprogrammet är att kapitalet kan hämtas från den privata sektorn och beroendet av en stark finansiär minskas. Genom fondstrukturen skapas möjligheter för ett mindre sparande i bostadsfastigheter och gör marknaden för potentiella investerare större. Uppsatsen behandlar två områden i Stockholm och är belägna Rinkeby- Kista och Skarpnäck. Med hjälp av räkneexempel på en fiktiv fastighet utplacerad i dessa två områden har det visat sig att det kan vara lönsamt ur en investerares perspektiv som vill köpa andelar i fastighetsfonden som används i denna uppsats. Exempelvis får en fondinvesterare 9,1 % per år i Skarpnäck. Med en upprustning av miljonprogrammet tillkommer kostnader för renovering samt hyresökningar. Uppsatsen redovisar vilka kostnader en renovering medför för att uppnå modern standard samt vilka konsekvenser som moderniseringen har på hyresnivån. På grund av en ökad hyresnivå behandlar uppsatsen även frågan om hyresgästerna kommer att ha råd med de nya hyrorna. / There are approximately half a million apartments of the building initiative from the 1970’s called “miljonprogrammet” that are in need of major renovation and development into modernized standard. The real estate companies that own these properties have difficulties in funding the required amount of capital in order to achieve the goals of higher standards and extending the life length of the properties. This essay investigates the possibility of real estate private equity funds as a financial solution to the issue. The benefits of using real estate private equity funds as a financial solution to the renovation and development issue is that equity may be raised by using the private market and the dependence of one powerful financial investor decreases. As the fund structure being as it is, opportunities for savings in smaller amounts are created, which expands the market of possible investors. The essay investigates two areas in Stockholm that are located in Rinkeby-Kista and Skarpnäck. By using calculations containing a fictive property placed in the two areas, it has been proved that investing in a real estate private equity fund, created for the purpose of this essay, could be profitable for small-scale investors. The average annual return, which is gained when investing in the fund, is 9,1 % in Skarpnäck. As a consequence of developing ”miljonprogrammet”, rents are increased in order to cover some of the renovation costs and to fit new standards of the properties. The essay also explores the details of the renovation costs and what level the new rents will be at. Analysis will also be performed whether the tenants will be able to afford the increased rents.

Purpose – BecauseThe purpose of this thesis is to investigate what methods financial institutions use to inform and encourage their existing and potential clients to choose more sustainable and responsible investment alternatives. The thesis should also identify some key determinants of private investors’ choice of sustainable and responsible investments (SRI), with focus on the effect of limited knowledge and access to information about SRI has on private investors’ choice. Methodology – In this thesis, both qualitative and quantitative research methods are used to collect significant data. Qualitative data was collected through interviews with three representatives from different financial institutions. A questionnaire was distributed and answered by 36 respondents. Quantitative data was collected using a questionnaire, the processed and analyzed by using a comparison analysis of percentages. Findings – Overall, the thesis finds that financial institutions have limited focus on private investors and lack of concrete methods to provide private investors with relevant information and thus increasing the level of knowledge about SRI. Furthermore, the results indicate that earning steady financial returns by considering social responsibility is one of the motivations to invest in SRI. Women are more likely to choose SRI than men and millennials prefer SRI more compared to other generations. Limited knowledge and limited access to useful information are considered as strong obstacles for private investors when considering SRI. Research limitations – Since the sample size was very small, it’s probable that the respondents’ opinions and approach to SRI cannot represent the view of the entire population. Because of the sample size there’s an enormous variation in response patterns. Therefore, the results and conclusions need to be taken cautiously. / Syfte – Syftet med denna uppsats syfte är att undersöka vilka metoder som finansiella institutioner använder för att upplysa och uppmuntra både befintliga och potentiella kunder att välja mer hållbara och ansvarsfulla investeringsalternativ. Uppsatsen ska även identifiera faktorer som påverkar privata investerares val av hållbara och ansvarsfulla investeringar, med fokus på effekten av begränsad kunskap och tillgång till information. Metod/tillvägagångssätt – I denna studie har både kvalitativa och kvantitativa forskningsmetoder använts för att samla in data. Kvalitativa data samlades in genom intervjuer med tre representanter från olika finansiella institutioner. En enkät har distribuerats och besvarats av 36 respondenter. Kvantitativa data insamlades med hjälp av ett frågeformulär, sedan bearbetades och analyserades informationen med hjälp av en jämförelse av procentsatser. Iakttagelser – Sammantaget finner tesen att finansiella institutioner har begränsad fokus på privata investerare och bristen på konkreta metoder för att ge privata investerare med relevant information och därmed öka kunskapsnivån om SRI. Vidare tyder resultaten på att jakten efter stabil avkastning på längre sikt, genom att ta samhällsansvar är den främsta motivationen att investerare väljer SRI. Kvinnor och millenniegeneration är mer benägna att välja SRI än män och andra generationer. Begränsad kunskap och tillgång till relevant information betraktas som en stark barriär för privata investerare att välja SRI. Forskningsbegränsningar – På grund av att urvalets storlek är väldigt liten, är det troligt att de svarandes åsikter och förhållningssätt till SRI inte kan representera hela befolkningen. Urvalets storlek gör också att det finns stora variationer i svarsmönster. Därför bör resultaten och slutsatserna tas med stor försiktighet.

Bakgrund: Under våren år 2020 drabbades aktiemarknaden av coronapandemins påföljder. På en månad minskade Stockholmsbörsens värde med 30% men var åter tillbaka på rekordnivåer sex månader senare. Ett liknande börsras inträffade under hösten samma år, men då var värdeminskningen mindre och återhämtningen ännu snabbare. Vid varje upp- och nedgång måste den privata investeraren göra viktiga finansiella beslut om att sälja eller att fortsätta tro på portföljen, där eventuella börspsykologiska biases kan bidra till en suboptimal avkastning. Coronapandemin och dess effekt på aktiemarknaden innebar en möjlighet att undersöka hur bias har påverkat privata investerares finansiella beslut under året 2020.   Syfte: Studien har som syfte att undersöka huruvida psykologiska fallgropar påverkat investerare vid marknadsnedgången under våren 2020, samt jämföra med forskning från tidigare kriser i den mån det är möjligt. Vidare ämnar studien att undersöka i vilken utsträckning privata investerares finansiella beslut i mars 2020 influerade besluten under nedgången i oktober under samma år.   Metod: I studien genomförs 8 kvalitativa, semi-strukturerade djupintervjuer med privata investerare. Utifrån detta har en helhetsbild över hur dessa investerare reagerat och blivit påverkade av fallgropar bildats utifrån existerande teori, i mån av att uppfylla studiens syfte.  Slutsats: Studien finner att privata investerare har upplevt en stark påverkan av psykologiska bias under den studerade perioden. Av de undersökta fallgroparna är det primärt överkonfidens och social interaktion som har haft störst påverkan. Kännedomen är generellt låg om beteendefinans vilket visar sig i att respondenterna har svårt att förhålla sig till dessa bias och därvid bemöta dem. Vid de tillfällen som det finns en kännedom om fallgroparna visar det dock en förstärkt möjlighet att minska dess påverkan. Studien identifierar vissa skillnader i respondenternas beteende under våren gentemot hösten 2020, detta är dock i mindre grad. Vidare är det inte möjligt för studien att i större utsträckning konstatera om påverkan av bias på något vis påverkat respondenternas resultat under perioden. / Background: In the spring of 2020, the stock market was struck by the repercussions of the corona pandemic. The Stockholm stock exchange lost 30% of its value over the course of a month, which only required half a year to fully recover from. A similar market crash occurred in the fall of the same year, but had a smaller deflation and a faster recovery. With each fluctuation, the private investor must make important financial decisions to either sell or to hold. This provides space for potential biases that could bring negative effects on the portfolio yield. The corona pandemic and its effect on the stock market provided an opportunity to examine how biases have affected the financial decisions of private investors during 2020. Purpose: The purpose of the study is to examine whether psychological biases have affected private investors during the stock market decline in spring 2020, and compare the results to prior research in past crises. Furthermore, the study intends to examine the extent to which private investors' financial decisions in March 2020 influenced their decisions during the stock market decline in October 2020. Method: The study consists of eight qualitative, semi-structured interviews with private investors. Based on these answers and reflections a conclusive picture is formed out of the existing theories in order to fulfill the purpose of the study. Conclusion: The thesis finds that private investors have experienced a great impact of psychological biases during the studied period. Out of the examined biases, overconfidence and social interaction are those that displayed the largest impact. The awareness of behavioral finance was generally low among the respondents of the study, which resulted in them having a hard time relating to and managing the biases. At times when respondents had awareness of a bias, the possibility of reducing its impact seemed enhanced. The study also identified some differences in respondent behavior during the spring compared to the autumn of 2020, though to a lesser extent. Furthermore, it is not possible to establish that an impact of bias affected the financial results of the respondents in this study.

Firms‘ resource base is one of the determinants of their capacity to innovate. When firms’ internal base of financial, intangible or technical resources is not sufficient to realize innovation projects, resources provided by other stakeholders can mitigate innovation constraints. This cumulative dissertation intends to shed light on innovation-related collaborations and interactions of three specific kinds of actors. The first article investigates the role innovation plays for investors when screening and evaluating potential investment targets and explains to which extent the investors’ behavior re-orients towards the implementation of innovation-pushing measures once being invested. Also, the second article refers to the interaction between investors and innovative firms: Subsequent to a derivation of an industry-specific business model pattern, the second article analyzes whether and how financing of new and innovative digital health ventures differ between Europe and USA. Adopting a single case study approach, the third article focuses on the interaction between corporate accelerators and innovative firms and identifies shortcomings of Telefonica’s corporate accelerator Wayra.:1 Introduction 2 Theoretical background of dissertation 3 Purpose and focus of dissertation 4 Overview and summaries of dissertation articles 5 First article: The Role of Innovation in Venture Capital and Private Equity Investments in Different Investment Phases 6 Second article: Venture Capital in the Digital Health Industry: Analyzing and Comparing Funding Environment and Business Models of Digital Health Start-ups in USA and Europe 7 Third article: Start-ups in a Corporate Accelerator: What is Satisfying, What is Relevant and What can Corporates Improve? 8 Contribution of dissertation 9 Limitations of dissertation 10 Future Research 11 References

While there is considerable academic research on the intersection of comprehensive plans, finance policies, zoning policies and how these factors influence real estate developers' choice of what land to develop and what buildings to construct on that land, little is understood about whether these three variables promote or hinder real estate developers' choice of whether to build communities that promote healthy living. Using urban planning theory as the foundation, the purpose of this correlational study was to determine how real estate developers' decisions are made to support healthy New Urbanism development in the United States. Secondary data from the Urban Land Institute were used for this multiple regression study that explored the degree to which comprehensive plans, finance, and zoning policies predict the likelihood that real estate developers will build New Urbanism communities in the United States. Findings indicated that comprehensive plans, finance policies, and zoning policies had a statistically significant influence on real estate developers' decisions on the types of communities to build in the United States by 53.6%, 46.8%, and 71.6% respectively p < .05. The information presented in this study is important to urban planners/designers, health care professionals, and municipal officials because of the intra and interdisciplinary approach of the built environment as a nonmedical determinant of health. Cultivating public and private collaboration to develop public policy could affect social change by directly affect the alterations and improvements in the built environment health that either promote or impede healthy outcomes.

The global pandemic of Covid-19 led to a crisis of not only fatal impact but financially. The stock market experienced one of its biggest market crashes ever and the young investors of our generation experienced something that they could never imagine. Their financial situation and investments suddenly changed and many of them did not know how to act or behave during this difficult period. This paper is based on qualitative research where ten different young investors have been interviewed to determine if they have matured and how their behavior has changed financially. The two research questions for the paper are: Is Covid-19 a blessing in disguise forcing young investors to mature, increasing their financial literacy, and thus change their investment behavior? and how has the Covid-19 pandemic affected young investors decision making on the stock market? The study and research questions were determined using three theories which are the efficient market hypothesis, behavioral finance, and the stages of change model. All three models were used to see how an individual behave during a financial crisis. The efficient market hypothesis basically argues that all relevant information matches the prices of stocks at any given time. Behavioral finance examines how an individual behave in a financial setting such as investment behaviors. Herding behavior and overconfidence are two cognitive biases within behavioral finance that was easily seen in the individuals for this study. The stages of change model states that an individual go through five different stages when a change of behavior is needed. This model could be applied on any individual, but a change of investments behavior should not go through so many stages as the model has so it had some limitations on the individuals in the study. The results and findings of the paper states that young investors have learned a valuable lesson from the Covid-19 pandemic increasing their financial literacy and creating more sustainable strategies for future investments.

This thesis investigates the current sustainable investment strategy of Swedish institutional investors that are not covered by the EU Taxonomy and how the Taxonomy will affect their work with sustainable investments. As a basis, 7 semi-structured interviews have been conducted. The respondent group consists of three institutional asset owners and four Swedish public pension funds. The former group, not having asset management as their core business, mainly use negative and norms-based screening whereas the latter are professional investors and they combine several other SRI strategies. The difference in SRI strategies between the investor groups is mainly explained by the professional investors having a more extensive ESG risk awareness and a greater organizational capacity. Except the screening strategies, the following SRI strategies are commonly used; corporate engagement and shareholder action, sustainability themed investing and ESG integration which is in line with the literature. Though, the institutional investors in this study are employing positive/best-in-class screening to a much less extent than the literature states. The investors agree with the literature and have a general positive view of the implementation of the Taxonomy and that there is a need of a consistent, global reporting standard. However, the investors raise criticism of the EU Taxonomy only including certain sectors, European countries and the exclusive climate focus which decreases the utility and is in line with the current literature. None of the interviewed investors has implemented the EU Taxonomy in their work with sustainable investments yet and do not believe that the EU Taxonomy will affect their investment strategies. This contradicts the current literature where private investors see the EU Taxonomy as a long awaited common framework with standardized KPI:s which will improve comparability on the market. However, a majority of the investors believe that the EU Taxonomy will- or probably will affect their work with sustainable investments in the future as an additional reporting tool where the professional investors show a greater belief than the asset owners. This study shows that Swedish institutional investors will probably use the EU Taxonomy as a reporting framework in the future but the implementation will not change the investor's SRI strategies. Professional investors are more likely to report according to the EU Taxonomy than institutional asset owners. Furthermore, the Taxonomy's level of impact depends on the investor’s Taxonomy knowledge; a more extensive knowledge increases the possibility to start reporting according to the Taxonomy. / Denna studie undersöker svenska institutionella investerares nuvarande hållbara investeringsstrategier, som inte omfattas av EU-taxonomin, samt hur taxonomin kommer att påverka deras arbete med hållbara investeringar. Som underlag har 7 semistrukturerade intervjuer genomförts. Respondentgruppen består av tre institutionella kapitalägare och fyra svenska publika pensionsfonder. Den förstnämnda gruppen, som inte har kapitalförvaltning som sin kärnverksamhet, använder främst negativ- och normbaserad screening medan de professionella investerarna kombinerar flera olika SRI-strategier. Skillnaden i SRI-strategier mellan investerargrupperna kan främst förklaras av att de professionella investerarna har en mer omfattande ESG-riskmedvetenhet och en större organisatorisk kapacitet. Förutom screeningstrategierna är följande SRI-strategier populära bland investerarna; aktivt ägande, hållbarhetstematiska investeringar och ESG-integration, detta i linje med litteraturen. De institutionella investerarna i denna studie använder sig dock av positiv/bäst-i-klassen-screening i mycket mindre utsträckning än vad litteraturen säger.  Investerarna är samstämmiga med litteraturen och har en generellt positiv syn på genomförandet av taxonomin och är eniga om att det finns ett behov av en konsekvent, global rapporteringsstandard. Däremot väcker investerarna kritik mot att EU-taxonomin endast inkluderar vissa sektorer, europeiska länder och det snäva klimatfokuset, vilket är i linje med befintlig litteratur. Ingen av de intervjuade investerarna har ännu implementerat EU-taxonomin i sitt arbete med hållbara investeringar och tror inte att EU-taxonomin kommer att påverka deras investeringsstrategier. Detta går emot den nuvarande litteraturen som menar att privata investerare ser EU-taxonomin som ett efterlängtat ramverk med standardiserade KPI:er som kommer att förbättra jämförbarheten på marknaden. En majoritet av investerarna tror att EU-taxonomin kommer att påverka deras arbete med hållbara investeringar i framtiden som ett ytterligare rapporteringsverktyg. De professionella investerarna har en betydligt större tro på EU-taxonomins genomslagskraft än kapitalägarna. Denna studie visar att svenska institutionella investerare med hög sannolikhet kommer att börja rapportera enligt EU-taxonomin i framtiden, men att taxonomin inte kommer att påverka investerarnas investeringsstrategier. Professionella investerare kommer med större sannolikhet börja rapportera enligt EU-taxonomin än instutionella kapitalägare. Taxonomins genomslagskraft beror på investerarnas taxonomikunskap; en mer omfattande kunskap ökar sannorlikheten att börja rapportera enligt taxonomin.

Over the past decades, investing and saving in mutual funds has become a popular alternativefor generating returns. Interest continues to grow and is widespread among different types ofinvestors, ranging from small-scale savers to professional investors, as well as differentgeographic markets. As interest and investment has grown, so has the range of fundsavailable, and with it the range of focused funds. Among these are real estate funds, fundsconsisting of holdings in the real estate market including different types of real estatecompanies and property-related assets. The ownership of funds is associated with a fee to cover various costs associated withoperating the fund. These fees can vary greatly in size across fund types and managers andaffect the fund’s performance and returns. Fees in relation to return have been researchedwith varying results and with the rise of focused funds, the authors felt that it should befurther investigated. The purpose of this study was thus formulated to investigate whetherthere is a relationship between fund fees and returns for real estate funds. This in turn toanswer whether it is justified for fund managers to charge a higher fee and to examine if theTheory of an Efficient Market holds or not. For this, a total sample of 69 real estate fundsfrom the Swedish, Norwegian and Finnish markets during a 3 year period from 1th of January2020 to the 31th of December 2022 was examined. In summary, based on the conducted regression analyses, it can be inferred that the results,similar to previous research, vary. However, it can be observed that there is a negativerelationship between fund fees and the risk-adjusted returns of real estate funds whenanalysing funds that have been active throughout the examined period. The analyses alsoreveal that the age and size of the funds have an impact on the risk-adjusted returns, whereyounger funds with large assets generate higher returns. This means that young real estatefunds with large assets and lower fees generate higher returns compared to older funds withsmall assets and higher fees. Consequently, it is not justified for managers to charge higherfees, nor for investors to pay them. Investors seeking to maximise their returns are thereforeadvised to choose real estate funds with low fees. Finally, based on this, it can be assumedthat the Theory of Efficient Markets holds for real estate funds in the Swedish, Norwegian,and Finnish markets.

Rather than a new masterplan I developed a strategy how to deal with a complicated area between the two Brno train stations. The land on the south of the city center has not been used for almost 100 years. There is a plan today, caused by removal of the main station to the south and introduction of the new city-train, to build up the area. The strategy I propose is based on the critical analysis of the current state of the area, of the plans that the city of Brno has, on the principles of the “compact city”, on my research on the potential users of the site and a study of life of 7 (imaginary) different potential user groups in the future, within the specific time horizon.