Submitted by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2015-11-30T10:45:03Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Loraine Vidgal Lisboa - 2015.pdf: 1198544 bytes, checksum: a160421041b5c26982e9ffa061e21d5c (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2015-11-30T10:47:36Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Loraine Vidgal Lisboa - 2015.pdf: 1198544 bytes, checksum: a160421041b5c26982e9ffa061e21d5c (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-11-30T10:47:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Loraine Vidgal Lisboa - 2015.pdf: 1198544 bytes, checksum: a160421041b5c26982e9ffa061e21d5c (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-04-27 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES / The internet has been the space – also known as cyberspace – used for interaction between contemporaneous social subjects. The technological rise, especially after war, personal computers trade and many electronic devices that we have access nowadays allow interactions which were impossible to happen without such technology. In this context, it is possible to recognize the overlapping of different human activity spheres, and because of that, the individual inserted in this technological context encounters communicative needs that have not existed previously. To meet the emerging gaps in that environment, many discursive genres have emerged or got adapted to this new reality. In this sense, this masters dissertation entitled “Memes jurisprudenciais no facebook do STJ: A constituição dialógica de um gênero verbo-visual” regards to a study in which we propose that the jurisprudential meme, authored by the Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ), is a discursive genre spread in the social network facebook – produced and circulated in this space – providing dialogic relations between legal discourse materialized through verb-visual language, thus favoring the formation of architectonic genre in question. To accomplish this, we set out to conduct a theoretical and documentary research about some Bakhtinian fundamentals that are relevant to this research, and analyze the dialogical relations found in 4 (four) memes (among 109 collected) displayed at STJ photo albums presented on its facebook page. This choice was made from thematic and imagistic recurrences that refer to discourses on laws which concern relations between parents and children, as well as the use of Star Wars characters that, in a context of imbricated spheres, form the architectonic of this genre. Our hypothesis is that when the jurisprudential meme materializes several discourses through verb-visual language on its statements, establishing dialogical relations between them, it can be considered a discursive genre according to Bakhtin studies. Our theoretical and methodological reflections and analyzes are based on the dialogical conception of language advocated by Bakhtin Circle, specially formed by Bakhtin, Volochínov and Medviedev. Our emphasis is given in dialogism, ideological sign, verbal interaction, discourse genre, as well as discourse, because, according to the dialogical school of thought preconized by Bakhtin Circle, is from the dialogical relations allowed by the relatively stable statements that form the discursive genres that the social subject has access to the discourses and to the language, interacting with himself, with others and with the world around them, forming himself continuously. / A internet tem sido o espaço – também denominado por alguns como ciberespaço – destinado à interação entre os sujeitos sociais da contemporaneidade. A ascensão tecnológica, especialmente pós guerra, a comercialização de computadores pessoais e os diversos dispositivos eletrônicos a que temos acesso atualmente trazem à tona interações antes impossibilitadas sem tal tecnologia. Nesse contexto, é possível reconhecer o imbricamento de diversas esferas de atividade humana, fazendo com que o sujeito inserido em contexto tecnológico se depare com necessidades comunicativas inexistentes anteriormente e, para suprir as lacunas emergentes desse ambiente, diversos gêneros discursivos surgem ou se adaptam a essa nova realidade. Nesse sentido, a presente dissertação de mestrado intitulada Memes jurisprudenciais no facebook do STJ: A constituição dialógica de um gênero verbo-visual diz respeito a um estudo em que propomos que o meme jurisprudencial, de autoria do Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ), é um gênero discursivo propagado na rede social facebook – produzido e circulado neste espaço – propiciando relações dialógicas entre discursos jurídicos materializados por meio da linguagem verbo-visual, favorecendo, assim, a constituição da arquitetônica do gênero em questão. Para tal, nos dispusemos a realizar uma pesquisa teórico-documental sobre alguns fundamentos bakhtinianos pertinentes à pesquisa, assim como analisar as relações dialógicas encontradas em 4 (quatro) memes (dentre 109 coletados) veiculados nos álbuns de fotos da página pública do STJ no facebook. Tal escolha foi feita a partir de recorrências temáticas e imagéticas que se referem a discursos sobre leis que contemplam relações entre pais e filhos, assim como ao uso de personagens da saga Star Wars que, em imbricamento de esferas – jurídica e midiática – compõem a arquitetônica deste gênero. Partimos da hipótese de que o meme jurisprudencial, ao materializar discursos diversos por meio da linguagem verbo-visual de seus enunciados, estabelecendo relações dialógicas entre eles, pode ser considerado um gênero discursivo segundo os estudos bakhtinianos. Para nossas reflexões teórico-metodológicas e análises, nos pautaremos na concepção dialógica da linguagem preconizada pelo Círculo de Bakhtin, constituído principalmente por Bakhtin, Volochínov e Medviédev. Nossa ênfase se dará nas noções de dialogismo, signo ideológico, interação verbal, gênero discursivo e discurso, pois, segundo o pensamento dialógico do Círculo, é a partir das relações dialógicas possibilitadas pelos enunciados relativamente estáveis que configuram os gêneros discursivos que o sujeito tem acesso aos discursos e à linguagem, interagindo consigo mesmo, com o outro e com o mundo à sua volta, constituindo-se continuamente.

<p><p><p>This thesis has focused on specific aspects of the law concerning the 2nd paragraph of The Care of Young Persons Act (1990:52), LVU. The purpose of this study was to examine the provision <em>other circumstance in the home </em>from a legal perspective; how is the provision defined in the law? A second purpose was to reveal any discrepancy between the intention of the legislation of the already mentioned provision and how this provision was interpreted and applied in practice. This study was jurisprudential and based on both traditional juristic method and sociological methods with qualitative interviews with social workers and text analysis of a case from The County Administrative Court. The gathered information was analysed using a method of discourse analysis. The theoretical framework for this thesis was social constructionism based upon the work of Berger and Luckmann. The conclusion of this study was that the provision <em>other circumstance in the home </em>is connected to the role of the mother though this is not noticed through the legislation. Another conclusion was that the practice considers the legal demand to anticipate as unattainable. The interpretation and application of the provision made by the practice, compared with the intention of the legislation, was representing both an expand and restriction of the provision.</p></p></p>

This thesis has focused on specific aspects of the law concerning the 2nd paragraph of The Care of Young Persons Act (1990:52), LVU. The purpose of this study was to examine the provision other circumstance in the home from a legal perspective; how is the provision defined in the law? A second purpose was to reveal any discrepancy between the intention of the legislation of the already mentioned provision and how this provision was interpreted and applied in practice. This study was jurisprudential and based on both traditional juristic method and sociological methods with qualitative interviews with social workers and text analysis of a case from The County Administrative Court. The gathered information was analysed using a method of discourse analysis. The theoretical framework for this thesis was social constructionism based upon the work of Berger and Luckmann. The conclusion of this study was that the provision other circumstance in the home is connected to the role of the mother though this is not noticed through the legislation. Another conclusion was that the practice considers the legal demand to anticipate as unattainable. The interpretation and application of the provision made by the practice, compared with the intention of the legislation, was representing both an expand and restriction of the provision.

本論文之主要論旨，在於探討公平正義是否可能在裁判之過程中獲得實現。筆者主要透過德沃金的法理論以及平等理論作為討論的出發點。筆者首先對於德沃金的理論進行相關的分析與討論。德沃金的法理論主要可區分為四個部分，包括：語義階段，法理階段，原理階段，以及裁判階段。在語義階段，德沃金指出，法律的概念，必須要作為一個詮釋性概念；在法理階段，德沃金將法律的概念當成一種政治價值的概念。德沃金認為，法律的概念所表彰的政治價值，便是「合法性價值」，亦即「法治」。進一步，德沃金指出，對於「合法性價值」與「法律的概念」的最佳理解，便是「整全性」。筆者認為，「整全性」是一個連接德沃金的「法理論」以及「平等理論」的關鍵概念。在《法律帝國》一書當中，德沃金主張：裁判的整全性，要求法官適用由公平與正義原則所推導出來的法律。這樣的主張，將我們帶向德沃金的平等理論。 德沃金的平等理論可以區分為兩個層面，一為討論關於分配正義的資源平等理論，另一為關乎政治權力分配的政治平等理論。這兩個概念，提供了司法裁判實踐公平正義的可能性。資源平等理論提供了相關的判準，可以使法院在裁判具體個案時得以援引，以判斷公民所擁有的具體權利，以及政府是否違反了在平等關懷下所需踐行的平等保護原則，而導致侵害人民的權利。同時，政治平等理論則為民主制度下的司法審查，提供其理論基礎。 最後，德沃金指出，關於裁判如何適用法律於具體個案的裁判過程，其與上述三階段有密切的關聯性。德沃金認為，在此一階段中，他與法實證主義者最大的不同，便是在於對於法官的裁量權的理解。德沃金認為，在其法理論體系當中，法官對裁量權的行使，是一種法律義務，而非如法實證主義者所稱，是一種道德責任。 不可避免的，對於德沃金的理論，存在有許多的反對意見。在此筆者援引了Joseph Raz以及Samuel Schaffler的論文，對德沃金的理論進行檢試。Raz指出，德沃金的理論本身，與其所主張的融貫並未有直接的關係，同時，德沃金的理論，忽略了權威在現代國家中所扮演的角色。Schaffler則指出，德沃金過份的強調經濟平等，因而致政治或社會平等遭到忽視。此外，Schaffler認為，德沃金的資源平等理論裡，欠缺對於境況與志向的區分標準。最後，Schaffler則是提到，德沃金的資源平等理論，隱藏著存在階級社會的可能性。 的確，Joseph Raz以及Samuel Schaffler的論文提供了反思性的觀點，不過，筆者認為，他們所提出的問題，無法成功的全然拒絕德沃金的理論。筆者認為，德沃金的法理論，成功的融合了「法治」以及「正義」與「公平」，因此，其理論也確實為司法裁判實踐公平正義的理念，提供了可能了路徑。 關鍵字：公平、正義、語義階段，法理階段，原理階段，裁判階段、法理論、平等、整全性、融貫、平等關懷 / The main issue of my thesis focuses on whether realization of the ideal of justice and fairness in adjudication is possible. I discuss this main issue by means of Dworkin’s legal theory and his theory of equality. First of all, I start my discussion with analysis of Dworkin’s legal theory, which includes four stages: the semantic stage, the jurisprudential stage, the doctrinal stage, and the adjudicative stage. In semantic stage, Dworkin points out that the concept of law should be interpretive concept. In jurisprudential stage, he deems the concept of law as a concept of political values, and what the value presented by concept of law is the value of legality. Furthermore, he considers the best concept of the value of the legality, so as the best conception of law, is integrity. I believe this is the key concept which connects Dworkin’s legal theory with theory of equality. In Law’s Empire, Dworkin said that integrity in adjudication asks judges apply the laws which come from the principle of justice and fairness. This leads us to Dworkin’s theory of equality. Dworkin presents his theory of Equality with two dimensions. One is equality of resources, which could be narrowly seen as a theory about distributive justice. The other is political equality concerning the distribution of political power. These two dimensions of his theory of equality offer the possibility of realizing the justice and fairness in adjudication. The theory of equality of resources offers the guidelines for courts to follow when deciding if citizens have some sort of concrete rights, and if government violates the equal protection of citizen’s rights that demanded by the ideal of equal concern. According to political equality, it offers the basis of judicial review in democracy. Finally, Dworkin points out that how judges apply laws to concrete case is something related to those three stages as mentioned above. Dworkin distinguishes himself from the legal positivists, such as Hans Kelsen and H.L.A. Hart. The different between Dworkin and legal positivists is discretion power of judges. In his theory, it is judge’s legal obligation rather than moral responsibility as positivists regard. Inevitably, there are some critics to Dworkin’s theory of equality. Here I cited the research of Joseph Raz and Samuel Schaffler to exam Dworkin’s theory. Their articles offer reflective points of view to me. Joseph Raz criticizes Dworkin’s theory as something irrelative to the coherence that Dworkin himself requests. He further criticizes that Dworkin’s theory of adjudication ignores the role of authority in modern state. Samuel Scheffler criticizes that Dworkin’s theory of equality ignores the importance of political and social equality. Besides, how to distinguish circumstance and ambition is not clear enough in Dworkin’s theory. Furthermore, Scheffler considers that Dworkin’s theory of equality may allow a heirachy administration exists. Although they point out some defects, I do not think they did fulfill significant challenges to Dworkin’s theory. After all, I consider that Dworkin’s legal theories build up a perfect framework for realizing the value of legality, which can also be referred as the rule of law. Most importantly, his legal theories are coherent the other moral values and convictions of ethics. I think Dworkin’s theories of law and equality may offer the best possibility to realize the ideal of justice and fairness in adjudication. Key Words: justice, fairness, the semantic stage, the jurisprudential stage, the doctrinal stage, the adjudicative stage, integrity, coherence, legal theory, equality, equal concern

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:25:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Augusto Grieco.pdf: 807036 bytes, checksum: f5a5f167db0673f493e2cbc84d16a5d8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007-10-22 / The present masters degree dissertation has as an objective to establish the real position of the statements of The Council of Social Welfare Recourses ( in Portuguese Conselho de Recursos da Previdência Social CRPS) in the Brazilian law. This essay is justified by the evolution of the access to the courts by the commons users of the Social Security what brings the revival of the administrative process as an instrument of social protection. The focus of this work is the birth of the jurisprudence in social welfare by the processual exercise of the Public Administration. It emphasizes the unicity of the political power and its indivisibility, and the importance of the exercise of the administrative activity, in its jurisprudential guide lines as a basilar element for the State secures its purposes for the social order, such as the welfare and the social justice. This study recognizes the administrative process as a branch of the processual gender as so, one of the fundamental guarantee to the citizen. The core of this study will be the analysis of the instrument of jurisprudential uniformization at service of the Plenary Court of the Council of Social Welfare Recourses (CRPS). This work broaches the subject of the species of jurisprudential uniformization expected by the Internal Rules of the Council of Social Welfare Recourses (CRPS). At last, this essay arises essential conclusions developed during the study, which evidence of rule character of the statements of the Council of Social Welfare Recourses, which get in the Brazilian Law as rules of general and abstract character, as an element that binds all the administrative structure of the social welfare, mainly the Social Security National Institute / A presente dissertação de mestrado tem por finalidade situar os enunciados do Conselho de Recursos da Previdência Social no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro. Justifica-se o presente estudo diante da evolução do acesso à justiça por parte dos beneficiários que impõe um renascimento do processo administrativo como instrumento de proteção social. O trabalho focaliza a formação jurisprudencial administrativa previdenciária pelo exercício da processualidade no âmbito da Administração Pública. Destaca o poder político como uno e indivisível e o exercício da atividade administrativa pela sua linha jurisdicional como elemento fundamental para que o Estado alcance os objetivos traçados para a ordem social, quais sejam, o bem-estar e a justiça sociais. Reconhece o processo administrativo como uma espécie do gênero processo e como garantia fundamental do cidadão. O núcleo do estudo será, por sua vez, a análise do instrumento de uniformização jurisprudencial colocado à disposição do Conselho Pleno do CRPS. Por derradeiro, aborda as espécies de uniformização de jurisprudência previstas no Regimento Interno do CRPS. Ao final, apresentam-se as conclusões essenciais desenvolvidas durante o estudo, que evidenciam o caráter de norma aos enunciados do CRPS, os quais ingressam no ordenamento jurídico na qualidade de norma com caráter geral e abstrato, vinculando toda a estrutura administrativa previdenciária, em especial o Instituto Nacional do Seguro Social

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:22:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Alexandre Fidalgo.pdf: 16088782 bytes, checksum: e136f0aff41651cea382a81612b81f29 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-10-18 / This study aims to discuss the possibility of rescissory action based on article 485, V, of the Code of Civil Procedure, under the justification of jurisprudential divergence. It defends that the merit decision transited in rem judicatam may be rescinded if it is contrary to prevailing jurisprudence at the time, considering analogous situations and incurred in a similar historical and social moment, under penalty of offense to the principle of isonomy, not applicable the Supreme Court Precedent Nr. 343 as being unconstitutional. Under the same argument, it presents the possibility of rescissory action against decision that does not obey the binding precedent and decision contrary to prevailing jurisprudence determined later. It also defends the possibility of rescissory action against sentence based on rule of law later declared unconstitutional and against decision declaring unconstitutional rule of law later declared constitutional. The study is presented in three main parts. The first one relates to the concepts and legal nature of the rescissory action, its admissibility presuppositions and the traditional assumptions of rescissory action. The second part addresses the issue of the possibility of rescissory action based on jurisprudential divergence. Finally; the third part is dedicated to the concepts of the rescissory action elements (parties, cause of action and claim - ius rescindens and ius rescissorium), as well as it address the jurisdiction and the suspension of effects of the rescinded decision / O presente 'trabalho tem por objeto discutir a possibilidade de ação rescisória, fundamentada no artigo 485, V, do Código de Processo Civil, sob a, justificativa de -', divergência jurisprudencial. Defende que a decisão de mérito transitada em julgado pode ser rescindida se for contrária à jurisprudência dominante à época, considerando situações análogas e havidas em um idêntico momento histórico e social, sob pena de ofensa ao princípio da isonomia, não sendo aplicável a Súmula. 343 do STF, por ser inconstitucional. Sob esse mesmo argumento, apresenta a possibilidade de ação rescisória contra decisão que não obedecer a súmula vinculante, além de decisão contrária a jurisprudência dominante fixada posteriormente. Também defende a possibilidade de ação rescisória contra sentença fundada em norma posteriormente declarada inconstitucional e contra decisão que considerou inconstitucional norma posteriormente declarada constitucional. O trabalho se apresenta em três grandes partes. A primeira diz respeito aos conceitos e natureza jurídica da ação rescisória, seus pressupostos de admissibilidade e as hipóteses tradicionais da ação rescisória. Na segunda parte, aborda o tema da possibilidade de ação rescisória fundamentada em Divergência jurisprudencial. Por fim, a parte final é dedicada aos conceitos da competência da ação rescisória e da suspensão dos efeitos da decisão rescindenda

Text in English and Arabic / In pre-colonial Africa, the Southwestern Sahara which includes Mauritania, Mali and Senegal belonged to what was then referred to as the Sudan and extended from the Atlantic seaboard to the Red Sea. The advent of Islam and the Arabic language to West Africa in the 11th century heralded an intellectual marathon whose literary output still fascinates us today. At a time when Europe was emerging from the dark ages and Africa was for most Europeans a terra incognita, indigenous African scholars were composing treatises as diverse as mathematics, agriculture and the Islamic sciences. A twentieth century Mauritanian, Arabic monograph, Irshād al- Muqallidīn ʿinda ikhtilāf al-Mujtahidīn1, written circa 1910/1332, by a yet unknown Mauritanian jurist of the Mālikī School, Bāba bin al-Shaykh Sīdī al- Shinqīṭī al-Ntishā-ī (d.1920/1342), a member of the muchacclaimed Shinqīṭī fraternity of scholars, is a fine example of African literary accomplishment. This manuscript hereinafter referred to as the Irshād, is written within the legal framework of Islamic jurisprudence (usūl al-fiqh). A science that relies for the most part on the intellectual and interpretive competence of the independent jurist, or mujtahid, in the application of the methodologies employed in the extraction of legal norms from the primary sources of the sharīʿah. The subject matter of the Irshād deals with the question of juristic differences. Juristic differences invariably arise when a mujtahid exercises his academic freedom to clarify or resolve conundrums in the law and to postulate legal norms. Other independent jurists (mujtahidūn) may posit different legal norms because of the exercise of their individual interpretive skills. These differences, when they are deemed juristically irreconcilable, are called ikhtilāfāt (pl. of ikhtilāf). The author of the Irshād explores a corollary of the ikhtilāf narrative and posits the hypothesis that there ought not to be ikhtilāf in the sharīʿah. The proposed research will comprise an annotated translation of the monograph followed by a synopsis and commentary on its dominant themes. / Religious Studies and Arabic / D. Litt. et Phil. (Islamic Studies)