Arizona is presently in the midst of a general adjudication for the Gila River system -- the watershed which comprises the southern two- thirds of the state. The purpose of the adjudication is to prioritize all water claims in the river system: both state -established and federally reserved rights. Arizona adheres to a bifurcated (or divided) system of water law which only recognizes a component of ground water -- called subflow -- to be appropriable. Wells which pump non-appropriable water -- called tributary flow -- are not to be included in the adjudication. The problem is that federal laws do not recognize this artificial bifurcation. The challenge lies in identifying a subflow zone which satisfies the hydrologic fiction of existing state precedents and the hydrologic reality of federal statutes. At the core of the problem lies the fate of Arizona's perennial stream water and the fulfillment of federally reserved tribal water rights. Thus, larger questions loom: can Arizona law reconcile its glutinous past with a water -scarce future, will the adjudication ever reach a finality, and even if it does, will it be a finality that all sides can live with?

Thesis (LLD (Private Law))--University of Stellenbosch, 1998. / 490 leaves double sided printed, preliminary pages and numbered pages 1-469. Includes bibliography. Digitised using a HP Scanjet 8250 Scanner to pdf format (OCR). / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: The thesis investigates the effect of the recognition of the rights of the child on the parent-child relationship in private law. Rights of the child seem, on the face of it, to undermine parental authority and family values. The impression is created that the state is abdicating its role as protector of the child in favour of unfettered freedom of the child. The delicate balance between individual freedom and family autonomy may in the result also be under threat. It was, therefore, necessary to extend the investigation to include the role of parents and that of the state. The study is divided into three parts. The first contains a theoretical analysis of the concept rights of the child. It is clear that the concept is a manifestation of fundamental human rights. The rights of the child are unique in nature and accommodate the changing phases of dependence and developing abilities of the child. Theoretical analysis negates the perception that the recognition of the rights of the child contributes to erosion of the family: the importance of the commitment of parents and of the state is apparent. The second part consists of a comprehensive review of the parent-child relationship in the South African private law, and an analysis of the public law dimension of the concept rights of the child. This part of the investigation demonstrates that parental authority is firmly rooted in legal history and that substantive private law does not recognise the child as bearer of rights within the context of the family. However, the Bill of Rights and the 1989 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child unequivocally give public law status to the child as bearer of rights. The study shows that the private and public law status of a child cannot be isolated from one another and that adaptations will have to be made to implement the rights of the child. In the third part of the study an attempt is made to identify the kind of adaptation that must be made. The impact of the idea of the rights of the child upon the parent-child relationship in private law is investigated. Australian and Scottish law are examples of legal systems which endeavour to implement fully the concept of the rights of the child. Indigenous law places a high value on human dignity. The interaction between rights and duties in indigenous systems reflect values which are inherent in the idea of the rights of the child. The study shows that the impact of the rights of the child on the parent-child relationship is such that change and adaptation of private law is necessary. Change and adaptation are required at both theoretical and practical level. A number of obstacles which may inhibit the process of change are identified. Finally, the kind of change and adaptation required is illustrated by a number of practical examples of the impact ofchange on the parent-child relationship. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Daar word in hierdie proefskrif gepoog om te bepaal wat die effek van die erkenning van kinderregte op die ouer-kind verhouding in die privaatreg is. Kinderregte skep op die oog af die persepsie dat ouerlike gesag en gesinswaardes onderrnyn word en dat die staat sy rol as beskerrner van 'n kind abdikeer ten gunste van onbeperkte vryhede aan 'n kind. Die delikate balans tussen individuele vryhede en gesinsoutonomie is in gedrang en op hierdie wyse word die rol van ouers en die staat ook by die ondersoek betrek. Die studie behels 'n drieledige ondersoek. In die eerste plek vind 'n teoretiese ontleding van die begrip kinderregte plaas. Hierdie ondersoek toon aan dat kinderregte 'n verskyningsvorrn van fundamentele menseregte is. Kinderregte het 'n eiesoortige aard en akkommodeer die wisselende fases van afhanklikheid en ontwikkelende verrnoens van 'n kind. Die betrokkenheid van ouers en die staat word beklemtoon en die teoretiese uitgangspunt besweer gevolglik negatiewe persepsies dat die erkenning van kinderregte tot gesinsverbrokkeling sal meewerk. Die tweede deel van die ondersoek bestaan uit 'n volledige uiteensetting van die ouerkind verhouding in die Suid-Afrikaanse privaatreg en 'n ontleding van die publiekregtelike dimensie van die begrip kinderregte. Hierdie deel van die ondersoek bewys dat ouerlike gesag regshistories sterk fundeer is en dat die substantiewe privaatreg nie die kind as draer van regte binne gesinsverband erken nie. Daarteenoor verleen die Handves van Regte en die Verenigde Nasies se Konvensie op die Regte van die kind 1989 'n duidelike publiekregtelike status aan die kind as draer van regte. Die ondersoek toon aan dat die privaatregtelike en publiekregtelike status van 'n kind nie van mekaar gelsoleer kan word nie en dat aanpassings sal moet plaasvind ten einde kinderregte te implementeer. Die tipe aanpassings wat gemaak sal moet word, vloei voort uit die derde element van hierdie studie. Hierdie deeI van die studie behels 'n toepassing van die idee van kinderregte op die ouer-kind verhouding in die privaatreg. 'n Regsvergelykende element word betrek en die Australiese en Skotse reg word as modelle van 'n regstelsel voorgehou wat poog om kinderregte tot sy volle konsekwensies te implementeer. Vir doeleindes van interne regsvergelyking word daar ook na die inheemse reg verwys. Die hoe premie wat laasgenoemde regstelsel op menswaardigheid plaas en die wisselwerking tussen regte en verpligtinge verteenwoordig waardes wat eie aan die idee van kinderregte is. Die gevolgtrekking is dat die effek van kinderregte op die ouer-kind verhouding van sodanige omvang is dat aanpassings in die privaatreg sal moet plaasvind. Veranderings in regsdenke en formele aanpassings word vereis en 'n aantal struikelblokke wat deel van hierdie proses is, word uitgelig. Sekere praktiese implikasies vir die ouer-kind verhouding word ook voorgehou ten einde te illustreer wat die aard van die aanpassings is wat vereis word.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

"Mémoire présenté à la Faculté des études supérieures en vue de l'obtention du grade de Maîtrise en droit (L.L.M.) Option recherche" / La découverte des cellules souches embryonnaires et de leur immense potentiel thérapeutique a fait naître de grands espoirs. De nouvelles thérapies révolutionnaires pour traiter certaines des maladies les plus graves dont souffre l'humanité sont désormais envisageables. Le traitement de la vie à son stade le plus précoce est mis en cause. Le statut juridique reconnu au foetus et à l'embryon humain a des répercussions directes sur le domaine de la recherche et sur leur utilisation à des fins thérapeutiques. Nous avons examiné l'état du droit canadien quant au statut juridique du foetus et de l'embryon. De cette étude, nous avons constaté l'incertitude qui prévaut au Canada quant à leur statut. Par la suite, nous avons étudié les différentes normes canadiennes établies pour encadrer l'utilisation des cellules souches embryonnaires à des fins thérapeutiques et nous les avons analysées et comparées pour faire ressortir leurs similitudes et leurs différences. II est ressorti de notre analyse que les textes canadiens se rejoignent généralement sur l'essentiel et qu'il y a eu peu de changements de 1993 à aujourd'hui, en regard des activités de recherche interdites au Canada. Puis, nous avons examiné les systèmes normatifs applicables à ces recherches à l'étranger, soit aux États-Unis et en GrandeBretagne. Nous avons effectué une analyse comparative des trois systèmes normatifs étudiés, en évaluant différents paramètres communs à ces systèmes. Il est ressorti de cette analyse, que la Grande-Bretagne est le pays le plus libéral relativement à ces domaines de recherche, que les États-Unis sont les plus conservateurs sur ces questions et que le Canada se situe entre les deux. / The embryonic stem cells discovery and the immense therapeutic potential glven to them has created big hopes in the world of today. The appearance of new revolutionary therapies to treat sorne of the most serious known diseases are now conceivable. However, the treatment of life to its earliest stage is questionned. The legal status recognized to the foetus and the embryo has, in fact, a direct effect to the research area and industry as weil as to its therapeutic use. Therefore, we have examined and studied the CUITent canadian law with respect to the legal status of the foetus and embryo. Following this study, we have noticed the uncertainty that prevails in Canada concerning the said legal status. Afierwards, we have examined ail the different canadian norms and regulations already established regarding the use of embryonic stem cells for therapeutic ends. We also did the comparaison between those norms and regulations so as to see their differences and similarities. It appears from our analysis that ail the canadian litterature generally treat the subject in the same way and that there have been few changes from 1993 up until now with respect to the forbidden researchs activities in Canada. We also have analysed the foreign law standards and regulations in United States and Great Britain concerning those forbidden researchs activities. We did the exercise of comparing the state of the law in these three countries with different parameters. It emerges from that that Great Britain is the most liberal country, United States being the most conservative and Canada being in between them.

Depuis la création de l'Union soviétique jusqu'à sa dissolution, la mer Caspienne appartenait à l'Iran et à l'URSS, qui constituaient ses deux seuls États riverains. Ces derniers avaient convenu de gérer la Caspienne «en commun », selon un régime de condominium, dans deux accords bilatéraux signés en 1921 et 1940. Cependant, après le démembrement de l'Union soviétique en 1991, trois nouveaux États indépendants et riverains de la Caspienne (1'Azerbaïdjan, le Kazakhstan et le Turkménistan) se sont ajoutés à l'équation, et ont exigé une révision du régime juridique conventionnel en vigueur. Ainsi, des négociations multilatérales ont été entamées, lesquelles ont mis en relief plusieurs questions juridiques faisant l'objet d'interprétation divergente: Le régime juridique conventionnel de 1921 et de 1940 (établissant une gestion en commun) est-il toujours valable dans la nouvelle conjoncture? Les nouveaux États riverains successeurs de l'Union soviétique sont-ils tenus de respecter les engagements de l'ex-URSS envers l'Iran quant à la Caspienne? Quel est l'ordre juridique applicable à la mer Caspienne? Serait-ce le droit de la mer (UNCLOS) ou le droit des traités? La notion de rebus sic stantibus - soit le « changement fondamental de circonstances» - aurait-elle pour effet l'annulation des traités de 1921 et de 1940? Les divisions administratives internes effectuées en 1970 par l'URSS pour délimiter la mer sont-elles valides aujourd'hui, en tant que frontières maritimes? Dans la présente recherche, nous prendrons position en faveur de la validité du régime juridique établi par les traités de 1921 et de 1940 et nous soutiendrons la position des États qui revendiquent la transmission des engagements de l'ex-URSS envers l'Iran aux nouveaux États riverains. Pour cela nous effectuerons une étude complète de la situation juridique de la mer Caspienne en droit international et traiterons chacune des questions mentionnées ci-dessus. Le droit des traités, le droit de la succession d'États, la Convention des Nations Unies du droit de la mer de 1982, la doctrine, la jurisprudence de la C.I.J et les positions des États riverains de la Caspienne à l'ONU constituent nos sources pour l'analyse détaillée de cette situation. / From the creation of the Soviet Union to its dissolution, the Caspian Sea belonged to Iran and the USSR, which were its only two littoral States. The Caspian was, during this period, governed by two bilateral agreements signed in 1921 and 1940, in which the two States had agreed to “jointly” manage the Sea. However, after the dissolution of the USSR in 1991 gave birth to three newly independent States (Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan) with coast lines along the Caspian Sea, these three new actors demanded with insistence that the existing treaty-based regime be revised. During the course of the ensuing negotiations, several legal questions have been raised: Is the treaty-based legal regime established by the 1921 and 1940 treaties still valid in the new regional configuration? Are the newly independent States, successors to the USSR, obliged to respect the former Union's legal obligations towards Iran? If not, what is the appropriate legal regime applicable to the Caspian? Is it the law of the Sea (as defined mostly in the UNCLOS) or the law of treaties? Considering the new regional configuration, does the concept of rebus sic stantibus - or the fundamental change of circumstances - invalidate the 1921 and 1940 treaties? Will the internal administrative divisions established in 1970 by the former Soviet Union with regards to the Caspian become - de jure - the new international maritime frontiers? In this thesis, we argue in favour of the validity of the legal regime established by the 1921 and 1940 treaties and we support the position of those States which assert the transmissibility of the obligations of the former Union to the newly independent littoral States. In doing so, we will provide a complete analysis of the legal dilemma at hand and suggest appropriate analytical answers to the aforementioned questions. The law of treaties, the law of the succession of States, the 1982 United Nations' Convention of the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), doctrinal commentaries, case law of the I.C.J, and official U.N documents revealing the positions of each littoral States will be thoroughly conversed in this regard.

This study critically analyses the protection and enforcement of inmates’ socio-economic rights in South Africa. For the purpose of this study inmates’ socio-economic rights include the right to adequate medical treatment, accommodation, nutrition and education. This analysis is informed by the fact that South African courts are struggling to interpret and enforce inmates’ socio-economic rights as required by the Constitution and international norms and standards. The objective of this study, therefore, is whether South Africa protects and enforces these rights as required by the Constitution and international norms and standards. In an attempt to resolve the problem, the methodology of this study relies on a legal methodology which focuses on a review of law books, journal articles, the constitutions, statutes, regulations and case law. The study concludes that South Africa protects and enforces these rights as required by the Constitution and complies with international norms and standards. However, the enforcement of these rights has to pay attention to the constitutional imperatives of interpreting the Bill of Rights. When interpreting inmates’ right to adequate medical treatment, it is imperative for the courts to unpack its content. The courts need to also promote the value of human dignity when determining whether overcrowding violates their right to adequate accommodation. The determination of whether their right to adequate nutrition has been violated should focus on whether inmates’ claim to cultural food is based on a sincere belief which could be objectively supported. Further, the Regulations should extend the right to cultural or religious food to all inmates. Lastly, it is the duty of the courts and the institutions of higher learning to ensure that inmates have access to the internet for study purpose. / Public, Constitutional, and International Law / LL. D.

In 2003, Congress passed the Prison Rape Elimination Act to address the problem of sexual violence in prison. Although research has shed light on the prevalence and incidence of sexual violence in U.S. prisons, few studies examine inmates’ perceptions of rape and safety from rape in prison. This study examined rape perceptions and the likelihood to seek mental health treatment in prison of three distinct groups of male inmates who are at greater risk of sexual victimization or exposure to sexual violence while incarcerated: gay and bisexual inmates, inmates with a juvenile incarceration history, and inmates who were first incarcerated in the adult criminal justice system during adolescence or emerging adulthood. This study examined the relationships between sexual orientation and inmates’ perceptions of the threat of rape and seeking of mental health treatment in prison. Data from 409 incarcerated men residing in 23 maximum security correctional institutions revealed that gay and bisexual inmates were significantly more likely than straight inmates to fear the threat of rape and to voluntarily request mental health treatment in prison. Incarcerated men with a history of childhood abuse were significantly more likely than inmates without an abuse history to fear the threat of rape. Having a history of childhood sexual abuse, identifying as black, and being incarcerated for longer than 18 years also significantly predicted increased likelihood to voluntarily request mental health treatment in prison. Implications for practice and policy are discussed. / Includes bibliography. / Thesis (M.S.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2016. / FAU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Collection

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:24:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Marcos Alberto Sant Anna Bitelli.pdf: 1865746 bytes, checksum: 3e81c50146c4e4ff4d762357c05f7f01 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-03-15 / The study aims to: (i) demonstrate that not all features of personality rights are confirmed effectively in the daily exercise of the right of publicity in the contemporary moment; (ii) evidence that the economic use is an inexorable reality that requires the definition of new contours of the right of publicity; (iii) propose to identify limits to the right of publicity; (iv) to propose the identification of principles applicable to legal relations in the economic use of image rights. Rationale: The right of publicity obtained its autonomy in relation to other personality rights and in Brazil, it was raised to a constitutional fundamental right. The Civil Code treated the right of publicity in Article 20 that is subject to severe critics from the doctrine and cause several disputes in Courts, having been challenged its constitutionality. The Federal Supreme Court in the trial of ADI 4815 that had as its backdrop the need for authorization to produce biographies established rational balance between the fundamental rights of freedom of speech and right of publicity, recognizing the precedence of that freedom of speech on such right. The civil law operation can identify limits to the right of publicity in the production of contents that materialize the freedom of speech without having to seek for solution trough some resolution conflict techniques of constitutional rights. Hypothesis: The work brings as hypothesis that the right of publicity, like author s rights, is a personality right that allows the identification of limits to its exercise and to be subject of civil agreements with economic content, without destroying the core of such right or denying its legal nature. Theoretical and methodological aspects: This study develops an evaluation of the rights of publicity in order to initially identify it as a kind of legal status rather than subjective rights, to then integrate it into the personal assets of the person. Methods of the rules of evidence, analysis and synthesis were used to demonstrate the absence of apparent unanimity about the characteristics of the publicity rights. The case law, jurisprudence and the paradigms of foreign law were additional elements to illustrate the hypothesis. Result: The result was the identification of the boundaries of image rights, the principles that should be applied to relations that the image is the object, a proposal for a revision of Article 20 of the Brazilian Civil Code and of the Precedent 403 of the Superior Court of Justice / O trabalho tem como objetivos (i) demonstrar que nem todas as características dos direitos de personalidade se confirmam de forma efetiva no exercício cotidiano do direito à imagem no momento contemporâneo; (ii) evidenciar que a utilização econômica é uma realidade inexorável que exige a definição de novos contornos do direito à imagem; (iii) propor a identificação dos limites ao direito à imagem enquanto situação jurídica absoluta; (iv) propor a identificação de princípios aplicáveis às relações jurídicas que tenham com objeto à utilização econômica do direito à imagem. Justificativa: O direito à imagem conquistou sua autonomia em relação aos demais direitos de personalidade e no Brasil foi erguido à condição de direito fundamental. O Código Civil tratou no direito à imagem no artigo 20 que é objeto críticas doutrinárias e grandes disputas judiciais, tendo sido desafiado quanto sua constitucionalidade. O Supremo Tribunal Federal no julgamento da ADI 4815 que tinha como pano de fundo a necessidade de autorização para a produção de biografias estabeleceu racional de ponderação entre os direitos fundamentais de liberdade de expressão e à imagem, reconhecendo a precedência daquela liberdade sobre esse direito. A civilística pode identificar limites aos direito à imagem na produção de conteúdos que materializam a liberdade de expressão sem que se tenha que recorrer às técnicas de solução de conflitos aparentes entre direitos constitucionais. Hipótese: O trabalho traz como hipótese a afirmação de que o direito à imagem, tal qual o direito de autor, é um direito de personalidade que admite a identificação de limites ao seu exercício bem como que se estabeleçam com ele relações jurídicas de caráter econômico, sem que se destrua o núcleo essencial do direito ou se negue sua natureza jurídica. Aspectos teóricos e metodológicos: Desenvolveu-se uma avaliação do direito à imagem de modo a identifica-lo primeiramente como uma situação jurídica ao invés de um direito subjetivo, para em seguida, integrá-lo ao patrimônio da pessoa. Utilizou-se os métodos das regras de evidência, análise e síntese para demonstrar a ausência da aparente unanimidade sobre as características do direito à imagem. A casuística, a jurisprudência e os paradigmas de direito estrangeiro foram elementos adicionais para ilustrar a hipótese. Resultado: Os resultados obtidos foram a identificação dos limites do direito à imagem, os princípios que devem se aplicados às relações jurídicas de que seja objeto, uma proposta de revisão do art. 20 do Código Civil brasileiro e da Súmula 403 do Superior Tribunal de Justiça