No description available.

No description available.

Submitted by Marcia Bacha (marcia.bacha@fgv.br) on 2012-05-07T21:06:46Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Bruno Barata Magalhães.pdf: 542878 bytes, checksum: db37ec4808295e352a4efa3c0675e4e7 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Marcia Bacha (marcia.bacha@fgv.br) on 2012-05-08T12:16:50Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Bruno Barata Magalhães.pdf: 542878 bytes, checksum: db37ec4808295e352a4efa3c0675e4e7 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2012-05-08T13:07:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Bruno Barata Magalhães.pdf: 542878 bytes, checksum: db37ec4808295e352a4efa3c0675e4e7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-03 / O Supremo Tribunal Federal entregou ao ordenamento jurídico brasileiro, em 21 de agosto de 2008, a súmula vinculante nº 13. O referido verbete trata da vedação a nomeações de cônjuge, companheiro ou parente em linha reta, colateral ou por afinidade até o terceiro grau, no âmbito da administração pública direta e indireta, em todas as esferas. Antes da vigência da súmula vinculante nº 13, o nepotismo era praticado de forma nebulosa, tendo em vista a ausência de uma fiscalização eficaz e eficiente. Os Estados e Municípios, através de legislação própria, buscaram o combate a essa prática em momento anterior à edição do verbete, o país carecia de uma regra geral. A partir do início da vigência da súmula vinculante nº 13, o que se verificou, no âmbito da administração pública brasileira, como será demonstrado adiante, foram diversas exonerações de servidores por simples suposição de que determinada situação jurídica configuraria nepotismo, cenário totalmente contrário àquele então proposto.. O STF manifesta-se face aos casos concretos apenas em sede de reclamação. Têm-se, atualmente, uma situação de grave insegurança jurídica, onde servidores públicos não sabem se podem ou não ser nomeados ou se podem continuar exercendo suas funções. O presente exame, pautado no direito comparado e em estudo de casos, analisou algumas situações hipotéticas que, supostamente, configurariam nepotismo, e outras já decididas pela Suprema Corte e propõe uma alteração de natureza legislativa ao instituto das súmulas vinculantes: a criação de incisos a incluídos no corpo do enunciado após cada decisão em sede de reclamação, cujos efeitos não possuem efeito vinculante. Dessa forma, a administração pública direta e indireta poderá aplicar a súmula vinculante nº 13 de forma eficaz, sem interpretações equivocadas, de modo a permitir uma sintonia entre a segurança jurídica e a moralidade. / The Supreme Court gave to the brazilian legal system, on August 21, 2008, the summary with binding effect no. 13. This summary’s goal is to sealing the nomination of spouse, partner or relative in a straight or side line, or by affinity to the third degree under the direct and indirect public administration in all spheres. Before the effect of the summary with binding effect no. 13, nepotism was practiced in an obscure way, with the absence of an effective and efficient supervision. The states and municipalities, through their legislations, sought to combat this practice just prior to the edition of the summary, the country lacked a general rule. From the outset of the summary with binding effect no. 13, it was possible to verify dismissals of public servants by simple assumption that a particular legal situation would set nepotism, totally contrary to that scenario then proposed. The Supreme Court manifested in relation to specific cases bases only on complaint. The society is dealing with a currently situation of serious legal uncertainty, where public servants do not know whether or not they can be appointed or continue performing their duties. This examination, based on comparative law and case studies, examined some hypothetical situations that, supposedly, could comprise nepotism, and other already decided by the Supreme Court and proposes a legislative change to the institute of summary with binding effects: the creation of the items, included in the body of the summary after every decision from a complaint. Thus, the direct and indirect public administration may apply the summary with binding effect no. 13 effectively, without misinterpretation to allow a line between legal certainty and morality.

Cette thèse s'inscrit dans la nouvelle histoire du droit européen en proposant les résultats de recherches biographiques sur les premiers juges, avocats généraux et greffier qui ont fait fonctionner la Cour de Justice de l'Union européenne pendant les vingt premières années de son existence (1952 - 1972). Il s'agit tout d'abord de mettre en lumière les parcours professionnels et personnels des pionniers de la juridiction et des hommes qui ont prononcé certains de ses jugements les plus connus, ceux qui ont lancé le processus de « constitutionnalisation » de l'ordre juridique communautaire. Ensuite, il s'agit d'utiliser les résultats de ces recherches biographiques pour apporter, sur trois points précis, des éléments de réponse à une question qui intéresse depuis deux décennies en particulier les politistes - et de manière plus récente, les historiens: comment cette institution réussit-elle, à partir des années 1960, à autant limiter la souveraineté des Etats membres, en posant notamment le principe de primauté du droit européen, et cela sans semble-t-il être confrontée à de sérieuses résistances de la part des dirigeants des Etats membres ? Cette thèse analyse tout d'abord le processus de nomination des juges et des avocats généraux, afin de savoir si les gouvernements tentent, ou non, via le mécanisme de sélection de mettre un terme à sa jurisprudence audacieuse. Puis, elle étudie les convictions européennes des membres de la Cour et leur vision du rôle qu'ils doivent jouer dans le processus d'intégration. Enfin, elle s'intéresse au réseau politique des hommes de la juridiction européenne et leurs interactions officieuses avec les dirigeants des Etats membres. / This Ph.D. thesis contributes to the new history of European law by proposing the results of in-depth biographical research on the first judges, advocates general and registrar who worked at the European Court of Justice during the first twenty years of its existence (1952 - 1972). Firstly, it sheds new light on the professional and personal trajectories of the Court's pioneers and of those who pronounced some of its most commented judgments, those who laid the foundation of the 'constitutionalization' of the European legal order. Secondly, it leans on the collected biographical data in order to bring to the surface new elements of knowledge on three precise points with regard to a question which political scientists have been interested in for two decades - and which now also historians address: how did the European Court of Justice, from the 1960s onwards, succeed in seriously limiting the Member States' sovereignty, especially by imposing the principle of primacy of European law, without provoking a rebellion by national decision-makers? It first of all analyzes the nomination process of the first judges and advocates general, in order to establish whether governments did, or did not, use the appointment mechanism to curb down ECJ activism. It then studies the members of the Court's views and convictions with regard to European integration and their role in the European Communities. Finally, it looks at the political affiliations of the first members of the Court of Justice and their unofficial interactions with national decision-makers.

Emotional and Behavioral Disorders (EBD) directly influence learning, relationships, mood, and overall scholastic experiences. Research provides evidence that early intervention and prevention efforts can address the needs of students with EBD (Allen-DeBoer, Malmgren, & Glass, 2006; Cook, et al. 2008; Lien-Thorne & Kamps, 2005; Regan, Mastropieri, & Scruggs, 2005; Rivera, Al-Otiba, & Koorland, 2006), but in order to identify these at-risk youth, a screening system is needed to broadly consider Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Concerns (SEBC).This dissertation evaluated the alignment of a teacher nomination process (Teacher Nomination Form (TNF)) and a normative screener of EBD risk (BASC-2 Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (BESS), Kamphaus & Reynolds, 2007). Teacher nominations and rankings were significantly correlated to the BESS in the internalizing (.177), externalizing (.246), and combined categories (.304) groups. Multiple teacher nominations were not significantly related to BESS scores. Social validity evidence was gathered and interpreted.

No description available.