Submitted by Cássia Santos (cassia.bcufg@gmail.com) on 2015-04-27T12:55:40Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Johnny Taliateli do Couto - 2015.pdf: 1475599 bytes, checksum: a72aa2de6227133988708dd7793a4a75 (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2015-04-28T12:05:00Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Johnny Taliateli do Couto - 2015.pdf: 1475599 bytes, checksum: a72aa2de6227133988708dd7793a4a75 (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-28T12:05:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Johnny Taliateli do Couto - 2015.pdf: 1475599 bytes, checksum: a72aa2de6227133988708dd7793a4a75 (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-02-11 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES / This research has the goal of investigate the relationship between the Portuguese monarchy and the Papacy during the thirteenth century, especially, the reign of Sancho II (1223-1248). King, Kingdom and Papacy intersect each other in our analysis about the deposition process that unseated the Portuguese king and, at the same time, those interactions are crucial regarding the dynamic research that we establish in this work. Sancho II had a troubled coexistence with the clergy and the papal curia, especially in the time of Gregory IX (1227- 1241) and Innocent IV (1243-1254). We argue that this problem came from the great power concentrated in the hands of Iberian clergy, beyond the break of the king with a certain faction of those prelates, in particular, Master Vicente and the archbishop of Braga, Silvestre Godinho. In the Council of Lyon (1245), the Portuguese monarch was deposed by Pope Innocent IV (called rex inutilis, in other words, inadequate to lead the government of the kingdom), due to a linkage involving not only the high Portuguese ecclesiastical dignitaries, but also the king’s brother, Afonso, the Count of Bologna. We have spent some effort to understand some details of papal action, especially the time when the king’s situation worsened. For that investigative task, we emphasize the documents issued by the Chancellery of Sancho II and the papal documentation designed to Portugal. We intend with our analysis to evince that far from being unable to rule, in different circumstances, the Portuguese monarch expressed the royal will, both in negotiations and in retaliations against opponents. / Esta pesquisa tem como fito investigar as relações da monarquia portuguesa com o papado no século XIII, de modo especial, o reinado de D. Sancho II (1223-1248). Rei, Reino e Papado se entrecruzam em nossa análise acerca do processo de deposição que destituiu o monarca português e, ao mesmo tempo, na dinâmica de investigação que estabelecemos no corpo deste trabalho. Sancho II teve uma convivência conturbada com o clero e com a cúria pontifícia, mormente no tempo de Gregório IX (1227-1241) e Inocêncio IV (1243-1254). Defendemos que esse problema proveio do grande poder contido nas mãos do clero ibérico, além do rompimento do rei com determinada facção daqueles prelados, nomeadamente, Mestre Vicente e o arcebispo de Braga, Silvestre Godinho. No Concílio de Lyon de 1245, o monarca português foi deposto pelo Papa Inocêncio IV (tratado como um rex inutilis, isto é, insuficiente para conduzir o governo do reino), devido uma articulação que envolveu não só os altos dignitários eclesiásticos portugueses, mas também o irmão do rei, Afonso, o Conde de Bolonha. Foi preciso despendermos certo esforço para compreender alguns pormenores da ação pontifícia, principalmente, o momento em que a situação do rei se agravou. Para essa labuta investigativa, recorremos com maior ênfase aos documentos expedidos na chancelaria de Sancho II e a documentação pontifícia destinada a Portugal. Pretendemos com nossa análise, evidenciar que longe de mostrar-se incapaz, em diversas circunstâncias o monarca português manifestou a vontade régia, tanto em negociações, assim como em retaliações aos oponentes.

Submitted by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2017-03-07T13:01:42Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Láisson Menezes Luiz - 2017.pdf: 1390387 bytes, checksum: bb6ba0742be9cf98288b19df1490207d (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2017-03-07T13:03:26Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Láisson Menezes Luiz - 2017.pdf: 1390387 bytes, checksum: bb6ba0742be9cf98288b19df1490207d (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-03-07T13:03:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Láisson Menezes Luiz - 2017.pdf: 1390387 bytes, checksum: bb6ba0742be9cf98288b19df1490207d (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-02-14 / Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPq / This research aims to understand how D. Dinis (1279-1325) managed during his reign to soften the relations between the crown and the clergy. For when this monarch assumed the Portuguese throne in the second half of the thirteenth century, he encountered a kingdom in crisis due to the disagreements of earlier monarchs with ecclesiastical power. For this reason, one of his first acts as king was to end these conflicts that had been dragging practically since the reign of D. Sancho I (1185-1211). The problems with the clergy were solved with the establishment of concordats, in all were signed two, one in 1289 and another in 1309. With these concordats D. Dinis was able to strengthen the monarchical power without major conflicts with the ecclesiastical power, that had to open some privileges, however, their rights have been respected. Therefore, after several years of quarrels and intrigues involving the crown, the clergy and the nobility, we observed that D. Dinis was the monarch who, in fact, obtained some result, leaving to his son, D. Afonso IV (1325-1357), A kingdom in progress and development both in relation to the consolidation of the policy of royal sovereignty and to an evolutionary social and economic dynamic. / Esta pesquisa tem como objetivos compreender como D. Dinis (1279-1325) conseguiu durante seu reinado amenizar as relações entre a coroa e o clero. Pois, quando este monarca assumiu o trono português, na segunda metade do século XIII, encontrou um reino em crise devido às desavenças de monarcas anteriores com o poder eclesiástico. Por esse fato, uma de suas primeiras atitudes como rei foi acabar com esses conflitos que vinham se arrastando praticamente desde o reinado de D. Sancho I (1185-1211). Os problemas com o clero foram resolvidos com o estabelecimento das concordatas, ao todo foram assinadas duas, uma em 1289 e outra em 1309. Com essas concordatas D. Dinis pôde fortalecer o poder monárquico sem maiores conflitos com o poder eclesiástico, que teve que abrir mão de alguns privilégios, entretanto, seus direitos passaram a ser respeitados. Portanto, depois de vários anos de disputas e intrigas envolvendo a coroa, o clero e a nobreza, observamos que D. Dinis foi o monarca que, de fato, conseguiu algum resultado, deixando para seu filho, D. Afonso IV (1325-1357), um reino em progresso e desenvolvimento tanto com relação à consolidação da política de soberania régia quanto a uma dinâmica evolutiva social e econômica.

L’objectif de cette thèse est de contribuer à la connaissance de l’histoire de l’art en Europe entre la Révolution et la Restauration, à travers l’étude du profil artistique, intellectuel et social du peintre Vincenzo Camuccini (1771-1844). Considéré dès son plus jeune âge comme l’un des artistes les plus influents de son époque, Camuccini occupe pendant plusieurs décennies de nombreuses charges au sein de l’administration pontificale (Académie de Saint-Luc et musée du Vatican). L’étude de sa production de tableaux d’histoire atteste qu’il est le principal représentant en Europe d’un néoclassicisme tardif, qui attribue une valeur fondante à la fidélité aux sources anciennes et qui filtre l’histoire contemporaine à travers des formes antiques. Ses tableaux religieux documentent, en outre, sa participation à l’élaboration de la politique culturelle de la papauté. Cet artiste résolument académique a été condamné par la critique dès sa mort en 1844. La présente monographie souhaite évaluer à sa juste mesure une personnalité artistique qui permet d’apporter un regard renouvelé sur les rapports entre art, politique et religion au sein des États pontificaux et en Europe entre la fin du XVIIIe et la première partie du XIXe siècle. L’objectif de cette thèse et de contribuer à la connaissance de l’histoire de l’art en Europe entre la Révolution et la Restauration, à travers l’étude du profil artistique, intellectuel et social du peintre Vincenzo Camuccini (1771-1844). / Through the study of the artistic, intellectual and social aspects of painter Vincenzo Camuccini’s (1771-1844) career, this PhD research is meant to expand the knowledge of European art history between the French Revolution and the Bourbon Restoration.Regarded as one of the leading artists of his time since he was young, Camuccini held high office in the Pontifical administration for several years (Saint Luke Academy and Vatican Museums). From the study of his historical paintings he emerges as the leading representative in Europe of a late neoclassicism characterized by an axiomatic adherence to historical sources and a mediated approach to contemporary history through the lens of past styles. His religious paintings attest his participation in the development of the papacy’s cultural policy. Since his death in 1844 such firmly academic artist has been condemned by the critics. This monographic study is aimed at a reassessment of Camuccini’s career allowing for a new regard on the relationship between art, politics and religion both within the Vatican State and in Europe between the end of the 18th century and the first part of the 19th century.

Matthieu d'Aquasparta (v. 1240-1302) est une figure emblématique de la fin du XIIIe siècle. Maître en théologie de l'Université de Paris, son oeuvre est abondante ; franciscain, il est élu ministre général de l'Ordre ; nommé cardinal par Nicolas IV, il est un des plus fidèles alliés du pape Boniface VIII. Pourtant, malgré ses écrits et son parcours politique, Matthieu d'Aquasparta ne connaîtra aucune postérité avant d'être redécouvert au début du XXe siècle. Son oeuvre de théologien acquiert une place croissante dans les analyses des historiens et des philosophes médiévistes grâce aux éditions de ses Questions disputées, publiées par les frères de Quaracchi ; les interprétations s'affinent progressivement : après l'avoir longtemps considéré comme un « néo-augustinien » convaincu, les historiens s'interrogent sur sa place parmi les franciscains de sa génération, son lien avec Thomas d'Aquin et ses rapports avec la tradition aristotélicienne. L'édition de ses six Quodlibets disputés à Paris et à la Curie pontificale offre de nombreuses perspectives de recherches. Ces textes sont conservés principalement dans deux manuscrits, un autographe et une copie corrigée par l'auteur ; il s'agit par conséquent d'un témoignage exceptionnel pour étudier le travail d'un maître en théologie. L’analyse de ses manuscrits (autographes et manuscrits de travail) complétée par l’étude du contenu des questions éditées permettent d’esquisser une introduction biographique du personnage. La diversité des questions quodlibétiques contribue ainsi à éclairer différents aspects de la pensée du maître sur des sujets aussi divers et précis que la forme substantielle unique ou le métier des avocats et des juges. / Matthew of Aquasparta (v. 1240-1302) could be seen for many reasons as an emblematic figure at the end of the thirteenth century. He was a master of theology at the University of Paris and wrote many works ; as a Franciscan, he was elected as Minister general of the Order ; he was nominated cardinal by Nicolas IV and was one of the most faithful allies of Bonifacius VIII. However, in spite of his position as a master of theology and as a cardinal, Matthew of Aquasparta did not become a famous historical figure and only became acknowledged at the beginning of the twentieth century. His work as a theologian became more and more important in the studies of historians and medievalist philosophers, thanks to the editions of his Disputed questions published by the Quaracchi brothers ; the interpretations became more and more refined : historians considered him as a “neo-Augustinian”, but they recently wondered about his place among the contemporary Franciscans, his links with Thomas Aquinas and his connection with the Aristotelian tradition. This work is based on an edition of his six Quodlibeta. It is completed by some studies and commentaries which throw light on his life and on different sides of his work. The master’s Quodlibeta are kept on an autograph and on a copy corrected by Matthew himself ; his manuscripts are important testimonies to study the process of writing and the work of a theologian master. The variety of sources and the diversity of themes in his Quodlibeta (the unicity of substantial form or the ethics of advocates and juges) enables us to understand his historical importance better and to clarify his part in the intellectual and political context at the end of the thirteenth century.

The thesis presents firstly the political and historical situation in the Late Roman Empire in which the Church was granted liberty. Through the historical events is shown how the theological discussions were jointed and influenced by the contemporary political situation of the Empire. Secondly, the life of the Pope Innocent I before and during his pontificate is presented and Nachleben of Innocent as a saint man, the style of his letters is involved too. In the same chapter is his pontificate described and discussed through letters, which he sent to various groups of bishops. These are divided into the following groups: Eastern bishops, bishops in Europe, boshops of Africa and the letters as a support for his friend John Chrysostom. In all these fields Innocent treats self-confidently, with the authority of the Roman bishop, but the kinds of claims to his authority depends on geographical location in which the letters are sent. Alongside the contribution of the basic introduction to the letters of the Pope Innocent I this thesis also offers the short excursion to the philological analysis and the selected theological topics (especially liturgical) of his letters.

Cette thèse porte sur l’histoire de l’Église catholique romaine entre la fin du XVIIIe et les premières décennies du XIXe siècle. L’itinéraire du barnabite Francesco Luigi Fontana constitue un prisme pertinent pour éclairer d’un jour nouveau les dynamiques internes à la Curie romaine et les sensibilités des collaborateurs de Fontana, lesquelles permettent aussi d’expliquer les solutions apportées aux nombreuses questions intra- et extraecclésiales soumises à Rome. L’étude des prises de décisions fait apparaître une Curie non monolithique mais au sein de laquelle plusieurs solutions étaient envisagées avant l’adoption de celle définitive.Au-delà même de cette perspective, l’enjeu de la présente recherche est d’ordre méthodologique, s’agissant du type d’analyse à conduire et des catégories à adopter pour comprendre les prises de position intellectuelles, politiques et ecclésiologiques des membres de la Curie. Un autre questionnement a trait à l’exercice, qui fait l’objet de récents approfondissements historiographiques, de la biographie et en l’espèce de la figure d’un cardinal placé à la croisée de plusieurs thématiques majeures de la période considérée, interrogeant enfin certains éléments de continuité de l’histoire de la papauté et du catholicisme de la fin de l’époque moderne au début de la période contemporaine / This doctoral thesis is focused on the history of the Roman Church between the end of the 18th Century and the beginning of the 19th Century. Using Francesco Luigi Fontana’s biography, I will describe the ecclesiastical dynamics and the different sensibilities of the curiali (the members of the Roman Curia) who cooperated with the barnabite to find a solution for both intraecclesiali and extraecclesiali problems submitted to Rome from all over the world.Consequently I will outline the developments in policymaking, in order to represent a non-monolithic Roman Curia, in which –conversely– different solutions were examined before making a definitive political decision.Furthermore this doctoral thesis reflects upon the problems linked to the paradigm chosen and upon the opportunity to use a biography and the category of intransigenza –employed in this study to interpret the intellectual, political and ecclesiological opinions of the curiali– to determine the crucial issues and to identify the elements of continuity of ecclesiastical history.

No description available.

Thesis (DTh (Systematic Theology and Ecclesiology))--University of Stellenbosch, 2004. / This dissertation explores how Anglican and Protestant church perspectives on the papacy are increasingly changing, as they identify the need for and value of a universal ministry of unity that may potentially be recognised in the future as a legitimate and propitious structure of ministry, though not without modification.

Fifteenth-century diplomatic protocol required the city of Florence to send diplomats to congratulate both new and militarily victorious rulers. Diplomats on such missions poured praise on their triumphant allies and new rulers at friendly locations. However, political realities also meant that these diplomats would sometimes have to praise rulers whose accession or victory opposed Florentine interests. Moreover, different allies and enemies required different levels of praise. Jealous rulers compared the gifts, status, and oratory that they received from Florence to the Florentine entourages sent to their neighbors. Sending diplomats with too little or too much social status and eloquence could spell diplomatic disaster. Diplomats met these challenges by varying the style, structure, and content of their speeches. Far from formulaic pronouncements of goodwill, diplomatic orations varied from one speech to the next in order to meet the demands of the complex diplomatic world into which they fit. Contextualizing these orations reveals the subtle reservations of diplomats praising a hostile ruler, the insertion of specific citations to flatter specific audiences, and the changing intellectual and stylistic interests of humanists throughout the fifteenth century. This essay will examine the different shades of flattery practiced by Florentine diplomats and the contexts that explain these variations.

No description available.