Santo Agostinho e João Calvino são pensadores representativos de dois momentos históricos distintos da cristandade, e figuram entre aqueles que ajudaram a moldar, de forma determinante, os contornos da tradição cristã de pensamento a qual representavam. A despeito do lapso temporal que os separa, João Calvino foi muito influenciado pelo pensamento de Agostinho em virtude da presença marcante da teologia e espiritualidade agostinianas na atmosfera intelectual e religiosa do século XVI, sendo boa parte destes influxos, produto da apropriação direta de Calvino de aspectos do pensamento de Agostinho, por meio do contato in loco com suas obras. Estes influxos diretos e indiretos do pensamento de Agostinho sobre Calvino resultaram em muitos paralelos e similaridades teológico-filosóficos. Um dos temas comuns a estes dois pensadores cristãos foi o da centralidade da doutrina do conhecimento de Deus e do autoconhecimento. Na verdade, ambos definem a natureza do projeto sapiencial e beatífico humano em termos de aquisição deste duplo conhecimento. Portanto, a principal finalidade deste trabalho é apresentar a relevância que a doutrina da cognitio Dei et sui desempenha na proposta teológico-filosófica de ambos os pensadores, bem como estabelecer uma análise de suas fontes, natureza e características. Este trabalho visa demonstrar, também, que apesar de haver similaridades e paralelos estreitos entre Calvino e Agostinho no tocante aos aspectos gerais que envolvem a doutrina do conhecimento de Deus e do autoconhecimento, existem distinções incontornáveis naquilo que concerne aos meandros específicos desta matéria, como aquelas disjunções relacionadas à natureza e às características específicas da dinâmica interna deste duplo conhecimento. / St. Augustine and John Calvin are thinkers representing two different periods in the history of Christianity, remarkably appearing among those who helped to shape up the contours of the Christian tradition of thought they represented. Despite the time gap that set them apart, John Calvin was greatly influenced by the thought of Augustine due to the strong presence of Augustinian theology and spirituality in the intellectual and religious atmosphere of the sixteenth century. Most of these inputs were the product of Calvins direct assimilation of certain aspects from Augustine\'s thought through in loco contact with his works. Such direct and indirect inflows of Augustines thought on Calvin resulted in many theological and philosophical parallels and similarities. One theme common to both Christian thinkers was the centrality of the doctrines of the knowledge of God and self-knowledge. In fact, both Augustine and Calvin define the nature of the human sapiential and beatific project in terms of attaining this dual knowledge. In this context, the present study aims to present the relevant role the doctrine of cognitio Dei et sui plays in the theological and philosophical views of both thinkers, as well as to develop an analysis of its sources, nature and characteristics. In addition, this work demonstrates that although there are close parallels and similarities between Calvin and Augustine with regards to general issues surrounding the doctrines of knowledge of God and self-knowledge, there are compelling distinctions as far as the particulars of this subject are concerned; such as disjunctions related to the nature and specific features of the internal dynamics of this dual knowledge.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-28T20:39:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Peggy Coelho Carvalho.pdf: 501518 bytes, checksum: 6149c62f1458e0b29d66c0c53c49c3ac (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-12-19 / This work aims to investigate some functions of silence on the psychoanalytic pratice. In his psychoanalytic space, where the core of the work is talking, dialoguing, the silent experiences can upset the analyst s capacity of observation and apprehension of the psychic reality, since some observable elements become unavailable. The adopted method is my own poetic style and, through the poetic bond established with the reader, I propose to expand the knowledge, reflections and comprehension of silent situations. I make an analogy with the musical technique of counterpoint using trhee principal and simultaneous events, or voices: Beethoven s, John Milton s and my own, interrelated around the theme of silence during all the narrative. My hypothesis is that it is possible that the being/not being can reveal and/or hide itself through silence, pregnant of mental pain. In this trajectory, I did not come across the silence by itself, but with the process of silence and, at the end, I found the silence as mental pain and pleasure / O objetivo deste trabalho é investigar algumas funções do silenciar na clínica psicanalítica. Neste espaço psicanalítico, no qual o cerne do trabalho é o conversar, o dialogar, as experiências silenciosas podem dificultar a capacidade de observação e apreensão da realidade psíquica por parte do analista, uma vez que alguns elementos observáveis ficam indisponíveis. O método adotado é o meu próprio estilo poético e, através do vínculo poético estabelecido com o leitor, proponho expandir nossos conhecimentos, nossas reflexões e compreensão sobre as situações silenciosas. Faço analogia com a técnica contrapontística musical no sentido de que utilizo três principais acontecimentos simultâneos, ou, vozes: de Beethoven, de John Milton e a minha própria voz que se inter-relacionam em torno do tema do silenciar durante toda a narrativa. Minha hipótese é a de que seja possível que o ser/não ser possa revelar-se e/ou ocultar-se através do silêncio, pregnante de dor mental. Nesta trajetória, fui deparando não com o silêncio, coisa-em-si, mas com o processo de silenciar e, ao final, encontrei o silenciar como dor e prazer mentais

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-29T14:27:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Pedro Savelli.pdf: 1178771 bytes, checksum: e340079926a5e9d29ae08f90eefddb56 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-11-17 / Deification: in the ecstatic love of God we are deified to be in communion with His life and nature. The Perspective of the Deification opens three paths for the human being to be conscious of taking part of the divine nature: a) through the way of Life. We only exist by virtue of the kindness of God. Out of nothing, He calls everything to the light: the work of the Creation expresses the Will of God, everything belongs to Him and from Him receives the natural deification; b) through the way of Revelation. The people from Israel knew how to interpret its own history as a singular election of God, whose objective is to be the light to the nations: deification by the obedience to the listening of the Word of God. c) Through the way of Grace: Reincarnation and Glorification of the Christ-Sacrament. Father God, in the mystery of His donation to the humanity, invites us to participate in His divine nature, transformed by the Son in the strength of the Hole Spirit: covering us of Christ by the Baptism and feeding us from Him by the Eucharist: sacramental deification. In Christ, Head, the Church is Sacrament. It updates the deifying Grace through the Spirit, celebrating the liturgy, particularly, the Eucharist: it is in the latter that we find ourselves / Deificação: no amor extático de Deus somos deificados para estarmos em comunhão com a Sua vida e natureza. A Perspectiva da Deificação abre três caminhos para o humano tomar consciência de participar da natureza divina: a) pelo caminho da Vida. Existimos somente pela bondade de Deus. Ele do nada, chama tudo à luz: a obra da Criação expressa a Vontade de Deus, tudo pertence a Ele e Dele recebe a deificação natural; b) pelo caminho da Revelação: o Povo de Israel soube interpretar a própria história como uma eleição particular de Deus, cuja finalidade é ser luz às nações: deificação pela obediência à escuta da Palavra de Deus. c) Pelo caminho da Graça: Encarnação e Glorificação de Cristo-Sacramento. Deus Pai, no mistério de sua doação à humanidade, convida-nos a participar de Sua natureza divina, transformados pelo Filho na força do Espírito Santo: revestindo-nos de Cristo pelo Batismo e alimentando-nos Dele pela Eucaristia: deificação sacramental. Em Cristo, Cabeça, a Igreja é Sacramento. Ela atualiza pelo Espírito a Graça deificante, celebrando a liturgia, em particular a Eucaristia: é neste último caminho que nos encontramos

This study has attempted to show the overarching significance of the conquering motif in relation to discourse dynamics of the entire book of Revelation and the significance of salvific history for its syntagmatic understanding. Based on language-in-use as a whole between the model author and the model audience, syntagmatic analysis (i.e., SVU analysis) and associative analysis (i.e., sign-intertextual reading) are eclectically and concertedly utilized by means of sampling analysis. Utilizing this integrative method, the findings are as follows: (1) the interwoven network of the prologue (Rev 1:1-8) programmatically provides the paradigmatic reading strategy for understanding the key paraenetic motif in the rest of the book against the background of salvific history; (2) by summarizing the churches’ earthly prophetic roles – withdrawal and witness through martyrdom – in terms of conquering, the model author alerts his audience to the military significance of their daily actions or choices in their ordinary earthly lives through visionary communication; (3) just as the prologue preliminarily guides, the ever-forward-moving historical framework serves as an incentive device for the paraenetic-imperative in Rev 2-3 and 4-22.

Both Plato and the Cambridge Platonists hold the view that moral knowledge depends primarily on cognitive resources which are innate to the mind. There is, nevertheless, a need for our minds to be prompted through experience in order for knowledge to occur. The following study is an attempt to reconstruct and compare the accounts in Plato and the Cambridge Platonists of the empirical conditions that are required for knowledge. For Plato, these conditions are a result of a decline in political and psychological constitutions, through which the intellect is increasingly developed. Dialectical analysis of received customs, laws, opinions, and language may then reveal the moral ideas upon which the polity was initially based and which remain implicit in common sense throughout the historical decline. Philosophical knowledge consists of a recollection of the ancient wisdom which was revealed to the original lawgiver by the gods. In the Cambridge Platonists, philosophical knowledge likewise consists of a recollection of revealed knowledge that stood at the foundation of a form of life, namely, Judaism. The revival of ancient Greek and Jewish philosophical theories in modern times heralds the end of history, in which the complete system of knowledge is both attainable and necessary for salvation. From the perspective of humanity as a whole, knowledge is initially granted through revelation, then generally forgotten, and finally recollected in a highly intellectual age of deteriorating morality and stability. The esoteric traditions of knowledge, coupled with recent developments in science and philosophy, act as the prompts for knowledge, given an intuitive basis that has been formed through the spread of Christianity. This intuitive basis serves as the concrete way in which the natural anticipations of the mind are gradually shaped in order to recognize the truth when it appears in a shrouded manner in modern philosophy. Both Plato and the Cambridge Platonists are critics of the similar intellectual trends in their times and they respond with similar arguments; however, unlike Plato, the Cambridge Platonists are unable to connect their rational critique with their genetic critique of modern ideas, rendering the latter ineffective. / Thesis (Ph.D, Philosophy) -- Queen's University, 2009-09-24 16:19:49.145

La théologie catholique affirme que Jésus, médiateur par excellence, est la Révélation plénière de Dieu à son peuple. Cependant, il y a eu au fil des siècles des révélations dites «privées», dont certaines ont été reconnues par l’autorité de l’Église. Le cas des révélations privées non reconnues a toujours été générateur de malentendus et de conflits froids et parfois ouverts entre l’autorité de l’Église et certains fidèles. En contexte africain, où le christianisme se greffe sur la culture traditionnelle, cette question de révélations privées est importante car elle imprègne la religion ancestrale. Dans notre contexte où le Christianisme semble avoir le vent en poupe, on se demande quelque rapport y a-t-il entre foi et expérience individuelle de révélation privée; la révélation privée est-elle un couronnement d’une vie de foi bien menée sous le regard du Seigneur et des hommes? Comment Dieu se manifeste-t-il aux hommes et comment en rendre compte sans faire face à l’adversité? Avec l’étude de l’expérience de Paul en 2Co 12, 1-10, il y a lieu de revenir sur la théologie catholique au sujet de la Révélation en rapport avec les révélations pour voir comment elle s’est articulée, à partir de la Bible, au fil des temps, en fonction des cultures et des réalités sans cesse nouvelles. À la base de cette théologie, on peut trouver en bonne position l’influence herméneutique de l’expérience mystique de Paul. Une révélation privée comme celle qu’il vit, fait toujours face à des doutes ou des attitudes sceptiques parfois tenaces pour se préciser après coup et fonder en raison son apport par rapport au Christ et à la vie ecclésiale. Si le jugement de l’Église est important pour son insertion dans la vie des communautés, toutefois, il faut dire qu’il n’est pas déterminant. Tout se joue entre Dieu et la personne certes, mais la qualité des fruits de ce jeu spirituel étant garante de la crédibilité de la révélation. Dieu, qui sait toujours communiquer avec son peuple sous des formes variées, en est capable en tout temps et selon le mode qu’il se donne. Pour mieux parler de l’expérience de Paul en 2Co 12,1-10, les démarches historico-critique et narrative ont été d’une utilité complémentaire en vue d’authentifier dans la péricope ce qu’il convient d’appeler : la mystique de Paul. Le témoignage spirituel de Paul peut servir de paradigme pour les personnes et d’éclairage pour l’Église dans le discernement des phénomènes de révélation privée aujourd’hui. Paul vit une relation forte avec le Dieu de Jésus Christ, il la fait vivre à ses communautés; quoiqu’il advienne, il n’hésite pas à en rendre compte et à la communauté, et à Pierre et aux autres. Sa vie intensément mystique, ne le soustrait pas de la démarche ecclésiale pour défendre ses révélations. / The catholic theology professes Jesus Christ as Mediator per excellence between God and his people. He is the Revelation of revelations that could never be surpassed, but along the centuries, there were many private revelations a few of which were confirmed by the Church and others not. The cases of mystical or private experience of God that are never taken into consideration by the authorities bring many troubles and divisions in the community of the catholic faithful. This situation is also common in some of the communities in Cameroon. This work is a biblical survey on Paul’s experience of God (in 2Cor 12,1-10) for the purpose of enlightening the phenomenon of private revelation. Although Paul is boasting for the excellence of his revelations and defends himself as one of the most important apostles of Christ, he doesn’t forget the need of the confirmation by those who have been chosen before him (Ga 1-2). The testimony of Paul could be a framework to look over and enable us to testify all the cases of visions or revelations that someone claims to have received directly from God. The whole Church could also update her judgement on some cases of mystical life that appear among Christians. To preserve and keep on fulfilling the will of her Founder, the Church has not only to be careful, but to be opened at such phenomenon as Peter and the others apostles did towards Paul. The beneficiaries of private revelations or visions have to humble themselves and face all the adversities in the spirit of Paul, who takes these as signs of God’s power revealed in his weaknesses.

Zugl.: Bonn, Universiẗat, Diss., 2007.

A dynamic interpretation of the Prayer of St. Benedict provides a methodology for understanding and explicating Christian faith consistent with enduring elements in the theological tradition and meaningful to the contemporary milieu. Within the overarching structure of the Prayer as a meta-paradigm, are three subsidiary paradigms that describe characteristics of approaches to faith. The structure, content, and intention of the Prayer reveal these to be experiential, critical, and transcendental. Wisdom is asserted as integrating and orienting the discussion, which is a constructed on a Personalist foundation and is a postcritical reflection on faith. Faith is grounded in the affirmations and assumptions of faith, discerned in the enfolding appeals, and the supplications, a basis for an expository discourse on the dimensions of faith. / Philosophy, Practical and Systematic Theology / M. Th. (Systematic Theology)

Anyone familiar with the Rastafari movement and its connection with the Bible is struck by the prevalence of I-locution found in them both. Because the phenomenon is important in the canonical Testaments, more so the New, this study seeks to investigate its significance in certain epistolary pieces (Romans 7 :14-25 ; 15 :14-33), the bio-Narratives and the Apocalypse, in their historical and cultural milieu. The next stage of the investigation then compares the findings of the aforementioned New Testament books with corresponding statements of the Rasta community to determine their relevance for the ongoing Anglophone theological discussion. In this connection, the following questions are addressed: (1) what are the inter-textual link(s) and function(s) of the `I' statements in Romans? (2) How do they relate to similar dominical sayings? And (3) can any parallel be established between the language of Rastafari and these? In sum, the study seeks to bring into critical dialogue the permutative `I' of the NT with the self-understanding of Rastafari. / NEW TESTAMENT / DTH (NEW TESTAMENT)

S’interroger sur l’adoption, dans un contexte d’évolution controversée des représentations de la parenté en Tunisie, oblige à s’attarder sur l'arrière plan social, culturel et juridique dans lequel elle s'inscrit. Le discours social sur l’adoption continue à promouvoir l’idée d’une bipartition de la parenté entre une parenté biologique, « de sang » ou « naturelle » et une parenté sociale, « affective »ou encore « du cœur ». A partir de témoignages de parents adoptifs et des adoptés, nous avons essayé de relever les différentes dimensions de l’épreuve d’adoption et des relations au sein de la parenté adoptive. L’étude des différents points soulevés permet d’emblée de questionner la place de la pluriparentalité à travers les pratiques et les représentations de la filiation adoptive dans un contexte socio-politique en mouvance. Elle permet en outre de déterminer le rapport entre la généalogie et la subjectivité dans le processus de la construction identitaire. / Questioning adoption, in a context of a controversial evolution of the representations of parenthood in Tunisia, compels one to dwell upon the social, cultural and legal backgrounds where it belongs. Social discourse on adoption continues to promote the idea of a dichotomy of parenthood, divided between biological parenthood - "blood" or "natural" parenthood- and social parenthood - "emotional" or "heart-based" parenthood. Based on accounts of adoptive parents and adoptees, we tried to identify the different dimensions of the experience of adoption and of the relationships within the adoptive parenthood. In building a relationship of adoption, representations appear as a primary mediator. The study of the various points raised directly questions the role of multi parenting through the practices and representations of adoptive kinship in a socio-political movement. It also allows to determine the relationship between genealogy and subjectivity in the process of identity construction.