Portfolio allocation theories have been studied and used ever since the mid 20th century. Nevertheless, many investors still rely on personal expertise and information gathered from the market when building their investment portfolios. The purpose of this master’s thesis is to examine how personal preferences and expertise perform compared to mathematical portfolio alloca- tion theories and how the risk between these di↵erent strategies di↵er. Using two portfolio allocation theories, the Black-Litterman model and mod- ern portfolio theory (Markowitz), a portfolio managed by the investment firm Placerum Kapitalf ̈orvaltning in Ume ̊a will be compared and challenged to investigate which strategy gives the best risk adjusted return. Using scenario modelling, the portfolios can be compared using both historical data and future forecasted scenarios to analyze the past, present and future of the allocation theories and Placerum’s investment strategy. The first allocation theory, the Black-Litterman model, combines historical information from the market with views and preferences of the investor to select the optimal allocations derived from return and volatility. The second allocation theory, the modern portfolio theory (Markowitz), only uses histori- cal data to derive correlations and returns which are then used to select the optimal allocations. By analysing several risk measures applied on the portfolios historical and forecasted data as well as comparing the performance of the portfolios, it is shown that the investment strategy used at Placerum succeeds with its intentions to achieve relatively high return while reducing the risk. However, the portfolios given using the two allocation theories results in higher potential returns but at the cost of taking on a higher risk. Comparing the two studied allocation theories, it is shown that when using the Black-Litterman model with the assumptions and views defined in this project, modern allocation theory actually beats it in terms of potential return as well as in terms of risk adjusted return, even though its underlying theory is much simpler.

Some financial problems as minimizing the shortfall risk when hedging in incomplete markets lead to problems belonging to test theory. This paper considers a generalization of the Neyman-Pearson lemma. With methods of convex duality we deduce the structure of an optimal randomized test when testing a compound hypothesis against a simple alternative. We give necessary and sufficient optimality conditions for the problem.

[pt] As operações das empresas de óleo e gás são naturalmente perigosas e suscetíveis a ocorrência de acidentes. As perdas financeiras associadas a acidentes podem ser elevadas. Para evitar esse risco, é comum que as empresas adquiram seguros. No entanto, determinar seus parâmetros adequados requer estimativas de exposição ao risco, o que ainda é uma tarefa difícil. Para lidar com essa questão, alguns autores sugerem uma caracterização de incerteza baseada em barreiras de segurança. Essa abordagem facilita a definição das consequências e também atua de forma mais preditiva quando comparada aos modelos baseados apenas em dados históricos. Um modelo de otimização é sugerido, utilizando os resultados obtidos com o método de caracterização de incerteza mencionado. Como as funções de perdas não são completamente conhecidas, de forma a resolver o problema estocástico, uma abordagem de Sample Average Approximation (SAA) é usada. Os resultados obtidos foram comparados à situação sem seguro e a outras duas opções de contrato de seguros. O modelo de otimização proposto foi o que conferiu maior previsibilidade dos valores de perdas, apresentando o menor desvio-padrão. Ressalta-se que a segunda melhor opção obteve um desvio-padrão 102 por cento a mais do que o obtido com o seguro otimizado. Além disso, o modelo também proporcionou maior proteção contra os eventos extremos, característica representada pelos menores valores de VaR e CVaR, com a segunda melhor opção apresentando um CVaR 41 por cento maior do que o obtido com o seguro otimizado. / [en] Operations in oil and gas companies are naturally dangerous and susceptible to the occurrence of accidents. The financial losses due to accident damages can be elevated. To avoid the risk of high expenses, it is usual for firms to acquire insurance. However, setting the right parameters for an insurance contract requires estimating the firm s risk exposure, which is still a hard task. To handle this issue, some authors suggest uncertainty characterization models based on safety barriers and precursor information. This approach facilitates the definition of consequences and also acts in a more predictive way when compared to usual models based only on historical data. Then, an optimization model is suggested, using the results obtained with the uncertainty characterization method mentioned as one of its inputs. As loss functions are not fully known, in order to solve the stochastic problem, a Sample Average Approximation (SAA) approach is used. The results obtained were compared to the situation where the company does not acquire insurance and to other two insurance contract options. The optimization model proposed was the one that granted greater predictability to the loss values, presenting the smallest standard deviation. The second best option presented a standard deviation 102 percent greater than the one obtained with the optimized insurance. Also, the model provided greater protection against extreme events, characteristic shown by smaller VaR and CVaR values, with the second best option presenting a CVaR 41 percent greater than the optimized model s CVaR.

The theoretical study of nonlinear expectations is the focus of attention for applications in a variety of different fields — often with the objective to model systems under incomplete information. Especially in mathematical finance, advances in the theory of sublinear expectations (also referred to as coherent risk measures) lay the theoretical foundation for modern approaches to evaluations under the presence of Knightian uncertainty. In this book, we introduce and study a large class of jump-type processes for sublinear expectations, which can be interpreted as Lévy-type processes under uncertainty in their characteristics. Moreover, we establish an existence and uniqueness theory for related nonlinear, nonlocal Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations with non-dominated jump terms.

The theoretical study of nonlinear expectations is the focus of attention for applications in a variety of different fields — often with the objective to model systems under incomplete information. Especially in mathematical finance, advances in the theory of sublinear expectations (also referred to as coherent risk measures) lay the theoretical foundation for modern approaches to evaluations under the presence of Knightian uncertainty. In this book, we introduce and study a large class of jump-type processes for sublinear expectations, which can be interpreted as Lévy-type processes under uncertainty in their characteristics. Moreover, we establish an existence and uniqueness theory for related nonlinear, nonlocal Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations with non-dominated jump terms.

On présente une nouvelle approche de simulation pour la fonction de densité conjointe du surplus avant la ruine et du déficit au moment de la ruine, pour des modèles de risque déterminés par des subordinateurs de Lévy. Cette approche s'inspire de la décomposition "Ladder height" pour la probabilité de ruine dans le Modèle Classique. Ce modèle, déterminé par un processus de Poisson composé, est un cas particulier du modèle plus général déterminé par un subordinateur, pour lequel la décomposition "Ladder height" de la probabilité de ruine s'applique aussi. La Fonction de Pénalité Escomptée, encore appelée Fonction Gerber-Shiu (Fonction GS), a apporté une approche unificatrice dans l'étude des quantités liées à l'événement de la ruine été introduite. La probabilité de ruine et la fonction de densité conjointe du surplus avant la ruine et du déficit au moment de la ruine sont des cas particuliers de la Fonction GS. On retrouve, dans la littérature, des expressions pour exprimer ces deux quantités, mais elles sont difficilement exploitables de par leurs formes de séries infinies de convolutions sans formes analytiques fermées. Cependant, puisqu'elles sont dérivées de la Fonction GS, les expressions pour les deux quantités partagent une certaine ressemblance qui nous permet de nous inspirer de la décomposition "Ladder height" de la probabilité de ruine pour dériver une approche de simulation pour cette fonction de densité conjointe. On présente une introduction détaillée des modèles de risque que nous étudions dans ce mémoire et pour lesquels il est possible de réaliser la simulation. Afin de motiver ce travail, on introduit brièvement le vaste domaine des mesures de risque, afin d'en calculer quelques unes pour ces modèles de risque. Ce travail contribue à une meilleure compréhension du comportement des modèles de risques déterminés par des subordinateurs face à l'éventualité de la ruine, puisqu'il apporte un point de vue numérique absent de la littérature. / We discuss a simulation approach for the joint density function of the surplus prior to ruin and deficit at ruin for risk models driven by Lévy subordinators. This approach is inspired by the Ladder Height decomposition for the probability of ruin of such models. The Classical Risk Model driven by a Compound Poisson process is a particular case of this more generalized one. The Expected Discounted Penalty Function, also referred to as the Gerber-Shiu Function (GS Function), was introduced as a unifying approach to deal with different quantities related to the event of ruin. The probability of ruin and the joint density function of surplus prior to ruin and deficit at ruin are particular cases of this function. Expressions for those two quantities have been derived from the GS Function, but those are not easily evaluated nor handled as they are infinite series of convolutions with no analytical closed form. However they share a similar structure, thus allowing to use the Ladder Height decomposition of the Probability of Ruin as a guiding method to generate simulated values for this joint density function. We present an introduction to risk models driven by subordinators, and describe those models for which it is possible to process the simulation. To motivate this work, we also present an application for this distribution, in order to calculate different risk measures for those risk models. An brief introduction to the vast field of Risk Measures is conducted where we present selected measures calculated in this empirical study. This work contributes to better understanding the behavior of subordinators driven risk models, as it offers a numerical point of view, which is absent in the literature.

Das vorliegende Skript ist aus einer Lehrveranstaltung hervorgegangen, die von mir mehrere Jahre an der Fakultät Wirtschaftswissenschaften der TU Dresden gehalten wurde. Diese Lehrveranstaltung hatte erst die Bezeichnung "Monetäre Risikomaße" und später "Risikomaße". Mehrere frühere Fassungen dieses Skripts, das häufig überarbeitet und erweitert wurde, trugen den Namen Monetäre Risikomaße (Auflagen 1 bis 7). Die einzelnen Kapitel enthalten in der Regel die drei abschließenden Abschnitte "Übungsaufgaben", "Beweise" und "Ergänzung und Vertiefung" mit Material zum jeweiligen Kapitel, das nicht in der Vorlesung vorgetragen wurde.

[pt] O conceito de que a construção de um portfólio formado por ativos diversificados e descorrelacionados permite reduzir sua variância – e com isso seus riscos – é a base da teoria de portfólios clássica e norteia a criação do Mecanismo de Realocação de Energia (MRE) no Brasil. O MRE foi criado visando mitigar o risco de quantidade ao qual as hidrelétricas estão frequentemente expostas, ao permitir que estas usem para contabilização na Câmara de Comercialização de Energia Elétrica (CCEE) os créditos de energia obtidos dentro do mecanismo ao invés de geração física. Esses créditos de energia atualmente são calculados como o produto entre a cota de cada usina do MRE e a geração total dentro do mecanismo. Por sua vez, essa cota é calculada como a razão entre a Garantia Física (GF) da usina e o somatório das GF de todas as usinas participantes. No entanto, a metodologia vigente para o cálculo da GF não leva em consideração que diferentes usinas contribuem para o sistema de maneiras distintas dados os diferentes aportes em termos de valor esperado e de volatilidade da produção da usina e seus impactos na produção total do sistema. Este fato aponta para um potencial subsidio cruzado entre usinas no MRE. O objetivo deste trabalho é propor uma metodologia, que pode ser aplicada na repartição do benefício decorrente da formação de um pool de qualquer conjunto de geradores, mas que neste trabalho será focada no MRE, para definir a cota de cada participante do mecanismo baseada no método de benefícios marginais considerando, não apenas o efeito que a produção média das usinas tem sobre o portfólio, mas também a volatilidade dessa produção. Neste critério, usinas que possuírem correlação negativa com a produção total do sistema agregarão um benefício maior ao MRE, já que contribuirão para a redução da volatilidade dos créditos deste mecanismo. Para avaliar se o objetivo foi alcançado, a metodologia proposta será comparada à metodologia de rateio vigente no Brasil e aplicada a um conjunto de agentes do Sistema Elétrico Brasileiro, envolvidos em um MRE formado por hidros, eólicas e biomassas. / [en] The Energy Reallocation Mechanism (ERM) was created to mitigate the production risk to which the hydroelectric power plants are often exposed. The ERM allows the hydro plants to use, for the purpose of the CCEE market clearing, the energy credits obtained within the ERM instead of their physical generation. These energy credits are currently calculated as the product of the share that each plant has in ERM and the total amount of energy produced by the plants that are part of the mechanism. In turn, this share is calculated as the ratio between the Physical Guarantee (PG) of the plant and the total PG of all the ERM participants. However, the current methodology for calculating PG does not take into account that each power plant has different contributions to the total generation of the system in terms of expected value and volatility of its generation. This indicates a potential cross-subsidy among power plants in ERM. In this sense, this work proposes a methodology, that can be applied in the allocation of the benefits resulting from the formation of a pool of any set of generators, but that in this work will be focused on ERM to set the shares of the mechanism based on the method of Marginal Benefits capturing at the same time the effect that the expected value and the volatility of production of each participant has on the portfolio. In this criterion, power plants with a negative correlation with the total production of the system will add greater benefits to ERM, as they would help to reduce the volatility of generation (energy credits) within the mechanism. In order to evaluate if the objective was achieved the proposed methodology will be not only compared to the current methodology in Brazil, but also applied to a set of Brazilian generators engaged in an ERM formed by hydro, biomass and wind power plants.

In dieser Arbeit werden verschiedene Eigenschaften von dynamischen konvexen Risikomaßen für beschränkte Zufallsvariablen untersucht. Dabei gehen wir vor allem der Frage nach, wie die Risikobewertungen in verschiedenen Zeitpunkten von einander abhängen, und wie sich solche Zeitkonsistenzeigenschaften in der Dynamik der Penalty-Funktionen und Risikoprozesse widerspiegeln. Im Kapitel 2 widmen wir uns zunächst der starken Zeitkonsistenz und charakterisieren diese mithilfe von Akzeptanzmengen, Penalty-Funktionen und einer gemeinsamen Supermartingaleigenschaft des Risikoprozesses und seiner Penalty-Funktion. Die Charakterisierung durch Penalty-Funktionen liefert eine explizite Form der Doob- und der Riesz-Zerlegung des Prozesses der Penalty-Funktionen. Anschließend führen wir einen schwächeren Begriff der Zeitkonsistenz ein, den wir Besonnenheit nennen. In Analogie zu dem zeitkonsistenten Fall charakterisieren wir Besonnenheit durch Akzeptanzmengen, Penalty-Funktionen und eine bestimmte Supermartingaleigenschaft. Diese Supermartingaleigenschaft gilt allgemeiner für alle beschränkten adaptierten Prozesse, die sich ohne zusätzliches Risiko aufrechterhalten lassen. Wir nennen solche Prozesse nachhaltig und beschreiben Nachhaltigkeit durch eine gemeinsame Supermartingaleigenschaft des Prozesses und der schrittweisen Penalty-Funktionen. Dieses Resultat kann als eine verallgemeinerte optionale Zerlegung unter konvexen Restriktionen gesehen werden. Mithilfe der Supermartingaleigenschaft identifizieren wir das stark zeitkonsistente dynamische Risikomaß, das aus jedem beliebigen Risikomaß rekursiv konstruiert werden kann, als den kleinsten Prozeß, der nachhaltig ist und den Endverlust minimiert. Diese Beschreibung liefert ein neues Argument für den Einsatz von zeitkonsistenten Risikomaßen. Im Kapitel 3 diskutieren wir das asymptotische Verhalten von zeitkonsistenten und von besonnenen Risikomaßen hinsichtlich der asymptotischen Sicherheit und der asymptotischen Präzision. Im Kapitel 4 werden die allgemeinen Ergebnisse aus den Kapiteln 2 und 3 anhand des entropischen Risikomaßes und des Superhedging-Preisprozesses veranschaulicht. / In this thesis we study various properties of a dynamic convex risk measure for bounded random variables. The main subject is to investigate possible interdependence of conditional risk assessments at different times and the manifestation of these time consistency properties in the dynamics of corresponding penalty functions and risk processes. In Chapter 2 we focus first on the strong notion of time consistency and characterize it in terms of penalty functions, acceptance sets and a joint supermartingale property of the risk measure and its penalty function. The characterization in terms of penalty functions provides the explicit form of the Doob and of the Riesz decomposition of the penalty function process for a time consistent risk measure. Then we introduce and study a weaker notion of time consistency, that we call prudence. Similar to the time consistent case, we characterize prudent dynamic risk measures in terms of acceptance sets, of penalty functions and by a certain supermartingale property. This supermartingale property holds more generally for any bounded adapted process that can be upheld without any additional risk. We call such processes sustainable, and we give an equivalent characterization of sustainability in terms of a combined supermartingale property of a process and one-step penalty functions. This result can be viewed as a generalized optimal decomposition under convex constraints. The supermartingale property allows us to characterize the strongly time consistent risk measure arising from any dynamic risk measure via recursive construction as the smallest process that is sustainable and covers the final loss. Thus our discussion provides a new reason for using strongly time consistent risk measures. In Chapter 3 we discuss the limit behavior of time consistent and of prudent risk measures in terms of asymptotic safety and of asymptotic precision. In the final Chapter 4 we illustrate the general results of Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 by examples. In particular we study the entropic dynamic risk measure and the superhedging price process under convex constraints.

L'entrée en application depuis le 1er Janvier 2016 de la réforme réglementaire européenne du secteur des assurances Solvabilité 2 est un événement historique qui va changer radicalement les pratiques en matière de gestion des risques. Elle repose sur une prise en compte importante du profil et de la vision du risque, via la possibilité d'utiliser des modèles internes pour calculer les capitaux de solvabilité et l'approche ORSA (Own Risk and Solvency Assessment) pour la gestion interne du risque. La modélisation mathématique est ainsi un outil indispensable pour réussir un exercice réglementaire. La théorie du risque doit être en mesure d'accompagner ce développement en proposant des réponses à des problématiques pratiques, liées notamment à la modélisation des dépendances et aux choix des mesures de risques. Dans ce contexte, cette thèse présente une contribution à l'amélioration de la gestion des risques actuariels. En quatre chapitres nous présentons des mesures multivariées de risque et leurs applications à l'allocation du capital de solvabilité. La première partie de cette thèse est consacrée à l'introduction et l'étude d'une nouvelle famille de mesures multivariées élicitables de risque qu'on appellera des expectiles multivariés. Son premier chapitre présente ces mesures et explique les différentes approches utilisées pour les construire. Les expectiles multivariés vérifient un ensemble de propriétés de cohérence que nous abordons aussi dans ce chapitre avant de proposer un outil d'approximation stochastique de ces mesures de risque. Les performances de cette méthode étant insuffisantes au voisinage des niveaux asymptotiques des seuils des expectiles, l'analyse théorique du comportement asymptotique est nécessaire, et fera le sujet du deuxième chapitre de cette partie. L'analyse asymptotique est effectuée dans un environnement à variations régulières multivariées, elle permet d'obtenir des résultats dans le cas des queues marginales équivalentes. Nous présentons aussi dans le deuxième chapitre le comportement asymptotique des expectiles multivariés sous les hypothèses précédentes en présence d'une dépendance parfaite, ou d'une indépendance asymptotique, et nous proposons à l'aide des statistiques des valeurs extrêmes des estimateurs de l'expectile asymptotique dans ces cas. La deuxième partie de la thèse est focalisée sur la problématique de l'allocation du capital de solvabilité en assurance. Elle est composée de deux chapitres sous forme d'articles publiés. Le premier présente une axiomatisation de la cohérence d'une méthode d'allocation du capital dans le cadre le plus général possible, puis étudie les propriétés de cohérence d'une approche d'allocation basée sur la minimisation d'indicateurs multivariés de risque. Le deuxième article est une analyse probabiliste du comportement de cette dernière approche d'allocation en fonction de la nature des distributions marginales des risques et de la structure de la dépendance. Le comportement asymptotique de l'allocation est aussi étudié et l'impact de la dépendance est illustré par différents modèles marginaux et différentes copules. La présence de la dépendance entre les différents risques supportés par les compagnies d'assurance fait de l'approche multivariée une réponse plus appropriée aux différentes problématiques de la gestion des risques. Cette thèse est fondée sur une vision multidimensionnelle du risque et propose des mesures de nature multivariée qui peuvent être appliquées pour différentes problématiques actuarielles de cette nature / The entry into force since January 1st, 2016 of Solvency 2, the European regulatory reform of insurance industry, is a historic event that will radically change the practices in risk management. It is based on taking into account the own risk profile and the internal view of risk through the ability to use internal models for calculating solvency capital requirement and ORSA (Own Risk and Solvency Assessment) approach for internal risk management. It makes the mathematical modeling an essential tool for a successful regulatory exercise. The risk theory must allow to support this development by providing answers to practical problems, especially those related to the dependence modeling and the choice of risk measures. In the same context, this thesis presents a contribution to improving the management of insurance risks. In four chapters we present multivariate risk measures and their application to the allocation of solvency capital. The first part of this thesis is devoted to the introduction and study of a new family of multivariate elicitable risk measures that we will call multivariate expectiles. The first chapter presents these measures and explains the different construction approaches. The multivariate expectiles verify a set of coherence properties that we also discuss in this chapter before proposing a stochastic approximation tool of these risk measures. The performance of this method is insufficient in the asymptotic levels of the expectiles thresholds. That makes the theoretical analysis of the asymptotic behavior necessary. The asymptotic behavior of multivariate expectiles is then the subject of the second chapter of this part. It is studied in a multivariate regular variations framework, and some results are given in the case of equivalent marginal tails. We also study in the second chapter of the first part the asymptotic behavior of multivariate expectiles under previous assumptions in the presence of a perfect dependence, or in the case of asymptotic independence. Finally, we propose using extreme values statistics some estimators of the asymptotic expectile in these cases. The second part of the thesis is focused on the issue of solvency capital allocation in insurance. It is divided into two chapters; each chapter consists of a published paper. The first one presents an axiomatic characterization of the coherence of a capital allocation method in a general framework. Then it studies the coherence properties of an allocation approach based on the minimization of some multivariate risk indicators. The second paper is a probabilistic analysis of the behavior of this capital allocation method based on the nature of the marginal distributions of risks and the dependence structure. The asymptotic behavior of the optimal allocation is also studied and the impact of dependence is illustrated using some selected models and copulas. Faced to the significant presence of dependence between the various risks taken by insurance companies, a multivariate approach seems more appropriate to build responses to the various issues of risk management. This thesis is based on a multidimensional vision of risk and proposes some multivariate risk measures that can be applied to several actuarial issues of a multivariate nature