<p>Uppsatsen granskar talet om erfarenheter från internationella övningar – hur de värderas och påverkar verksamheten och byggandet av kunskap. Studien jämför också uppfattningar – om vilka kunskaper och erfarenheter som är viktiga att inneha som flygförare för att kunna lösa uppgifter i en internationell kontext – mellan de med respektive de utan egen erfarenhet från internationellt övningsdeltagande. Syftet är att möjliggöra och locka till reflektion övar vad diskurserna kring internationella övningar leder till för praxis inom det svenska Flygvapnets stridsflygdivisioner.</p><p>För att granska talet används diskursanalys som metod. Analys görs genom ett socialkonstruktivistiskt perspektiv. Jämförelsen av vilken kunskap som anses vara viktig görs genom att statistiskt beräkna skillnader i uppfattningar ur en enkät besvarad av hälften av det svenska Flygvapnets JAS39-piloter. Resultaten analyseras genom samma teoretiska perspektiv som används i diskursanalysen.</p><p> Resultatet av jämförelsen visar att det finns en statistisk säkerställd skillnad i uppfattning i 4 av 71 uppmätta kunskaper, erfarenheter och färdigheter.</p><p>Diskursanalysen visar att erfarenheterna upplevs vara mycket betydelsefulla för byggandet av kunskap i det svenska Flygvapnet.</p><p>Så betydelsefulla att medarbetare efter att ha deltagit i övningar och flugit ett fåtal flygpass tillåts utforma och påverka utbildningsanvisningar, stridstekniska ramverk och flygsystem.</p> / <p>This essay examines the speech about the experiences from international LIVEX – how they are appreciated and affect business and the building of knowledge.  The study compares opinions – about what knowledge and which experience is important to be in possession of as a fighter pilot to be able to solve tasks in an international context – between those with and those without own experience from international LIVEX. The aim is to enable and to entice to reflection over which kind of practice the discourses surrounding international LIVEX leads to within the Swedish Air Force’s fighter squadrons.</p><p>Discourse analysis is used as a method to examine the speech. The analysis is done through a socialconstructivistical perspective. To compare opinions about which knowledge is perceived as important statistical calculations is being done from a survey answered by half of the Swedish Air Force’s fighter pilots. The result is being analysed with the same theoretical perspective as in the discourse analysis.</p><p> The result of the comparison shows a statistical significant difference in opinions in 4 of 71 measured knowledge’s, expediencies and skills.</p><p>The discourse analysis shows that the experiences are perceived as very important for the building of knowledge within the Swedish Air Force.</p><p>So important that co-workers after participation in LIVEX and after flying only a few sorties are allowed to shape and influence training instructions, tactical instructions and aircraft development.</p>

No description available.

Uppsatsen granskar talet om erfarenheter från internationella övningar – hur de värderas och påverkar verksamheten och byggandet av kunskap. Studien jämför också uppfattningar – om vilka kunskaper och erfarenheter som är viktiga att inneha som flygförare för att kunna lösa uppgifter i en internationell kontext – mellan de med respektive de utan egen erfarenhet från internationellt övningsdeltagande. Syftet är att möjliggöra och locka till reflektion övar vad diskurserna kring internationella övningar leder till för praxis inom det svenska Flygvapnets stridsflygdivisioner. För att granska talet används diskursanalys som metod. Analys görs genom ett socialkonstruktivistiskt perspektiv. Jämförelsen av vilken kunskap som anses vara viktig görs genom att statistiskt beräkna skillnader i uppfattningar ur en enkät besvarad av hälften av det svenska Flygvapnets JAS39-piloter. Resultaten analyseras genom samma teoretiska perspektiv som används i diskursanalysen.  Resultatet av jämförelsen visar att det finns en statistisk säkerställd skillnad i uppfattning i 4 av 71 uppmätta kunskaper, erfarenheter och färdigheter. Diskursanalysen visar att erfarenheterna upplevs vara mycket betydelsefulla för byggandet av kunskap i det svenska Flygvapnet. Så betydelsefulla att medarbetare efter att ha deltagit i övningar och flugit ett fåtal flygpass tillåts utforma och påverka utbildningsanvisningar, stridstekniska ramverk och flygsystem. / This essay examines the speech about the experiences from international LIVEX – how they are appreciated and affect business and the building of knowledge.  The study compares opinions – about what knowledge and which experience is important to be in possession of as a fighter pilot to be able to solve tasks in an international context – between those with and those without own experience from international LIVEX. The aim is to enable and to entice to reflection over which kind of practice the discourses surrounding international LIVEX leads to within the Swedish Air Force’s fighter squadrons. Discourse analysis is used as a method to examine the speech. The analysis is done through a socialconstructivistical perspective. To compare opinions about which knowledge is perceived as important statistical calculations is being done from a survey answered by half of the Swedish Air Force’s fighter pilots. The result is being analysed with the same theoretical perspective as in the discourse analysis.  The result of the comparison shows a statistical significant difference in opinions in 4 of 71 measured knowledge’s, expediencies and skills. The discourse analysis shows that the experiences are perceived as very important for the building of knowledge within the Swedish Air Force. So important that co-workers after participation in LIVEX and after flying only a few sorties are allowed to shape and influence training instructions, tactical instructions and aircraft development.

No description available.

<p>This paper studies the schoolstaffs experiences of children with ADHD within the region of Kalmar kommun. The aim is to describe and analyze these experiences from a gender perspective. The study is of a qualitative art and is based on six interviews whith school principals. The theory that is used to analyze the six interviews is the theory of socialconstructivism. The study shows that boys and girls generally is treated differently by the schoolstaff. It also shows that the schoolstaff does not always have the knowledge that is necessery to observe children, mainly girls, with ADHD.</p><p> </p>

<p>The purpose of this study was to examine high school students conceptions of young people who run away or get thrown out of their homes. Earlier research shows that this group of young people often come from families were physical, psychological and sexual abuse is reappearing factors. They often face a life of homelessness, drug abuse and prostitution. Still there is little research done about this phenomenon and what kind of help and support these young people could need. This study was done in a qualitative approach with the use of focus groups. The results were analyzed through the theoretical views of socialconstructivism and theorizing childhood and were also compared with earlier research. The results showed that about half of the participants had in some point in their life run away from home. They expressed that they thought that there are many young people who run away or get thrown out of their homes each year and that many of them probably don´t come to the knowledge of the social services. Their thoughts of what risks youths may encounter on the streets accord with results from earlier research. They also think that friends are the most valuable in terms of help and support.</p>

This paper studies the schoolstaffs experiences of children with ADHD within the region of Kalmar kommun. The aim is to describe and analyze these experiences from a gender perspective. The study is of a qualitative art and is based on six interviews whith school principals. The theory that is used to analyze the six interviews is the theory of socialconstructivism. The study shows that boys and girls generally is treated differently by the schoolstaff. It also shows that the schoolstaff does not always have the knowledge that is necessery to observe children, mainly girls, with ADHD.

The purpose of this study was to examine high school students conceptions of young people who run away or get thrown out of their homes. Earlier research shows that this group of young people often come from families were physical, psychological and sexual abuse is reappearing factors. They often face a life of homelessness, drug abuse and prostitution. Still there is little research done about this phenomenon and what kind of help and support these young people could need. This study was done in a qualitative approach with the use of focus groups. The results were analyzed through the theoretical views of socialconstructivism and theorizing childhood and were also compared with earlier research. The results showed that about half of the participants had in some point in their life run away from home. They expressed that they thought that there are many young people who run away or get thrown out of their homes each year and that many of them probably don´t come to the knowledge of the social services. Their thoughts of what risks youths may encounter on the streets accord with results from earlier research. They also think that friends are the most valuable in terms of help and support.

The purpose of this study is to examine whether pedagogues, in their daily work with children with intellectual disabilities, have perceptions based on earlier work experience with for instance children with average intelligence and also if the perceptions, norms and categorizations of society affect the school environment in which children with intellectual disabilities exist.The study, which focuses on the pedagogues work experience of childrens with intellectual disabilities, was carried out by interviewing four pedagogues in a qualitative manner. The study was analyzed through the theoretical framework of social constructivism. Terms used in the study are: intellectual disability, inclusion, exclusion, integration, perception, categorization, normality, anomaly, norm criticism, power, the competent child and expectation.The results show that the pedagogues has his or her own perceptions about children with intellectual disabilities. The pedagogues’ own use of language affects how perceptions, norms and categorizations are conveyed to the pupils. They also points to their insufficient knowledge of intellectual disabilities. This lack of knowledge also affects how the pedagogues view the institutional striving towards student inclusion in a “school for everyone.” The study also shows that a norm critical perspective is preferable as it allows for perceptions, norms and categorizations to be made visible. The study showed that, in order to avoid unfavorable categorizations and norms, a communicative environment is needed in order to create an understanding in regards to the individual differences that exist between students in the school environment. This essay illuminates the fact that pedagogues – working with children with intellectual disabilities – are affected by the perceptions, norms and categorizations of society.

Arbetet har sin bakgrund i att Malmö stad under de senaste åren delar ut datorer till bland annat eleverna i de kommunala gymnasieskolorna. Arbetet har även sin grund i forskningen kring TV- och dataspelsbruk. Arbetet syftar till att undersöka hur Malmös kommunala gymnasieskolor arbetar för att uppmärksamma negativt bruk av TV- och dataspel bland sina elever. Vidare att undersöka hur de kommunala gymnasieskolorna i Malmö arbetar för att stödja de elever som fastnar i ett negativt bruk av TV- och dataspel. Arbetet syftar även till att undersöka hur yrkesverksamma inom kommunala gymnasieskolor, definierar ett negativt bruk av TV- och dataspel. I studien användes en kvalitativa design med semistrukturerade intervjuer. Intervjuer har genomförts med fyra kuratorer som arbetar vid olika kommunala gymnasieskolor i Malmö. Resultatet i detta arbete har analyserats utifrån teorin kring socialkonstruktivism och diskuterats med tidigare forskning inom ämnesområdet TV- och dataspelsbruk. Arbetet visar bland annat att de kommunala gymnasieskolorna inte har något specifikt arbete kring frågan om negativt TV- och dataspelsbruk, utan utgår från ett generellt förhållningssätt för att uppmärksamma negativa förändringar bland sina elever. Vidare erbjuder skolorna stöd i form av samtalskontakt till de elever som har ett negativt bruk av TV- och dataspel. Resultatet visar även att de intervjuade definierar ett negativt bruk av TV- och dataspel utifrån de eventuella konsekvenser som drabbar individen av dennes spelande. / This work has its origin in that the city of Malmö in recent years, have been handing out computers to e.g. students in the municipal high schools. The work also has its basis in research on TV- and computer game use. This work aims to investigate how Malmo's municipal high schools work to pay attention to negative use of TV- and computer games among their students. Furthermore, to investigate how the local high schools in Malmö work to support those students who get stuck in a negative use of TV- and computer games. The work also aims to examine how professionals in the municipal high schools, defines a negative use of the TV- and computer games. The study used a qualitative design with semi-structured interviews . Interviews were conducted with four counselors working at various municipal high schools in Malmö. The results of this work have been analyzed based on the theory of social constructivism and discussed with previous research in the subject area TV and computer game use. The work shows that the municipal high schools do not have any specific work on the issue of negative TV and computer games use, but is based on a general attitude to notice negative changes among their students. Further schools offers support in the form of dialog-contact with those students who have a negative use of the TV- and computer games. The result also shows that the respondents define a negative use of TV and computer games based on the possible consequences faced by the individual of his or her gambling.