No description available.

Between the outbreak of World War I and the mid-1930s, the best-selling and most widely read book on the topic of modern art in Germany was written by the art historian Fritz Burger (1877–1916). Burger is now all but forgotten in the art historiography of the period and absent in the English literature. This thesis provides the first English interpretation of Burger's major works and seeks to locate his art historical method in relation to then-contemporary intellectual streams. Trained in the late 19th century, Burger largely rejected the cultural-historical studies and theories of stylistic development and embraced an artistic-critical model forwarded by neo-Kantians like Adolf Hildebrand and Konrad Fiedler. Beginning with Burger's texts Cézanne und Hodler (1913) and Einführung in die Moderne Kunst (1917), I examine the conceptual underpinnings of these works with particular attention to Burger's notions of color, artistic cognition and philosophical speculation. I consider Burger's written output as the compliment to his hands-on pedagogical technique at the University of Munich, his involvement with the Munich avant-garde and friendship with the artist Wassily Kandinsky. Burger's work is a rare and early attempt to write about contemporary art as an historical document but without recourse to artistic biography or cultural milieu as interpretive tools. / text

L’étude des concepts fondamentaux de l’iconologie permet de dégager la conception de l’art, de l’histoire et de la création qu’elle implique. L’examen de l’analyse iconographique, des formations par analogie et de la critique du formalisme de Wölfflin permet de réviser l’idée selon laquelle l’intellectualisme de Panofsky le conduirait à méconnaître la spécificité du visuel. La mise au jour des torsions que l’iconologue fait subir au concept de forme symbolique clarifie la question du néo-kantisme et pose celle de l’usage de concepts (philosophiques) par l’historien. Le propre de la démarche historienne ressort aussi de l’analyse du concept rieglien de Kunstwollen qui engage la théorie de la création, la définition de l’art, son autonomie et la légitimité de l’iconologie. Celle-ci passe également par la résolution d’une tension entre le souci d’écarter toute approche esthétique ou normative de l’objet d’art et la nécessaire prise en compte de sa spécificité épistémologique et pratique. Enfin le concept d’habitus et la refonte des notions d’influences et de tradition lèvent l’antinomie entre liberté créatrice et nécessité historique. L’usage du modèle dialectique (hégélien) de l’histoire relève d’un choix de méthode et d’une prise de distance par rapport à Warburg dont les concepts centraux sont détournés. / The study of the fundamental concepts of iconology enables us to identify the idea of art, of history and of creation it presupposes and also to rethink the traditional interpretation which is made of it. The analysis of the iconographical moment, of the creation by analogy and of the criticism of Wölfflin’s formalism challenges the idea that Panofsky supposedly fails to recognize the implacability of the visual aspect. As for Panofsky’s thesis of Neo-Kantianism, it is based on resorting to the concept of symbolic form. But the twisting it undergoes is relevant of the unique way in which the historian resorts to (philosophical) concepts. The distinguishing feature of the historical approach also emerges from the study of the Rieglian Kunstwollen concept which involves the theory of creation, the definition and the autonomy of art, and the legitimacy of iconology. This legitimacy also emerges from the solving of the tension between the desire to turn down any esthetical or normative approach of the objet d’art, and the necessity to take its epistemological and practical specificity into account. The historian’s will to be objective and the transformation of the taste-based judgment into the knowledge-based judgment it seems to imply are also questioned. Finally, the concept of habitus and the transformation of the notions of influence and tradition remove the antinomy between creative freedom and historical necessity. The use of the dialectic (Hegelian) model of history is a choice of method and implies that Panofsky voluntarily stands back from Warburg’s philosophy, the key concepts of which are thus embezzled.

One of the main goals of this thesis is to better understand Czech Neo-Baroque tendencies and their placement within the context of Czech sculpture in general. To be able to better understand the role of Neo-Baroque in this artistic branch it is important to first cover the process of Baroque's revival in Czech lands which triggered creative approach to Baroque motifs and the birth of Neo-Baroque at the end of the 19th century. This is covered in the first part of the thesis. The opening chapter mentions different perceptions of the term Neo-Baroque and how its understanding evolved from the 19th century until present. Chapter that follows elaborates on the topic of Neo-Baroque being one of the historicizing styles and discusses the cultural and ideological circumstances which led to its widespread use. The topic that strongly resonates here is the Prague urban sanitation which turned most of the sculptors into modelers who would transform Neo-Baroque facades of new buildings into complex decorative schemes. The topic in question also covers periodical swatches of Celda Klouček and Friedrich Ohmann, a very valuable ideological impulse which significantly contributed to raising awareness of the Baroque beauties of Czech provenience as an inspirational source for decorative sculpture and plaster...

This thesis examines the possibility of expanding the toolset for art historical studies of digital art, doing so by studying if older influential art theories can be used in image analysis of digital artworks. More specifically, the study centers around the application of Heinrich Wölfflin’s objective classifying principles as well as Erwin Panofsky’s iconology and iconography on the digital art form pixel art. The aim of the thesis is to research the level of applicability of these well-used image analysis methods on the art style, arguing for the legitimacy of pixel art as an art form as well as contributing to the expanding knowledge about digital art within the Swedish art history field. The results of the study showed that both Wölfflin’s and Panofsky’s image analysis methods are applicable on pixel art artworks, but in different ways with different prerequisites. The objective classifying principles of Wölfflin as well as the pre-iconographical stage of Panofsky’s method center around “surface level” aspects of a work of art such as lines, shading or image composition. These are aspects that in many ways differ greatly in execution between traditional painted art and pixel art, so for these methods to work there needs to be some translation to terms and aspects more applicable to pixel art. Panofsky’s iconography and iconology are on the other hand interested in “deeper” as well as contextual aspects of a work of art such as symbols or references. These aspects of pixel art artworks function in the same way as most other art, traditional or otherwise, and can therefore be directly applied without “translation”.

<p>Föreliggande uppsats studerar Friedensreich Hundertwassers (1928-2000) organiska/vegetativaarkitektur, begränsad till utvalda signifikativa arkitekturelement på fyra olika bildnivåer, frånöversiktsbild till en avgränsad del av ett mindre utrymme. Den byggnad som avses är kvarteretDie Grüne Zitadelle i Magdeburg, Tyskland. Uppsatsen är tudelad i den meningen att den utgårifrån nämnd arkitektur och analyseras/syntetiseras enligt Erwin Panofskys ikonologiska metod. Urdenna första analys framvaskas relevanta dikotomier, en metod som i sin ursprungliga form ärHeinrich Wölfflins komparativa. Dock jämförs inte Hundertwassers verk genom epokskiljandestilfaktorer, utan genom jämförande med en konstnär som enligt tidigare forskning anses varanärliggande Hundertwasser. Denne arkitekt är Antoni Gaudí (1852-1926), verket för analysen ärCasa Milá i Barcelona i Spanien. Syftet med uppsatsen är att genom dikotomierna experimentelltjämföra arkitekterna och deras verk, och forskningsinriktningen ligger i att urröna omdikotomierna kan blottlägga insikter om skillnader och/eller likheter som annars kunde varit svåraatt identifiera. Resultatet visar att arkitekterna tolkat filosofin på delvis lika och delvis olika sätt.Sammanfattande har Hundertwasser ett betydligt mer individualiserat formspråk avseende designifikativa arkitekturelementen. Oavsett om den dubbla metoden tillför nya kunskaper eller inte,torde dikotomierna kunna fungera som stöd för arkitekturanalyser och som hjälp vidkonstreflektion.</p>

Föreliggande uppsats studerar Friedensreich Hundertwassers (1928-2000) organiska/vegetativaarkitektur, begränsad till utvalda signifikativa arkitekturelement på fyra olika bildnivåer, frånöversiktsbild till en avgränsad del av ett mindre utrymme. Den byggnad som avses är kvarteretDie Grüne Zitadelle i Magdeburg, Tyskland. Uppsatsen är tudelad i den meningen att den utgårifrån nämnd arkitektur och analyseras/syntetiseras enligt Erwin Panofskys ikonologiska metod. Urdenna första analys framvaskas relevanta dikotomier, en metod som i sin ursprungliga form ärHeinrich Wölfflins komparativa. Dock jämförs inte Hundertwassers verk genom epokskiljandestilfaktorer, utan genom jämförande med en konstnär som enligt tidigare forskning anses varanärliggande Hundertwasser. Denne arkitekt är Antoni Gaudí (1852-1926), verket för analysen ärCasa Milá i Barcelona i Spanien. Syftet med uppsatsen är att genom dikotomierna experimentelltjämföra arkitekterna och deras verk, och forskningsinriktningen ligger i att urröna omdikotomierna kan blottlägga insikter om skillnader och/eller likheter som annars kunde varit svåraatt identifiera. Resultatet visar att arkitekterna tolkat filosofin på delvis lika och delvis olika sätt.Sammanfattande har Hundertwasser ett betydligt mer individualiserat formspråk avseende designifikativa arkitekturelementen. Oavsett om den dubbla metoden tillför nya kunskaper eller inte,torde dikotomierna kunna fungera som stöd för arkitekturanalyser och som hjälp vidkonstreflektion.

Ausgehend von einem ‚Close Reading’ der ersten Durchführung aus dem langsamen Satz von Johann Nepomuk Davids dritter Symphonie diskutiert der Beitrag Kontrapunktlehrwerke der 1930- und frühen 1940er-Jahre, um von dort her das Spielfeld von ‚Linearität' abzustecken, eines Begriffs, der aus der Theorie der Bildenden Kunst Mitte der 1910er-Jahre in musikgeschichtliche Diskurse wanderte, um sich um 1940 mit kämpferischem Ton zu rüsten.