Spelling suggestions: "subject:"[een] CLASS ACTIONS"" "subject:"[enn] CLASS ACTIONS""
51 |
[en] DEMOCRATIZATION OF THE JUDICIARY IN THE OF RIO DE JANEIRO: A STUDY OF THE INDIVIDUAL AND CONLLECTIVE ACESS OF SLUM DWELLERS TO JUSTICE CONTEXTUALIZED BY A HISTORY OF SOCIAL CONTRASTS / [pt] DEMOCRATIZAÇÃO DO JUDICIÁRIO NA CIDADE DO RIO DE JANEIRO: UM ESTUDO SOBRE O ACESSO INDIVIDUAL E COLETIVO DE MORADORES DE FAVELAS À JUSTIÇA, CONTEXTUALIZADO A LUZ DE UMA HISTÓRIA DE DESIGUALDADESRAFAELA SELEM MOREIRA 03 June 2019 (has links)
[pt] Discutimos aqui a democratização do acesso de moradores de favelas
cariocas ao Judiciário através de análise histórico-temporal e espacial. O
levantamento de dados incluiu dados históricos, sócio-econômicos e políticos das
favelas e a realização de pesquisas quantitativas e quali-quantitativas com
julgados cíveis do TJRJ. As análises destes dados foram realizadas sob dois
enfoques: (1) do acesso – individual e coletivo ao judiciário; (2) do
posicionamento dos magistrados frente às demandas propostas. Os resultados
sugerem a relação entre: (1) aumento do acesso de moradores de favelas ao
judiciário e melhoria dos índices de desenvolvimento social; (2) baixa incidência
de demandas coletivas e tratamento omisso dispensado por magistrados a este tipo
de ação; (3) falta de coerência entre as decisões judiciais de magistrados e
realidade social da favela e seus ajustes ao longo dos últimos anos; e traz (4) o
questionamento de algumas crenças teóricas consolidadas sobre as principais
variáveis na promoção do acesso à justiça. A partir de dados empíricos, esta
pesquisa sugere possibilidades mais eficazes de transformações sociais quando
compatíveis com a realidade social urbana local. / [en] This article discuss the democratization of access to residents of Rio s
favelas to judiciary through a temporal and spatial analysis. Data collection
included historical datas, socio-economic datas and political datas about the slums
reality in Rio and also a quantitative and quali-qualitative research with the civil
trials (Jurisprudence) of the Estadual Court of Justice of the state of Rio de
Janeiro. The analysis of these data were performed under two approaches: (1)
access - individually and collective to the judiciary, (2) the positioning of the
magistrates in response to the judicial demands. The results suggest a relationship
between: (1) the increase of the access of slum dwellers to the judiciary and
improvement of indices of social development, (2) low incidence of collective
demands and the omission of the judges in judge such kind of cause, (3) lack of
consistency between judicial decisions of magistrates and social reality of the
slums and their adjustments over the years, and brings (4) the questioning of
some consolidated theoretical beliefs about the key variables in promoting access
to justice. From empirical datas, this research suggests possibilities for more
effective social transformations when compatible with very local social realities.
|
52 |
The appraisal remedy and the determination of fair value by the courtsHillis, Kevin Ross 15 April 2014 (has links)
This paper examines the different share valuation methods and principles likely to be used by a court in determining the fair value of dissenting shareholders’ shares in appraisal proceedings in terms of section 164(14) of the Companies Act 2008. It is submitted that the valuation principles and methods used by the courts will affect the operation of the triggering actions contemplated in subsections 164(2)(a) - (b).
It is proposed that section 164 court appraisals are likely to be guided by the valuation methods and principles developed in section 252 and section 440K court appraisals under the Companies Act 1973, as well as by the decisions of the courts in the state of Delaware relating to share valuations under the appraisal remedy. It is further proposed that the purpose ascribed to the appraisal remedy will influence the application of these valuation methods and principles. / Mercantile Law / LL.M. (Corporate law)
|
53 |
The appraisal remedy and the determination of fair value by the courtsHillis, Kevin Ross 15 April 2014 (has links)
This paper examines the different share valuation methods and principles likely to be used by a court in determining the fair value of dissenting shareholders’ shares in appraisal proceedings in terms of section 164(14) of the Companies Act 2008. It is submitted that the valuation principles and methods used by the courts will affect the operation of the triggering actions contemplated in subsections 164(2)(a) - (b).
It is proposed that section 164 court appraisals are likely to be guided by the valuation methods and principles developed in section 252 and section 440K court appraisals under the Companies Act 1973, as well as by the decisions of the courts in the state of Delaware relating to share valuations under the appraisal remedy. It is further proposed that the purpose ascribed to the appraisal remedy will influence the application of these valuation methods and principles. / Mercantile Law / LL. M. (Corporate law)
|
54 |
Le contentieux privé des pratiques anticoncurrentielles : Étude des contentieux privés autonome et complémentaire devant les juridictions judiciaires / Private litigation of competition law (cartels and abuses of dominance) : Study of stand alone and follow-on litigations in national courtsAmaro, Rafael 05 December 2012 (has links)
L’actualisation des données sur le contentieux privé des pratiques anticoncurrentielles fait naître laconviction que l’état de sous-développement souvent pointé est aujourd’hui dépassé. Les statistiquessont nettes : des dizaines d’affaires sont plaidées chaque année. Toutefois, ce contentieux s’esquissesous des traits qui ne sont pas exactement ceux du contentieux indemnitaire de masse faisant suite àla commission d’ententes internationales. C’est un fait majeur qui doit être noté car l’essentiel desprojets de réforme furent bâtis sur cet idéal type. Trois des caractères les plus saillants de la réalitéjudiciaire témoignent de cette fracture entre droit positif et droit prospectif. D’abord, le contentieuxprivé est majoritairement un contentieux contractuel entre professionnels aux forces déséquilibrées. Ensuite, c’estun contentieux national – voire local – plus qu’un contentieux international. Enfin, c’est plutôt uncontentieux autonome se déployant devant les juridictions judiciaires sans procédure préalable oupostérieure des autorités de concurrence (stand alone). Paradoxalement, les actions complémentaires(follow-on), pourtant réputées d’une mise en oeuvre aisée, sont plus rares. Ces observations invitentalors à réviser l’ordre des priorités de toute réflexion prospective. Ainsi, la lutte contre l’asymétried’informations et de moyens entre litigants, l’essor de sanctions contractuelles efficaces, larecomposition du rôle des autorités juridictionnelles et administratives dans le procès civil ou encorele développement des procédures de référé s’imposent avec urgence. Mais s’il paraît légitime desoutenir ce contentieux autonome déjà existant, il n’en reste pas moins utile de participer à laréflexion déjà amorcée pour développer le contentieux indemnitaire de masse tant attendu et dont onne peut négliger les atouts. De lege ferenda, le contentieux privé de demain présenterait donc uncaractère bicéphale ; il serait à la fois autonome et complémentaire. Il faut alors tenter de concevoir unrégime efficace pour ces deux moutures du contentieux privé en tenant compte de leurs exigencesrespectives. Or l’analyse positive et prospective de leurs fonctions révèlent que contentieuxautonome et contentieux complémentaire s’illustrent autant par les fonctions qu’ils partagent que parcelles qui les distinguent. Il serait donc excessif de vouloir en tous points leur faire application derègles particulières ou, à l’inverse, de règles identiques. C’est donc vers l’élaboration d’un régime commun complété par un régime particulier à chacun d’eux que s’orientera la présente recherche.PREMIÈRE PARTIE. Le régime commun aux contentieux privés autonome et complémentaireSECONDE PARTIE. Le régime particulier à chacun des contentieux privés autonome et complémentaire / Pas de résumé en anglais
|
Page generated in 0.0558 seconds