Teorijos bei praktikos analizė leido pažvelgti į kaltinimo formų pakeitimą probleminiu aspektu. Teisės doktrinoje kaltinimo formų pakeitimo baudžiamajame procese problemos nekeliamos, tačiau tiek praktinė medžiaga, tiek patys praktikai išduoda, jog šiai temai turėtų būti skiriamas dėmesys – pirmiausiai iškeliant problemas į dienos šviesą, o po to jas sprendžiant. Praverstų tiek šiuo metu galiojančių teisės normų, susijusių su privačiai viešo ir ypač su privataus kaltinimo institutais, peržiūrėjimas, detalesnis reglamentavimas ar bent jau išaiškinimas, tiek bandymas formuoti kitokią praktiką. Šiame darbe analizuojamos Lietuvos, Vokietijos, Norvegijos bei Rusijos baudžiamuosiuose procesuose įtvirtintos kaltinimo formos. Detaliai aptariami jų požymiai bei sąlygos, leidžiančios vieną kaltinimo formą pakeisti kita. Tokia teorinė analizė atveda prie praktinių problemų, kurios apribojamos Lietuvos baudžiamuoju procesu. Daug dėmesio skiriama „visuomeninio intereso“ neapibrėžtumui bei formuluotės „dėl svarbių priežasčių negali ginti teisėtų savo interesų“ traktavimui, svarstomas privačiai viešo bei privataus kaltinimo veikų tinkamumas ir vertinamas nuoseklus baudžiamojo proceso vykdymas dviem kaltinimo formomis. / Theory and practice‘s analysis let aproach to a change of prosecution form in a problematic aspect. In the law doctrine the problems of a change of a prosecution form are not imposed, but as a practical matter, both issued by practitioners themselves, that this topic should focus on - primarily by bringing problems to light, and then solving them. Useful for both the current law relating to private public and especially the private prosecution institutions review, more detailed regulation, or at least the interpretation, and attempt to shape a different practice. This work examines Lithuanian, German, Norwegian and Russian prosecution forms enshrined in criminal proceeding. Discussed in detail the characteristics and conditions for a change of prosecution form. This theoretical analysis leads to practical problems that are limited by the Lithuanian criminal proceeding. Much attention is paid to an uncertainty of "public interest" and treatment of "unability to defend one‘s legitimate interests for valid reasons". Public private and private prosecution acts are under consideration and the appropriateness of criminal proceeding in two prosecution forms consistently is assessed.

[pt] O presente trabalho destrincha a tensão entre poder constituinte e poder constituído na perspectiva das manifestações no Rio de Janeiro em junho de 2013, que são analisadas como formas contemporâneas de vivência real e prática da democracia, através da multidão, que velozmente reagia às agressões acumuladas vindas do poder constituído e dos setores interessados em manter o status quo. A multidão que foi às ruas participar dos movimentos iniciados em 2013 no Rio de Janeiro, através das redes sociais da internet, promoveu a interação e conexão de pessoas por meio dos movimentos em rede, independentemente de suas origens, ideologias ou filiações. A partir da autonomia desse espaço virtual, os movimentos sociais venceram o medo do poder constituído e lançaram-se às ruas, formaram coletivos e utilizaram-se de táticas de autodefesa. A essa parcela da sociedade contemporânea formadora da multidão de 2013 são negados os direitos da cidadania, distanciando-a dos interesses do capital e aproximando-a do conceito de inimigo. Isso ocorre especialmente quando esta se rebela contra o status quo, cuja manutenção interessa à sociedade global de controle, e que funciona simultaneamente como fomentador e como estabilizador da desigualdade, sendo esta aumentada com o incremento da repressão do Estado. A repressão violenta e desproporcional do Estado é exemplificada neste trabalho por três momentos que contribuíram para o enfraquecimento do movimento constituinte emerso das ruas em 2013, na cidade do Rio de Janeiro, marcando uma verdadeira instrumentalização da repressão à multidão: (i) a criação da Comissão Especial de Investigação de Atos de Vandalismo, através de decreto do chefe do Executivo estadual; (ii) a tramitação em regime de urgência do projeto de lei e a sanção, pela chefe do Executivo Federal, da Lei que cria o conceito de organização criminosa; e (iii) o inquérito policial que culminou com a prisão de vinte e três manifestantes cariocas às vésperas da final da Copa do Mundo no Brasil. A severa repressão dos levantes de 2013 colaborou para a manutenção do pensamento inquisitorial e para o fortalecimento de instituições autoritárias. Tal fenômeno desafia o presente trabalho a refletir sobre a viabilidade da instrumentalização do Processo Penal como meio de contenção das arbitrariedades reiteradamente cometidas contra aqueles que não se beneficiam da manutenção do status quo. / [en] This work unravels the tension between constituent and constituted power in the perspective of the protests of June 2013 in Rio de Janeiro, analyzed as contemporary ways of a practical and concrete experiencing of democracy, given the spontaneity of the multitude, who rapidly reacted to the gathered aggressions that came from the constituted power and the segments interested in maintaining the status quo. The multitude that went to the streets to protest in the movements started in Rio de Janeiro, 2013, through the social media, promoted the interaction and connection of people through network movements, regardless their origins, ideologies or affiliations. From this autonomous virtual space, the social movements overcame the fear of the constituted power and went to the streets, formed collective initiatives and used self-defense tactics. Citizenship rights are denied to this part of contemporary society that formed the 2013 multitude, making it more distant from the interests of capitalism and closer to the concept of enemy. This happens specially when this multitude rebels against the status quo, whose maintenance interests the global control society, and that works simultaneously as promoter and stabilizer of inequality, which is raised by the increase of the State repression. The violent and unmeasured State repression is exemplified in this work by three moments that contributed to the weakening of the constituent movement surfaced from the streets of Rio de Janeiro in 2013. These moments marked a true instrumentalisation of the repression of the multitude: (i) the creation of the Special Commission for the Investigation of Vandalism Acts, through decree from the chief of the state Executive Power; (ii) the urgent proceeding of the bill and the sanction of the law that creates the concept of criminal organization, by the chief of the Federal Executive Power; and (iii) the police inquiry that resulted on the arrest of twenty-three carioca protestors right before the ending of FIFA World Cup in Brazil. The severe repression of the 2013 movements collaborated to maintain the inquisitorial thought and to strengthening authoritarian institutions. This phenomenon challenges this work to ponder on the viability of the instrumentalisation of the Criminal Procedure as a way of restraining the arbitrary actions repeatedly perpetrated against those who do not benefit from the maintenance of the status quo.

L’universalisme des droits a fait accéder au concept des droits de la défense des diversités procédurales. Au niveau de chaque pays, qu’il soit petit ou grand, quelle que soit sa culture, il est accepté et officiel qu’on ne peut juger sans se référer aux règles fondamentales, et sans se faire assister par un avocat. Les droits à la défense sont garantis en Mauritanie par la loi n° 2007-036 portant approbation d'un Code de Procédure Pénale, la loi n° 2007- 012 portant l'Organisation Judiciaire et la loi n° 99-035 portant code de Procédure Civile Commerciale et Administrative. Les règles des droits de la défense ne peuvent être atteintes sans la mise en place d’organes qui encadrent les dispositions de celle-ci. L’égalité devant la Justice est expressément considérée de droit fondamental dans la constitution du 20 juillet 1991. Cependant, le principe n'ait aucune portée réelle malgré la précision du texte. Ce qui paraît absurde avec notre modèle de système de « droit ineffectif », implique, que les règles du procès équitable ne sont pas affectées de manière égalitaire à tous. Ce n’est pas la seule difficulté ou ambigüité. La présente étude soutient, d’une part, que l’exercice des principes du contradictoire et de l’égalité des armes garantit l’effectivité des droits de la défense, et d’autre part, que le développement des principes participe à un renouveau des droits. La position contemporaine des droits de la défense emploie cette notion, démontrant souvent les droits de la défense comme une implication supérieure et d’une évidence logique de la procédure, obéissant donc aux critères fondamentaux du droit à un procès équitable. Il se détermine par toute une série de procédures menées dans un procès et se déclare, aujourd’hui, sous un ensemble de bases juridiques protégeant les droits de la défense. Pour ce faire nous avons essayé de faire un travail d’évaluation sociologique sans prétention de scientificité parfaite. Evitant tout juridisme ou positivisme, le travail reste néanmoins à dominance juridique. / Universalism of the rights have come the concept the rights of the defenses diversity of procedural. A the level of each country, however big or small, whatever is its culture, he (It) is accepted and official that we cannot judge without referring to the fundamental rules (rulers), and without being attended by a lawyer. Rights of defence are guaranteed in Mauritanie by the law number 2007-036 carrying Code of criminal procedure, the law number 2007-012 carrying the judicial organization, the law number 99–035 carrying Code of civil procedure, commercial and administrative. The rules of rights of defence not wind not to be reached without the implementation of organs which frame the capacities of this one. The equality before the courts is expressly considered by fundamental law in the of the constitution owed July 20th, 1991. However, the principle is of no real reach in spite of the precision of the text. What seems absurd with our model of system of ineffective right, imply that the rules of the fair trial are not allocated in a egalitarian way to all. It is not the only difficulty or the ambiguity. The present study supports on one hand that the exercice of the equality of the contradictory and the equality of weapons guarantees the effectiveness of rights of defence, and on the other hand, that the development of the principles participates in a revival oo the rights.The contemporary position of rights of defence uses this notion demonstrating, often rights of defence as a superior implication and of a logical obvious fact of the procedure, thus obeying the fundamental criteria of the right to fair trial. He is determined by a whole series of procedures led in a trial and declares itself, today, under a set of legal bases protecting rights of defence. To this end we had tried to make a work of unpretentious sociological evaluation of perfect scientificity. Avoiding any legalism or positivism, the work stays nevertheless in legal dominance.

[pt] A presente dissertação visa abordar aspectos sobre a figura do juiz das garantias instituído pela Lei n° 13.964/19, de modo a analisar não somente a sua compatibilidade com o ordenamento jurídico pátrio, como também analisar a sobredita figura sob um prisma da teoria da tomada de decisão, para compreender se a separação entre o juiz que atuou na fase preliminar do juiz que atuará na fase de conhecimento atende à necessidade de que o julgador possua a devida abertura cognitiva para apreciar as teses defensivas apresentadas na fase processual. Sem prejuízo, serão analisados aspectos sobre a decisão de suspensão da vigência dos artigos que disciplinam o juiz das garantias pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal, bem como sobre os aspectos gerais das reformas processuais penais realizadas na América Latina. / [en] This dissertation aims to address aspects of the figure of the judge of guarantees instituted by Law number 13.964/2019, in order to work the compatibility with the legal system and the decision-making theory, to understand whether the separation between the judge who acted in the preliminary phase and the judge who will act in the knowledge phase meets the need for the judge to have the proper cognitive opening to appreciate the defensive theses presented in the procedural phase. Without prejudice, aspects about the decision to suspend the validity of the the judge of guarantees by the Supreme Court will be analyzed, as well as the general aspects of criminal procedural reforms carried out in Latin America.

Le déclin de la responsabilité collective du gouvernement devant Parlement, est la situation à laquelle plusieurs pays pratiquant un régime parlementaire ont été contraints de faire face comme les expériences passées de la France, ainsi que de la Thaïlande, le prouvent. En effet, le contrôle parlementaire sur le gouvernement est bloqué par le fait majoritaire, si bien que le gouvernement peut difficilement perdre la confiance de l’Assemblée nationale. Cela ne fait qu’encourager la recherche de nouveaux moyens de contrôle et d’améliorer les instruments de contrôle de la responsabilité individuelle des membres du gouvernement sous diverses formes. Par exemple : le contrôle de la responsabilité individuelle des ministres par l’exécutif lui-même ; le déplacement de cette responsabilité devant le juge ; la revalorisation de la responsabilité politique individuelle des ministres devant le Parlement, ou bien encore une moralisation accrue de la vie politique et une amélioration de sa transparence. Les principaux instruments du contrôle de responsabilité individuelle des ministres en matière politique et pénale en Thaïlande et en France sont étudiés de manière comparative. L’étude comparée peut être utile afin d’adapter ces mécanismes aux conditions sociales et politiques de chaque pays. / The decline of the “parliamentary control on the collective responsibility of members of the Government” is the situation that many countries under the parliamentary regime often encounter in their practices including of France and Thailand. In fact, the parliamentary control on the collective responsibility is obstructed by the “majority rule”, for that reason, it is difficult that the Parliament has lost confidence in the Government. This situation leads to improvement in the mechanisms: the control on the individual responsibility of Ministers is, therefore, found in various forms For example the self-control of the executive, the displacement of the individual responsibility of Ministers to the court, the parliamentary control on the individual responsibility of Ministers, and the moralisation of politic and transparency of political life. The main instruments of control on the individual responsibility of Ministers in political and criminal fields in Thailand and France are comparatively studied so that each country can use and adapt the mechanisms to suit its own social and political conditions.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:29:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Roberto Ferreira Archanjo da Silva.pdf: 1923709 bytes, checksum: 72b4c9cc870e5eaa7c5ab269e40af19f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-09-14 / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico / The criminal proceeding and the Criminal Procedural law had evolved through the conquests of the humanity. The first one, of mere half of application of the sanction to the offender of the criminal law, started to be an instrument of guardianship of the individual against possible state wills, crowned for the basic human rights and guided for the supply-principle of the dignity of the person human being, as reflected of the culture of the democratic societies. The Criminal Procedural law acquired scientific contours in the end of century XIX, due to the own elevation of the Jurisprudence to science. The called general theory of the process aims at in general systemize the studies on the process, without propitiating to the researcher the necessary knowledge for the accurate understanding of the analyzed institute. In Brazil, the process of democratization restored for the Constitution of the Republic of 1988 inspired the elaboration of works specialized for the scientists of the area of the Criminal Procedural law. The understanding of justinian codes, rules and proper principles of the criminal proceeding demands specialized knowledge. These works raise legal science to become efficient the criminal proceeding half to reach the common good, in order to protect the double society in sensible: against the possible current state excesses of power-having to punish in the search offender of the criminal law during criminal persecution e; against the violators of the social peace (the criminals). The meeting of these specialized works of the scientists makes possible the system organization of a proper theory of the Procedural law Criminal, capable to form a new school of criminal procedures. The organization of the legal system through the systematic thought allows the vision of, but without generalizations the all undesirable one, that depreciation the study object. The specialized knowledge can imply in the elaboration of a Code of criminal procedure democratic and efficient, capable to protect the accused and of punishing the criminal in a swift and safe way / O processo penal e o Direito Processual Penal evoluíram através das conquistas da humanidade. O primeiro, de mero meio de aplicação da sanção ao infrator da lei penal, passou a ser um instrumento de tutela do indivíduo contra possíveis arbítrios estatais, coroado pelos direitos humanos fundamentais e norteado pelo supra-princípio da dignidade da pessoa humana, como reflexo da cultura das sociedades democráticas. O Direito Processual Penal adquiriu contornos científicos no final do século XIX, decorrente da própria elevação da Jurisprudência à ciência. A denominada teoria geral do processo visa a sistematizar os estudos sobre o processo em geral, sem propiciar ao pesquisador o conhecimento necessário para a exata compreensão do instituto analisado. No Brasil, o processo de democratização instaurado pela Constituição da República de 1988 inspirou a elaboração de trabalhos especializados pelos cientistas da área do Direito Processual Penal. A compreensão de institutos, regras e princípios próprios do processo penal exige conhecimento especializado. Esses trabalhos elevam a ciência jurídica para tornar o processo penal eficiente meio de alcançar o bem comum, a fim de proteger a sociedade em duplo sentido: contra os possíveis excessos estatais decorrentes do poder-dever de punir na busca infrator da lei penal durante a persecução penal e; contra os violadores da paz social (os criminosos). A reunião desses trabalhos especializados dos cientistas possibilita a organização sistêmica de uma teoria própria do Direito Processual Penal, capaz de formar uma nova escola de processualistas penais. A organização do ordenamento jurídico através do pensamento sistemático permite a visão do todo, mas sem generalizações indesejáveis, que denigrem o objeto de estudo. O conhecimento especializado pode implicar na elaboração de um Código de Processo Penal democrático e eficiente, capaz de proteger o acusado e de punir o culpado de forma célere e segura

The thesis on The process of implementing modern information technologies in public administration with a focus on the Police of the Czech Republic deals with the progressive modernization of the administrative processes at Police of the Czech Republic. It describes and analyzes a particular example of the implementation of new electronic system called Evidence of Criminal Proceedings. Until now used method of evidence called the Diary of a criminal case files was mainly based on the principle of keeping paper documents in each part of organization. This thesis trying to compare the previously used system with newly introduced system and also makes reference to the various implementation models, which could be possible used during the introduction of an information system Evidence of Criminal Proceedings. The thesis presents three possible models of implementation. During the introduction, from 2003 until now, the Police of the Czech Republic used a combination of two of the three options. Furthermore you will find a description, analysis and assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of information systems, these systems compare with each other with view the involvement of various participants, staff and financial performance, efficiency, etc. The theoretical approach of this study is the...

[pt] A presente dissertação investiga e analisa a instrumentalização do processo penal, convertido em arma de guerra – lawfare -, para viabilizar práticas autoritárias punitivas amparadas no casuísmo, no âmbito da chamada Operação Lava Jato, bem como analisa o manejo/utilização/implementação de mecanismos de exceção dentro da rotina democrática brasileira com o fim de eliminar um inimigo personificado na figura do ex-presidente Lula, objetivando retirá-lo da corrida eleitoral de 2018, estabelecendo, assim, a consolidação do golpe iniciado em 2016, com a derrubada da Presidenta Dilma Rousseff. O trabalho discute a Operação Lava Jato abordando o fenômeno do intercruzamento entre direito e política (ativismo judicial, judicialização da política e politização da justiça), analisando criticamente a atuação da grande mídia hegemônica oligopolista brasileira. Desta forma, esta pesquisa enfrenta essa questão a partir do fenômeno identificado como lawfare. No capítulo introdutório, é apresentado o tema, problema, hipóteses, objeto da pesquisa, a justificativa do trabalho, referencial teórico e metodologia da pesquisa. No segundo capítulo são apresentadas algumas abordagens conceituais sobre o termo lawfare, desenvolvidas por diversos intelectuais que se debruçaram sobre o tema, trazendo a discussão para o contexto brasileiro. No terceiro capítulo, analisase o lawfare para fins geopolíticos e empresariais, a extraterritorialidade coercitiva universal estadunidense e como esse emaranhado de legislação internacional impacta na soberania econômica do Brasil. No quarto capítulo defende-se que a Operação Lava Jato foi um maxiprocesso jurídico-político-midiático utilizado como instrumento de lawfare, interferindo no realinhamento de forças políticas no país e abrindo caminho para implantação de um governo neoliberal extremado, com suporte da mídia hegemônica oligopolista e da ofensiva restauradora do campo neoliberal ortodoxo. No Anexo 1, apresenta-se parte das mensagens periciadas pela Polícia Federal no bojo da Operação Spoofing. No anexo 2, apresenta-se a decisão favorável ao ex-Presidente Lula, proferida pelo Comitê de Direitos Humanos da ONU. / [en] The present dissertation investigates and analyzes the instrumentalization of the criminal process, converted into a weapon of war - lawfare -, to enable punitive authoritarian practices supported by casuism, within the scope of the so-called Operation Car wash, as well as analyzing the management/use/implementation of mechanisms of exception within the Brazilian democratic routine in order to eliminate an enemy personified in the figure of former President Lula, aiming to remove him from the 2018 electoral race, thus establishing the consolidation of the coup that began in 2016, with the overthrow of President Dilma Rousseff. The paper discusses Operation Car Wash addressing the phenomenon of the intersection between law and politics (judicial activism, judicialization of politics and politicization of justice), critically analyzing the performance of the Brazilian oligopolistic hegemonic media. Thus, this research addresses this issue from the phenomenon identified as lawfare. In the introductory chapter, the theme, problem, hypotheses, research object, work justification, theoretical framework and research methodology are presented. The second chapter presents some conceptual approaches to the term lawfare, developed by several intellectuals who have focused on the subject, bringing the discussion to the Brazilian context. In the third chapter, we analyze lawfare for geopolitical and business purposes, the universal coercive extraterritoriality of the United States and how this tangle of international legislation impacts Brazil s economic sovereignty. In the fourth chapter it is argued that Operation Car Wash was a legal-political-media maxi-process used as an instrument of lawfare, interfering in the realignment of political forces in the country and opening the way for the implantation of an extreme neoliberal government, with the support of the oligopolistic hegemonic media. and the restorative offensive of the orthodox neoliberal camp. In Annex 1, part of the messages examined by the Federal Police in the context of Operation Spoofing is presented. Annex 2 presents the decision in favor of former President Lula, delivered by the UN Human Rights Committee.

L’entraide policière internationale, en raison de la multiplicité de ses sources et de ses applications, apparaît comme un phénomène pluriel difficile à appréhender. Sa mise en œuvre différenciée dans les différents espaces géographiques et les nombreuses évolutions qu’elle a connues aggravent sa complexité. L’objet de la présente étude est de proposer une grille de lecture dont l’ambition est de donner une vision plus claire et plus cohérente. En définitive, deux types d’entraide se dessinent : l’assistance et la coopération. Ce résultat est révélé par une étude notionnelle et conforté par la modélisation du régime. L’étude de la notion permet de révéler, malgré une définition unitaire, la nature duale de l’entraide policière. Cette dualité se répercute sur le régime puisque deux types distincts apparaissent : l’assistance s’apparente au régime de droit commun et la coopération prend les traits d’un régime spécial. En filigrane, il apparaît que l’entraide policière internationale emprunte à la procédure pénale et au droit international leurs caractères et leurs facteurs d’influence. / Due to the several sources and its implementation, the international mutual help between the polices tends to be a concept difficult to understand. The different ways to set up the cooperation in the different part of the world and the several evolutions known, are increasing the difficulties to understand its complexity. This study wants to show and give a clearer vision of this mutual help. Basically, there are two kinds of mutual helps: the assistance and the cooperation. The result appears after a notional study and is consolidated by the establishment of a framework. Despite a commom definition, the study of the notion reveals a duality in the international mutual help between the polices. This duality has an impact on the legal framework, as two types of frameworks are appearing: the assistance relates on the common law system and the cooperation tends to be a specific framework. Finally, it appears the international mutual helps between the polices borrows from the criminal proceedings and from the international rights their caracteristics and their influences.