Global ETD Search

1	A Study on Content and application of Due Process of Law in Administrative Appeal Act Chang, Hung-chieh 01 February 2008 (has links) An administrative appeal procedure is for an administrative action to be examined in terms of legitimacy and adequacy by an administrative agency according to Administrative Appeal Act and then an administrative appeal decision is made. Therefore, an administrative appeal procedure is substantially a general administrative procedure. An administrative appeal procedure and an administrative procedure both belong to the system which guarantee procedure justice, but the former is set afterwards while the latter is mainly beforehand. There are still some differences between them in terms of the objective of Administrative Appeal Act and the values of procedures. An administrative appeal procedure after an administrative action is similar to a quasi-judiciary one that needs to be made exactly to conform to the intention of Article 16 of the ROC Constitution and the expectations from the public.I am of the opinion that the contents of an administrative appeal procedure concerned with due process of law need to be expounded. Furthermore, since an administrative appeal is part of administrative remedy, the procedure made to the inferior agency by the agency with jurisdiction of administrative appeal authorized by the laws needs to be examined. Thus while agency with jurisdiction of administrative examines a case, whether the principles are followed according to due process of law should be thoroughly examined. This paper makes comment and discussion from real appeal cases. There are five chapters included: Chapter 1: Motives, objective, scope and method of this research. Chapter 2: Introduction to the contents and conception of due process of law. Chapter 3: Analysis and discussion of the principles involved with due process of law in administrative appeal procedures. Chapter 4: Views from discussion of the cases to see whether the decisions and the administrative actions violate the basic principles in due process of law. Chapter 5: Conclusion and suggestions for amendment to Administrative Appeal Act and for improvement on appeal system. Keywords: administrative appeal procedure, administrative procedure, due process of law, the agency with jurisdiction of administrative appeal administrative appeal procedure
2	The Analysis of Administrative Appeals of Kaohsiung City Government Cheng, Tsui-ling 20 January 2009 (has links) Administrative appeal, as a critical part of the administrative remedy system, refers to a civil remedy action against any illegal or improper administrative act implemented by all levels of government, as well as any passive act that hinders fulfillment of their obligations. Administrative appeal is a basic right of citizens in a democratic country under the rule of law. Through the appeal procedures, regulations may remain accurate and adequate, and legalization of administrative measures may be ensured. In recent years, due to the rapid boom in commercial activities and advancement of technology, the social structure has drastically changed, and the amount of public affairs concerning economy, society, labor, transportation, and environmental pollution has gradually increased, resulting in a closer and more complicate relationship between government and people. As administrative actions by the government occur more frequently, it becomes difficult to ensure that every action is legal or proper. Furthermore, with higher levels of education and increased awareness of their rights, most citizens understand how to follow legal procedures to seek remedies when they refuse to accept the administrative acts implemented by government agencies. Hence, a solid administrative remedy system and its enforcement are essential to democratic countries under the rule of law. This study targets the administrative appeal cases filed to Kaohsiung City Government, and explores the influence of relevant regulations and procedures for administrative appeals on appeal practice following the enforcement of the new Administrative Appeal Act. It also discusses the increase and distribution of administrative appeal cases, as well as the reasons for administrative litigations, in order to make comparisons with the appeal conditions in Taipei City Government. It aims to understand the actual situations concerning appeal practice and the difficulties that appellants may encounter, draw up a corresponding improvement plan, and provide suggestions on policy adjustment and regulation revision, in the hope of eliminating the source of disputes and maximizing the function of policy feedback. This study consists of seven chapters, including: foreword, introduction to the administrative appeal system in Taiwan, administrative appeal procedures, Comprehensive analysis of administrative appeal cases filed to Kaohsiung City Government and its business, as well as the review and analysis of concrete administrative appeals filed to Kaohsiung City Government, concrete implementation plans for improving administrative appeal business, and conclusions and suggestions. It is hoped that the findings can help effectively resolve all of the problems exist in appeal practice, enhance the quality and accuracy of appeal case processing, refine administrative appeal business performance, and safeguard legitimate interests of appellants. Administrative appeal the administrative remedy system
3	Les litiges en matière de marque : contribution à une étude de droit comparé entre la France, la Chine continentale et Taïwan / Trademark litigation : contribution to a comparative law study between France, Mainland China and Taiwan Su, Yii-Der 06 December 2017 (has links) Le droit de la propriété intellectuelle a connu d’importants développements dans le sillage de la révolution technologique et du phénomène de la globalisation. Le droit de marque confère un monopole au profit de son titulaire, qui lui permet d’établir des liens avec les consommateurs, à travers les produits et les services qui sont revêtus du signe protégé : des liens juridiques et des liens commerciaux par l’effet de la communication, de la publicité, de la transmission de l’image de l’entreprise que celui-ci véhicule. Toutefois, les prérogatives attachées au droit de marque rencontrent des limites inhérentes à tout monopole, à savoir le respect de l’intérêt général, fil un conducteur qui gouverne la procédure d’enregistrement de la marque, au-delà, son maintien en vigueur et la détermination des frontières qui séparent ce qui est permis de ce qui est interdit. S’agissant de s’interroger sur les procédures de règlement des litiges, à l’aune de leur comparaison, entre trois systèmes de cultures juridiques très différentes, à savoir la France « berceau » du droit continental et, du droit administratif d’une part, et, d’autre part, deux entités de tradition juridique divergente - la Chine continentale et Taïwan - , on peut relever un renforcement du pouvoir administratif et en même temps, un mouvement d’harmonisation des règles du contentieux. Le renforcement du pouvoir administratif se manifeste à travers l’extension des compétences en matière de droits de propriété intellectuelle. Ainsi, en Chine continentale, les autorités administratives locales peuvent appliquer les lois administratives pour régler avec célérité les litiges de propriété intellectuelle. En France, le renforcement du pouvoir administratif s’exprime avec la transposition future de la directive de 2015 sur l’harmonisation du droit des marques dans l’Union européenne, qui attribue compétence à l’INPI en matière de déchéance et de nullité des marques, au premier degré. L’harmonisation du droit des marques se révèle avec le renforcement du mécanisme de la retenue en douane en Chine continentale et à Taïwan et, par ailleurs, avec l’instauration de juridictions spécialisées, le législateur taïwanais étant le premier entre les trois systèmes juridiques, à créer une Cour en propriété intellectuelle en 2007. / There continues to be significant developments in intellectual property law in the wake of the technological revolution and the globalization phenomenon. This thesis seeks to analyze procedures for settling disputes by comparing three decidedly different judicial systems: France (the « cradle » of Civil law legal system) on the one hand, contrasted with two entities of diverging judicial traditions, namely Mainland China and Taiwan. We will take up two trends in particular: a strengthening of administrative power and at the same time a movement toward harmonizing settlement procedures.The strengthening of administrative power is evidenced by its “specialization” and extension of its competence in the area of intellectual property rights. Thus, in Mainland China local administrative authorities can enforce administrative laws to expediently deal with intellectual property disputes. In France, on the other hand, the growth of administrative power can be seen in the transposing of the 2015 future directive regarding the harmonization of trademarks within the European Union, which attributed competence to the INPI for the first degree examination in the revocation and invalidity procedures.The harmonization of trademarks is also visible in the introduction of a reinforced “customs seizure” mechanism in Mainland China and Taiwan. Furthermore, with the establishment of specialized courts, the Taiwanese legislature became the first of the three justice systems to create an intellectual property court in 2007. Droit de marque Procédure de délivrance Recours administratif Contrefaçon Validité Harmonisation juridique Règlement des litiges Dispute settlement Trademark law Process of granting Administrative appeal Infringement Validity Jurisdiction in intellectual property Legislative harmonization Dispute settlement (litigation) 340
4	行政機關改制國營事業之行政法律關係問題—以桃園國際機場之案例研究為中心 / Administrative Legal Relations of State-owned Enterprises in Restructuring of Administrative Organs－Focusing on Case Studies of Taoyuan International Airport 朱曉芬, Chu, Hsiao-Fen Unknown Date (has links) 在現今與時俱進的社會中，為了達成多樣化的行政目的，會選擇以其他新型態的組織體代替傳統之行政組織來進行行政任務。在現行之組織體中，可供選擇的組織態樣包括行政機關、行政法人、國營事業以至於民營企業。至於該選擇哪一種組織型態以符合其行政目的，沒有一定的標準，法律亦無明文規定，原則上政府有選擇何種型態為最佳的權利。在桃園航空站改制成國營公司之後，從原本得行使公權力之行政機關，變成無公權力可行使之機構。在其改制之後，對公司內部人員之法律關係，以及對外部組織之合作關係，是否發生變化？又這些變化是否會影響其相關業務之執行？又國營事業仍屬政府掌控及監督之組織，如有侵害人民相關權利及利益，是否有國家賠償法之適用？是否可以尋求行政爭訟以資救濟？這些問題都是本文欲探討之處。桃園國際機場的改制，只是政府將交通建設進行企業化管理的第一步。台灣尚有十六個機場，如欲進行改制，在法制面上應注意哪些事項，而桃園國際機場是否應進一步走向民營化，也將作為本文之結論。 / In order to achieve diversified administrative purposes, the government will choose the other new types of organizations for administrative tasks to replace the traditional administrative organizations with this time. Among the different type of organizations currently in operation, alternative organizational forms include administrative organs, independent administrative institution, state-owned enterprises and private-owned enterprises. There is no certain standard regarding to which type of organization to choose for the administrative purposes, and there is no express statutory provision in the law. In principle, the government has the right to choose which one is the best choice. After Taoyuan Airport was transformed into a state-owned company, the change is from the executive organ that originally had to exercise public power turned into an organization that could exercise no public authority. After its restructuring, is there any change of the legal relationship of the company's internal staff, as well as the cooperation with external organizations? Will these changes affect the implementation of its related business? Owing to the state-owned enterprise still an organization which controlled and supervised by the government, is there any application of the State Compensation Law if it infringes on people's rights and interests? Otherwise, can we seek administrative litigation in order to provide relief? These questions will be explored in the text. The reform of Taoyuan International Airport is only the first step toward the government-led management of transport construction. There are still 16 airports in Taiwan. To reform the system, what matters should be noted on the legal system and whether the airport should be further privatized, these 2 issues will be the conclusion of this article. 行政法律關係國賠法訴願法行政訴訟法 Administrative legal relations State compensation law Administrative appeal act Administrative relief act
5	Les principes directeurs du procès dans la jurisprudence du Conseil Constitutionnel / The Trial’s guiding principles in the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Council Lestrade, Éric 21 November 2013 (has links) Malgré le peu de fondements écrits consacrés à la justice dans le texte de la Constitution du 4 octobre 1958, le Conseil constitutionnel, en réalisant un travail d’actualisation à partir de la Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen, a permis l’émergence d’un droit constitutionnel processuel, construit autour de principes directeurs. Ceux-ci peuvent être répartis dans trois catégories : deux principales, selon que l’acteur du procès prioritairement concerné soit le juge ou les parties et une troisième, complémentaire, celle des garanties procédurales, permettant de favoriser les qualités essentielles du juge et de contrôler le respect des droits des parties. Une gradation des exigences du Conseil constitutionnel est discrètement perceptible entre les deux premières catégories de principes, plus facilement identifiable entre celles-ci et la dernière famille. Cette échelle décroissante de « densité » des principes directeurs du procès témoigne d’une véritable politique jurisprudentielle en matière de droit constitutionnel processuel, qui met l’accent sur l’accès au juge, doté des qualités indispensables à l’accomplissement de sa mission juridictionnelle. Toutefois, aussi satisfaisante que soit l’action du juge constitutionnel français à l’égard du droit du procès, celle-ci nécessiterait aujourd’hui le relais du constituant, afin de moderniser le statut constitutionnel de la justice. / In spite of a relatively low number of written dispositions dedicated to justice inside of the body of the Constitution of October 1958 4th, the constitutional Council, while updating this text through the Declaration of Human Rights, contributed to the development of a procedural constitutional law, which is structured around guiding principles. Those principles can be classified within three different categories : two major categories depend on the trial actor that is primarily concerned, either the judge or the parties; a third and additional category pertaining to procedural protections, fosters the essential qualities of the judge and secure the protection of the parties’ rights. A gradation of the requirements of the constitutional Council is discreetly perceptible between the first two categories of principles, and more easily identifiable between those first two categories and the last one. This decreasing scale of “density” yoked to the trial guiding principles highlights a genuine judicial policy when it comes to procedural constitutional law, emphasizing access to the judge, whom is given essential qualities in order to achieve its judicial duty. However, the action of the French constitutional judge, as satisfactory as it is towards the rights of the trial, would easily support the intervention of the constituent power in order to update Justice’s constitutional status. Accès au juge Actes de gouvernement Action en justice Appel Autorité de la chose jugée Avocat Cassation Conseil constitutionnel Conseil supérieur de la magistrature Contradictoire Collégialité Délai raisonnable de jugement Déni de justice Double degré de juridiction Droits de la défense Droit au recours juridictionnel effectif Effet dévolutif de l’appel Effet suspensif de l’appel Égalité des armes Égalité devant la justice Garde à vue Impartialité Inamovibilité Injonction pénale Indépendance Instance Instruction Intérêt pour agir Juge unique Juridiction Magistrat Ministère public Motivation Parquet Partie au procès Présomption d’innocence Principes directeurs Procès Publicité des audiences Recours administratif préalable Siège Validations législatives Voies de recours Access to the judge Acts of government Adversarial proceedings Appeal Argumentation Authority Cassation Collegiality Constitutional Council Constitutionnalization of procedural law Criminal injunction Denial of justice Equality before the law Equality of arms Force of res judicata Guiding principles High Council of the Judiciary Impartiality Independence Independent administrative authorities Instruction Interest to act Judge Jurisdiction Lawyer Legal proceedings Legal remedies Legislative validations Party to the proceedings Plea-bargaining Police custody Preliminary administrative appeal Presumption of innocence Prosecutor Public prosecutor Publicity of hearings Rights of the defense Single judge Sitting judge Tenure The devolutive effect of appeal The right to a second hearing The right to effective judicial review The suspensive effect of appeal Trial 340

1

Page generated in 0.0798 seconds