Coronakrisen är en global pandemi som påverkat hela världen. En revisors arbete som innebär att vara ett granskande organ för ett företags kom att påverkas med tanke på de restriktioner som uppstod på grund av Coronakrisen. Något som därmed är av intresse att undersöka är hur revisorns arbetssätt gällande revisionsprocessen blivit påverkad under Coronakrisen. Syftet med studien är att undersöka om revisorer upplever att arbetet med revisionsprocessen blivit påverkat och förändrat av Coronakrisen samt om effekterna kan förklaras utifrån byråtillhörighet. För att uppnå syftet har litteratur som behandlar revisorers arbetssätt, revisionsprocessen, Coronakrisens påverkan och byråtillhörighet använts. Studien visar att Coronakrisen haft en liten påverkan på revisorns arbete gällande revisionsprocessen, dock inte i så stor utsträckning. Vidare visar resultatet att det inte finns någon skillnad i hur Coronakrisens påverkan på revisionsprocessen kan förklaras utifrån byråtillhörighet. Studiens viktigaste bidrag är att förmedla att revisorer upplever att arbetet med revisionsprocessen inte blivit påverkat under Coronakrisen, samt att det inte finns någon skillnad mellan hur revisorer på stora och små byråer upplever ett förändrat arbetssätt. Dessutom bidrar studien till att visa hur en revisors arbete inte är platsberoende och att en omställning kan ske snabbt, vilket inte kommer påverka en revisors arbete i speciellt stor utsträckning. / The Corona crisis is a global pandemic that affected the entire world. The work of an auditor, which involves being a reviewing part for a company, was affected in the view of the restrictions that arose due to the Corona crisis. Something that is of interest to investigate is how the auditor’s working method regarding the audit process has been affected during the Corona crisis. The purpose of the study is to investigate whether auditors feel that the work with the audit process has been affected and changed by the Corona crisis, and whether the effects can be explained on the basis of agency affiliation. To achieve the purpose, literature dealing with auditor’s working methods, the audit process, the impact of the Corona crisis, and agency affiliation have been used.The study shows that the Corona crisis had a small impact of the auditor’s work regarding the audit process, but not to such extent. Furthermore, the results show that there is no difference in how the impact of the Corona crisis on the audit process can be explained om the basis of agency affiliation. The most important contribution of the study is to convey that auditor has not been affected in the audit process during the Corona crisis, and there is no difference between how auditors in big and small agencies experience a changed way of working. In addition, the study helps to show how an auditor´s work is not dependent on location, and that a change can take place quickly, which will not affect an auditor´s work to any great extent.

Digitalization is regarded as one of the most important forces in the world today. The unexpected covid-19 had its effects on the auditing process. The effects caused by covid-19 have been positive as well as negative. Many management had to adjust and rethink to find new solutions and methods to continue operating. The management was forced to make a digital transition to adjust to the situation. What is being investigated in this study is how the digitalization contributed to a more efficient auditing or less efficient. We will also like to see the consequnces of the IT-implementation in auditing companies. Previous studies has shown that smaller auditing firms is better equpped at using IT in the thier auditing process. This study will be using a qualitative research method in order to reach the purpose of the study. In order to use the qualitative research method, we used semi structured interviews. The interview concluded responses from 10 authorized auditors in different auditing firms. The conclusion from this study is as follows. The review phase was the most damaged by the rapid introduction of digitization. What is also confirmed is that there is a difference in digital condition between audit firms.

The unexpected outbreak of Covid19 that came in 2020 affected the entire world's population, industries and companies overnight. The auditing industry and its auditors have also been affected by the pandemic and the following crisis. Due to the crisis caused by the pandemic, many company managements have had to rethink and develop new strategies for continued operations. The audit companies and their auditors have been forced to make a digital transition and work remotely using digital tools to continue the audit work. The purpose of the study is to try to assess auditors' perceived change in the audit process and quality in connection with the digital transition that took place during Covid 19. We also want to see if the effects can be explained based on IT application and use depending on agency affiliation, as previous research indicates that smaller audit firms are better at IT implementation, use and are quicker to change. The study uses a qualitative research method in the form of semistructured interviews. The results were obtained by seven authorized auditors from audit firms of various sizes in Sweden. The conclusion that can be drawn from the study is that the pandemic has been a catalyst for digitization in t he auditing industry. Of the three parts of the audit process, the review phase was the most affected part, where the exchange of information was made more difficult, which led to longer lead times. The quality has not suffered to a large extent. It can be noted that there is a certain difference in digital conditions between audit firms.

Efterfrågan på hållbarhetsinformation är något som ökar i dagens samhälle. Samtidigt visar tidigare studier att det finns allvarliga brister i företags hållbarhetsrapporter. Forskare har dessutom konstaterat att revisorer har en kvalitetssäkrande roll för hållbarhetsrapporters trovärdighet. I takt med samhällsutvecklingen växer hållbarhetstjänster inom revisionsbranschen, och det går att skönja ett proaktivt hållbarhetsarbete hos revisorer. Något som oss veterligen inte studerats tidigare är vad som driver revisorers proaktiva hållbarhetsarbete. Syftet med studien är att förklara vad som driver revisorers proaktiva hållbarhetsarbete utifrån fyra individ- och byråspecifika faktorer. Dessa faktorer är byråtillhörighet, kompetens, individens hållbarhetsengagemang och hierarkisk position. Frågeställningen är: I vilken utsträckning kan revisorers proaktiva hållbarhetsarbete förklaras utifrån fyra individ- och byråspecifika faktorer? Legitimitetsteorin, professionsteorin och institutionella teorin har använts som teoretisk ram för att uppnå studiens syfte. Även litteratur som behandlar hållbarhetsrapportering, autonomi, proaktivt agerande och de fyra faktorerna har använts. Med utgångspunkt i litteraturen har sex hypoteser bildats, vilka sedan testats empiriskt. För att samla in data konstruerades en webbenkät som sedan skickades ut via mejl till revisorer runtom i Sverige. Resultaten av studien visar att det finns ett positivt samband mellan revisorers proaktiva hållbarhetsarbete och kompetens, yrkesmässigt såväl som privat hållbarhetsengagemang respektive hög hierarkisk position. Däremot gick det inte att påvisa att byråtillhörighet och tid i branschen skulle vara förklarande faktorer till revisorers proaktiva hållbarhetsarbete. Studiens viktigaste bidrag är att ge revisionsbranschen insikter i vad som driver proaktivt hållbarhetsarbete bland revisorer. Studien upplyser också samhället om att revisorers proaktiva hållbarhetsarbete kan gynna hållbarhetsutvecklingen i samhället. / Demand for CSR information is increasing in today’s society. At the same time, previous studies show some serious deficiencies in CSR reporting. Researchers have also found that CSR reports certified by a financial auditor are perceived as more credible. CSR services are a growing business area in the audit industry, and a proactive CSR work among auditors can be discerned. As far as we are aware, there has yet to be any research conducted on what influences auditors’ proactive CSR work. The purpose of this study is to explain what influences auditors’ proactive CSR work based on four individual- and agency specific factors. The research question is: To what extent are auditors’ proactive CSR work explained by four individual- and agency specific factors? Legitimacy-, professional-, and institutional theory, and literature that deals with CSR reporting, autonomy, proactive behavior and our four factors has been used as a theoretical framework. Based on the literature, six hypotheses have been formed, which later have been empirically tested. Data was collected through a web-based survey which was sent via e-mail to Swedish auditors. The results show that there is a positive relationship between auditors’ proactive CSR work and competence, dedication to sustainability issues – professionally as well as private, and high hierarchical position. It was not possible to demonstrate that agency affiliation or time in the industry would be an explanatory factor for auditors’ proactive CSR work. The main contributions of this study are to provide the audit industry with insights into what influences auditors’ proactive CSR work. The study also informs society that auditors’ proactive CSR work can benefit the sustainable development.